Using the pill can protect women from certain cancers "for up to 30 years"

Women who have taken the contraceptive pill are protected from some types of cancer for as long as 30 years after they stopped taking it, according to new research.

Those who have used the pill “during their reproductive years” are less likely to have bowel cancer, endometrial cancer or ovarian cancer than women who had never taken it, a study at the University of Aberdeen found.

Researchers also looked at the risk of all types of cancer in women who have taken the pill during their reproductive years and found it does not lead to new cancer risks later in life.

The results are the latest published from the longest-running study in the world into the effects of taking the contraceptive pill.

Established by the Royal College of General Practitioners in 1968, the Oral Contraception Study was set up to look at the long-term health effects of oral contraceptives.

The latest study, led by Dr Lisa Iversen, relates to 46,000 women followed for up to 44 years.

Iversen, research fellow in the Institute of Applied Health Sciences at the university, said: “Because the study has been going for such a long time we are able to look at the very long-term effects, if there are any, associated with the pill.

“What we found from looking at up to 44 years’ worth of data was that having ever used the pill, women are less likely to get colorectal, endometrial and ovarian cancer.

“So, the protective benefits from using the pill during their reproductive years are lasting for at least 30 years after women have stopped using the pill.

“We were also interested in what the overall balance of all types of cancer is amongst women who have used the pill as they enter the later stages of their life. We did not find any evidence of new cancer risks appearing later in life as women get older.

“These results from the longest-running study in the world into oral contraceptive use are reassuring. Specifically, pill users don’t have an overall increased risk of cancer over their lifetime and that the protective effects of some specific cancers last for at least 30 years.”

The study, which has received funding from bodies including the Medical Research Council, Imperial Cancer Research Fund and the British Heart Foundation, published its latest findings in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

Using the pill can protect women from certain cancers "for up to 30 years"

No cancer risk to using glyphosate weedkiller, says EU watchdog

A controversial chemical used in Monsanto’s Roundup weedkiller has been judged safe for public use by the European Chemical Agency (Echa).

Glyphosate has been the subject of a relicensing battle which split governments, regulators and scientists, with one arm of the World Health Organisation linking the substance to cancer, while another denied any risk.

Echa was asked to assess its toxicity after EU countries failed to agree on a reauthorisation for the best-selling herbicide last summer, despite a positive recommendation from the European Food Safety Authority.

Today, the agency decided that “the available scientific evidence did not meet the criteria to classify glyphosate as a carcinogen, as a mutagen or as toxic for reproduction”.

“This conclusion was based both on the human evidence and the weight of the evidence of all the animal studies reviewed,” Tim Bowmer, the chairman of Echa’s Committee for Risk Assessment, said in an online briefing.

A classification that glyphosate causes serious eye damage and is toxic to aquatic life will remain in place. The controversy over its health and environmental effects though, looks set to rumble on.

The new Echa opinion now faces an internal check before it is submitted to the European commission which will restart EU discussions so that a final decision can be reached by the end of the year.

“This is not the end of the process,” a commission spokesperson said.

The Echa team responsible for the study was itself accused of conflicts of interests by Greenpeace, as several of its members had either undertaken consultancy work for chemical firms, or worked for institutes that had.

Greenpeace EU’s food policy director, Franziska Achterberg, said: “Echa has gone to great lengths to sweep all evidence that glyphosate can cause cancer under the carpet. The data vastly exceeds what’s legally necessary for the EU to ban glyphosate, but Echa has looked the other way.”

Industry groups heartily welcomed the assessment. “Science prevailed,” said Graeme Taylor, of the European Crop Protection Agency. “Glyphosate is not carcinogenic. We expect the European commission to move swiftly with the registration process for the substance in the EU and grant a 15-year approval.”

Just hours before today’s ruling was announced, unsealed documents in a long-running US federal suit by non-Hodgkins lymphoma sufferers raised new questions about Monsanto’s relations with Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulators.

These suggested that the US agriculture giant was given a heads up by Jess Rowland, an EPA deputy division director, about an International Agency for Research on Cancer report linking glyphosate to cancer, allowing it to mount a pre-publication PR offensive. Rowland also allegedly told a Monsanto executive that he would try to prevent a separate government probe of glyphosate, saying: “If I can kill this, I should get a medal.”

In a statement in the New York Times, Monsanto said: “Glyphosate is not a carcinogen.” Monsanto also rebutted criticisms concerning the academic research it underwrites.

Other documents revealed in the US suit include an extraordinary letter from Marion Copley, an award-winning EPA scientist, who said it was “essentially certain” that glyphosate caused cancer.

Copley, who was herself dying of cancer, made several conflicts of interests allegations.

“I have cancer and I don’t want these serious issues in HED [health effects division] to go unaddressed before I go to my grave,” she wrote in her valedictory letter. “I have done my duty.”

Almost half a million people have signed a petition, started in February, calling for a European ban on glyphosate, regulatory reform and mandatory targets for reducing pesticides use.

If the number of signatories reaches a million, the European commission will have to consider a legislative proposal under its citizen initiative rules.

No cancer risk to using glyphosate weedkiller, says EU watchdog

How to Remove Mucus, Bacteria, and Toxins From Your Lungs Using Himalayan Pink Salt

How to Remove Mucus, Bacteria, and Toxins From Your Lungs Using Himalayan Pink Salt

Fight 9 Types Of Cancer Using Cannabis

Fight 9 Types Of Cancer Using Cannabis

5 Amazing Benefits of Using an Inversion Table

Did you ever suffer from back pain? Did you ever consider using an inversion table?

Inversion table were designed for relieving back pain using the force of gravity. Inversion tables allow individuals to hang upside down in an inverted angle where the feet are lower than the heart. Hanging in such a position helps decompress the spine and thus reduce back pains. Inversion tables are hugely beneficial and are recommended for people who are suffering from back pain. The inversion table helps the heart recover from the rigors of daily activities and improves the blood circulation.

