figures etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
figures etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

11 Mayıs 2017 Perşembe

NHS patients waiting months for vital bowel cancer tests, figures show

Patients with one of the most lethal forms of cancer are having to wait months to have vital diagnostic tests, in a new sign of the relentless pressure on NHS services.


People suspected of having bowel cancer are facing waits of three months for tests when they should have them within a maximum of six weeks, the latest NHS waiting time figures show.


In March almost half the patients referred for the disease to Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust had to wait more than the six weeks set out in the NHS constitution. In all 144 (49.3%) of the 292 patients that month had to ensure waits of several months, and 39 of them were kept waiting for more than 13 weeks.


Campigners warned that patients could die as a result of the delays in patients undergoing either a colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy, the two tests used to detect bowel cancer.


Prof Colin Rees, vice-president of the British Society of Gastroenterology, said: “By testing the right people at the right time we can save lives and stop people dying needlessly.”


In March 24% of hospital trusts in England missed the six-week target for colonoscopy, which meant that 1,121 patients were kept waiting. In the same month, 18% of hospitals breached the six-week target for flexi-sigmoidoscopy.


Deborah Alsina, chief executive of Bowel Cancer UK, said the waiting times “present a worrying picture for patients”. She identified a lack of diagnotic staff as a key problem and lamented the latest of several delays in Health Education England publishing a plan, first promised in 2015, to boost the NHS cancer workforce.


About 41,000 people a year in the UK develop bowel cancer and around 16,000 die from it. It is Britain’s fourth most deadly cancer after lung, breast and prostate.


Meanwhile, NHS performance against its key waiting times targets is now the highest it has been for five years, NHS Englnd’s latest statistics show.


During 2015-16, 2.5 million people were not treated within four hours of arriving in A&E, and a total of 362,687 patients did not receive planned care in hospital – usually an operation – within 18 weeks.


Another 26,113 waited longer than 62 days for supposedly urgent cancer treatment after being referred by their GP, while 985,583 people with a life-threatening condition waited more than the maximum eight minutes for an ambulance to respond to an 999 call.


“These figures reveal the dismal human cost of the NHS crisis,” said Norman Lamb, the Liberal Democrat health spokesman. “Millions of patients are waiting in distress and anxiety, but Theresa may doesn’t care.”


Responding to the latest monthly statistics, a Conservative spokesman said: “These figures show A&E performance has improved a great deal since the equivalent time last year. Waiting times for an operation again got shorter in March, and crucially patient outcomes continue to improve. Breast cancer survival is at its highest ever level.”


The figures came as the Health Foundation warned that the care patients receive is under threat because of the NHS’s unprecedented financial squeeze.


In a report, the thinktank says: “It is difficult to see how the intense financial pressures on all NHS and social care services will not threaten the quality of care in the near future if nothing changes.


“As OECD analyses have shown, the UK’s performance on quality is middling when compared with other OECD countries, but then so are our funding levels.”



NHS patients waiting months for vital bowel cancer tests, figures show

8 Şubat 2017 Çarşamba

Bed-blocking three times worse than NHS figures show – study

The number of patients trapped in hospital despite being fit to leave is three times higher than official data shows, according to a study.


Nuffield Trust, a health thinktank said far more hospital beds were taken up by patients classed as “delayed transfers of care” than NHS England’s counting system detected.


NHS bosses said the findings bore out their own experience and the official figures hugely underestimated how many people had to stay in hospital because of problems elsewhere.


Nigel Edwards, Nuffield Trust’s chief executive, who undertook the research, said: “Our audits show that up to two-thirds of the patients stuck unnecessarily in hospital beds aren’t actually being counted in the official figures.


“That means that a typical 650-bed hospital may actually have only around 250 beds available for all its emergency patients, once you’ve taken out all the people who could go home if they had more support, and discounted maternity, paediatric and cancer beds.”


Delayed transfers – which some call bed-blocking – are running at their highest ever level, with 193,680 bed days lost because of it in November, according to the most recent official NHS figures.


Edwards cited his thinktank’s own research about bed occupancy trends at three small and medium-sized hospitals NHS hospitals and a separate study of 7,500 bed days in a large number of bigger hospitals.


In one small rural hospital, only 40 (24%) of the 277 patients examined were counted as delayed transfers of care (DToCs). However, 80 others (30%) were also fit to leave, and another 35 (13%) were not medically fit to be discharged but could have been safely looked after in a nursing home if places in them had been available.


Separate research by the Oak Group, a firm that reviews inpatient stays, found the same picture in the bigger hospitals it analysed. “These audits confirmed that significant numbers of patients could be cared for elsewhere; for typically 50%-60% of the acute bed days examined,” Edwards said.


He said 19% could have gone home without receiving any support afterwards, 28% needed nursing or social care support in order to get out of hospital, and 12% needed long-term supported live-in nursing or residential care.


“This failure to record the true situation is significantly increasing the pressure hospitals are facing. Speeding up the discharge of patients who would be better cared for elsewhere needs to be the top priority for the NHS and social services departments,” Edwards added.


Chris Hopson, the chief executive of NHS Employers, which represents NHS trusts, said: “Our hospital members tell us that because the official definition of delayed transfers is so specific, the actual number of patients medically fit to discharge, or who could be cared for in other settings, is much greater than the definition implies. So in that sense the problem of blocked hospital capacity is significantly greater than the DToC figures by themselves suggest.”


Separately, Whitehall’s spending watchdog has concluded that a £5.3bn reserve designed to relieve strain on overcrowded hospitals by integrating health and social care is failing to save money or stem the rise in admissions.


The Better Care Fund has not achieved the main targets set for it when it was established two years ago by the health secretary Jeremy Hunt, according to a report by the National Audit Office.


Health officials hoped to use the fund to reduce emergency admissions by 106,000, but the report discloses that admissions instead rose by 87,000. The fund was supposed to be used to make savings of £511m, but instead spent an additional £311m, the report says.


Officials had aimed to reduce the days lost when patients are ready to leave but cannot do so by 293,000, but instead that figure rose by 185,000, costing £146m more than planned, it adds.


Norman Lamb, the Liberal Democrats’ health spokesman, who helped draw up plans for the fund when a coalition minister, said the report showed the NHS was hurtling towards a “catastrophe” without a bigger financial injection.


“This does not undermine the case for joining up health and social care and ending the irrational divide which too often lets patients down. But it is a clear warning that with demand rising so rapidly, more funding is needed,” he said. “It would be unforgivable for the government not to act in light of these warnings.”


Meg Hillier, the chair of the public accounts committee, which scrutinises public spending for parliament, said the “deep flaws” in the fund were first highlighted two years ago but the warnings had not been heeded by ministers.


Under the Better Care Fund, councils receive money, mainly from the NHS budget, in return for introducing schemes to reduce demand for hospital care.


Auditors found that the Department of Health and NHS England were both over-optimistic about what the fund could achieve.


The NAO did notice some benefits from the fund, such as 90% of local areas agreeing or strongly agreeing that delivery of their plan had improved co-operation between different bodies.


A Department of Health spokesperson said: “The Better Care Fund is just one element of this government’s programme to integrate health and social care for the first time – and as the report recognises, it has already incentivised local areas to work together better. We will build on this for the future in making care even more joined up.”


An NHS England spokesperson said the NAO report was a “statement of the obvious” because the NHS never believed or claimed that cutting hospital budgets to fund social care would by itself save money.


“The obvious lesson for next phase of care integration is that joining up local NHS and council services may be worthwhile, but is not by itself a silver bullet solution to wider pressures on health and social care,” she said.



Bed-blocking three times worse than NHS figures show – study

19 Ocak 2017 Perşembe

Nurse shifts left unfilled at nearly every hospital in England, figures show

Almost every hospital in England has fewer nurses on duty than each believes are needed to guarantee safe patient care, research shows.


Analysis of official data by the Health Service Journal (HSJ) found that 96% of NHS hospital trusts in England had fewer nurses covering day shifts in October than they had planned and 85% did not have the desired number working at night.


The disclosure of such widespread failure to ensure hospitals are properly staffed has prompted fresh concern that a chronic lack of nurses and the NHS’s dire finances are putting patient safety at risk.


Nurse shortages have led to patients having to wait for medication, going unwashed or not having observations done on time, the HSJ said.


Janet Davies, the chief executive of the Royal College of Nursing, said: “This is yet more evidence that there are too few nurses caring for patients, putting people at serious risk. Safe staffing levels aren’t an optional extra. Having the right number of nurses is essential to ensure that patients can recover properly.”


The college estimates there are as many as 24,000 vacancies for nurses across the UK.


Nurses told the HSJ that understaffing meant hospitals were already providing substandard care, leading to patient safety “near misses”.


The figures are the worst hospitals have recorded since they were obliged to start publishing details of staffing levels in 2013, in the wake of a report on the Mid Staffordshire care scandal.


