Almost untreatable superbug CPE poses serious threat to patients, doctors warn

Doctors are warning that the rise of an almost untreatable superbug, immune to some of the last-line antibiotics available to hospitals, poses a serious threat to patients.

The number of lab-confirmed cases of the bug, called carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE), rose from three to nearly 2,000 in the 12 years to 2015, according to Public Health England (PHE). But that may be far short of the real number because hospitals are not compelled to report suspected cases. PHE admits it does not know where the infections are coming from or how many people are dying.

Freedom of information requests made by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism reveal that at least 81 people infected with CPE have died since 2009 at 66 NHS trusts in England – although the bug may have been a complicating factor rather than the main cause of death in some cases.

But the real figure is almost certain to be much higher. Many trusts did not respond to the requests or were unable to supply complete data. Out of 136 NHS hospital trusts that were asked for the numbers of infections and deaths between 2009 and 2016, 97 responded but nearly half did not have data on CPE or could not extract the details.

In Manchester and London, dealing with CPE has cost NHS trusts almost £10m. There have also been confirmed outbreaks in Liverpool, Leeds, Sheffield, Birmingham, Nottingham, Colchester, Edinburgh, Belfast, Dublin and Limerick, among others.

Elsewhere, Italy had only sporadic cases of CPE in 2009 but by 2014, the bugs were rife across the country. “If you look at Italy they’ve suspended bone marrow transplant programmes,” said Dr Matthew Laundy, consultant medical microbiologist at St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. “If you’ve got no antibiotics to treat CPEs you’re stuck.”

Experts are calling for reports of suspected CPE infections to be made mandatory. The numbers revealed by the Bureau are “shocking,” said Val Edwards-Jones, emeritus professor of microbiology at Manchester Metropolitan University.

“It should absolutely be mandatory for trusts to report this,” she said. “If you go back to the 1990s MRSA [reporting] wasn’t mandatory. It was only when hospitals did proper surveillance and began looking at the bugs in the blood that we knew the scale of the problem. Then it was found that there were certain things that weren’t being done correctly.”

Dr Michael Cooper, a consultant microbiologist and director of infection control at the Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, said: “If something’s not mandatory, it’s the places doing well that take care to report. You don’t get figures from the trusts with their head in the sand, the poor performers.

“Public Health England have no idea how many people are dying, they’ve no outcome data. This is a serious mistake.”

CPE is carried harmlessly in the gut, but may kill if it enters the bloodstream through a wound of a patient who is already sick or frail, which makes it a real danger in hospitals. About 40-50% of patients with a CPE bloodstream infection die. CPE is not untreatable, but it is difficult as antibiotic combinations or older, more toxic drugs have to be used.

CPE, dubbed the “nightmare bacteria” by Tom Frieden, former head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the USA, has developed resistance to the carbapenems, a group of “last resort” antibiotics that are used in serious infections when other drugs will not work. They include KPC (Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase) and NDM (New Delhi Metallo-beta-lactamase).

Experts have warned that antibiotic resistance is a major threat to the world and could turn the clock back on medical advances by making some surgery, such as heart transplants, impossible.

There are high levels of CPE in India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, the Middle East, south and Central America, China, southeast Asia, Taiwan, Japan, some countries in southern Europe and the USA. In February the World Health Organisation named carbapenem resistant bugs a “critical priority” for which new antibiotics are urgently needed.

In 2014, the medical directors of both Public Health England and NHS England took what they called “the unusual step” of writing to all NHS Trust chief executives, urging them to take action to prevent the spread of CPE.

“CPE represents one of the most serious emerging infectious disease threats that we currently face, and the failure to control their spread now, while we still have the opportunity, could have substantial human health and financial consequences,” wrote Dr Paul Cosford and Sir Bruce Keogh.

However, Professor Alan Johnson, head of the department of healthcare-associated infection and antibiotic resistance at PHE, said patients should be reassured that infections caused by CPE can usually be treated with other antibiotics. Fewer than 2% of E coli or Klebsiella bloodstream infections are resistant to carbapenems, he said.

“We carry out enhanced surveillance on carbapenem-resistant bacteria to determine the numbers and different types of CPE. Although reports of CPE have increased recently, part of this may reflect increased laboratory testing of many sample types other than blood stream infections, as awareness of CPE has grown,” he said.

Manchester

New figures show that four times as many people have died as had previously been reported in an outbreak in Manchester.

In 2009, the first cases of a type of CPE called Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase were detected. In 2014, the hospital trust confirmed that 14 people had died from this infection, contracted within the hospital, in the previous four years.

But the Bureau’s research shows that there have been 61 deaths in the last seven years, including a six-year-old boy with leukaemia who caught the infection while undergoing a bone marrow transplant.

Many of those affected were very ill and had underlying medical problems and so it is not known whether the infection directly caused their death. Some may have died with a CPE infection rather than from it.

An investigation into the outbreak found in 2015 that CPE bacteria were living in the hospital kitchen sinks and handwash basins, which had drains that allowed splashback. Hugh Pennington, a leading microbiologist who chaired official inquiries into E coli outbreaks in 1996 and 2005, said such basins elsewhere in the NHS should be replaced. “It’s all about sound plumbing. It’s not rocket science. If your sink is going to spread the bug, get rid of it.”

Almost untreatable superbug CPE poses serious threat to patients, doctors warn

Sarah Weddington, Roe v Wade attorney, on Trump’s threat to abortion rights

Sarah Weddington is the lawyer who, aged just 26, represented “Jane Roe” in the landmark case Roe v Wade, which in 1973 effectively legalised abortion in the US. The daughter of a Methodist minister, she was born in 1945 in Abilene, Texas. Having graduated with a degree in English from McMurry University, she enrolled at the University of Texas Law School in 1964, one of 40 women among a student body of 1,600. “I thought I would be teaching eighth graders to love Beowulf,” she recalls. “But that wasn’t working out so well, so I decided to go to law school instead. In this, I was encouraged by the dean of my college, who told me that it would be far too tough for a woman. ‘As sure as dammit I am going,’ I thought.”

After graduating, she joined a group of students who were seeking to challenge anti-abortion laws, agreeing to file a suit against the state of Texas on their behalf. Soon after, 21-year-old Norma McCorvey was referred to Weddington and her colleague Linda Coffee, now actively looking for pregnant women who were seeking abortions. McCorvey became the plaintiff “Jane Roe”, though by the time the supreme court issued its ruling, her baby had long since been born and given up for adoption. McCorvey later became an evangelical Christian and vocal anti-abortion campaigner, and claimed to have been the “victim” of the Roe v Wade lawyers. She died last month aged 69.

I was very nervous. It was like going down a street with no street lights. But there was no other way to go

Weddington remains the youngest person ever to have argued a successful case at the supreme court. In 1973, she was elected to the Texas House of Representatives, where she served for three terms. In 1973, she became the first female General Counsel at the US Department of Agriculture. From 1978 until 1981, she served as assistant to President Carter, directing his administration’s work on women’s issues. She now runs the Weddington Center, Austin, whose work focuses on women and leadership. She recently told NBC news that the election of Donald Trump may pose the biggest threat yet to abortion rights in the US.