Lets discuss the main benefits of inversion tables:

1. Better alternative to surgery

Back pain surgery is the traditional treatment prescribed to patients suffering from back pains. However, this kind of surgery is usually painful and takes a long time for a patient to recover fully. Additionally, surgery is not a permanent solution to back pains. The inversion table is the best alternative to invasive back surgery. People prone to back pains can live for extended year’s pain free by using inversion table therapy on a regular basis. There exists a substantial body of medical research that shows that the use of inversion table therapy is a better alternative to invasive back surgery. Also, inversion table therapy is not as painful as surgery and takes a shorter time to eliminate back pains. In this regard, one of the main benefits of inversion tables is that they remove the need for painful and time consuming back surgery.

2. Improves the health of the lymph system

Waste in the lymphatic system travels in a one way direction. This can contribute to the accumulation of toxins in the lymph systems. According to the physicians and arthritis relief experts, hanging upside down on an inversion table helps the lymph system flush out some of these toxins. Hanging in this position helps flush out lactic acid and other waste. The accumulation of waste in the lymphatic system causes pain. Therefore, the use of an inversion table improves an individual’s lymphatic system and flush out dangerous toxins.

3. Improves a person’s mood

Depression and stress are common psychological conditions affecting millions of people worldwide. The use of inversion table has been proven to improve people’s moods. Hanging in an inverted position improved blood circulation, which in turn leads to the release of neurotransmitters. The release of neurotransmitter balances out hormones that determine a person’s mood. Inversion tables help deal with depression, mood swings as well as premenstrual symptoms. This is another significant benefit of regular use of inversion table therapy.

4. Improves blood circulation

Hanging in an inverted position on an inverted table helps increase blood flow to the brain. This helps improve circulation of nutrients and oxygen to the brain cells. The increased flow of blood and nutrients to the brain helps improve the efficiency of the brain. According to experts, the use of inversion table helps improve the brain’s efficiency by up to 14%. The result of this is increased concentration, clear thinking, and memory observation. Additionally, an inverted table helps circulate stagnated blood due to the fact that an individual is an inverted pose against gravity. Thus, using an inversion table helps improve a person’s mental health and boost blood circulation in the body.

5. Relieves Herniated pain

The body’s vertebrae are separated by soft discs. The latter discs function as shock absorbers. Moreover, these discs allow nerves to flow from the spinal cord to the spinal cord without being pinched. These discs get pulled down due to gravitational forces. The center of the vertebrae has jelly like part which bulges out between the vertebrae and causes pressure against the spinal cord. It is for this reason that herniated discs are also referred to as raptured disc. The rapturing of the discs causes pinched nerves, which causes mild to excruciating pain. To relieve the pain, inversion table therapy significantly decompresses the pressure created by the herniated disc. The decompression of pressure on the vertebrae moves the disc back in place and relieves the pain. The decompressions also improve circulation in the disc, allowing the removal of waste in the discs and improve the flow of oxygen in the discs. Though there is little research on the impacts of inversion table on herniated discs, many physicians assert that inversion table can be used to relieve the pain caused by the rapturing of herniated discs.

5 Amazing Benefits of Using an Inversion Table

Using Animals For Emotional Support

All of us need time on our own away from the world and other people to recharge our minds and wind down. There are also those which spend the majority of time alone due to emotional or psychological disability’s which prevent them from interacting properly with other people, this prevents them from going outside as they have no reason to and they tend to become very lonely, this is why emotional support animals are available!

What these people have found is animals can provide enough interaction and friendship to support their day-to-day lives, especially those with social anxiety and other emotional disabilities.

What Is An Emotional Support Animal

In my view there are two kinds of emotional support animals, there are those that you can purchase from a pet shop or a reputable store, then there are those that are actually trained to deal with certain emotions a human shows. This mean that just by the very presence, it mitigates the emotional and psychological symptoms associated with the owners condition or disorder, these animals soothe their owners upsets.

They are their friend and companion, they also help cope with a lot of stress and emotional upset, this means it is less difficult to cope with day-to-day issues. These animals do not have to undergo the high training that guard dogs or blind dogs need because dogs especially, have the ability to read human emotions, therefore they do not require large amounts of training.

Let’s See What Is Possible….

Some psychiatric disorders can be so severe that it interferes with a person to live a normal life and basic ability to function and survive on their own, with a little more training it is possible for certain dogs to…

• Finding – These animals are trained to find a special place or a certain person, for example, they are trained to navigate around crowded areas and locate the exits – such as if the handler is having an anxiety or panic attack.


• Searching – If the person has anxiety about entering certain establishments such as local shops, businesses or certain rooms in their home, the dog will enter and search all of the rooms and spaces – if the dog finds someone they will bark to warn the owner.


• Interruption –  An obsessive-compulsive owner can be helped by the dog, since the dog can detect when the owner is doing something that is repetitive, this means the dog will act on this and redirect the owner to help them onto more productive tasks, like brushing the dog.


• Help – When their owners are having a serious panic attack, the dog will be trained to direct help to the owner via a signal that the owner must give – this brings help to the owner.

There are so many options when going for an emotional support animal and they really do help people – they help many to get out of their homes and walk with their dogs. Thousands of people from all over the world are reaching out for this type of support.

Additional Support

Animal Support For Anxiety – Anxiety.org, A real good article I found on-line about animals for Anxiety support.

Emotional Support Animal Letter – OnlineDogtor.com, For those with landlords that do not allow pets.

Emotional Support Animal – Wikipedia, for more reading about Emotional Support Animals.

Using Animals For Emotional Support

China may still be using executed prisoners" organs, official admits

An official in charge of overhauling China’s organ transplant programme has said the country may still be using organs from executed prisoners in some cases, even though there is technically zero tolerance for the practice.

The admission by Huang Jiefu, a former Chinese deputy health minister, came as human rights activists and medical ethics experts voiced strong objections to his inclusion at a Vatican summit designed to tackle illicit organ trafficking.

The activists said that by giving Huang a platform, the Vatican risked giving China’s practices an air of legitimacy. Huang told reporters on Tuesday that the controversy was “ridiculous” and repeated assertions that the use of organs from prisoners is now “not allowed”.