The number of trusts that do not have planned numbers of staff at work has gone up despite the recruitment of record numbers of nurses by acute hospitals. Limits introduced in 2015 on the amount hospitals can pay to hire agency nurses may help explain why staffing levels are dropping in many places.


One nurse said: “Sometimes observations get missed and I can recall many times where the patient is found to be deteriorating when they are eventually done. This gives you immense stress as you are left with the realisation you did not pick up on your patient’s condition early enough to prevent an acute episode.”


Another said: “I have seen patients not have proper care, dressings not changed, [and] not given the choice of shower or a wash as it takes more time that we do not have.”


HSJ reached its conclusions by examining data on nurse staffing levels that trusts release through the NHS Choices website. These include the numbers present in general medical wards, maternity units, surgical wards and intensive care units at 214 acute hospitals.


In hospitals in England, a nurse is meant to look after no more than eight medical patients, and the ratio can be as low as one to one in neonatal and intensive care units.


The figures show that Dewsbury and district hospital in West Yorkshire had 75% of the number of nurses it had planned to have on duty last October, down from the 87% it managed in the first three months of 2015.


Princess Alexandra hospital in Harlow, Essex, which went into special measures that month, covered 77% of shifts, as did Pontefract general infirmary in West Yorkshire.


The HSJ found that some trusts were employing unusually high numbers of healthcare assistants. That may suggest they are replacing nurses with cheaper personnel who have little clinical training.


Prof Peter Griffiths, of Southampton University, a member of NHS Improvement’s safe staffing committee for acute wards, said: “This is clearly not a good place for the NHS to be and it isn’t getting any better.” He said healthcare assistants could help plug gaps but relying on them to deputise for nurses in the long term risked compromising patient safety and involved “the risk of a false reassurance”.


The shadow health secretary, Jonathan Ashworth, said: “Tired, overworked nurses cannot be expected to continue providing the quality of care which patients need. The government needs to do much more to make sure nursing remains an attractive profession and to ensure hospitals can get in place the number of nurses they need to keep patients safe.”


A Department of Health spokesman said: “We expect all parts of the NHS to make sure they have the right staff in the right place at the right time to provide safe care. That’s why there are already almost 26,000 extra clinical staff, including almost 11,400 additional doctors and over 11,200 additional nurses on our wards since May 2010.”



Nurse shifts left unfilled at nearly every hospital in England, figures show

10 Ocak 2017 Salı

More than 2m people wait over four hours in A&E, figures show

More than 2 million people had to wait more than four hours at A&E units last year, a sharp rise on the previous year, official NHS figures have shown.


The latest annual data from NHS Digital shows that more people than ever before were treated at an accident and emergency unit in England last year – the first time the figure has risen above 20m – which suggests shortstaffed units are under increased pressure.


In 2015-16, 20,457,805 people attended either an emergency department at an acute hospital or an urgent care centre or walk-in centre. That was about 900,000, or 4.6%, more than the previous year.


The NHS experienced a surge in demand last winter, similar to the one this year that has prompted widespread claims from medical groups that the service is in crisis.


While A&E attendances between April and December 2015 rose by just 2.2% to 15.2m, compared with the same period a year earlier, they shot up by 12.2% between January and March 2016 to 5.2m, again compared with the same quarter in 2015.


A&E attendances

More patients are waiting longer before they leave A&E. In 2015-16 a total of 2,090,200 people were not dealt with for at least four hours and one minute, well up on the 1,638,058 seen the year before. Last year, 5.2 million people waited between three and four hours for care, up from the 2.4 million who did so in 2007-08, and the 4.9 million who did so in 2014-15.


NHS waiting times

The figures, which underline the relentless and ongoing increase in demand for A&E care, come a day after the health secretary sparked a huge political row by vowing to water down the NHS’s commitment to treat and then admit, transfer or discharge 95% of patients within four hours of their arrival.


Jeremy Hunt told MPs: “This government is committed to maintaining and delivering that vital four-hour commitment to patients. But since it was announced in 2000 there are nearly 9m more visits to our A&Es, up to 30% of whom NHS England estimate do not need to be there. And the tide is continuing to rise.


“So, if we are to protect our four-hour standard, we need to be clear it is a promise to sort out all urgent health problems within four hours, but not all health problems, however minor.”


Labour and the Liberal Democrats said Hunt was letting down patients by saying that the four-hour pledge – which has existed since 2004 though initially with a target of 98% – should not apply to the 30% of people who attend A&E with a minor ailment.


Theresa May’s spokeswoman insisted on Tuesday that Hunt had made no change to the four-hour pledge when he addressed MPs.


“The point that the health secretary was making in the house yesterday is a point that the government has made before, which is about making sure that A&E is there for people for what it says on the tin – accident and emergency. It’s not about non-urgent care,” she said when asked if Hunt had weakened the target.


There was, the spokeswoman said, “more to be done to make sure that the public understand” when they should go to A&E departments. Hunt had briefed the cabinet on Tuesday about the pressures facing A&E, she added.


“The target is a target for accident and emergency,” she said. “I understand what accident and emergency should be about. If I have a cold, I’m not going to go to accident and emergency and expect to be treated for a cold within four hours.”


Asked whether the four-hour target originally featured this distinction, she said: “There’s a commitment that accident and emergency is for emergency care.”


NHS organisations say inadequate GP and social care services outside of hospitals, including sometimes long waits to see a family doctor, are prompting more and more people to use A&E.


Growing numbers of patients who arrive at hospital through A&E are having to be admitted as a medical emergency, with 4.1m such cases last year. But that remains about one in five of all attendees, and not a growing proportion, despite the growing numbers of older people and the often complex medical conditions they present with.


Four million (19.8%) other patients were discharged to be followed up by their GP, and 2.6m (12.7%) were referred to a specialist clinic or outpatients department, NHS Digital’s data shows.


NHS England also produces data on A&E activity. While it covers every type-one unit, urgent care centre and walk-in centre in England, NHS Digital’s figures are based on just 87% of such places, though they do include every hospital emergency department.


“This report confirms what we have been saying, that hospitals are coming under increasing pressure but in the main are continuing to cope,” said a spokesman for NHS England.


“In fact, these figures show that last year the median time to assessment was 11 minutes and, on average, patients left A&E just two hours and 40 minutes after arriving. This shows the fantastic job staff are doing in ensuring patients get the urgent care they need.”


NHS England repeated its plea to the 30% of people believed to be turning up at A&E unnecessarily to seek care elsewhere, such as with a GP, pharmacist or NHS111.



More than 2m people wait over four hours in A&E, figures show

31 Aralık 2016 Cumartesi

Serious mistakes in NHS patient care are on the rise, figures reveal

Serious mistakes by hospital staff that put patients at risk are on the rise, despite the government’s drive since the Mid Staffs scandal to make care safer, official NHS figures reveal.


The last few years have seen more cases of delayed diagnosis, staff failure to act on patients’ test results, poor care of seriously ill patients and blunders during surgery.


The figures, obtained by former health minister Norman Lamb from NHS England, have sparked concern that the unprecedented strain on hospitals – created by rising demand for care, shortages of doctors and nurses, and the need to save money – is making staff more likely to make errors.


The number of cases in which NHS England recorded that a patient whose health was deteriorating received what it calls sub-optimal care more than doubled, from 260 in 2013-14 to 588 in 2015-16. Similarly, the number of diagnostic incidents – either a delayed diagnosis or an NHS worker not acting on test results – rose from 654 to 923.


“Jeremy Hunt [the health secretary] has talked a lot about wanting to make the NHS the safest healthcare system in the world,” said Lamb. “But is that ambition realistic? These figures show worrying rises in the number of incidents which have a damaging and potentially fatal effect on patients.


“My worry is that the NHS is under such impossible pressure, with clinicians too often working under intense strain, that increases the risk of serious harm being caused to patients, which can have incalculable consequences for them and their families.


“These figures confirm the stark and distressing reality that thousands of people are being failed in their hour of need because the NHS is under such intolerable pressure, with overstretched hospital staff unable to give patients the care and treatment they deserve,” he added.


The figures that he obtained, using the Freedom of Information Act, also show that the number of surgical incidents more than doubled from 285 in 2013-14 to 740 in 2015-16. There were 202 surgical errors and 83 cases of wrong-site surgery – in which surgeons operated on the wrong part of a patient’s body – during 2013-14. They rose to 248 and 114 respectively a year later.



Norman Lamb


Norman Lamb: ‘These figures confirm the stark and distressing reality that thousands of people are being failed in their hour of need.’ Photograph: Ben Birchall/PA

But after changing the way it collates data in May 2015 regarding incidents in which patient safety is endangered, NHS England says that 30 surgical errors and 19 wrong-site surgeries occurred in 2015-16, as did another 691 cases of a “surgical/invasive procedure incident”.


The disclosures come amid growing fears among NHS bodies, health trade unions and thinktanks that the service in England will experience its first full-blown winter crisis since 2011-12 and that both the quality and safety of care are in danger of deteriorating in coming weeks and months.