Where were you on election night? Did you sense that Trump was going to win?
Austin is one of the more liberal towns in Texas, though the state itself is barely liberal. Most people I know strongly expected Hillary to win. But I’d been on a panel a few weeks before where a man had said: “You liberals think Hillary is going to win. Well, let me tell you, there are a lot of people out here who are voting with our finger – the middle finger.” So I knew there was… resistance. There were a lot of parties on the night, but I had enough concerns to be afraid that going to one might turn out to be too depressing. So I came here to my office, and watched it on the New York Times website.

What’s your impression of the president so far?
I thought he would be terrible, and he has proven me correct. In Texas, we have a lot of people from Mexico and El Salvador, and a lot of them are worried family members will be deported.

What do you make of the growing fear that under this administration Planned Parenthood [a 100-year-old nonprofit organisation that is the largest single provider of reproductive health services, including abortion, in the US] will lose its federal funding?
The federal government has never given money to Planned Parenthood for abortion. It gives money to it for the provision of contraception and well woman care: for the treatment of venereal disease, mammograms, and so on. The anti-abortionists recognise that the money is not used for abortion, but they want it cut off anyway. It is a real threat. But Planned Parenthood may ultimately benefit from what Trump is doing and saying. Last week, I was in Houston for a Planned Parenthood event. Usually, there would be about 1,000 people in the audience. This time, we had 2,500. People are very worried, and they are giving more generously.

Sarah Weddington with president Jimmy Carter. She served as his assistant from 1978 to 1981. Photograph: Courtesy Sarah Weddington

What about abortion? Is it possible it could become illegal again in the US?
Trump has always said that he would try to appoint people who were strongly against abortion to the supreme court. But Neil Gorsuch [a conservative judge, and Trump’s nomination to the supreme court] has never said that much about abortion. States can’t make abortion illegal. But some have been passing laws that make it much less available, for instance by saying that no abortion can be done except in a facility that meets the requirements for emergency care. In other words, they make the cost of abortion much higher. A lot of women are already crossing state lines, and in that sense, a lot of what is happening is just like it was before Roe v Wade was decided. You’ve got one vacancy now on the supreme court. But Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who is helping to keep abortion available, is 83, and there are a couple of older male judges too. If Gorsuch’s nomination is approved, will abortion be illegal the next day? No. One new judge won’t necessarily make much difference. But two or three might.

How did you feel on hearing that Norma McCorvey had died?
Well, I was sad. I appreciate that she was once concerned with overturning the law on abortion. But on the back of being Jane Roe, she ended up going on all these pro-choice tours. I learned to be very careful about believing what she said.

You worked somewhat against the odds on the case in which she became involved.
That’s right. There was a building across the street from the University of Texas and a lot of student organisations had cubby holes there, with desks rescued from the garbage. In one little nook, women and some men were trying to work on women’s issues. One thing that was upsetting was that the university health centre did not give out information about, or prescriptions for, anything relating to contraception. A couple of these women had gone to New York and got a copy of Our Bodies Ourselves [a landmark book of 1971 that dealt plainly and openly with women’s health and sexuality] – I still have this mental image of them in a closet with a flashlight reading this book – and they began to give the relevant information out to women. As they did, women would sometimes say: “I’m already pregnant. Where can I get an abortion?” So they started going to places where abortion was available, and they’d write up that information, too. Sometimes, for instance, they’d write: “This person does not seem very skilled: never send anyone here.” A lot of women were going to Mexico. Abortion was illegal there, too, but it was close to Texas, and sometimes women ended up in the wrong hands because people there wanted to make money out of the situation.

The upshot of all this was that the women students were getting worried the police might arrest them for being accomplices to abortion. We were sitting at the snack bar in the law school one day and one of them, Judy Smith, said: “We need to get a lawsuit filed and try to overturn the Texas law. Would you be willing to do it?” I told her she would be better off with someone with more legal experience. I’d only done uncontested divorces, wills, one adoption for my uncle; I had no experience at all in federal court. “How much would you charge?” she asked. When I admitted I would do it for free, she said: “OK, you are our lawyer.”

Protest marchers form a ‘ring of life’ around the Minnesota Capitol building protesting the US supreme court’s Roe v. Wade decision, 22 January 1973. Photograph: AP

Were you nervous?
I was very nervous. It was like going down a street with no street lights. But there was no other way to go, and I didn’t have any preconceived notions that I would not win. In 1965, there was a case, Griswold v Connecticut, involving doctors and the supply by doctors of contraceptive devices to a married couple. [Connecticut was then one of two states where contraception was effectively illegal, even if the law was rarely enforced.] Yes, neanderthal. That case was won in the US supreme court, and in its ruling, the court had talked about the right of privacy under the constitution. It was, the court said, for the married couple to decide whether or not to use contraception. So there was a precedent. But I certainly was not confident.

You won in the federal court, but the case still went to the supreme court. Why?
In Dallas, the court ruled there was a right of privacy, that abortion should be legal. Henry Wade, the district attorney, then unwittingly helped us. At a press conference, he said: “I don’t care what any court says; I am going to continue to prosecute doctors who carry out abortion.” There was a procedural rule that said if local elected officials continue to prosecute after a federal court had declared a law unconstitutional, there would be a right to appeal to the supreme court.

Did you have any hint at all as you addressed the supreme court that you might win?
No, it was impossible to read the justices’ faces. The attorney on the other side started by saying something inappropriate about arguing a case against a beautiful woman. He thought the judges would snicker. But their faces didn’t change a bit.

It was a while before the verdict was released, wasn’t it?
I had to argue it twice in the supreme court – in 1971, and again in 1972. On 22 January 1973, I was at the Texas legislature when the phone rang. It was a reporter from the New York Times. “Does Miss Weddington have a comment today about Roe v Wade?” my assistant was asked. “Why?” she said. “Should she?” It was beginning to be very exciting. Then we got a telegram from the supreme court saying that I had won seven to two and that they were going to airmail a copy of the ruling. Nowadays, of course, you’d just go online. I was ecstatic, and more than 44 years later we’re still talking about it.

When you published your book A Question of Choice in 1992, you decided to reveal that in 1967 you’d had an abortion yourself, while you were still a law student. Why did you wait so long to reveal this?
Just before the anaesthesia hit, I thought: I hope no one ever knows about this. For a lot of years, that was exactly the way I felt. Now there’s a major push to encourage women to tell their stories so people will realise that it is not a shameful thing. One out of every five women will have an abortion. I was lucky because the man I was planning to marry [Ron Weddington; they divorced in 1974] was with me. He drove me to Mexico. We had gotten information from a woman he knew about where to go, and luckily I was working three jobs so I had the money to pay. It was anxiety-inducing. You’re going across the border to see someone you don’t know. But it turned out that my doctor was very good. I wish I had his name, so I could thank him.

Are you still able to get in touch with the young woman you once were, or does she feel very far away?
Well, my hair is white now, so in one way, I don’t see myself as her at all, even if, whatever else I do in my life, the headline on my obituary is always going to be: “Roe v Wade attorney dies.” But in terms of my emotions, yes: I think most women of my generation can recall our feelings about the fight. It’s like young love. You may not feel exactly the same, but you remember it.

Sarah Weddington, Roe v Wade attorney, on Trump’s threat to abortion rights

Jersey monitors threat from toxic sea lettuce fumes

Authorities in the Channel Islands are looking at ways to protect residents and visitors from toxic beach gases after the death of a jogger in France that has been linked to the fumes from rotting seaweed.

The government of Jersey said on Monday it was considering the installation of devices to check gas levels from deposits of sea lettuce. Warning signs could also be erected on affected coastlines to tell people of the potential danger posed by rotting green algae.