“There is zero tolerance. However, China is a big country with a 1.3 billion population so I am sure, definitely, there is some violation of the law,” he told reporters at a conference in Rome.

Pope Francis has called illicit organ trafficking a form of modern slavery. At the start of the conference on Tuesday participants painted a bleak picture of the scale of the problem, with patients who are desperate for life-saving procedures flocking to countries like Egypt, India, and Mexico to buy organs cheaply.

Huang, who has long been a controversial figure in the world of transplantation, said trafficking could be stemmed through the creation of a global task force headed by the World Health Organisation.

But experts have questioned Huang’s assessment of the situation, saying China probably still systematically uses the organs of executed prisoners in order to meet an overwhelming demand.

Last year, China’s alleged use of prisoners’ organs was debated at an international conference after two doctors said it was premature to declare China an ethical partner in the international transplant community.

Nicholas Bequelin, the east Asia director for Amnesty International, said it was known at the time that the vast majority of organ transplants in China came from executed prisoners.

The number of prisoners China executes annually is a state secret, but Bequelin said estimates ranged from 3,000 to 7,000. He said experts had cast doubt on Huang’s claims that China had outlawed the practice. “They haven’t stopped the practice and won’t stop. They have a need for organ transplants that far outpace the availability of organs,” Bequelin said.

Details of the process are grim. Bequelin said China did not adhere to World Health Organization recommendations on how doctors should determine whether a person is legally dead. In some cases, organs have been removed before the prisoner would be considered medically dead by international standards.

“The timing of the execution is – we think – sometimes dependent on the need of a particular transplant surgery. You will execute this person at this time on this day, because that is when the patient has to be ready,” Bequelin said. “It is very secret and there is not a lot of reliable information.”

The Vatican has released new bioethics rules that say organ transplantation must involve the free consent of living donors or their representatives and that in ascertaining the death of a donor, it must be diagnosed with certainty, especially when a child is involved.

China may still be using executed prisoners" organs, official admits

9 Unique Ways to Clean Your Teeth and Gums without Using Toothpaste

Taking care of our bodies is an important daily routine. From washing our hair to eating properly, it’s necessary to take care of ourselves. Dental hygiene is also a vital step. However, sometimes the tools we use can be harmful. The chemicals in toothpaste, like fluoride and titanium, can have damaging effects like causing acne or even cancer. There are a host of healthier, natural options for cleaning your teeth. Here are nine unique ways to clean your teeth and gums without toothpaste.

1. Coconut Oil

Coconut oil is a great addition to any beauty or health regimen. It’s an excellent hair and skin moisturizer, and can be used as a natural cleaner for your teeth. Coconut oil has antibacterial and antifungal properties which makes it great for preventing oral conditions like gingivitis or cavities. It can also be combined with baking soda or used for oil pulling.

2. Dry Brushing

This will definitely feel a little strange at first. But dry brushing is a great option if you can’t be bothered to search through all the natural options. Be mindful of using a toothbrush with soft bristles in order to avoid any scratches or damage to your teeth and gums.

3. Baking Soda

This is easily one of the most popular alternatives to traditional toothpaste. You can either use it without adding anything; just coat your brush in it, then brush as normal. Another option is to dissolve the baking soda and then brush with the solution. This is also a great method for cleaning your Invisalign aligners or dentures. Just let them soak in the solution. If the idea of brushing with baking soda is too far-fetched for your taste, you can use it instead to make your own mouthwash.

4. Oil Pulling

This is a fairly recent trend that is a great way to maintain your oral health without any expensive additions. You can use a variety of oils but coconut oil is the most popular. Swish the oil around your mouth for about a minute and a half before brushing with plain water or another healthy alternative like baking soda.

5. Strawberries and Tomatoes

Using fruit as a natural substitute is an effective solution in various aspects of life, generally for diets. But they can also be beneficial for your oral health, as well. Both strawberries and tomatoes have high levels of Vitamin C. The Vitamin C will stimulate your body’s natural healing. Apply the fruit pulp directly to your teeth and let it sit for roughly 5 minutes to soften the plaque that’s built up from daily eating. Afterwards, rinse with a mix of warm water and baking soda.

6. Aloe Vera

Aloe Vera is a great natural ingredient that is used for a variety of ailments. People generally think of hydrogen peroxide as a cleaner for wounds or cuts. That’s why it’s great for dental maintenance. While also helping to maintain your oral health, it will help keep your teeth white, as well. Dip your toothbrush in the hydrogen peroxide before brushing. You can combine this with other natural remedies, too.

7. Green Tea

This one works as both an external and internal remedy. You’ll want to drink one or two glasses of green tea extract per day. Studies have shown that doing so will help reduce the rate of periodontal disease and protect your oral health in the long-term.

8. Clove Oil  

This is a great option if you have problems with bleeding gums or any other form of periodontal disease. You’ll find clove oil in many of the treatments for gum so using it alone makes for an even stronger solution. The best and easiest way to use this is to gently rub it into your gums. While initially, there is a slight burning situation it will disappear with continued use.

9. Sea Salt

Sea salt is not just a benefit to your diet. It’s also a great addition to your oral routine. Because the granules are large, they do a great job of rubbing away debris. If you’re worried that the grains might do damage, you can dissolve the salt into warm water before brushing.

Sources:

9 Unique Ways to Clean Your Teeth and Gums without Using Toothpaste

Kill Infections Using This 7 Ingredient Master Tonic

Kill Infections Using This 7 Ingredient Master Tonic

Home Office refuses to enforce privacy code on NHS staff using video

The government has rejected a request by the surveillance camera watchdog to allow it to monitor the increasing and unregulated use of body-worn video cameras in hospitals.

The cameras, which record sound as well as images, are being increasingly deployed in hospitals in an effort to tackle abuse of frontline health service staff.

On Wednesday, it emerged that surveillance camera commissioner Tony Porter had warned ministers last year that the privacy of millions of NHS patients was put at risk by the unchecked use of the cameras.