Worsening gaps in medical rotas, big year-on-year rises in the number of patients attending and being admitted, and the growing complexity of patients’ illnesses are also key factors.


Hunt has launched an array of initiatives to improve the safety of NHS care since Robert Francis QC’s seminal report in 2013 into the scandal of poor care at Stafford Hospital between 2005 and 2009, which led to patients dying.


“We have long warned that underfunding and staff shortages within the NHS will impact on patient safety. It appears that our worst fears are now being confirmed,” said Eddie Saville, general secretary of the Hospital Consultants and Specialists Association, which represents several thousand hospital doctors.


“Hospital doctors and fellow medical staff are increasingly hampered by the spending constraints placed on frontline services. It is time that the government listened to those voices warning that it has got funding wrong. It shouldn’t be a case of waiting for a major incident to hit the headlines before acknowledging this fact and changing tack.”


The figures also paint a mixed picture of patient safety in NHS maternity services. There were fewer maternity-service serious incidents (82), mothers’ unplanned admissions to intensive care (134) and unexpected neonatal deaths of a newborn (122) in 2014-15, compared with 2013-14. However, 535 newborn babies had to be admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit in 2014-15, up from 380 the year before. The number of maternal deaths also rose over the same period from 54 to 62.


The Department of Health denied the figures were proof that patient safety was slipping. “To suggest this indicates a decline in standards is a simple misreading of the information,” a spokesman insisted. The rises in these types of serious breaches of safety were due to better recording of such occurrences, he said.


“This data is precisely what we would expect given the government’s focus on building the safest and most transparent healthcare system in the world. The NHS is becoming ‎far better at recording and learning from the open reporting of a wider range of incidents,” he said.



Serious mistakes in NHS patient care are on the rise, figures reveal

11 Aralık 2016 Pazar

Shock figures show Tory plans are ‘making social care worse’

The full extent of the crisis facing social care is revealed by an Observer investigation which demonstrates the government’s flagship policy to keep elderly people out of hospital is failing in most parts of the country.


The findings – amid claims from senior NHS figures that “we are going backwards in many places” – come as ministers face calls to provide an urgent injection of extra cash to local councils to avoid services buckling under increasing financial pressure.


The Tory chair of the Commons select committee on health, Sarah Wollaston, said ministers should act immediately to prevent more suffering for elderly people, their families and other patients.


She also demanded all-party talks on the future of the NHS and social care. “We are at a tipping point,” she said. “We are seeing indications of the great stresses in the system and these need addressing now.”


The Observer’s investigation reveals that the landmark government scheme designed to relieve the strain on overcrowded hospitals – the Better Care Fund – is failing to deliver its aims of keeping older people healthy at home and so cutting “bedblocking”, despite £4bn a year being poured into it.


Theresa May and the health secretary, Jeremy Hunt, have repeatedly claimed that the fund, and a separate policy of allowing councils to raise more money for social care by increasing council tax, are jointly addressing the spiralling problems in social care.


Responses to freedom of information requests submitted to 151 local councils reveal that in England 58% of targets for improving care in people’s homes and local communities were missed.


In another blow to ministers, new figures from the King’s Fund thinktank show English councils will raise just a fraction of the sums required to plug gaps in their budgets by increasing council tax bills.


Better care at home is universally accepted as the way to keep people out of hospital and free pressure on beds. With so many elderly people and others having no alternative but hospital, services suffer a chain reaction of lengthening waiting lists and cancelled operations for other patients.


May and Corbyn clash over NHS and social care funding at PMQs

Data from 98 of the 151 local authorities in England with statutory responsibility for social care show that they met only 218 (42%) of 515 targets to improve social care in their area and missed the other 297 (58%).


Under the Better Care Fund councils receive money, mainly from the NHS budget, in return for introducing schemes to reduce demand for hospital care. This is done, for example, by providing better care for people in their own home or in care homes. But the FoI responses reveal that councils met barely a quarter of their targets in 2015-16 for reducing non-elective (emergency) admissions to hospital.


One senior NHS boss, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the disclosures raised the possibility that the fund was turning out to be “a waste of money”.


Chris Hopson, chief executive of NHS Providers, which represents hospitals, said efforts to improve out-of-hospital care were “going backwards in many places”. He added: “These findings show that the Better Care Fund – a key government scheme to increase out-of-hospital care – is not delivering as intended.


The findings are echoed in the fact that more than 50% of NHS trusts told us in a survey conducted last week that reductions in care facilities beyond hospitals have made it more difficult for the NHS to meet the demand it faces.


“Just at the point when the NHS desperately needs more out of hospital care, we seem to be going backwards in many places. That can’t be right,” Hopson said.


Stephen Dalton, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, said: “These figures are very worrying as we head into what could be a very tough winter for the NHS. We only need a significant dip in the weather, which has been mild so far, and people would become more vulnerable and we would see a big spike in demand. We have a perfect storm going on at the moment of unprecedented demand for care, the fact that we have reached a tipping point in terms of the demographics, and cuts to local councils that are among the biggest in their history.”


Oxfordshire council performed worse than in 2014-15 against all six targets, while Bracknell Forest, Wolverhampton and North Yorkshire each did worse against five of the targets.


The new data from the King’s Fund shows councils across England will raise £382m a year as a result of their ability to increase council tax to pay for social care in 2016-17, a fraction of the funding gap they face this year.


The social care “precept” allows councils to charge up to an extra 2% on council tax bills from this year in order to fund social care services. But King’s Fund analysis shows it will raise less than 3% of what councils will spend on social care, which does not even cover the extra £612m cost they face as a result of the “national living wage”.


The King’s Fund figures also show the social care precept will widen inequalities in access to care services, contributing further to fears of a developing two-tier system.


The 10 most affluent areas will raise more than two and a half times (£41m) the amount of the 10 areas with the greatest level of pensioner need (£17m). Tower Hamlets, the council with the highest level of pensioner need as measured by pensioner income deprivation, will raise just £7 per head of its adult population, compared with the £13 per head that will be raised by Wokingham, with the lowest level of pensioner need in England.


This week ministers are rumoured to be preparing to increase further the amount that councils can raise to pay for social care. But the Tory chairman of the Local Government Association’s community wellbeing board, Izzi Seccombe, said this would not be an adequate response, as she warned that the country was facing the “worst ever funding crisis” in social care.


“Extra council tax-raising powers will not bring in enough money to alleviate the pressure on social care and councils will not receive the vast majority of new funding in the Better Care Fund at the end of the decade,” she said. “Even with this extra money, we have estimated the funding gap amounts to at least £2.6bn. This includes £1.3bn needed right now to stabilise the provider market and a further £1.3bn by 2019-20.”


A Department of Health spokesperson said: “We are giving local areas access to up to £3.5bn extra for social care by 2020. While many areas are already providing high quality services within existing budgets, the Better Care Fund, which brings together health and social care provision locally for the first time ever, will get additional funding in the next few months to raise standards further. This government is committed to ensuring those in old age throughout the country can get affordable and dignified care.


Chancellor wrong on social care funding, says former health secretary

Shock figures show Tory plans are ‘making social care worse’

23 Ekim 2016 Pazar

NHS figures show "shocking" rise in self-harm among young

The number of children and young people self-harming has risen dramatically in the past 10 years, new NHS figures obtained by the Guardian show.


The sharp upward trend in under-18s being admitted to hospital after poisoning, cutting or hanging themselves is more pronounced among girls, though there have been major rises among boys, too.


Experts say the rise is “shocking” confirmation that more young people are experiencing serious psychological distress because they are under unprecedented social pressures.


The number of girls under 18 who have needed hospital treatment after poisoning themselves has gone up from 9,741 in 2005-06 to 13,853 – a rise of 42% – figures collated by NHS Digital show. The numbers of boys ingesting a poisonous substance have stayed almost unchanged; 2,234 did so in 2005-06 and 2,246 did so in 2014-15.


Poisonings among girls were 42% higher in 2014-15 than 10 years previously

However, the number of girls treated as inpatients after cutting themselves has almost quadrupled over the same period, from 600 to 2,311 – a 385% rise. The number whom A&E teams have treated after hanging themselves has also risen during that decade, from 29 to 125.


While far fewer boys end up in hospital after cutting themselves, the numbers went up from 160 in 2005-06 to 457 in 2014-15 – a rise of 286%. Similarly, the numbers of boys who hanged themselves also doubled from 47 to 95 over the same period, the figures show.


“This is a depressing confirmation of the clinical experience of child and adolescent psychiatrists’ experience on the ground,” said Dr Peter Hindley, chair of the Faculty of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry at the Royal College of Psychiatrists.


“It is also shocking because it appears to confirm our clinical experience that levels of distress are rising, though not all young people who self-harm have mental health problems, and [that] mental health disorders are rising, for both girls and boys,” he said.


Experts said the rises were likely to be due to a variety of factors, including pressure to succeed at school, the damaging effects of social media, family breakup, growing inequality in recent years, children’s body-image fears, a history of abuse, including sexual abuse, and increasing sexualisation.


