moves etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
moves etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

28 Ekim 2016 Cuma

Disharmony in British yoga community over moves to regulate teachers

Last year, while attempting an advanced yoga move, Chris Flack ruptured a muscle in his back and slipped a disc in his neck. He had set himself a challenge – to achieve the scorpion pose, an advanced position that involves balancing on your hands or forearms, then arching your back and legs over until your toes touch your head, scorpion-like.


“I wasn’t listening to my body. It was a good lesson to me, to slow down. I had come out of some inversions [headstands and handstands] quite badly a few times, and came crashing down on to my neck. It was just irresponsible practice.”


For six months, Flack was in and out of hospital with pain management appointments, and taking morphine. The eventual cure happened shortly before he was due to have a guided cortisone injection, and was less orthodox. After staying off alcohol for months because of the injury, he got a little tipsy at a wedding, and was on the dancefloor at 2am when an elderly woman – “a drunk auntie,” he says with a laugh – jumped on his back and all but fixed him.


He still has to manage the injury, which involves daily physiotherapy and a fortnightly deep tissue massage. As for his yoga practice: “I don’t practice inversions any more. Here in the west we want to push ourselves. It’s a competitive culture where we want to win, to achieve, to be the gold medal winner of the yoga Olympics. I think for me yoga’s a lot more about letting go and being comfortable with just being. It’s quite hard to get that balance. I think it’s dangerous if you’re not really aware.” As a yoga instructor, he says, “I teach very carefully, I don’t want to push people, but the odd thing was I was pushing myself.”


Which goes to show even conscientious yoga teachers can get it wrong when it comes to their own practice. But it’s the ones who encourage their students to go too far who are currently under scrutiny. Now the British Wheel of Yoga has begun a year-long consultation with a view to regulating yoga teachers and introducing National Occupational Standards. Is there really a problem with bad, even dangerous, teachers? “We think so,” says Paul Fox, the organisation’s chair, which won’t be a surprise to anyone who has ever taken a dodgy yoga class (in my first class in a south London leisure centre, the teacher encouraged me to do a headstand).


In a now infamous (among the yoga community) excerpt from science journalist William J Broad’s book The Science of Yoga: the risks and rewards, he highlighted how yoga had been linked to knee, back and shoulder injuries and even strokes. Others have reported repetitive strain injury, torn ligaments, and damaged wrists and hips caused by yoga.


But there isn’t really any evidence to suggest yoga is more dangerous than any other physical activity.


Fox concedes most of the evidence is anecdotal, but says good teaching will minimise any risks. “If you’re going to take members of the public through a set of yoga poses, you do have a duty of care towards them. You do have to do a risk assessment, and know how to modify postures and how to deal with people who have lower back pain, arthritis, high blood pressure or any number of common ailments. Many good yoga teacher training courses will cover that.”


In gyms and leisure centres, yoga teachers have to join the Register of Exercise Professionals (REPs), in the same way spin and aerobics instructors do, but privately anyone can set themselves up as a yoga teacher. And the problem with REPs, say many within the yoga community, including Yoga Alliance, which represents and accredits instructors, is that its standards are so low. The new proposal is to improve standards, but it has been criticised as needless bureaucracy and financially beneficial for the bodies involved, the BWY among them. Yoga Alliance describes it as “a cosy little arrangement”.


Is it a money-making scheme? “I think it’s the opposite,” says Fox. The BWY trains teachers, which takes a minimum of 18 months; some courses take three years. “Because it’s unregulated, a lot of people run [sub-standard] teacher training courses and charge pretty much what we charge. They’re the ones making a lot of money out of it.” But people within the yoga community are not happy. At the recent first meeting, says Fox, the mood was “rather un-yogic”.


The problem is that it’s not entirely clear what yoga is. For a start, there are a variety of disciplines. Then there are some who believe it’s a spiritual or religious practice (and probably one that should not be taught by western instructors to white people in designer gymwear) and as such shouldn’t be regulated. Or that it’s a creative art and can’t be controlled.


“The other school of thought,” says Sarah Shone, a chartered physiotherapist who is also a yoga teacher, “is that yoga is more of a physical practice and physical practices do run the risk of having a negative effect on the body. There is a risk of injury with any physical activity that any of us undertake.”