In a call backed by privacy campaigners, Porter recommended adding NHS trusts to a list of public bodies required to comply with a code of practice on the use of surveillance in effort to promote greater transparency and accountability.

Now the Home Office, the department to which Porter reports, has rejected the requests.

A letter to Porter sent last week from the home office minister, Brandon Lewis, and released by the government on Wednesday, said the recommendation was unnecessary as: “We had not exhausted the possibilities of increasing voluntary compliance.”

In letter in November, also released on Wednesday, Porter warned that the voluntary approach had twice been rejected by NHS Protect, the body responsible for hospital security, “on the ground that they could not enforce compliance”.

Porter’s letter added: “Despite our best attempts, voluntary adoption has not worked … and it will difficult without government intervention.”

Under the code, which is overseen by Porter as the surveillance camera commissioner, public bodies such as the police must demonstrate a “pressing need” for the use of surveillance cameras, and warn the public of their use and how images will be stored and used. Porter, a former senior counter-terrorism officer, has been working with the police to ensure how public privacy can be protected as forces roll out body-worn video for frontline officers. He wants to do the same in the NHS.

In his November letter, Porter warned Lewis that he was becoming increasingly concerned about the use of surveillance in the NHS.

He said: “The NHS trusts are complex organisations that use surveillance camera systems in public areas where people under surveillance are likely to be vulnerable and distressed, and where the privacy requirements and burden on those conducting transparent, legitimate and proportionate surveillance is surely at its highest.”

It pointed out that millions of people use hospitals each year, and added: “The introduction of body-worn video cameras at several hospitals has increased my concerns. Body-worn video cameras are a particularly intrusive device as they capture audio and video simultaneously without the option of switching either off whilst recording.”

Porter said the government’s decision to allow surveillance to go unchecked in the NHS raised a series of questions about the privacy of patients.

In a statement to the Guardian, he said: “Surveillance cameras play an important role in maintaining public and staff safety, preventing and resolving crimes. Yet in the healthcare sector they are not subject to scrutiny and standards, and therefore can we be reassured that they are fit for purpose and are doing what they are meant to be doing?

“Are we sure that security officers using body-worn video are doing so without invading an individual’s right to privacy when they may be at their most vulnerable? NHS Protect have twice rejected recommending that trusts adopt the surveillance camera code of practice as it’s not mandatory for them – the code is designed to ensure cameras are used effectively, transparently and efficiently to protect individuals’ freedoms.

“In the absence of any mandate to adopt the code, I’m continuing to work with government to look at how we can encourage NHS trusts and hospitals to voluntarily adopt the surveillance camera code of practice.”

Daniel Nesbitt, research director at Big Brother Watch, urged ministers to heed Porter’s warning.

He said: “The government shouldn’t be standing in the way of effective oversight. The NHS controls a large number of CCTV cameras and the public have to be able to trust they will use them properly.

“Giving the surveillance camera commissioner the power to oversee how trusts use their cameras should be a no-brainer.”

Home Office refuses to enforce privacy code on NHS staff using video

Botox use is on the rise – but are some using it to freeze their feelings? | Anouchka Grose

Dannii Minogue has admitted to using Botox at difficult times in her life in a subconscious attempt to mask her feelings. Not only might she literally have been disabling her capacity to frown, she may also have been acting things out on her body in order to fend off her own emotions.

It’s about time someone said it. As a working therapist I have occasionally noticed my female patients’ faces change quite noticeably from week to week, but no one has ever spoken to me about what was making this happen. Cosmetic treatments, and the difficult thoughts and feelings that might make someone undergo them, are apparently one of the hardest things to talk about.

On the one hand perhaps these treatments are so normalised that they do not seem worth discussing in therapy – a new study in the US shows that young women using Botox has risen by 41% since 2011 – but on the other you probably wouldn’t spend hundreds of pounds on something that carried serious health risks if you weren’t feeling pretty worried about your appearance. Doing stuff to your face is like the sunny side of self-harm; you might try it in order to short-circuit anxiety or sadness, but the end result is supposedly regeneration rather than damage. Still, nothing signals underlying unhappiness and self-loathing more than a pumped-up, frozen physiognomy. In that sense, it’s a socially acceptable form of wound.

It’s hardly surprising that people, especially women, are prone to feeling insecure about their looks. But Botox is perhaps a special kind of beauty treatment in that it inhibits the visible expression of emotion. It helps people hide the way they feel. That this should come as a bit of a surprise is interesting in itself – this has never been its explicit selling point. The idea has been more that youth is good and age is bad. By starting Botox in your 20s you can supposedly pre-empt the signs of passing time. But what is facial ageing if not physical proof that you have smiled, frowned and been surprised? In other words, that you have let the outside world in on some of your feelings.

In Jane Austen’s great philosophical masterpiece Sense and Sensibility, we see two sisters attempting a serious experiment in living. Marianne expresses emotion freely while Elinor buttons it up. Which of them will fare best in life and love? Austen’s ultra-humane answer is that both ways have their ups and downs. And anyhow, while you think you’ve made your choice about which is better, you may find yourself doing the other.

Women in particular have had to rely on their beauty and personal charm in order to secure economic stability

More than 200 years later we’re still struggling over the same question. From the misery memoir to Instabrag via Geordie Shore, we’re trying to work out what will make us more lovable: free expression or self-control. Loosely speaking, some therapies work more towards the former, some towards the latter. As Austen wisely noted, there’s no clear answer as to which is best, although extremes in either direction do seem to cause trouble.

For humans, ensuring lovability is closely linked with survival. Babies very quickly learn how to endear themselves to their carers, and this habit continues into most people’s adult lives. If it doesn’t, modern psychiatry would even be inclined to brand you with a personality disorder. To generalise, becoming lovable seems to involve not crying and fussing too much, and learning to put your feelings aside for the sake of other people while still being affected enough by the world to experience empathy. You need to be able to control the release and expression of emotion, but not to the point of cold-bloodedness.