The NHS’s most senior doctor responsible for young people’s health said the “distressing” figures underlined that greater improvements were needed to boost support for troubled children.


“It’s clearly distressing that more young people are causing harm to themselves and we know that the problems facing children are growing,” said Dr Jackie Cornish, NHS England’s national clinical director for children, young people and transition to adulthood.


“In common with most experts, we believe this is due to increasing stress and social pressure on young people, including to succeed at school, and emerging problems with body image leading to eating disorders and self-harm.


Poisoning accounts for 88% of all self-harm admissions among under-18s

She added: “We recognise that vital care for children and young people’s mental health is an area where more work needs to be done.”


Jeremy Hunt, the health secretary, severely criticised NHS care of troubled young people last week. Child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) were the “biggest single area of weakness in NHS provision” and beset by “big problems”, including failure to intervene early enough when problems such as eating disorders emerged, which meant that “too many tragedies” were occurring, he said.


Hindley added: “The rise is likely to be as a result of many factors but the most important ones are likely to be: growing inequality in the age of austerity, the negative impact of the digital age, increasing sexualisation – this is particularly important for girls – and the impact of abuse and sexual exploitation, and increased pressure to succeed.”


Sarah Brennan, the chief executive of Young Minds, said that troubled young people were harming themselves partly because help for them is so inadequate that some do not receive specialist support once it is obvious they have psychological problems. “It’s extremely worrying that the number of young people needing hospital treatment for self-harm has risen so sharply. There needs to be far more investment in early intervention, so that problems are dealt with when they first emerge.”


Budget-driven local council cuts to social workers, educational psychologists, parenting classes and mental health services in schools had reduced care and support for under-18s in distress, she said. CAMHS teams were responding to rising demand by rationing care.


“The pressure on CAMHS has forced services to raise the bar for access to treatment. Consequently, about a quarter of young people are being turned away, and this will include many who self-harm. At the moment too many vulnerable children end up going to A&E because no other help is available,” Brennan added.


Young Minds is concerned that children who self-harm and then turn to the internet for help could come across unhelpful information about, and even encouragement to continue, their behaviour. Young people who self-harm are most likely to go online for information and few to seek their parents’ support, according to a survey it conducted in March with Childline, Self-Harm UK and The Mix. While 76% of youngsters said they would search the web, just 16% would look to their mother or father, while 61% would ask a friend, and 27% cited a GP and 17% a teacher.


The government has promised to put an extra £1.4bn into care of troubled children during this parliament to ensure that at least 70,000 more under-18s get high-quality care. However, NHS England chief executive Simon Stevens has admitted that even if that target is met, it will still only increase the proportion of young people being helped from a quarter to a third.


Hunt last week pledged to make children’s mental health a top priority. Cornish added that NHS England has created 56 extra beds in specialist inpatient units for children and young people in the last two years and is putting £30m into improving services for those suffering from an eating disorder such as anorexia nervosa. Earlier this month, it allocated £25m to help cut young people’s waiting time for treatment and reduce the backlogs of those awaiting urgent care.


NHS England collated the figures it shared with the Guardian from those covering self-harm and self-poisoning from its Hospital Episodes Statistics datasets from the past decade.


  • In the UK, the Samaritans can be contacted on 116 123. In the US, the National Suicide Prevention Hotline is 1-800-273-8255. In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is on 13 11 14.


NHS figures show "shocking" rise in self-harm among young

22 Eylül 2016 Perşembe

Thousands more NHS operations cancelled than figures show, report claims

Tens of thousands more operations were cancelled at the last minute in English hospitals than official figures suggest, an investigation has claimed.


About half of English NHS trusts admitted in response to Freedom of Information requests that they had cancelled nearly 42,000 operations between one and three days before patients were admitted.


It comes after official figures in May showed the number of hospital operations in England cancelled at the last minute because of a lack of staff or beds rose to 74,086, its highest in 15 years. However, that statistic only records cancellations on the day of admission.


The BBC, which carried out the investigation, says the new figures give a picture more in line with official figures published in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, where the definition of last-minute cancellations is wider and is taken over several days.


FoI requests were submitted to all 156 NHS trusts in England, asking them to provide figures for operations cancelled one to three days before patients were due to be admitted. Data from the 74 trusts which replied suggested they cancelled 41,474 operations within the period.


May’s official figures marked the worst record of cancellations for the NHS in England since 2001-02, when 81,743 patients had procedures cancelled on the day they were supposed to happen. Experts warned the data was a sign of the pressures on the health service.


At the time, Clare Marx, president of the Royal College of Surgeons, said pressures on A&E units, staff shortages, and bed shortages due to a lack of social care for discharged patients were contributing to the problem.


An NHS England spokesperson said: “The proportion of patients seeing their operations cancelled at the last minute remains under 1% in spite of record numbers of operations being scheduled.


“Our national data collection rightly requires trusts to focus on monitoring the number of last-minute cancellations, as this is where the most distress is caused for patients.


“Hospitals should continue to ensure that every effort is made to reschedule cancelled operations as soon as possible.”



Thousands more NHS operations cancelled than figures show, report claims

9 Eylül 2016 Cuma

Sugar warnings have not reduced consumption in England, figures show

Warnings about about the health risks posed by sugar have failed to curb consumption, with children aged four to 10 eating and drinking more than double the recommended amount, according to Public Health England (PHE) figures.


Britons are advised that sugar should account for no more than 5% of daily calories, but from 2012-14, the average was 13.4% for those aged between four and 10, 15.2% among 11- to 18-year-olds, 12.3% for adults under 65 and 11.1% for those aged 65 and over, the national diet and nutrition survey (NDNS) found.


Many believe sugar is the biggest contributor to the obesity epidemic crippling the NHS, and the results, published on Friday, reignited criticism of the failure by the government to take a stronger line in its childhood obesity strategy.


The Action on Sugar chairman, Graham MacGregor, a professor of cardiovascular medicine at Queen Mary University of London, said: “Today’s NDNS data shows that children are still consuming almost three times more sugar than the daily maximum recommendation. Theresa May must urgently rethink her pathetic childhood obesity plan that lacks restrictions on the marketing of, and promotions on, products high in saturated fat, sugar and salt.


“The strategy must include the implementation of the soft drinks industry levy and a mandatory reformulation programme, as the failed responsibility deal has already proven that a voluntary system does not work.”


The figures showed a drop in the consumption of soft drinks by children aged four to 10, from 130ml a day from 2008-10 to 100ml a day from 2012-14, which helped make the age group the only one in which sugar consumption declined, having stood at 14.4% from 2010-12.


But levels remain unacceptably high, despite attempts to raise awareness of the harmful effects of sugar and the proliferation of healthy eating content on blogs and social media. Last year, the UK’s official nutrition advisers slashed the recommended daily amount of sugar, which had been 11% of calorific intake, in response to rising concerns.


The Obesity Health Alliance and the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPH) said the figures underlined the need to protect children from junk food marketing on television and online, one of the most heavily criticised omissions of the obesity strategy published last month.


The RCPH president, Prof Neena Modi, said: “At a time when one in three 10-year-old children are overweight or obese, and one in three five-year-olds has tooth decay, the health risks posed by failure to tackle sugar intake are serious.


“An overweight or obese child is highly likely to be an overweight or obese adult, increasing the risk of developing heart disease, type 2 diabetes and some cancers.”


An Obesity Health Alliance spokeswoman called for “an environment that makes it easier to make healthier choices”.


The survey painted a grim picture of the UK’s dietary habits. It found that people consume too much saturated fat and not enough fruit, vegetables, fibre and oily fish, with very few improvements since 2008-10. Additionally, men are eating too much red meat and processed meat, which was ranked alongside cigarettes as a major cause of cancer by the World Health Organisation last year.


Dr Alison Tedstone, the chief nutritionist at PHE, said: “This data provides compelling evidence that we all need to eat more fruit, veg, fibre and oily fish, and cut back on sugar, salt and saturated fat to improve our health.”


The survey was based on responses from 1,288 adults and 1,258 children, drawn from households selected at random.



Sugar warnings have not reduced consumption in England, figures show

11 Temmuz 2014 Cuma

1000"s of females consuming as well much in the course of pregnancy, figures recommend

Babies born to mothers who drink heavily for the duration of pregnancy are at danger of creating foetal alcohol syndrome – a lifelong issue that can leave kids physically and mentally disabled.


One particular lady whose son was born with issue mentioned she was given tiny info about the consequences of drinking for the duration of pregnancy regardless of telling the midwife about her years of alcoholism.


Samantha Marchant, forty, from Slough, said: “When I was five months pregnant, I informed the midwife that I was an alcoholic and that I couldn’t handle my drinking.


“They referred me to a drug and alcohol team which place me on a drinks diary … I’d have liked them to say ‘you can have a area in rehab, but it was not supplied.


“I didn’t know about the biology of what transpires if you drink in pregnancy,” Marchant added. “I did not know that my child would be swimming in alcohol. I would have sought aid if I’d have identified.”