In yoga, she says, the most common injuries are often to do with overstretching and that can apply to any joint of the body. “People who are put into poor alignment can overstretch ligaments and tendons and can flare up problems that are already there. Yoga is a very safe form of physical activity for the vast majority of people, and as long as they are sensible and take responsibility for their own practice and always make sure the yoga instructor is aware of any pains and injuries so they can take that into consideration.” She is undecided on whether it needs more regulation.


“Anybody can call themselves a yoga teacher because there isn’t a central governing body. But then is there a governing body for every other form of exercise? And there isn’t.”



Disharmony in British yoga community over moves to regulate teachers

25 Haziran 2014 Çarşamba

Observe: paralysed man moves his hand using considered


An Ohio, US resident who was paralysed in a swimming accident has made history as the very first ever patient to move his injured hand making use of his personal ideas.




Ian Burkhart managed to pick up a spoon and open and near his initial right after doctors at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, with researchers from Battelle, inserted a Neurobridge technology microchip into his brain.




The medical breakthrough provides hope to hundreds of thousands of accident victims and stroke sufferers of a new bionic era of motion by means of believed.




Source: Storyful / Ohio State University Wexner Healthcare Center




Observe: paralysed man moves his hand using considered

29 Ocak 2014 Çarşamba

Ban on smoking in vehicles in front of youngsters moves closer following Lords vote

Man smokes in car

The prime minister would like to ‘listen to the arguments’ on banning smoking in cars with youngsters, No ten said. Photograph: Phil Noble/Reuters




A ban on smoking in vehicles in front of youngsters has moved a phase closer right after the Home of Lords voted to bring in new laws and Downing Street explained the prime minister was ready to “listen to the arguments”.


The thought will now be debated by MPs, who will be given a totally free vote on the situation – providing it a actual possibility of making it into legislation. It comes following Labour proposed an amendment to the youngsters and households bill that would give ministers a electrical power to carry in laws that would make it an offence for a driver to “fail to stop smoking in the motor vehicle when a kid or children are present”.


Sources said the prime minister was open-minded about the concern, as peers defeated the government by a slim margin of 25. It is the 89th time Labour and crossbench peers have inflicted a defeat on the coalition.


Asked what the prime minister thought of smoking in automobiles with young children, his spokesman mentioned: “This is an concern that is going to be discussed and debated in parliament right now, and the prime minister’s view is that he would like to listen to the arguments.”


In the morning, the Division of Health said it did not consider legislation was the most efficient way of stopping grownups smoking in front of children in autos. This was reiterated in the Lords by Earl Howe, a health minister, who said it would be complex to police and the government preferred “behaviour adjust”.


“Smoking in autos and in the property is most likely to be a consequence of a lack of understanding about the dangers of 2nd-hand smoke,” he mentioned, adding that the government was “spreading awareness”.


However, he also explained the government had not ruled out legislation and would take into account a overview of the evidence if the publicity campaign failed to have an impact. In closing remarks, Howe said: “We all want to eradicate smoking in automobiles carrying youngsters.”


The baffled position echoes Cameron’s selection to back plain packaging for cigarettes, ahead of dropping the policy, and then saying it would be adopted if there was proof it would be successful.


Andy Burnham, the shadow overall health secretary, said Britain need to comply with the instance set by Australia, Canada and some US states. Underneath Labour’s programs, it would be an offence to expose kids to tobacco smoke in cars and a breach would carry a £60 fine.


“When it comes to improving the well being of kids, we are duty bound to think about any measure that might make a variation,” he advised Sky News.


“Adults are totally free to make their own options but that usually does not apply to kids and which is why society has an obligation to defend them from preventable harm.


“Evidence from other nations displays that stopping smoking in the confined area of a vehicle carrying kids can avoid damage to their wellness and has strong public help.”


Smoking in workplaces and enclosed public spaces has been banned considering that 2007.


Nonetheless, Simon Clark, director of the smokers’ rights group Forest, told BBC Radio Four’s These days programme that the ban would be a slippery slope in the direction of a ban on all smoking in automobiles.


“I consider this legislation is extremely heavy-handed, entirely needless and, according to surveys, 84% of grownups wouldn’t dream of lighting a cigarette in a auto, in a modest enclosed area, with a little one current,” he explained.


“So grownups currently know how to behave. They will not need the state interfering in their lives like this. If there are nevertheless some folks who smoke in a vehicle with youngsters, then let us educate them, but let’s not legislate.”




Ban on smoking in vehicles in front of youngsters moves closer following Lords vote