Jean-René Auffray collapsed while jogging at a river estuary in Brittany, about 50 miles south-west of Jersey. French authorities concluded he died of a heart attack. But they are exploring the theory that he may have been overcome by sea lettuce fumes, following pressure from environment experts.

Sea lettuce exposed at low tide in Swanage, Dorset. Photograph: FLPA/Alamy

Gas from decomposing sea lettuce in northern France has been linked to the deaths of wild boars in 2011 and a horse in 2009.

St Aubin’s Bay in Jersey often has sea lettuce infestations. The island’s government, the States of Jersey, said it would monitor the situation and could introduce safety measures, but does not believe people are currently at risk.

The infrastructure minister, Eddie Noel, said the quantity of sea lettuce on Jersey were not at the same level as in France and elsewhere in the world.

“The levels are monitored and if there were to be any buildup, action would be taken to protect public safety,” he said, adding that heavy deposits of rotting sea lettuce – Ulva lactuca – may produce gases, including hydrogen sulphide.

Noel said contractors removed the algae for the Jersey government last summer and trialled the use of gas monitors, which were not activated.

But he said: “A review of operations for the 2017 summer season will include considering greater use of these monitors and possible public safety signage in extreme conditions to warn of the risk, however small, of walking, jogging or exercising dogs in heavily affected areas.”

Noel said it was unreasonable to connect Auffray’s death with the sea lettuce at St Aubin’s Bay and doing so could harm tourism on the island.

Auffray’s death has focused attention on what causes Jersey’s sea lettuce growth, which Noel said was owing to “several elements”. It tends to proliferate in warm, clear, calm, nitrate-rich waters. St Aubin’s Bay is a perfect breeding ground because of its position– it is sheltered and sandy – and because it is rich in nitrates washed from farms in Jersey and northern France, and from the Bellozanne sewage treatment works.

Jersey’s government stressed that the sea lettuce problem was not unique to the island: there have been blooms in Kent, Ireland, Portugal and Italy, commonly in bays with similar features to St Aubin’s.

Possible solutions for the problem include towing it out to sea and dumping it, and the introduction of oysters that feed on nitrates.

The campaign group Save Our Shoreline Jersey (SOSJ) said there was no doubt that sea lettuce released sulphurous gases. “These ‘rotten egg’ smells mean local residents have to shut their windows in hot weather, tourists and locals complain, and seaside cafes suffer from a marked decrease in custom,” the group said.

“Bouncing on the piles of dried lettuce runs the risk of toxic gas escaping, so we recommend small children and dogs are kept from [doing so because] they are much closer to the ground and could be affected before the wind disperses the gas.”

SOSJ said hundreds of tonnes of fertiliser was being used by farms growing Jersey Royal potatoes, and that the island’s growing population was creating more sewage.

Jacqui Carrel, an environmental scientist for SOSJ, said the group had suggested measures such as ploughing shallow furrows at angles to the sea in these areas, dislodging the weed before it takes root. “[But] successive governments have said there is nothing they can do.”

Jersey monitors threat from toxic sea lettuce fumes

Trump"s vaccine conspiracy theories are a threat to your children | Celine Goudner

This week, vaccine skeptic Robert F Kennedy Jr announced that he’d been nominated by President Elect Donald Trump to chair a commission on vaccine safety. A few hours later, the transition team issued a statement saying that that Trump was “exploring the possibility of forming a committee on autism”. Last summer, Trump met with Andrew Wakefield, who lost his medical license and was found to have produced fraudulent research linking vaccines to autism. Whether Trump is creating a commission on vaccine safety or autism, the message is clear. Trump is offering prominent support to the conspiracy theory that vaccines cause autism.

The science on vaccines is very clear: they are safe and effective. Vaccines do not cause autism. It’s a waste of our tax dollars to rehash this issue yet again. Vaccines are one of the greatest triumphs of modern medicine. Let’s consider measles, just one of many vaccine-preventable diseases. Before 1963, when the measles vaccine became widely available, 3-4 million Americans got measles each year, of whom 48,000 were hospitalized, 4000 developed encephalitis resulting in long-term brain damage, and 4-500 died. The country’s population has almost doubled since that time.

Trump and others have advocated delaying and spacing out vaccinations. But it’s important to understand that vaccination schedules are based on our scientific understanding of the immune system and disease transmission. A mother passes antibodies to her baby through the placenta as well as breast milk, thereby protecting her child against some infections. These antibodies don’t last forever. If you vaccinate a baby too early, the mother’s antibodies prevent the vaccine from taking effect. But if you wait too long to vaccinate, you leave the child unprotected. For example, studies have shown that by six months of age, over 95% of infants have lost the protection of their mother’s antibodies to measles.

At least until now, we’ve reaped the benefits of high vaccination rates: far less measles than in other parts of the world. When a disease becomes less common, the probability that you’ll come into contact with it goes down, actually giving us more wriggle room in our vaccination schedule. The measles vaccine also works a bit better if you wait until 12 months of age. But if you wait to vaccinate against measles until you’ve got a walking, talking toddler who’s around other kids, you’re putting that child at risk. Moreover, in the past two decades, more and more parents have chosen not to immunize their children, so much so that vaccination rates in some parts of the country are well below those seen in much poorer developing countries.

Parents want to do what’s best for their children. But in many cases, parents’ attitudes about vaccination have little to do with their understanding of the science and are driven by their distrust of the government on the right and the pharmaceutical industry on the left. Lack of trust in government – specifically its ability to create and sustain well-paying jobs in this country – helped elect Trump. As distrust in public institutions rises, conspiracy theories abound. Saying “I don’t believe you” is a way of saying “I don’t trust you,” no matter how much science there is to support a specific policy or course of action.

This isn’t the first time we’ve seen conspiracy theories proliferate about medical science – and it won’t be the last.

I spent two months as an aid worker in Guinea during the Ebola epidemic. In that time, I learned far more about the politics of science and medicine than about the virus itself. West Africans have very little trust in their public institutions – for good reason. These are among the most corrupt, least democratic nations in the world. And they have reason not to trust foreigners: a long history of slave trading followed by the stripping of natural resources for the profit of multinational corporations. We heard on the news that West Africans resisted recommendations about hand washing, safe burials, contact tracing and quarantines. On the ground, they told me that public officials were using the epidemic for political purposes and that expats were mercenaries. Yet we in the West dismissed their cynicism as primitive superstition.

President Elect Donald Trump has been a vocal proponent of numerous other conspiracy theories – about climate change, the media, our elections, Obama’s place of birth, the government’s role in the 9/11 attacks, the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, and the deaths of White House deputy counsel Vince Foster and Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia – to name just a few. As these false stories circulate, people lose trust in all institutions, especially the government and the media.

For now, Americans still trust scientists to act in the public’s best interest. We have a duty to live up to their trust. The lives of many Americans, our country’s future and the world’s are at stake.

Trump"s vaccine conspiracy theories are a threat to your children | Celine Goudner

Junior doctors" sleep deprivation poses threat to patients, says GMC

Trainee doctors in the NHS are often so sleep-deprived that they are in danger of harming patients, the medical profession’s regulator has said.

Increasingly heavy workloads and widespread staff shortages mean the UK’s 54,000 junior doctors are being left to look after wards of patients without proper experience, according to the General Medical Council’s biggest annual survey of trainee medics’ experiences

One in four doctors below the level of consultant say their schedule leaves them sleep-deprived and 43% describe their workloads as heavy or very heavy. Those with the most intense schedules are much more likely to encounter patient safety being put at risk, the survey found.