Dr. Raja Mukherjee, lead clinician for the nationwide foetal alcohol spectrum disorder clinic at Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Basis Trust, mentioned Ms Marchant is not alone in continuing to drink for the duration of pregnancy.


“All the analysis has proven that higher level alcohol publicity causes significant damage to a establishing foetus,” she explained.


“We know that women are consuming more … 90% of women in this nation drink and they do not all abruptly cease when they are pregnant.”



1000"s of females consuming as well much in the course of pregnancy, figures recommend

10 Temmuz 2014 Perşembe

United kingdom cities will exceed EU pollution limits right up until 2030, figures present

Air pollution levels in London, Birmingham, and Leeds will exceed European limits till at least 2030, newly-published figures display.


In a case at the European court of justice on Thursday lawyers for the commission described the UK’s failure to act on the breach as “maybe the longest operating infringement of EU law in historical past.”


The Uk has exceeded the EU’s nitrogen dioxide (NO2) pollution restrict considering that 2010, top the European commission and environmental lawyers to launch separate legal actions towards the government which faces potential fines of £300m a yr for its infraction.


On Wednesday, the government published revised and far more accurate projections for NO2 emissions, which display that it expects the Better London urban region, West Midlands urban location and West Yorkshire urban area will be in breach right up until “after 2030″, 5-10 years later on than previously expected.


NO2 is largely caused by diesel autos, and can aggravate current overall health troubles such as asthma. Research have begun to propose NO2 could have as wonderful an impact on early deaths as particulate pollution which have previously been linked to larger risks of lung cancer and heart failure. Air pollution triggers an estimated 29,000 deaths a 12 months in the Uk, in accordance to Public Overall health England.


Tyneside, Liverpool, Nottingham, Sheffield and Bristol, all previously expected to be in compliance of NO2 amounts by 2015, will now not be compliant until finally 2025, in accordance to the revised figures, which take into account much more precise “functionality of present day diesel cars and older petrol vehicles”.


Alan Andrews, a attorney for ClientEarth which has brought a situation towards the United kingdom for the breach which was heard by the European court of justice, said: “It’s poor sufficient that the government has no intention of complying with these limits in the foreseeable future. It’s even worse that they are attempting to hide behind legal procedural principles to maintain this quiet. We have a appropriate to breathe clean air and the correct to know when the government is failing to safeguard us.


He extra: “Another five many years of delay indicates thousands much more people will die or be made critically ill. The Uk demands to act now to get deadly diesel autos out of our towns and cities.”


Barry Gardiner, shadow setting minister, explained: “Today’s response from the European court of justice exhibits that the government is failing to meet even its very own inadequate air pollution targets. Instead of implementing measures to minimize the ranges of pollution, the government lately had to scrap its very own air top quality approach due to the fact it would have produced the difficulty worse, and presently the government have no strategy.”


“Now the government’s only target is covering their back by passing fines for their very own failure to reduce air pollution on to regional authorities. With out urgent action young children in the Uk will be waiting for one more twenty years before they can expect any improvement.”


This week, air pollution specialists at King’s School in London stated that NO2 levels in London’s Oxford Street were the worst in the globe. A verdict on the ClientEarth situation is anticipated from the European court of justice towards the end of this yr.



United kingdom cities will exceed EU pollution limits right up until 2030, figures present

30 Mayıs 2014 Cuma

Cancer waiting time figures reveal very first breach of target

NHS

NHS England has launched figures on waiting instances for cancer treatment. Photograph: Dominic Lipinski/PA




The target time period for sufferers to start remedy right after an urgent referral for suspected cancer has been breached for the very first time since it was launched.


NHS guidelines stipulate that 85% of this kind of sufferers must wait a optimum of 62 days to get started their 1st definitive treatment following referral by their GP. Figures present the proportion slipped to 84.four% in the course of the time period from January to March, down from 85.eight% in the preceding quarter.


The national clinical director for cancer for NHS England, Sean Duffy, explained work was essential to ensure standards have been met.


“It is vital cancer sufferers are diagnosed and taken care of swiftly so they have the best possible possibility of recovery,” he explained. “Newest figures present nationally the NHS has met and exceeded 7 out of eight cancer waiting time standards. But there is variation in meeting the challenging standards, and nationwide performance against one of the targets has dipped.


“CCG commissioners are operating together with local suppliers the place the standard is not currently being met to identify the concerns to guarantee individuals are taken care of in a timely way.”


Other figures launched by NHS England on cancer waiting instances demonstrate that the proportion of men and women witnessed by a professional inside of two weeks of an urgent GP referral for suspected cancer dropped from 95.6% to 95%, and the proportion of folks urgently referred for breast signs (exactly where cancer was not initially suspected) seen within two weeks fell from 95.five% to 93.9%, just above the target of 93%.


In all cancers, patients need to encounter a highest wait of one month in between obtaining their diagnosis and the begin of very first definitive remedy, with the operational regular being 96%. This was met in 98% of cases in the very first three months of the 12 months, down from 98.three% in the previous quarter.


Ranges decreased in individuals diagnosed with breast cancer (from 99.2% to 98.9%), lung cancers (from 98.9% to 98.six%), reduce gastrointestinal cancers (98.5% to 98.3%), urological cancers (96.4% to 96.one%) and skin cancers (down from 98.1% to 97.eight%).


The failure in the 62-day wait from urgent GP referral to first definitive treatment method is the 1st breach of any cancer waiting time considering that the introduction of the existing operational common in 2009.


Even more figures relating to this target indicate that 96.6% of individuals taken care of for breast cancers met the guideline, down from 97% in the final 3 months of last yr. There had been also drops amid individuals treated for reduced gastrointestinal cancers (from 78.seven% to 76.eight%) and urological cancers excluding testicular cancer (from 81.five% to 78.seven%.)


The figures improved amid people with lung cancers, from 77.8% in the ultimate quarter of final yr to 78.2% this year, and skin cancers (from 95.eight% to 96.2%).


Figures for waiting times for 2nd or subsequent therapy demonstrate that 96.8% of people underwent surgery inside 31 days, down from 97% the previous quarter.


Mike Hobday, director of policy and investigation at Macmillan Cancer Help, stated the figures had been worrying. “This is the 1st breach of any cancer waiting time in England because 2009 and is a clear warning sign that the NHS is below enormous strain,” he mentioned.


“The Uk presently has some of the worst cancer survival charges in Europe. More sufferers are now facing delays, which indicates far more sufferers are facing nervousness for longer and more lives are currently being put at chance. We’re very anxious that the coordination of cancer care is getting worse and that cancer is currently being overlooked in the new NHS. The quantity of cancer patients is set to boost from two to 3 million by the end of the subsequent government in 2020, and we cannot afford to see much more and far more individuals waiting longer.”




Cancer waiting time figures reveal very first breach of target

20 Mayıs 2014 Salı

Shock figures display extent of self-harm in English teenagers | Lorenza Bacino

There has been a threefold improve in the quantity of youngsters who self-harm in England in the last decade, in accordance to a Planet Overall health Organisation collaborative review.


The Wellness Behaviour in College-Aged Young children (HBSC) report, due to be published in the autumn, will reveal that of the 6,000 younger individuals aged eleven, 13 and 15 surveyed across England – up to a single in 515-yr-olds say they self-harm.  


There is no comparative data from other nations as England is the 1st nation to request this query on self-harm since the global review, which is conducted each and every four many years, began in 1983. The selection to include it follows a rise in anecdotal evidence from teachers in secondary schools across the nation. 


The last thorough examine of self-harm in England was published by the British Medical Journal in 2002. It surveyed close to 6,000 15- and 16-yr-olds in 41 schools and located that 6.9% of them said they had self-harmed above the past 12 months. This compares with the 2013-14 WHO study, which puts the figure at 20% of 15-yr-olds.


Self-harm contains actions such as cutting, burning and biting oneself. Professor Fiona Brooks, head of adolescent and child well being at the University of Hertfordshire, is the global study’s principal investigator for England. She says: “Our findings are genuinely worrying, and it is [self-harm] significantly worse among girls. At age eleven, each girls and boys report a very good level of emotional wellbeing. But by the age of 15, the gap has widened and we get 45% of adolescent women saying they feel minimal when a week in contrast with 23% of boys.” 


She warns of a ticking timebomb unless the rise in bad psychological well being between younger people is addressed. “We do not yet know ample about why this [bad psychological wellness] is but mother and father are busy and stressed, and children’s lives are turning out to be a lot more pressurised. They know they need to have much better grades to get to university, but there’s no assure of a task at the end of it all.”


Brooks believes that young individuals are “turning to techniques this kind of as self-harm to control tension in the short term”.


“Even though there has been a decline in classic danger behaviours like smoking and drug and alcohol abuse, there hasn’t been a transition to much more good wellness behaviours,” she says.


Grace, sixteen, appears to be a bubbly and confident teenager who loves music, singing and netball. She is studying for her GCSEs. Nonetheless, when she was twelve, Grace began self-harming.