Historically, women in particular have had to rely on their beauty and personal charm in order to secure economic stability. Keeping your face nice and your character sweet in order to hang on to your TV job is perhaps the contemporary equivalent of donning a corset and holding your tongue in the hope of keeping your husband. The problem is that everybody is pretty much aware of the painful tragicomedy of all this, and Botoxed women are a very visible enactment of it. It seems to be absolutely socially acceptable to blast an older woman for having a too-smooth face. Far more so than for having a baggy one. By trying so hard to hang on to our charms, we risk revealing how much we fear losing them. In hiding our feelings we give them away.

Although cynics might see Minogue’s admissions as yet another ruse by a celebrity who wants to reel us in, it’s probably time we started to speak more freely, and above all kindly, about facial injections and the different forms of pain they attempt to address.

Botox use is on the rise – but are some using it to freeze their feelings? | Anouchka Grose

Increase Red Blood Cells and Blood Count Using This Homemade Syrup

Increase Red Blood Cells and Blood Count Using This Homemade Syrup

How to Lose Weight Fast Using a Treadmill

The treadmill is one of the best tool developed so far by the mankind. A lot of people in this world has a habit to go out for jogging either in the morning or in the evening to keep themselves fit all the time. Even the doctors refer their patients to go out regularly for a walk. It is said that if you can jog or run for an hour or so everyday, you will never face an sort of health disorders in your life.

It also helps to lose weight and keep the body well toned. While the majority of people tends to go out everyday for jogging, not many people are able to take some time out of their busy schedule to do so. Owing to this fact, the treadmills were brought into the markets. This product enables everyone and anyone to walk or jog at their home. Ever since this product is available for common people, a lot of them have experienced positive changes in their life.

Buying a Treadmill

So, if you think that your daily work is not letting you jog or even walk, then it is probably the best time for you to get a treadmill for yourself. All you need to do is find yourself a best treadmill out of all, and you can practice all that you want at your home. However, while buying a treadmill, you will need to consider lots of things.

Since it is the only device which can help you to lose weight fast and in an easy way hence you will need to get the high quality product for yourself. There are several numbers of cheap brands which are easily available in the markets. You should try and avoid such brands. If you can consult a physician, he or she might have proper treadmill buying guide for you. Or else you can simply search for it online.

Loosing Weight with the help of treadmill

Buying a treadmill is the first and foremost task which you will need to do. Once you get yourself a proper high-quality product then you can start with your aim of loosing weight. Here are some steps which you can follow to achieve such dreams of yours:

• Simply start with walking. Most people jump start with running at high speed as soon as they bring a treadmill home. You will need to control your emotions and let muscle and body parts get habituated to the machine.


• Then there are the flat treadmill and inclined treadmill workout which you can practice, which are considered good for losing weight. Once get to know about the functionality of the machine, you can try out these forms.


• You can also jog on a treadmill if you set the speed to 1 mile per hour or 2 miles per hour. It is up to you, what exercise you are interested in. No matter what, you will need to practice for at 20 to 30 minutes to see effective results.

If you can maintain a regular practice on the tread, you are liable to experience a weight loss within first few weeks. All you need is a good quality treadmill and specific set of workouts to practice.

How to Lose Weight Fast Using a Treadmill

Express yourself: how a charity is using dance to improve mental health

Ten young people from Manchester mental health charity 42nd Street are struggling to spin their legs round their bodies while keeping their hands anchored to the studio floor as they’ve been shown. Instructor Kevin Turner stops them and explodes into his own demonstration of high-speed repetitions of the sequence, while they watch in astonishment.

“Look, my legs are all over the place,” Turner pants mid dance. “They are going like crazy. When I was ill, I often felt that things were happening that were out of my control. Can anyone else relate to that?”

Turner, 34, sits down, perspiring, among the group of young people aged 16 to 25. Several hands go up hesitantly, and a young woman quietly says, “I can”.

Turner founded Manchester-based Company Chameleon in 2007 with his friend Anthony Missen. Their was aim to make hard-hitting contemporary dance exploring the reality of being male in greater Manchester. Turner has bipolar disorder, as does at least one of the youngsters in this workshop, and he has told them his diagnosis.

Kevin Turner’s workshops help young people to use dance to explore their mental health problems.

Three years ago, Turner was sectioned and spent more than a month in hospital and almost a year working his way back to the physical and mental health he needs to perform.

He wants the young people he’s teaching today to see that they can use dance to explore their own mental health problems, and the impact on the people around them. Most of them have never danced before, but 42nd Street is convinced that dance can help build trust and confidence, without the need for words.

Turner’s latest work, Witness, performed by Company Chameleon’s five dancers, portrays his own experiences of his breakdown and the perspective of his friends and family. It is premiering at Plymouth University on 19 October, and touring until the end of November. Each performance will be supplemented by a workshop with schools, colleges and youth groups.

Sitting in his baggy trousers and T-shirt, this “lad” from Stretford, is clearly in control of himself and is a powerful image of hope for the young people he teaches. His demonstration was not some kind of ego trip, but to help them tap into the shared emotions of breakdown and give them the confidence to use their bodies to tell their own stories. They start by using exercises, sections from Witness and their own moves.

Turner and mental health charity 42nd Street believe dance can build trust and confidence.

“Where dance is different from simply doing exercise – which of course makes you feel good because of the endorphins – is that it helps you to use the physical to experience your internal world,” says Turner.

He believes his own mental health problems started when he was a teenager, but he did not recognise depression and tried to ignore it until it was no longer possible.

Dancing helped him handle the pain of his parents’ divorce from the age of eight, when he became a member of the Trafford Youth Dance Theatre. He argues that young people need to be aware of how creative movement can support good mental health.

There is nothing fluffy about this. Dance work like this should be recognised as a pre-crisis intervention

Simone Spray

Recent figures suggest that last year, nearly a quarter of a million children and young people were in contact with mental health services for issues such as anxiety, depression and eating disorders. But research also shows that 28% of children referred for support in England – including some who had attempted suicide – received no help in 2015.