In one unnamed hospital, a junior doctor was the sole medic left in charge of 300 patients overnight – a case the GMC’s chief executive, Charlie Massey, said was extremely concerning. The risk of the doctor being unable to deal with two medical emergencies happening simultaneously meant such lack of cover should never happen, he said.

“Patients who are in hospital overnight are in a hospital for a good reason and if something should happen to one or more patients during that nightshift, and that trainee has been left alone, that creates real potential risk to patients,” Massey said.

He said he was “astonished” to have learned that a single doctor had been left unsupervised and having to handle the care of so many patients.

The proportion of trainees describing themselves as sleep-deprived rose from 21% in 2012 to 24.4% this year. “This is an increasing and worrying trend and it’s very concerning when doctors say that it’s jeopardising their ability to make good judgments and to provide safe care,” Massey told the Guardian in his first interview since taking up his role last month.

“Sleep deprivation matters because [tired] doctors may not remember all of the things that they should remember – for example, all the things to do to safely intubate an individual – because they are so knackered or may not remember all the patient’s history and may therefore make the wrong clinical judgment about them.”

Massey is so worried by the potential for patients being harmed by rising fatigue and workload pressure among hospital doctors that he has written to every NHS provider of care across the UK warning them to take steps to ensure the safety and quality of care are protected.

“Those responsible and accountable for the delivery of medical education locally must take the appropriate steps to ensure the training of doctors remains protected, particularly as medical training is so often a bellwether for the quality and safety of patient care, and because patients are directly at risk if the support and supervision of doctors in training is inadequate,” he wrote in the letter.

A separate survey of junior doctors, undertaken by the Royal College of Physicians and published on Wednesday, found that 80% of trainee medics say their job sometimes or often causes them excessive stress.

One in four of the 498 junior doctors surveyed by the RCP said their job seriously affected their mental health and 54% said it affected their physical health. Pressure on trainees had reached a “harmful and unsustainable level”, the college said.

Massey said the demands being placed on trainees were now so great that there was a risk of some being “used and exploited” by their hospitals because there were too few staff to cope with the work that needed to be done.

“We have seen some signs that that is beginning to happen,” he said. The GMC, which supervises all doctors’ training, fears that some are not getting the training they need and the next generation of consultants may not be as highly skilled as they need to be.

Massey also voiced unease that the quality of handovers from one set of doctors to another – which are integral to patients receiving good care – had emerged as a growing concern. Young doctors’ clinical education is also being interrupted by them being called out of training sessions to attend to problems involving patients, the GMC found.

Key medical specialties that have seen some of the sharpest rises in demand from patients – such as A&E, acute internal and general medicine, respiratory medicine and gastroenterology – are those where trainee doctors’ workloads have increased significantly in recent years, the GMC found. A total of 53,835 junior doctors – just under 99% of the 54,563 across the UK who were eligible to complete the GMC survey – took part.

Dr Pete Campbell, of the British Medical Association’s junior doctors committee, said: “Patients and the public may be shocked by these findings, but no junior doctor will be surprised. It is still far too common that junior doctors are left sleep-deprived after regularly working beyond their rostered hours, on rotas that are desperately short of doctors.”

NHS Employers said the new contract being imposed on junior doctors in England, which prompted the recent year-long industrial dispute between the BMA and the government, would remove or mitigate many of the concerns behind their rising dissatisfaction.

“We want to support our junior doctors,” a Department of Health spokesman said. “That’s why the NHS has employed 11,900 more doctors since 2010. Yesterday, the health secretary announced plans to improve junior doctors’ training, including more support from consultants, more notice of future placements including where couples are placed, reviewing the appraisals process and investing £10m to bring doctors back up to speed when they take time out to have a family or other caring responsibilities.”

Junior doctors" sleep deprivation poses threat to patients, says GMC

Down’s syndrome and the threat of eugenics | Letters

Neither in Sally Phillips’ film, A World Without Down’s Syndrome, nor in your review by Julia Raeside (Last night’s TV: A documentary straight from the heart – and that’s the problem, 6 October) was there any reference to “eugenics”. Yet possibly still within living memory proponents of eugenics in America (and elsewhere) were advocating selective breeding to determine the future of society. It is worth noting that such ideas were grounded in the work of Francis Galton, who was a powerful influence on Cyril Burt, who in turn later developed the 11-plus exams. (His influence might be resurrected in the tests used to determine who is most fit for the new grammar schools we’re promised.)

Sally Phillips’ programme does, therefore, offer a timely reminder of the dangers of embarking on a determinist view of society and the risk that selective breeding is acceptable. As Phillips reported, there is a lot of pressure to avoid a potential “burden” as an outcome of the wrong sort of foetus. In America the eugenicists gathered data purporting to show which sectors of society were more (or less) fit for the future. Favoured solutions proposed to avoid a future populated by those deemed to be “unfit” for society included restrictions on immigration and enforced sterilisation. There is much in the history of that movement to warn us of the dangers of a determinist future. It is, therefore, right to have the questions raised: what kind of society do we want; and how kind do we want society to be?
Dr Simon Gibbs
Reader in educational psychology, University of Newcastle

• Hadley Freeman, in her opinion piece on A World Without Down’s Syndrome, writes that it is genuinely shocking that BBC 2 decided to screen such a blatantly anti-choice message (Sorry, Sally Phillips, but a woman should be able to know if her unborn baby has Down’s syndrome, theguardian.com, 6 October). Is she advocating censorship? In showing the joy her son with Down’s syndrome brings to her family, Sally Phillips is trying to counter negative headlines and arguments. She is not anti-choice. She wants people to have better information. We mothers who have or have had sons or daughters with Down’s syndrome should not be impeded from saying they enrich our families and lead valuable lives. It is important to have a debate about the kind of society we want to live in.
Hazel Morgan
Dorchester

Down’s syndrome and the threat of eugenics | Letters

UN agrees to fight "the biggest threat to modern medicine": antibiotic resistance

All 193 United Nations member states are set to sign a declaration agreeing to combat “the biggest threat to modern medicine” in Wednesday’s high-level meeting on antibiotic resistance.

The agreement was reached just before the general assembly convened to discuss the threat of antibiotic resistance, which is only the fourth health issue to trigger a general assembly meeting.

“It’s ironic that such a small thing is causing such an enormous public threat,” said Jeffrey LeJeune, a professor and head of the food animal research program at Ohio State University. “But it is a global health threat that needs a global response.”

The declaration routes the global response to superbugs along a similar path as the one used to combat climate change. In two years, groups including UN agencies will provide an update on the superbug fight to the UN secretary general.

It is estimated that more than 700,000 people die each year due to drug-resistant infections, though it could be much higher because there is no global system to monitor these deaths. And there has been trouble tracking those deaths in places where they are monitored, like in the US, where tens of thousands of deaths have not been attributed to superbugs, according to a Reuters investigation.

Scientists warned about the threat of antibiotic resistance decades ago, when pharmaceutical companies began the industrial production of medicine. The inventor of penicillin, Alexander Fleming, cautioned of the impending crisis while accepting his Nobel prize in 1945: “There is the danger that the ignorant man may easily underdose himself and by exposing his microbes to non-lethal quantities of the drug make them resistant”.