“I began cutting my wrists using scissors and razor blades, which I disinfected myself,” she says. “As time went on and I acquired worse, it progressed all the way up my left arm and my upper thighs. I just bandaged it up and left it.”


Many years of cutting have left her with deep scars that she covers up when close to individuals she does not know very effectively. “At my worst, I was hurting myself after a week or even a lot more. Occasionally it was after a month. It just depended what was going on all around me,” she explains. “It calmed me down but then I’d right away want I hadn’t completed it as it hurts and you need to hide it.”


Regardless of celebrities, including actor Angelina Jolie and singers Miley Cyrus and Demi Lovato, going public that they have self-harmed, and a variety of professional-self-harm web sites placing the behaviour on younger people’s radar, Grace says she wasn’t conscious of anybody else performing it. She never ever confided in her mum, but last but not least a teacher noticed.


“I was hauled into the headteacher’s office a single morning, and my mum and my teacher and the head have been all sitting there. I was entirely bowled more than when they said they knew what I’d been undertaking, ” she recalls. As a result of the meeting, Grace retreated more into her globe, self-harmed more and concealed it far better. “Even when I needed to cease, I could not – and it took me longer than I care to admit to get factors underneath handle,” she says.


The nearby youngster and adolescent mental wellness services (Camhs) in Oxfordshire mentioned it could not support Grace due to the fact she had not been formally diagnosed with any issue. She did receive counselling by way of her school, but says it did not aid since she couldn’t relate to the older counsellor.


Even though her mum says she feels she has failed her, Grace does not blame any person for what she went through. “It is no one’s fault. I just wish I’d been capable to cope with issues greater,” she says.


“When I was twelve, my mum was moving in with my now stepdad, I was not acquiring on extremely properly with anyone at college, and the few pals I did have weren’t currently being quite kind. I struggle with adjust, so from all elements it was hard. It had often been me, my mum and my sister, and it was all so new with my stepdad. My real dad worked abroad a great deal so I felt I did not have any person to talk to and I did not have any way of dealing with it.”


Of her gradual recovery, Grace says: “Possibly I just got utilised to the modifications around me and items received better at school. I have a close group of friends, and for the first time I have a best good friend which I have never had before. My family members has been really supportive as well.”


But she adds that getting diagnosed with depression a year ago was a massive relief and she believes that an earlier diagnosis would have helped. “It stopped me currently being baffled about why I felt this way,” she says. “Despite the fact that it sucked to have a label, becoming diagnosed aided me to realise that there was a purpose behind what I was performing and once I dealt with the reasons, I knew I would not have to revert back to self-harm any far more.”


Selfharm.co.united kingdom is a website set up in 1993 to support the emotional and social wants of all younger folks. It gives a forum in which self-harmers can seek guidance and truly feel linked with others going via similar experiences. Grace was asked to pilot its Alumina scheme, which offers weekly on-line meetings with counsellors and medical professionals and she participates in a variety of actions that support to analyse what she is doing.


Rachel Welch, the director of Selfharm.co.united kingdom, says catching the dilemma early makes it simpler to stop. “We know that the earlier you intervene, the less complicated it is to break this habit.”


Technology is enabling youthful people to seek help significantly much more quickly – even within a day of first self-harming, she believes. The Samaritans reports that self-harm is the major reason individuals use its text messaging support, which, it says, is proving hugely helpful to young folks.


Self-harm has only been recognised as a diagnosis across Europe because Could last yr. It is diagnosed as “non-suicidal self damage”. Professor Peter Fonagy, clinical adviser to NHS England’s Enhanced Access to Psychological Therapies programme, says: “Only a little fraction, up to 15% [of people self-harming] ever existing to clinical companies – so it genuinely is only the tip of the iceberg, as is the case with most psychological ailments, where the unmet need is very higher.” He adds that younger individuals who self-harm are much more likely to go to a trusted adult such as a teacher or a policemen or even A&ampE. “This is why it’s critical that these individuals are offered the right resources to assess the chance and take proper action,” he says. He factors to MindEd.org.united kingdom, an on the internet resource, launched by the Department of Wellness, for anybody working with youngsters and youthful people’s mental health concerns.


Dr Jacqueline Cornish, nationwide clinical director for young children and younger folks at NHS England, who is accountable for the Camhs service, says for those younger men and women who do seek assist from a wellness expert: “It is vital we have the correct companies in area when children, younger individuals or without a doubt grownups need to have them. But this have to be combined with higher public knowing of the factors why an individual may possibly self-harm and how to get assist.”


Brooks believes study is telling us a closer look is required at what has caused this kind of a dramatic improve in self-harm in the past decade. “We need to know what strategies to put in place to support youthful men and women navigate adolescence effectively.”


Grace advises any younger man or woman who is self-harming to “speak to somebody, attain out”. She welcomes celebrities, such as Lovato, who have utilized social media to raise awareness about followers who self-harm. “I never believe they glamorise it. She has dealt with numerous psychological overall health problems herself and now puts her experiences to the excellent of other people,” she says.


Of her own expertise of speaking out, Grace says: “I’ve had overwhelming support. I am in a great place and I can quite significantly say 100% I am not going to go back to it.



Shock figures display extent of self-harm in English teenagers | Lorenza Bacino

23 Nisan 2014 Çarşamba

Amount of overdue smear tests climbs 11%, figures show

Smear tests

The quantity of females overdue for smear exams was really worrying, the shadow wellness minister Liz Kendall said. Photograph: Dominic Lipinski/PA




New figures reveal an 11% rise in the amount of females whose smear test is overdue. Close to three.7 million had been late with their check out-ups in 2012-13 – 364,000 a lot more than in 2009-10. The greatest increases were among functioning-age women, data from the Well being and Social Care Details Centre displays.


Far more than a million females in their 30s were overdue, up 11%, whilst for people in their 40s the rise was 15%, to 925,000, and for people in their 50s it was 16%, to 620,000.


The shadow health minister, Liz Kendall, mentioned it was extremely worrying. She extra: “It’s vital to increase public awareness and make it simpler for women to book their tests, such as outdoors normal functioning hrs since it can be difficult acquiring to your neighborhood surgery if you’re working.”




Amount of overdue smear tests climbs 11%, figures show

14 Nisan 2014 Pazartesi

E-cigarette poisoning figures soar as vaping habit spreads across Uk

Electronic cigarettes to be regulated

Investigation exhibits 36.five% of the phone enquiries manufactured by wellness pros concerned kids aged four and younger. Photograph: Tim Ireland/PA




The quantity of men and women – like very youthful kids – poisoned by swallowing e-cigarette liquids containing nicotine rose sharply in the United kingdom final year.


There were 139 calls by wellness experts seeking professional guidance on how to treat members of the public as the vaping habit rapidly spread.


The figures obtained by the Guardian from the Nationwide Poisons Details Support(NPIS) display that there were 29 this kind of circumstances in 2012 and 36 in excess of the five years before that.


The NPIS’s analysis indicated that in excess of a third (36.five%) of calls concerned really youthful kids, 56% more than 18s and the rest young children of 5 and over and youngsters.


Most poisoning situations have been accidental and signs and symptoms, including vomiting, nausea, dizziness and abdominal pain, were typically quick-lived, according to the service’s director John Thompson.


“Whilst any instances of poisoning are of concern, our preceding analysis showed that fortunately fewer than 1-in-ten of individuals developed symptoms of toxicity which lasted far more than four hrs and only two individuals had long lasting symptoms.


“However, just above a third of the phone enquiries concerned children aged four and younger and of these, 10% produced symptoms which required hospital care,” mentioned Thompson.


“E-cigarette usage has increased drastically in latest years. The liquid found in e-cigarettes can be quite harmful and I would urge any person who employs e-cigarettes to make confident that the liquids are stored safely, and in particular away from kids.”


The figures obtained by the Guardian come after health warnings from the US Centers for Ailment Management (CDC) which has observed large increases in calls to poison centres involving e-cigarettes – from one particular a month in September 2010 to 215 in February this 12 months. In contrast to the British figures, these included calls from the public as nicely as overall health specialists, and also covered instances of inhalation and absorption by means of the skin and eyes.


Sweden too has reported increases in e-cigarette poisoning.


The NPIS figures come as EU nations prepare to tighten controls more than e-cigarettes and some businesses opt to look for costly licensing as medicines, which they would need to have to back up any declare they assist tobacco smokers to quit.


The Welsh government is considering regardless of whether e-cigarettes ought to be banned from public locations, and a new law banning income to underneath-18s in England and Wales is anticipated to be implemented soon.


The 1st e-cigarettes in the United kingdom went on sale in 2005 and now are used by at least 2m people, in accordance to Katherine Devlin, of the Electronic Cigarette Sector Trade Association(Ecita), a Uk physique with 26 companies in membership.


She explained the present EU laws covering the safety of items and chemical compounds should reassure the public. Makers have been already meant to warn e-cigarette end users that liquids in e-cigarette cartridges could be toxic if swallowed or in contact with the skin and urge them to preserve them locked up and out of attain of kids.