The number of referrals to 42nd Street is high. The charity, which has been running for almost four decades, is commissioned by the NHS to provide mental health support, including counselling, to young people across Manchester. However, advisers are having to tell suicidal young people they will have to wait more than four months for one-to-one support.

“It’s not something we are happy about,” says chief executive Simone Spray. She also worries about the short length of therapy, when it does happen, leaving young people without support before they are properly well. The charity’s solution is to invest heavily in the arts – including the new Horsfall Centre for performance, opening in December – to give young people what Spray calls “wrap-around support”.

Spray says: “There is nothing fluffy about this. Dance work like this should be recognised as a pre-crisis intervention, because it has such a positive impact on some young people.” In her view, it can prevent them needing to access therapy at all, or at least keep them feeling better until more formal help is available.

The young people in Turner’s workshop seem relaxed and focused. Kelly (not her real name) has bipolar disorder and was initially afraid she would not be able to do the exercises, but now she is beaming and keen to continue. “This has really drawn me in. At first I thought OMG! But now I’d like to do it again. People see bipolar as a joke, but Kevin has shared what happened to him and it’s helped us express the way we feel.”

• In the UK, the Samaritans can be contacted on 116 123. In the US, the National Suicide Prevention Hotline is 1-800-273-8255. In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is on 13 11 14. Hotlines in other countries can be found here.

Join the Social Care Network to read more pieces like this. Follow us on Twitter (@GdnSocialCare) and like us on Facebook to keep up with the latest social care news and views.

Express yourself: how a charity is using dance to improve mental health

Should I stop using antibacterial handwash and gels?

Need some soap? What could be better than antibacterial handwash that kills 99.9% of bacteria? Well, ordinary soap, says the FDA in America, which is banning the sale of certain soaps (bars, gels and liquids) containing antibacterial ingredients. It ruled last week that antibacterial soaps containing any of 19 named ingredients will be banned by 2017. The chemicals most under scrutiny are triclosan (in liquids) and triclocarban (in bars). Triclosan is linked to allergies in children and upsets the hormone levels of rats – reducing those of thyroid hormone and increasing oestrogen. Triclocarban is linked to raised male hormone levels and low birth weights in rats.

Dr Rolf Halden, director of the Center for Environmental Security at the Biodesign Institute in Arizona, estimates about 2000 products in the US contain triclosan. Although some manufacturers, knowing about the FDA’s ongoing investigation, have removed it, and triclocarban, from their products before the ban.

Halden says it’s hard to know which products contain the soon-to-be-banned chemicals. These antibacterial agents are called different names – I couldn’t find triclosan or triclocarban in common antibacterial soaps in the UK, and had no response from manufacturers as to their use of any of the other substances banned by the FDA.

However, the FDA is not stopping at soaps. A little bottle of antibacterial gel has become a handbag must-have – to kill nasty germs in the office, playground or on public transport. If you don’t have time to wash your hands, or are nowhere near a sink, a squirt of some pink hand sanitiser while running out the door, or in the great outdoors, has become a common alternative. But the FDA has asked sanitiser manufacturers to provide evidence that the benefits of their products outweigh any risks. They are focusing on the relative benefits or risks of ethanol, isopropyl alcohol and benzalkonium chloride not already on the banned substance list – which are common ingredients in sanitisers (in the UK as well as America).

Antibacterial agents can also promote antibiotic resistance – it’s not desirable to lay waste to all bacteria.

So should you bin the sweet smelling gels and antibacterial soaps?

The solution

Bin them. The Centers for Disease and Prevention in America says that washing your hands with soap and water is the best way to reduce germs.

There’s a whole science to washing hands – lathering with soap on the back, front, between your fingers and under your nails. You need to scrub them for the time it takes to sing one round of Happy Birthday. Then you rinse and dry. The temperature of the water does not seem to make a difference to getting rid of germs – although warmer water may be more irritating to hands. Honestly, not many of us do this properly.

If you don’t have soap or water to hand, then hand sanitisers are better than nothing. But their alcohol content must be more than 60% to kill germs effectively.

What’s more, sanitisers don’t even work well on dirty hands – they can’t penetrate grime because you need the friction provided by soap. Soap and water are also better than sanitisers at removing germs such as clostridium difficile (which causes a serious bowel infection). What’s more, Halden says, sanitisers can dry out hands, creating cracks that germs jump into. “In the absence of benefit,” he says, “why take the risk?”

Should I stop using antibacterial handwash and gels?

A digital detox sounds great. But using the internet mindfully is better | Emily Reynolds

Last week, in a largely futile attempt to actually do some work, I installed a browser extension that blocked pretty much any website I could possibly distract myself with. Twitter: gone. Facebook: gone. Even my emails, which I obsessively tend to in order to feel moderately productive, were off limits for an hour.

Having found new and imaginative ways to waste my own time, what surprised me most was not how much more work I did, but the sheer frequency with which I attempted to access the internet. I’d incessantly tap “twitter.com” into the address bar, somehow immediately forgetting it was blocked. I’d click on my still-open Facebook tab to check my feed before remembering there was no point. Every time I finished a sentence I’d flit away from my work again, trying to exchange 10 seconds of productivity for 10 minutes of distraction. I knew I spent a lot of time online – but not this much.

Related: Five ways to curb your internet use and get your life back | Rhiannon Lucy Cosslett

It turns out I’m not the only one who has what could probably be regarded as a mild internet addiction. A new study from Ofcom has found that on average, UK adults spend 25 hours a week online – a pretty sharp increase from the nine hours we spent on the internet back in 2005. Since then, the lines between “real life” and “online” have become increasingly blurred, and IRL (in real life) has started to sound as much of an outdated relic as ASL?, AFK or ROFLMAO.

This ubiquity is getting to us. According to the study, 59% of people feel they’re “hooked” to their devices. 48% said they neglected housework because they spent too much time online; 47% missed out on sleep. Around 30% said their friendships and relationships had suffered because of their internet use. This has led to an increase in what Ofcom have termed “digital detoxes”, with 15 million people seeking “a period of time offline” in order to break their habit.