But in the last few years, studies have dramatically increased awareness about antibiotic resistance. There has also been considerable advocacy by health officials, like Sally Davies, chief medical officer of the UK.

“Drug-resistant infections are firmly on the global agenda but now the real work begins,” Davies said in a statement. “We need governments, the pharmaceutical industry, health professionals and the agricultural sector to follow through on their commitments to save modern medicine.”

Signatories to the UN declaration committed to encouraging innovation in antibiotic development, increasing public awareness of the threat and developing surveillance and regulatory systems on the use and sales of antimicrobial medicine for humans and animals.

Only three other health issues have been the subject of general assembly high-level meetings: HIV/Aids, non-communicable diseases and Ebola.

Mark Woolhouse, professor of infectious disease epidemiology at the University of Edinburgh, said he was encouraged that unlike with HIV/Aids and Ebola, the UN is addressing this health crisis before it has spun out of control.

“It’s very serious indeed – it’s killing people around the world at the rate of hundreds of thousands of year and we all expect it to get worse if something isn’t done now,” Woolhouse said. “But the UN is coming in at just the right time, in a sense.”

UN agrees to fight "the biggest threat to modern medicine": antibiotic resistance

Owen Smith to target Tories over threat of NHS privatisation

Labour leadership hopeful Owen Smith is to hit out at the threat of creeping privatisation in the NHS, highlighting Department of Health accounts showing that spending on private-sector NHS providers has doubled under the Conservatives.

In a speech on Monday at a campaign trail stop at Trafford General hospital in Manchester, Smith will say that a Labour government led by him would boost health spending by 4% a year, suggesting there is “a secret Tory plan to privatise the NHS”.

Department of Health accounts published on the last day before parliament’s summer recess showed the spend on private-sector NHS providers more than doubled, from more than £4bn in 2009-10 to £8.7bn in 2015-16.

Smith’s early campaign has been dogged by accusations that he lobbied for further private-sector involvement in the NHS during his time as policy chief at the pharmaceuticals companies Pfizer. During his career as a lobbyist for the US firm, Smith had called on ministers to improve incentives for the pharmaceutical industry.

His speech on Monday will attempt to divert attention to his time as shadow health minister, saying that he “fought the Tories’ top-down reorganisation of the NHS line by line”. He will say: “I warned that it would lead to an explosion of privatisation – and that is exactly what has happened.”

Smith, a former shadow work and pensions secretary, has previously claimed it was a gross exaggeration to suggest he had campaigned for more privatisation of NHS services while at Pfizer, and suggested it had been an error for Labour to advocate greater choice over care providers.

He will focus his efforts on health policy a day after Corbyn’s announcement about plans for a national education service based on NHS principles.

Owen Smith to target Tories over threat of NHS privatisation

How to combat the threat of HIV drug resistance

For people living with HIV, antiretroviral treatment (ART) has been a life-saver. ART stops HIV from making copies of itself and prevents HIV from attacking the body’s immune system.

At the end of 2015, 17 million people were taking ART around the world and Aids-related deaths had fallen by 45% since the peak in 2005.

But those who don’t stick to the ART regimen set out by their doctor or health worker might become resistant to the drugs. Resistance occurs when ART regimens are not taken as prescribed, which allows HIV to make copies of itself and increases the risk that the virus will mutate and produce drug-resistant HIV. A person who is on a drugsuch as Efavirenz can develop resistance after as little as a two-day interruption of treatment.

Globally, HIV drug resistance is on the rise. The World Health Organisation (WHO) reported that up to 2010, HIV drug resistance levels remained at 7% in developing countries. However, recently, some countries have reported levels at or above 10% among those starting ART, and up to 40% among people restarting ART.

The time to act is now. If we don’t, we may find ourselves with a new global pandemic of drug-resistant HIV.

At the beginning of the epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa, there was fear among the international community that people living with HIV in resource-limited settings would not be able to adhere to their treatment due to a lack of education and resources. Would they be able to keep time well enough to take their ART at the same time every day?

However, studies have demonstrated that people in sub-Saharan Africa may be better than people in the west at taking their ART as prescribed. The issue in developing countries is that people lack the resources to get to a clinic and pick up their pills. I’ve worked in Namibia since 2009, and whenever I visit ART clinics, there are long queues stretching out the door. People often have to wait all day and many can’t afford to take this time off work every month.

The stigma associated with being seen waiting in a queue to pick up medication is also a factor in people not adhering to their treatment plans. To avoid this, some people on ARTs travel to a clinic many kilometres away from their town, so they can receive treatment without anyone recognising them. And if you took a whole day off work, borrowed money for the transport and stood in a queue all day, only to learn that the clinic had run out of your pills, what would you do?

ARTs and HIV drug resistance

As the use of ART increases, so does the risk of HIV drug resistance. It’s no surprise, then, that global HIV drug resistance is on the rise, both among those already on ART and those just starting on it.

What could happen if levels of drug resistance reached critical levels? Their ART regimens would no longer be able to stop the HIV in their bodies from making copies of itself and they would then have to be switched to second-line regimens, if available.

But second-line regimens are more expensive. For countries already struggling to provide ART to those who need it, this would is likely to mean that fewer people could be started on ART.

Related: Can WHO’s new ‘test and treat’ HIV policy reach those who need it most?

Second-line regimens may also have more negative side effects, such as nausea, vomiting, headache, weakness or changes in the shape or location of body fat. These plans can also be more challenging because of the large number of pills that need to be taken. As a clinician, I’ve seen patients who’ve reached the point where they have to take more than 10 pills a day.

Drug resistance has been a problem since the beginning of the HIV epidemic. In the west the problem was usually limited to individual patients. But in resource-limited settings, if a high percentage of the population develops drug resistance we could see large increases in Aids-related deaths and higher healthcare costs.

We must act now to help people adhere to their treatment plans, before it’s too late. Globally, there has been a huge focus on getting more people on treatment, but the quality of how it’s delivered has fallen by the wayside.

Drug resistance will rise when ART is not delivered in a well thought-out way. That requires strong drug supply systems with zero tolerance for an interruption of ART drug supply, strong and locally appropriate counselling to promote adherence, support for patients who don’t have the resources to access care, re-engagement of patients who have stopped going to the clinics, alternative ways to deliver care such as community-based ART groups, and strong medical record systems.

As we strive to end Aids as a public health threat by 2030, greater attention must be focused on identifying and correcting gaps in the quality of ART service delivery. Many lives depend on it and the time to act is now. If we don’t, we may find ourselves with a new global pandemic of drug-resistant HIV and be faced with a deadlier enemy than we started with.

Steven Hong is an assistant professor of public heath and community medicine at the Tufts University School of Medicine.

Join our community of development professionals and humanitarians. Follow @GuardianGDP on Twitter.

How to combat the threat of HIV drug resistance

Mediterranean diet plan improves cognition, protects brain and heart, and decreases threat of type two diabetes by 52%!

Heart condition is the variety a single lead to of death in the United States. (one) There are quite few circumstances of heart illness in countries of the Mediterranean.  Researchers feel that their healthful diet program is the principal purpose for their lower costs of heart condition.(two)

The Mediterranean diet program is higher in plants including fruits, greens, whole grains, legumes, potatoes, nuts and seeds.  They also use massive quantities of olive oil and red wine along with reasonable servings of fish, poultry, dairy and eggs.  Red meat is seldom consumed in this region.(two)

Though this diet plan has been about for centuries, it is at the moment gaining mainstream acceptance due analysis.  Numerous research have proven that the Mediterranean diet is a very good way to improve your overall health and avert condition. (two)

Mediterranean diet regime benefits in younger brains, reduction of fewer brain cells and enhanced cognition!