But trading specifications officers were not always enforcing the principles, leaving area for “cowboys” to exploit consumers, Devlin stated. Makers and retailers working illegally and not delivering suitable childproof packaging and labelling need to be pursued by authorities despite the fact that she recognised council trading specifications officers had suffered public spending cuts.


“We want accessibility to these goods but they require to be risk-free, appropriately examined and correctly sold,” mentioned Devlin.


Ecita says the new guidelines will indicate numerous e-cigarettes presently on the marketplace will be banned and make new varieties significantly less eye-catching and tougher to use. They are expected to be comprehensive in a directive subsequent month and will be phased in from 2016.


These will demand far more info on nicotine material, which includes its toxicity and addictiveness, new controls over liquid refills, powers for member states and Brussels to act in which there are “justified security worries”, and much better monitoring of developing e-cigarette market place.


The Department of Overall health stated: “We lately passed legislation to ban the sale of e-cigarettes to under 18s. Like any nicotine merchandise, we want to keep e-cigarettes out of the hands of youthful youngsters and are now working to put measures into spot to make certain that new European tobacco regulations are implemented properly.”




E-cigarette poisoning figures soar as vaping habit spreads across Uk

17 Mart 2014 Pazartesi

On the web device could be employed to recognize public figures" health care care, say critics

Surgeon and monitor readout of vital signs

OmegaSolver had entry to NHS hospital episode statistics and supplied an ‘internal database [which] tracks real sufferers inside each hospital within England’. Photograph: Luca DiCecco/Alamy




An on-line device that claimed to be able to use NHS patient hospital data to reveal treatment “appropriate from preliminary diagnosis until the current day” has been pulled from the web right after privacy campaigners warned it could be employed to determine the exact particulars of healthcare care for people in the public eye.


OmegaSolver, a organization founded final yr, had access to NHS hospital episode statistics and supplied an “internal database [which] tracks actual sufferers inside of every hospital within England providing … up-to-date data for every illness spot”. The firm explained its clients integrated drugs companies.


However, the firm’s site was closed down last week following press inquiries to the well being authorities relating to the release of “patient-level” information to the company.


On Sunday it had emerged that a billion NHS patient data have been offered to a subsidiary of Chime Communications, a single of the country’s greatest PR and marketing and advertising companies, which had been functioning with the pharmaceutical sector.


These revelations will place stress on to the Overall health and Social Care Details Centre (HSCIC), the arm’s-length entire body set up to house all of England’s patient information, which says it will release within a fortnight the complete record of organizations, government agencies and charities that have been handed medical information.


Privacy campaigners explained that if the OmegaSolver on-line tool’s claims had been appropriate then the health care histories of individuals in public daily life could very easily be tracked. Phil Booth of MedConfidential pointed out the date when the Labour leader, Ed Miliband, had surgical procedure on his nose to deal with a sleep issue and the hospital exactly where the operation took spot had been in the “public domain”.


“It seems to be like anyone with entry [to the on-line device] could pinpoint and read through off the health-related histories of prominent political figures or pretty significantly anyone who’s had an accident or health care method reported in the press or on the internet. Nick Clegg’s wife’s broken elbow, Tony Blair’s catheter ablation, Ed Miliband’s nose operation – all reported in the media, providing adequate info to spot one occasion and then read across their each and every hospital visit. Ministers and officials declare your information will be anonymous, but it isn’t.”


In response the business explained that its Patient Analyser device, which seemed to track personal sufferers, was an “illustrative instance only”.


It added: “Privacy of the personal is one particular of the basic concepts which underpins the terms and problems governing access to this data, and OmegaSolver takes its commitment to preserving patient confidentiality quite seriously. Measures are in location to make confident that the identity of a patient is in no way found. OmegaSolver has access to data products and examination and makes these available for grouping and linkage functions only.”


The HSCIC said the company had taken down its web site. In a statement the centre stated: “We have been in get in touch with with OmegaSolver and, although discussions are ongoing, they have assured us that the screengrab offered demonstrates aggregated patient information and does not represent the expertise of an personal.”


Nonetheless, the details centre came beneath fire from MPs on the potent health pick committee in excess of its obvious reluctance to get action.


Barbara Keeley, a Labour member of the committee, stated: “We have noticed examples of organisations promoting applications which website link and then show comprehensive info about individual sufferers. It is clear that this data could be linked with other data about that man or woman which means the state of their overall health could then be tracked.”


“Examples have been offered of politicians and their family members who obtained publicity when they had an accident or an operation and were handled in the NHS. If media or social media reports on them can be linked with hospital patient data to track the state of that person’s health, it is of very real concern.”


“It is disturbing that patients are nonetheless being left in the dark about industrial utilizes of their confidential health information. I am asking concerns of wellness ministers about business re-use licences and regardless of whether these will now be revoked and the patient information deleted. I am also asking for audits to be accomplished so that individuals can be reassured that their confidential healthcare details is no longer becoming commercially exploited.”




On the web device could be employed to recognize public figures" health care care, say critics

15 Şubat 2014 Cumartesi

Doctors paid up to £3,000 a shift, official figures show

All the sums incorporated costs paid to agencies, which typically consider around 15 per cent of the bill. Some medical doctors had been rewarded not just for the hours they worked, but for all the time they had been on phone, like when they have been sleeping.


The figures propose that the complete bill for these agency employees in 2013 was almost £250 million, a rise of one particular third in two many years. This would have been enough to pay out the yearly wages of 3,000 consultants or more than seven,000 junior doctors.


Experts stated the figures disclosed the full extent of a crisis in which casualty departments have turn into “entirely dependent” on short-term workers, amid desperate shortages of senior physicians and consultants.


Senior managers have previously insisted that rates of £1,000 per shift or far more are paid only in crisis situations where there is no alternative.


The investigation by The Telegraph shows that NHS trusts are routinely paying out such sums to meet workers shortages.


The evaluation located:



  • Heart of England NHS Basis Believe in in Birmingham paid at least £1,000 per shift on 719 occasions final 12 months



  • Kettering Common Hospital Foundation Believe in paid such charges 595 occasions in 2013, while Northern Devon Healthcare Trust did so for 255 shifts



  • Barking, Redbridge and Havering University Hospitals Trust in Essex had the highest bill for A&ampE company personnel, spending £7.1 million last 12 months, like 217 shifts paid at prices of at least £1,000 each and every.


The hospital was recently put on special measures right after its casualty unit was discovered to have the worst shortages of senior medical professionals in the country, with 13 out of 21 posts vacant.


The University of Emergency Medication, which represents A&ampE medical professionals, says there is a shortage of virtually 400 consultants in Britain.


They say shortages have occurred since not sufficient physicians had been skilled, while hundreds much more have emigrated to countries where the workload is less onerous.


Authorities say the crisis is prompting consultants to take on added work at extremely lucrative costs, whilst others come here from abroad.


Dr Cliff Mann, president of the College of Emergency Medicine, mentioned: “The use of agency medical professionals has turn into endemic in the NHS. There are units which would implode if they weren’t relying on them, day in, day out.”


Dr Mann, the most senior A&ampE medical doctor in the United kingdom, extra: “The figures are surprising and ludicrous. The worst of it is that with the cash we are wasting on temporary personnel we could double the number of A&ampE consultants, if only a far more long-phrase technique was taken. It doesn’t make financial sense, nor does it make clinical sense — because this is not great for patients.”


In total, 64 hospital trusts, out of 144 with A&ampE departments, responded in some kind to freedom of info requests.


Of people, 36 trusts supplied particulars on how many occasions they had paid more than £1,000 to cover a shift in A&ampE in 2013. Among them, they invested such sums on 2,317 events last year — the equivalent of 9,268 shifts, when extrapolated to cover all 144 hospital trusts in England with a casualty unit.


The trusts presented information of the highest quantities paid to a single medical professional or nurse at any time because 2011. At Lancashire Teaching Hospitals Basis Believe in, a consultant was paid £2,400 in May possibly 2012 to operate 9 hours in the hospital, plus 15 hours on contact.


Hospitals also spent heavily plugging gaps for nurses. Royal Devon and Exeter Basis Believe in paid £1,620 for a twelve-hour nursing shift in January 2012, even though University Hospitals Bristol Basis Trust invested £1,235 on an eleven.five-hour shift last April. Close by North Bristol Trust spent £1,150 on a twelve-hour shift in Could final year.


Amid desperate shortages, even the most junior employees were paid at inflated prices. Walsall Healthcare Believe in paid £968 for a clinical support employee to function an 11.5-hour shift last Christmas. This kind of staff, who assist in clinics and laboratories, are normally paid in between £14,000 and £17,000 per yr.


The trusts also offered figures for the overall complete commit on temporary medics for each of the final 3 many years. These had been employed to determine an NHS-broad figure, which exhibits £242 million invested final year, compared with £181 million in 2011 — a rise of 33 per cent.