This isn’t just a social issue: internet addiction can have an impact on our brains and mental health as well as our relationships and our sleep patterns. Some studies have suggested that the same neurobiological processes present in gambling and drug addiction may also be linked to internet addiction; pilot studies have been run to identify the role of dopamine in internet addiction; and in 2009 a study claimed that internet addiction is associated with “structural and functional changes in brain regions involving emotional processing, executive attention, decision making and cognitive control”. The American writer Nicholas Carr has even said that the internet impacts our creative capacities.

I know from my own experience how overuse of the internet affects mental health. When I’m having a major episode of depression I spend hours online, scrolling blankly through articles and newsfeeds and timelines as a way of distracting myself, using Twitter as a shield to avoid face-to-face interaction. Everything I need is online. I can order food rather than leaving the house, I can talk to strangers instead of seeing friends to fulfil my severely diminished social drive. It may seem like the perfect solution, but can often serve to isolate one even further.

Related: Turning off technology is about mental wellbeing – not being a hermit

It is a problem of which the mental health charity Mind is aware. Triggering websites or damaging online relationships can exacerbate or perpetuate existing problems. The charity, like Ofcom, also recommend that users take a break from the internet when it has “stopped being a positive thing” or is fostering unhealthy feelings, thoughts or behaviours.

If you take all this at face value, logging off seems like a good idea. Scaremongering would be easy, the nebulous spectre of ill-health being used as a tool to undermine those who spend a lot of time online (namely young people). But the internet is also an extremely powerful tool for good, especially for the mind. Though I can often get sucked in, it can also act as a lifeline in times of severe distress, providing comfort, distraction and sometimes even emergency support.

The problem is that the internet is so omnipresent that we forget or even preclude ourselves from experiencing these positive elements. Like many young people, my online life is tightly intertwined with my offline one: I met most of my friends online, I use Twitter to promote my work, I consume almost all of my media, including books, via a smartphone or tablet. It’s so normal that I barely register the fact that there’s a difference between the two.

In some cases, though, there is. Texting someone when I’m feeling depressed just doesn’t have the same impact as a real-life conversation, and shutting myself inside a wall entirely made of snarky tweets actively prevents me from seeking genuine help.

It might sound boring, but in the end, it’s a matter of balance. It’s not a matter of giving up Facebook for weeks at a time or ignoring rafts of emails. Rather, being mindful of the way we use the internet, and the negative impact that it can have on us, may provide a better solution than switching off completely.

A digital detox sounds great. But using the internet mindfully is better | Emily Reynolds

Using Splenda Linked to Type 2 Diabetes, IBS, and Cancer

More and more Americans are dieting each year, resulting in a steady increase in revenue for the diet industry.  As of 2012, Americans spent 65 billion dollars attempting to lose weight.  One of the largest markets were diet soda, with Americans spending 21.15 billion dollars. (1)

American’s spent 21.15 billion dollars on diet soda in 2012

Many people understand that high sugar intake is directly connected to weight gain and other health concerns.  Many people turn to diet soda and artificial sweeteners believing that these items will benefit their health and weight loss goals.  However, the research shows that artificial sweeteners will not help you lose weight and can increase your chance to developing diabetes, cancer, and irritable bowel disease. (2,3)

Artificial sweetened beverages linked to increase risk of developing Type 2 Diabetes

A 2013 study showed that both sugar-sweetened beverages and artificial sweetened beverages were linked to an increase risk of developing Type 2 Diabetes.  Another study examined the long-term relationship between 3,682 individuals and artificial sweetener.  The study showed that those who drink artificially sweetened beverages had a 47% higher increase in BMI than those who did not. (2)

Ground-breaking research found that artificial sweetener, Splenda, may cause diabetes, irritable bowel syndrome and increase your risk of cancer.  Many people in the diabetes community were told by Splenda that it would not affect their blood sugar or metabolism.  The ingredients that make up splenda is chlorine, dextrose, and maltodextrin (a GMO corn derivative).  Splenda is made by replacing hydrogen atoms with chlorine atoms.  As a result, it is possible to get chlorine poisoning and cellular toxicity related to continual use of this product. (3)

Regular use of Splenda can result in chlorine poisoning and cellular toxicity leading to Type 2 Diabetes, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, and Cancer

A study published in the Diabetes Care journal found that daily consumption of diet soda is associated with 36 percent increased risk of metabolic syndrome and 67 percent greater risk of type 2 diabetes.  It was also found that artificial sweeteners or sucralose destroys the probiotics within the body and can result in digestive disorders such as IBS or leaky gut. (3)

A study completed by Xin Qin Md, PhD from New Jersey Medical School found that utilizing Splenda causes IBS, ulcerative colitis, and Crohn’s disease.  Dr. Qin made this discovery while studying the rapid increase of IBS among residents of Alberta, Canada.  It was discovered that over a 20 year time period, the rate of IBS increased by 643 percent!  It was found that sucralose is more determinate on gut bacteria than other artificial sweeteners.  It was also discovered that the body is unable to digest sucralose, having it pass through the body unaltered leaving behind damages in the intestinal walls that can result in leaky gut. (3)

Studies from Duke University confirmed this research finding that Splenda not only reduces the beneficial bacteria in the gut but also increases the bodies fecal pH.  Not only does Splenda result in digestive distress it is also linked to increase risk of cancer due to its ingredient profile. (3)

The Merk Manual and OSHA Hazardous Waste Handbook reports that chlorine is a carcinogenic meaning that regular consumption, inhalation or absorption through the skin can result in cancer.  If you are exposed to a small amount of chlorine occasionally, the body is able to eliminate the chlorine through the bowels, kidney’s and liver, but consuming it daily could increase your cancer risk. (3)

Another study published in Toxicology and Environmental Health found that with Splenda is brought to high temperatures it generates chloropropanols, which is a toxin linked to cancer.  Cooking with Splenda will increase the risk of harm to the body. (3)

If your seeking an alternative sweetener, consider natural forms of stevia.  Stevia has shown in studies to reduce feelings of hunger and calorie intake.  Researchers have also found that stevia reduces post-meal glucose levels and helps to normalize blood sugar and reduce your risk for diabetes. (3)

Sources included:

(1)  http://www.fitnessforweightloss.com/diet-and-weight-loss-statistics/

(2) https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/healthy-drinks/artificial-sweeteners/

(3) https://draxe.com/splenda-linked-diabetes-ibs-cancer/

Using Splenda Linked to Type 2 Diabetes, IBS, and Cancer

Observe: paralysed man moves his hand using considered

An Ohio, US resident who was paralysed in a swimming accident has made history as the very first ever patient to move his injured hand making use of his personal ideas.