One review discovered that those who eat the Mediterranean diet program have much less brain atrophy, resulting in the loss of fewer brain cells and improved cognition.  The examine found that eating less meat resulted in a bigger brain volume.  Eating much more fish was linked with improved cortical thickness.  The research divided participants into two groups, people who ate Mediterranean diet regime and people who did not. The group that did not eat the Mediterranean diet’s brains had aged five many years compared to the group who consumed the Mediterranean diet plan.  In the group who consumed the Mediterranean diet, their brain volume was 13 percent larger.(3)

A 2010 study supports this data rerouted that individuals who adhere to the Mediterranean diet regime had been 36 percent significantly less probably to have damage to the brain. (three)

The diet regime is not only very good for the brain, but is also useful in preventing diabetes, metabolic syndrome and heart disease.  (2)

Mediterranean diet decreases threat of stroke by 39 %!

A 2013 examine had a complete of seven,447 participants with higher threat of cardiovascular condition.  They were divided into 3 various diet plans, a Mediterranean diet regime with extra olive oil, a Mediterranean diet regime with extra nuts and a minimal-body fat management group.  The examine concluded that the threat of stroke went down by 39 percent in the Mediterranean diet regime groups.  Those with high blood strain, lipid problems or obesity responded ideal to the Mediterranean diet plan.(2)

A 2007 examine examined the influence of the Mediterranean diet regime on 372 folks who had been at high cardiovascular risk.  After 3 months, researchers assessed changes oxidative pressure.  Researchers identified that the diet plan result in reductions in LDL cholesterol along with enhancements in other threat factors. (2)

Mediterranean diet decreases threat of creating kind two diabetes by 52 %!

A 2011 review, related to the 2013 study above, integrated 418 non-diabetic participants had been followed for 4 years.  Researchers examined their danger of building variety 2 diabetes.  The research identified that 10 and 11 percent of the men and women in the Mediterranean diet program groups became diabetic in contrast with 17.9 percent in the reduced-fat management group.  The Mediterranean diet reduced danger of establishing type two diabetes by 52 %!(2)

If you are not interested in providing up meat and dairy totally, the Mediterranean diet regime might be a excellent option that has quite a few well being positive aspects.

Sources incorporated:

(1) http://www.theheartfoundation.org/heart-condition-details/heart-illness-statistics/

(two) http://authoritynutrition.com/five-research-on-the-mediterranean-diet/

(three) http://www.sentinelsource.com/existence_and_type/lifestyles/mediterranean-diet regime-helps make-your-brain-younger/article_10f6ae0e-d7c3-5c3d-a10b-2f3ed9de2f8a.html

Mediterranean diet plan improves cognition, protects brain and heart, and decreases threat of type two diabetes by 52%!

Long Operate Hrs Could Increase Threat For Stroke

[unable to retrieve complete-text content material]

As engineering now allows us to work anywhere and anytime, thereby extending our normal doing work hours, it turns into a lot more crucial to keep a balance in existence. In truth, individuals lengthy days that flip into nights in the workplace could not be good for you in the extended run, and may possibly truly [...]

Long Operate Hrs Could Increase Threat For Stroke

A single drink a day increases the threat of breast cancer by 15 per cent

Having just 1 drink a day increases the chance of breast cancer in ladies by 15 per cent, a significant research has discovered.

The findings have led Harvard University researchers to suggest that those with a household background of cancer, especially girls, ought to contemplate reducing their consumption under suggested ranges.

The research, published by the BMJ, identified a website link between alcohol and cancer in men who had smoked at some point in their lives, but not in these who had never ever been a smoker.

Nevertheless, even in females who had in no way smoked, the chance of alcohol-related cancers – mainly breast cancer – elevated even right after one particular alcoholic drink a day.

Researchers explained that because smoking is a key danger element for most alcohol-relevant cancers – apart from female breast cancer – the apparent influence of alcohol on cancer could be partly driven by its result between smokers.

A female drinking a beer  Photo: Alamy

Light or reasonable drinking was classed as much less than 15g (about 1-and-a-half units or just underneath two drinks) a day in females and 30g (three units or three or 4 drinks) and beneath in males.

The review of much more than 88,000 girls and 47,000 men aged more than thirty identified the median consumption of alcohol was 1.8g a day in girls and five.6g in guys.

Other findings had been that abstainers or hefty drinkers had been much less very likely than light and moderatedrinkers to have had typical bodily examinations by their GP and be screened for colorectal, prostate, or breast cancer.

They also engaged in fewer bodily activities and had lower dietary scores. Hefty drinkers were far more most likely to be lengthy-phrase smokers.

Breast cancer was the foremost alcohol-connected cancer in females, even though colorectal cancer was the key alcohol-related cancer in men.

A woman consuming a glass of wine  Photograph: Alamy

For alcohol-relevant cancers, increased frequency of consuming was related with increased risk in guys but not in girls, whereas binge consuming was connected with enhanced danger in ladies but not in guys.

The research, which was led by Harvard TH Chan College of Public Wellness in Boston, Massachusetts, said it is estimated that alcohol consumption has triggered 3.6% of all cancers worldwide – one.seven% in ladies and five.2% in men.

An accompanying editorial in the BMJ by Dr Jurgen Rehm of the Centre for Addiction and Psychological Overall health in Toronto, Canada, said much more investigation is essential, and is turning into more and more achievable in higher earnings countries exactly where the number of non-smokers has improved although alcohol consumption has been relatively steady.

“Lastly, men and women with a family members background of cancer, specifically women with a household history of breastcancer, must contemplate lowering their alcohol consumption to beneath suggested limits, or even abstaining altogether, provided the now properly established hyperlink between reasonable consuming and alcohol-connected cancers,” he added.

Dr Richard Roope, clinical lead for cancer at the Royal University of GPs, stated: “We have identified about the strong link amongst alcohol and cancer for some time, but this study serves as a helpful reminder about how pronounced this is, particularly when coupled with smoking, and when men and women have a family members history of cancer.

“In accordance to current figures, thirty% of bowel cancers, 21% of oesophageal cancers, 12% of bowelcancers and six% of breast cancers in females are all related with alcohol each and every 12 months.

“GPs do not want to be killjoys – but we want our sufferers to reside lengthy and healthy lives and life style routines, this kind of as smoking and consuming alcohol, are extremely real danger factors in building cancer that cannot be ignored.”

A single drink a day increases the threat of breast cancer by 15 per cent

Genetic Biomarker Recognized That May Predict Suicide Threat

Investigators from Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine have recognized a distinctive modification to a gene linked to tension reactions that might potentially lead in the close to long term to a blood check to evaluate a person’s threat of attempting suicide.

Their findings had been published July 30 in The American Journal of Psychiatry.

The researchers discovered that modifications in a gene regulating the brain’s response to stress hormones that might help doctors determine who may possibly be at danger for suicidal ideas and behaviors.

“Suicide is a key preventable public health dilemma, but we have been stymied in our prevention efforts simply because we have no steady way to predict these who are at increased chance of killing themselves,” said lead writer, Zachary Kaminsky, Ph.D., an assistant professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at the Johns Hopkins University College of Medication. “With a check like ours, we may be able to stem suicide costs by identifying these men and women and intervening early adequate to head off a catastrophe.”