Many of the trusts explained they struggled to find workers simply because of the national shortage of consultants and that security of patients came initial. Many mentioned they have been doing work to reduce their investing on agency workers, but that payments were in line with normal fees paid for locum employees.


Heart of England NHS Basis Trust explained it was one of the largest trusts in the United kingdom, and that its priority was providing protected care, which often meant exceeding standard fees. It said it had just recruited 10 far more A&ampE medical professionals.


Kettering Common Hospital Foundation Believe in explained lowering spending on company employees was a priority, even though Northern Devon Healthcare Believe in said it suffered “abnormally high” workers sickness among A&ampE consultants last 12 months.


Wye Valley Trust said its difficulties have been compounded by its rural spot in Herefordshire.


Barking, Redbridge and Havering University Hospitals Believe in explained it was functioning “tirelessly” to recruit employees in spite of the nationwide shortage. Last winter, senior medics warned that A&ampE units had been like “war zones” as they struggled to cope with rising numbers of sufferers, several of whom had failed to safe help from out-of-hrs GPs.


On Friday, figures disclosed that casualty departments have had their worst week but, with a hundred of England’s 144 NHS trusts with A&ampE units missing targets to deal with patients inside 4 hrs.


A Division of Well being spokesman explained: “Holding on to doctors in A&ampE has been a dilemma for over a decade. There are a lot more than 20 per cent far more A&ampE consultants than there had been in 2010, but we know we need to have even a lot more and we have a program to make that happen.”


A spokesman for NHS England mentioned: “We recognise there are challenging troubles about senior healthcare staffing in the emergency medicine specialty, and this is compounding pressure on hospitals as A&ampE attendances improve 12 months-on-12 months.”



Doctors paid up to £3,000 a shift, official figures show

12 Şubat 2014 Çarşamba

Sorry, Conservatives: Based On The Most recent Signal-Up Figures, There Won"t Be An Obamacare Death Spiral

For quite some time now, a cohort of conservative pundits and politicians has confidently predicted that Obamacare will “collapse beneath its own weight.” But the newest indicator-up numbers from the Obama administration inform a distinct story. While fewer individuals than projected are signing up for Obamacare-based mostly insurance coverage, the numbers are not so far off as to indicate an all-out catastrophe, what overall health wonks call an “adverse variety death spiral.” The reality is far more prosaic. Obamacare will be costlier, and much less effective, than its cheerleaders have promised. But the law, and its trillions in taxpayer-funded subsidies, won’t disintegrate on their very own.


On Wednesday, the Workplace of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation of the U.S. Division of Overall health and Human Services—known in Washington-communicate as ASPE HHS—released updated figures for individuals who have signed up for well being insurance coverage on the Obamacare exchanges. (As a reminder, signing up is not the same point as real enrollment in a health insurance program somewhere between thirty to 50 % of those who have “selected a marketplace plan” on the exchanges will not end up paying out the initial month’s premium, and will therefore never ever formally enroll in health insurance.)


Signal-ups carry on to skew older


As we’ve discussed just before, a single of the massive troubles with the exchanges is that the men and women signing up for coverage seem to be older and sicker than the U.S. population. That trend continued with the newest update, although the age skew slightly enhanced in contrast to the finish of December. (The percentage of signer-uppers underneath the age of 35 improved from 29.9 to 30.eight.)


ACA enrollment by age group 2014-02


Nevertheless, there was a single excellent piece of information in terms of age skew. A single concern that I’d had more than the past handful of months was that younger, more healthy men and women would sign up for less costly, substantial-deductible bronze programs, whereas older, sicker people would sign up for the lower-deductible silver programs.


Thus far, that doesn’t appear to be taking place, except amid kids. Between signer-uppers under the age of 18, 21 % chosen a bronze prepare, and 45 percent chosen silver. Among everybody else, nonetheless, the numbers have been reasonably steady. Among 14 and 17 percent of adults chose bronze plans, and in between 63 and 68 percent chose silver plans.


Taxpayer-funded subsidies are cushioning adverse choice


This lack of adverse selection among the a variety of metal tiers of Obamacare-approved wellness strategies is nearly undoubtedly due to the law’s premium support insurance subsidies. In the federally sponsored exchanges, 72 percent of these eligible for subsidies picked the financially generous silver plan. Among individuals who didn’t qualify for subsidies, only 25 % picked a silver plan.


Overall, 82 percent of people signing up on the Obamacare exchanges have been eligible for some variety of subsidy. And this is how Obamacare is probably to function going forward. It’ll be a terrible deal for these who really don’t qualify for subsidies, or who only qualify for a modest subsidy. It’ll be a fantastic deal for these whose incomes are closer to the federal poverty line.


This is not a surprising final result. In states like New York and New Jersey, this two-tiered system existed prior to Obamacare, in which people eligible for subsidies could purchase affordable coverage, even though individuals ineligible for subsidies were priced out of the market place.


States that refused to put into action Obamacare are outperforming those that did


1 of the silliest talking points in defense of Obamacare’s underperformance to date is that it has been Republicans’ fault. “If only Republicans would apply the law of the land,” goes the line, “Obamacare’s enrollment figures would be a lot greater than they are.” It turns out that the numbers inform exactly the opposite story. The states that didn’t set up their very own exchanges are, on common, signing up several far more people than their supposedly professional-Obamacare counterparts.


Phil Klein of the Washington Examiner compared the most recent indicator-up figures to the enrollment targets that the Obama administration set in September 2013 for the identical time period. I’ve replicated his examination, and in contrast the progress of states that set up their very own exchanges—“State-Primarily based Marketplaces” in HHS lingo—to individuals that deferred to the federal government (“Federally-Facilitated Marketplaces”).


Among states that refused to set up their personal exchanges—the allegedly uncooperative states—1,939,588 folks have signed up for coverage, amounting to 79.four percent of the September 2013 enrollment target. Amongst the states with their very own exchanges—the most professional-Obamacare states—only 1,359,904 individuals have signed up, amounting to 69.8 percent of the September target. That’s a meaningful ten percentage-stage big difference in favor of the states that refused to set up their very own exchanges.


ACA sign-up ratio map 2014-02


Remember, again, that “signing up for coverage” is not the same point is enrollment, and for that reason that these figures overstate the actual enrollment efficiency. But if you generously assume that indicator-ups equal enrollments, eleven states are exceeding their September targets: Connecticut (238 %), Rhode Island (212), New York (156), Maine (144), New Hampshire (143), North Carolina (135), Idaho (133), Colorado (120), Wisconsin (115), Michigan (112), and Florida (a hundred). At least thirteen states are below 50 percent of their enrollment target: Massachusetts (5), D.C. (18), New Mexico (23), Oregon (23), Maryland (31), Nevada (32), Kentucky (36), Alaska (41), Washington (42), South Dakota (43), Iowa (46), Oklahoma (47), and Mississippi (48).


How several of the sign-ups had been previously insured?


A single situation that has emerged is whether or not or not all of these indicator-ups are individuals who have been previously uninsured. Following all, Obamacare’s upending of the U.S. wellness-care technique is created to offer wellness coverage to the uninsured. Hence far, surveys indicate that much more than two-thirds of people signing up were previously covered. A McKinsey survey located that 89 percent of these signing up on the exchanges had been previously insured. If those trends continue, Obamacare will fall properly short of its aspiration to reduce the uninsured population by thirty million people. But Obamacare can fail to cover the uninsured, and also fail to collapse.


Bottom line: Obamacare is underperforming it is not collapsing


One of the unseemly facets of the last four-plus months is watching some on the appropriate root for Obamacare to fail. No matter what your political affiliations, it is not a good factor if Obamacare wrecks the well being care program. True people—real lives—will be harmed, and are currently being harmed, as Obamacare makes wellness insurance coverage even significantly less affordable for numerous in the middle class.


In some quarters, there has been a sort of intellectual laziness, a belief that there is no require for critics to come up with better reforms, simply because Obamacare will “collapse under its own bodyweight,” relieving them of that responsibility.


Obamacare isn’t great for the nation. But it is not going to collapse. And that makes the growth of a credible, marketplace-oriented wellness-reform agenda a lot more urgent than ever.


*    *    *


Read AVIK’S NEW Guide, How Medicaid Fails the Poor (Encounter, 2013), obtainable at Amazon and other key retailers. Adhere to @Avik on Twitter, Google+, and YouTube, and The Apothecary on Facebook. Or, indicator up to get a weekly e-mail digest of articles from The Apothecary.


INVESTORS’ NOTE: The greatest publicly-traded gamers in Obamacare’s well being insurance coverage exchanges are Aetna (NYSE:AET), Humana (NYSE:HUM), Cigna (NYSE:CI), Molina (NYSE:MOH), WellPoint (NYSE:WLP), and Centene (NYSE:CNC), in purchase of the number of uninsured exchange-eligible Americans for whom their programs are accessible.



Sorry, Conservatives: Based On The Most recent Signal-Up Figures, There Won"t Be An Obamacare Death Spiral