Ian Burkhart managed to pick up a spoon and open and near his initial right after doctors at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, with researchers from Battelle, inserted a Neurobridge technology microchip into his brain.

The medical breakthrough provides hope to hundreds of thousands of accident victims and stroke sufferers of a new bionic era of motion by means of believed.

Source: Storyful / Ohio State University Wexner Healthcare Center

Observe: paralysed man moves his hand using considered

"I would like to see a greater target on using investigation to increase patient care"

Sharmila Nebhrajani would like to discover the proper stability amongst encouraging growth in study and guaranteeing it is risk-free and legal.

Describe your position in a single sentence:
Overseeing the perform of the Human Tissue Authority (HTA), the watchdog that can make positive human tissue and organs are utilized securely, ethically and, most importantly, with consent.

Why did you want to work in healthcare?
I didn’t consciously get that selection. I studied medicine at university, which gave me a robust interest, but I never ever practised. I spent most of my job in company and I kept my science hand in, sitting on the board of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority and operating as chief executive of the Association of Medical Research Charities. But science was an itch I didn’t fairly scratch – so it really is a genuine delight to have been appointed chair of the HTA.

How do you want to see the sector alter in the following 5 years?
I would like to see a higher target on using study to enhance patient care. The United kingdom has 1 of the most impressive research pedigrees in the world – we have far more Nobel prizes than any country other than the US – but the challenge remains translating that into treatment options for sufferers that are progressive, efficient and reasonably priced. We regulators have our position to play in helping that take place – obtaining the right stability in between encouraging that advancement and guaranteeing it is protected and legal.

My proudest achievement at work was … currently being part of the crew at the BBC that constructed and delivered the iPlayer. We were blessed in realizing we have been constructing one thing genuinely groundbreaking from the begin.

The most difficult issue I’ve dealt with at operate is … chairing the committee that accepted the first study licence to create a human/animal hybrid embryo. It was radical science, raised enormous ethical concerns and had a substantial “yuk” factor. The discussions have been lengthy and challenging fought on all sides.

I feel the biggest challenge facing the NHS is … how we will finance healthcare in the future. The Uk wants to put together itself for a conversation about what funding options exist. Obtaining a way to make certain the very best achievable companies are obtainable here in the Uk at the most economically cost-effective costs will challenge us all.

The people I operate with are … new to me. I have not too long ago began at the HTA, but what is struck me is our people’s expertise and passion for what they do and why it matters. The privilege of operating in the health sector is that our work is the two intriguing and important.

I do what I do since … I am relentlessly curious.

Sometimes folks consider that I … talk also much.

Appropriate now I want to … quit speaking.

At perform I am usually studying that … there is usually a lot more to find out, no matter how senior you get and most of it is going to be fascinating.

The 1 thing always on my mind at function is … could I have completed that greater? I am a perfectionist and that helps make me tough on myself. My largest struggle is discovering the sweet spot amongst creating anything the really best it can be, and settling.

If I could go back 10 many years and meet my former self I would say … there are fewer poor decisions in life than you feel. There are a number of right answers, a handful of wrong ones and most issues, if they are meticulously deemed, are really worth a punt.

If I could meet my future self I’d expect to be … in possession of a pilot’s licence. I have often wanted to find out to fly – I have had a handful of lessons but time stays a barrier.

What is the very best element of your occupation?
Working for an organisation in which the decisions we get matter and lead to improvements in the well being sector.

What is the worst element of your task?
Being super active – operating from a single location to another and constantly fretting that I am striving to pack also significantly in.

What can make you smile?
My children. Normally.

What keeps you awake at night?
Nothing – I sleep the rest of the contentedly exhausted.

If you would like to characteristic in our Five minutes with… series, or know somebody who would, allow us know by emailing healthcare@theguardian.com

Are you a member of our on-line neighborhood? Join the Guardian healthcare network to get standard emails and unique gives.

"I would like to see a greater target on using investigation to increase patient care"

Charge individuals "£10 a month for using NHS", examine suggests

The research, which is co–authored by the former Labour health minister Lord Warner, named for radical adjustments to how the NHS is funded.

Under the proposals, published by the centre-Proper believe tank Reform, every single resident would acquire “NHS membership” at a month-to-month charge of £10.

These getting free prescriptions would be exempt from the fees, the report extra. It argued that NHS funding from general taxation ought to only rise with inflation to steer clear of starving the rest of the public sector of sources.

Individuals need to also contribute “co-payments for the hotel expenses of some inpatient hospital care”. The report mentioned: “By the end of the subsequent Parliament, it is possible to envisage these changes in entitlements yielding more than £6billion a year.”

Lord Warner explained: “We can no longer pay out homage to an out–of–date and unaffordable NHS which is unfit for today’s and tomorrow’s care needs.”

A Department of Overall health spokesman mentioned: “The founding concepts of the NHS make it universally totally free at point of use and we are clear that it will carry on to be so.”

Practically half of politicians think the NHS could no longer remain free of charge at the level of require if the issues it faces are not tackled, a poll has located.

Wellness leaders have previously warned that the NHS will only survive if there are radical adjustments in the delivery of wellness care.

The poll of one hundred MPs, performed by the NHS Confederation, found 48 per cent agreed that a cost-free NHS would be unsustainable if some of its troubles are not tackled.

Charge individuals "£10 a month for using NHS", examine suggests