Researchers evaluated a certain genetic mutation in a gene identified as SKA2. Comparing brain samples from healthy individuals and people with psychiatric ailments, investigators found that amounts of SKA2 have been greatly diminished in these who committed suicide.

In the SKA mutation, researchers recognized an epigenetic modification, or addition of certain molecule, that changed SKA2 gene perform, but left the gene’s underlying DNA sequence unchanged. The certain aforementioned change additional methyl groups to the gene.  It turns out that higher levels of methylation had been subsequently noted in the same research participants whom had committed suicide. The higher amounts of methylation, noticed in persons whom committed suicide, had been then observed in two independent groups of sufferers who were evaluated in the research.

An additional part of the study involving 325 participants found similar methylation increases at SKA2 in men and women with suicidal thoughts or attempts.  Their model analysis accurately predicted–with 80 percent certainty—those with suicidal ideas or attempted suicide. Participants with a higher danger for suicide had a 90 % accuracy primarily based on final results.  And based mostly on the benefits of blood tests, researchers were in a position to predict with 96 % accuracy people persons who had attempted suicide.

The SKA2 gene, expressed in the prefrontal cortex of the brain, is concerned in inhibiting negative thoughts and controlling impulsive habits. SKA2 is exclusively responsible for permitting pressure hormone receptors into a cell’s nuclei to perform its function. If there isn’t sufficient SKA2, or it is altered in some way, the pressure hormone receptor is unable to suppress the release of cortisol throughout the brain. Earlier research has proven that such cortisol release is abnormal in these who try or total suicide.

Kaminsky reasoned that a check based mostly on the findings in this research could probably be utilized to predict future suicide attempts in these who suffer from mental sickness. It may possibly also be utilised to restrict availability of forearms among people at threat, and to make selections about the urgency for evaluation and intervention in those at chance for suicidal behaviors.

Kaminsky also explained that it would likely be worthwhile for the military to check soldiers for the gene mutation that could area them at higher risk.  Individuals who are at chance could then be a lot more closely monitored when they returned residence right after deployment. A blood test employed to detect the at-danger gene might also be beneficial in the emergency division to assess threat for suicide in patients presenting with regarding signs and symptoms and unknown to health care suppliers.

“We have identified a gene that we consider could be genuinely essential for constantly identifying a assortment of behaviors from suicidal thoughts to attempts to completions,” Kaminsky mentioned. “We need to study this in a greater sample but we believe that we may possibly be ready to keep track of the blood to recognize those at risk of suicide.”

1 professional agreed that the findings of this research may offer you the likely for clear advances in the future.

“Dr. Guintivano and his colleagues have elegantly demonstrated how a lot the field of psychiatric and behavioral genetics has evolved in excess of the final 10 years, stated Dr. Aaron Krasner, Adolescent Transitional Residing Plan Service Chief at Silver Hill Hospital in New Canaan, CT.

“With increasingly sophisticated technologies, a lot more nuanced appreciation of the science of genetic signaling, and more refined clinical phenotypes, the discovering that improved methylation at SKA2 amid suicide decedents merits consideration, replication, and represents a substantial contribution to the enormously challenging scientific venture of correlating biological underpinnings to complex human behaviors,” explained Krasner.

“Aside from the elegant science, Dr. Guintivano interrelates and elucidates 3 essential, and clinically relevant concepts in his paper: the biological basis of epigenetics (i.e., the nature/nurture debate), the require to employ clinical samples in the suicide discipline (which is a massive challenge), and the lucid but chronically elusive website link between the mind and the body,” (i.e., psychoendocrinology), added Krasner.

Genetic Biomarker Recognized That May Predict Suicide Threat

Could Ebola Virus Become A Threat In The U.S?

As the Ebola virus continues to spread throughout West Africa, with increasing concern between each health officials and the public alike, latest media reviews about a death of a guy who traveled to Lagos, Nigeria possessing been in an area rife with Ebola Virus, lately caught the world’s attention–and for excellent reason.

As we reside in an interconnected world–and not just by the web- we have to come to grips with the reality that hopping on a plane could possibly spread any virus–not just Ebola–to one more nation.

Therefore, the importance of enforcing correct infectious screening procedures of people who program to board an aircraft in an endemic location this kind of as West Africa becomes vital to containing the spread of the Ebola virus. Enforcing a “Do Not Board List” would be essential to preventing any spread of such a virus.

Whilst the Ebola virus could potentially be transported by vacationers to another country by a plane trip, in accordance to officials at the CDC, the real possibility of this creating in a significant public overall health danger to those residing in the US is modest.

One of the principal causes, officials believe, that the virus has a lower public well being risk is connected to the conditions which would be favorable to allow spread of the virus.  Bad and crowded living conditions, along with improper sanitation seem to be an essential element that contribute to the spread of the virus.  Such are not the living situations, in general, throughout most modernized nations in the Western planet

English: Transmission Electron Micrograph of the Ebola Virus. Hemorrhagic Fever, RNA Virus. Français : Virus Ebola. Italiano: Fotografia al microscopio elettronico della trasmissione del virus Ebola. Русский: Изображение вируса Эбола полученное с помощью просвечивающей электронной микроскопии. 中文: 電子顯微鏡下的伊波拉病毒結構. Türkçe: Ebola virüsü. Føroyskt: Ebola virus, eitt (-)ssRNA virus, undir elektronmikroskopi. (Photograph credit: Wikipedia)

Ebola, comprised of 5 strains, was initial identified in 1976 in the Western Democratic Congo along the Ebola river.  4 of the strains can be spread to humans. The fifth resides only in primates. The fruit bat, deemed a delicacy in West Africa, is usually regarded a normal reservoir of the Ebola virus.

Ebola is spread straight, human-to-human, by secretions this kind of as saliva, sweat, but also by blood and feces.  It can be spread directly by a break in the skin or mucous membranes or indirectly after touching your nose, mouth or eyes right after obtaining get in touch with with the virus.   It is not transmitting by coughing or sneezing (droplet spread)- as would be the situation for a person with influenza or measles.

Ebola virus, a member of the loved ones of  filoviruses, is one of the most deadly viruses recognized to guy, owing to its ability to continually undergo adjustments or mutations in its viral proteins. Signs commence suddenly–often with an extreme headache and fatigue, sore throat and chills–followed by vomiting, and diarrhea with onset of a hemorrhagic rash in the upper roof of the mouth and the skin that appears to be blister-like.  The virus attacks the immune method, releasing inflammatory mediators, which lead to collapse of the coagulation pathway, ending in massive external and inner bleeding.

Although the virus incubates from two-21 days, its critical to know that only those who are symptomatic–generally right after 8-9 days–having fever along with diarrhea, vomiting and possibly a hemorrhagic rash can transmit the virus to other people.

As a outcome, if somebody on a plane with energetic symptoms–including vomiting and diarrhea –soils a restroom, another man or woman who is not mindful could theoretically touch a contaminated region, and then acquire the virus.

That stated, its crucial to know that the vast majority of these who have turn out to be infected with the Ebola virus have been primarily healthcare staff in shut make contact with with patients as properly as family members members caring for sick loved ones members.  In addition, the threat of transmission from family members touching an infected corpse prior to burial represents an additional possible mode of transmission.

As a caveat, its also critical to know that early on its  program, persons with Ebola might have symptoms that are nonspecific (headache, chills fever) generating identification of the virus practically impossible. It could be effortlessly be mistaken for other illnesses like malaria, cholera or even typhoid fever. Only numerous days into the illness–after the onset of profuse vomiting and diarrhea–will a patient exhibit the telltale indicators of Ebola with bleeding from the mouth and nose along with rectal bleeding concurrent with shock, liver and renal failure, followed by [entity show="DIC" variety="organization" subtype="organization" energetic="correct" important="dic" exchange="Tokyo" organic_id="fred/company/1218"]DIC[/entity] and fulminant cardiovascular collapse.

As a end result, a heightened awareness, proper education,  and a latest travel background from West Africa are essential for for healthcare companies who are on the front lines.

The public need to be assured that medical providers in all US emergency departments are on higher alert for individuals with active symptoms and who have a regarding travel historical past. Prompt isolation making use of universal precautions, (gown, gloves, mask, eye safety) by suppliers is important to stopping spread of the virus.

Long term Program?

Could Ebola Virus Become A Threat In The U.S?

Aspirin can help mothers at threat from pre-eclampsia

The research examined pre-eclampsia in the first and second trimester and prevention using low-dose aspirin and calcium supplementation.

Taking low levels of aspirin before 16 weeks was found to have a significant effect in the prevention of pre-eclampsia, as was taking calcium supplements in women that are calcium-deficient.

Assessing women at 11 weeks to ascertain whether they were at risk of developing the condition was done through blood-pressure monitoring, using biochemical marker levels and uterine artery Doppler assessment.

To best assess the risks, the authors found that a combination of investigations were required, including examining maternal history and using biophysical and biochemical marker screening.

While treatment is currently reserved for at-risk pregnancies, in the future management could be tailored around preventative treatment based on the results of first trimester screening, the report authors said. But more research would be needed to see if these therapies could be beneficial in low-risk populations.

Fionnuala Mone, clinical fellow at University College Dublin’s school of medicine and medical science, who co-authored the review, said: ”Use of low-dose aspirin and calcium supplementation in at-risk populations can reduce the risk of developing pre-eclampsia, a serious condition which can lead to complications for both the mother and her baby.

”It is important to see if low-risk women can benefit from preventative treatments and screening through future research.”

Jason Waugh, editor-in-chief of The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, said: ”First trimester testing is a potential tool for clinicians to screen and then subsequently offer prophylaxis to prevent pre-eclampsia.

”However, not all units will have access to sonographers trained in uterine artery Doppler or laboratories able to analyse biochemical marker levels and this needs to be taken into account if first trimester screening is extended to low-risk pregnancies.”

Aspirin can help mothers at threat from pre-eclampsia

Urine check could predict threat of pre-term birth in 1st trimester, examine finds

They found elevated urinary ranges of the amino acid lysine have been linked with spontaneous premature birth.

In contrast, increased ranges of a N-acetylated glycoprotein, a molecule consisting of a carbohydrate and a protein, tended to be discovered in women who had to be induced early.

Decreased amounts of a third group of molecules, acetate, formate, tyrosine and trimethylamine, had been connected with bad foetal development.

Ladies with decreased ranges of these urine metabolites also showed indications of an elevated danger of diabetes, this kind of as larger blood insulin.

Urine samples were collected early in pregnancy at the 1st ultrasound appointment, which is generally towards the end of the 1st trimester or at the start off of the 2nd.

Pre-phrase birth and bad foetal growth have been shown to improve the likelihood of creating metabolic and cardiovascular problems later on in lifestyle.

Doctor Hector Keun, lead researcher from the Division of Surgical procedure and Cancer at Imperial School London, mentioned: “While we know that metabolic process in the mom alterations substantially for the duration of pregnancy to assist supply the increasing foetus with nutrients, we had been shocked to see so early in pregnancy a website link between metabolites that we could effortlessly detect in a urine sample and reduced birth weight.

“Our findings imply that it could be attainable to increase the identification of ladies at greater danger of delivering smaller sized babies or premature delivery utilizing non-invasive metabolic profiling technologies early in pregnancy.

“Armed with improved methods to predict chance of smaller infants early in pregnancy we can now revisit interventions such as folate supplementation or other nutritional interventions to see if they function greater in the group of women at greater threat.”

Even more research also demands to emphasis on whether modifications in metabolites are induced by pregnancy or indicate an underlying risk element, he additional.

Dr Keun mentioned: “Future investigation of the elements that create the molecules associated with these pregnancy outcomes need to enhance our understanding of the genetic and environmental aspects that influence restricted foetal growth and thus assist us to lessen the likelihood of these events.

“We will also go on to test if publicity to these metabolites for the duration of pregnancy has a lasting impact on kid advancement soon after birth.”

Urine check could predict threat of pre-term birth in 1st trimester, examine finds

Light drinkers could nonetheless be raising threat of heart condition

The research authors, who reviewed more than 50 studies into the consuming habits and cardiovascular health of more than 260,000 people, say this suggests that lowering alcohol intake even for people who do not drink much, could even now have wellness positive aspects.

This challenges the outcomes of earlier research which suggested light to moderate consuming, of 6 to 12 glass of wine a week, could have a protective effect on cardiovascular wellbeing.

Juan Casas, review writer and professor of epidemiology at the London College of Hygiene &amp Tropical Medication, said: “While the damaging effects of hefty alcohol consumption on the heart are nicely-established, for the final few decades we’ve typically heard reports of the possible well being positive aspects of light-to-moderate consuming.

“However, we now have evidence that some of these studies endure from limitations that may possibly impact the validity of their findings.

“In our research, we noticed a website link amongst a decreased consumption of alcohol and improved cardiovascular overall health, regardless of whether the personal was a light, reasonable or heavy drinker.

“Assuming the association is causal, it seems that even if you’re a light drinker, lowering your alcohol consumption could be helpful for your heart.”

The researchers employed a gene that serves as an indicator of alcohol consumption.

People that carry a genetic variant of the ‘alcohol dehydrogenase 1B’ gene are identified to breakdown alcohol at a diverse pace.

This triggers unpleasant signs and symptoms such as nausea and facial flushing, and has been located to lead to lower levels of alcohol consumption in the prolonged phrase.

Making use of the genetic variant as an indicator of decrease alcohol consumption, they were in a position to discover backlinks amongst these folks and improved cardiovascular well being.

Scientific studies into the prolonged-phrase well being effects of alcohol can be demanding, due to the difficulty of setting up trials involving several people who will sustain the very same alcohol consumption ranges in excess of an extended time period of time.

The researchers say that their study’s genetic approach makes it much less prone to some of the limitations of prior observational research.

Dr Shannon Amoils, senior research advisor at the British Heart Basis, stated: “Scientific studies into alcohol consumption are fraught with problems in component because they depend on people providing precise accounts of their drinking routines.

“Here the researchers employed a clever review design to get round this difficulty by which includes individuals who had a gene that predisposes them to drink significantly less.

“The outcomes reinforce the see that small to reasonable quantities of alcohol may not be wholesome for the heart despite the fact that the research would require to be repeated in a more substantial group of people for definitive benefits.

“Whilst the heart health effects of light to reasonable alcohol consumption are still unclear, what is clear is that drinking more than the recommended limits of alcohol can have a damaging effect on the heart.”

Light drinkers could nonetheless be raising threat of heart condition