British etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
British etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

19 Nisan 2017 Çarşamba

British teenagers more competitive than peers but more likely to bullied

British teenagers are highly motivated about their school work, but are more anxious, more likely to be bullied and are less satisfied with life than many of their peers elsewhere in the world, according to a survey.


Almost a quarter of British pupils who took part in the poll say they are being bullied a few times a month, while more than 14% say they are bullied frequently, making the UK the fourth worst affected of all 34 countries surveyed.


Anxiety levels are also high in British classrooms with seven out of 10 pupils (72%) admitting they feel anxious before taking a test, even if they are well prepared – the third highest in the survey. Girls are particularly badly affected, with 81% reporting anxiety before exams, compared with 63% of boys.


Possibly compounding the problem, UK students are also shown to be highly ambitious and competitive at school, with 90% claiming they want to be the best in whatever they do, compared with an average of 65% across the countries surveyed.


UK students are also among the highest users of the internet, with one in four 15-year-olds admitting to spending six hours online outside school hours on a typical weekday – the second highest of any country, and far higher than previous studies have suggested, prompting experts to call on the government to look at possible links between internet use and wellbeing.


The global survey of half a million 15-year-olds, carried out by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), will add to growing concern about the mental health and wellbeing of young people in the UK.


Particularly worrying is the increased risk that disadvantaged teenagers face, according to the survey, with pupils from less privileged families worse affected by high rates of bullying, unhappiness and anxiety than their wealthier peers.


Three in 10 UK pupils from less privileged backgrounds said they had been bullied, complaining of being physically abused by other students, made the target of negative rumours and deliberately left out of things.


There are also wide variations of expectation about higher education. Across OECD countries, 44% of students expect to complete university, but that number rises to three in four students in Colombia, Qatar and the US.


And while students from an immigrant background fare well in the UK, their experiences are less positive elsewhere. In 2015, 12.5% of students in participating countries were from an immigrant background. In some countries, those from an immigrant background were more likely to report feeling like outsiders, which impacts on satisfaction levels.


In the UK, while 42% of pupils polled expect to complete a university degree, less than a quarter of disadvantaged pupils expect to do so, compared with more than two-thirds of the most advantaged pupils.


The study, part of the OECD’s programme for international student assesment, also reveals that young people in the UK experience lower than average life satisfaction. Just 28% describe themselves as very satisfied with their lives, compared with an OECD average of 34%. Girls again fare worse with 28% very satisfied, compared with 33% of boys.



Students in a restaurant in La Candelaria, Bogotá


Students in a restaurant in La Candelaria, Bogotá. Colombian teenagers reported high levels of life satisfaction. Photograph: Alex Segre/Alamy

Elsewhere in the world there are huge disparities in life satisfaction among students. While in the Netherlands fewer than 4% are dissatisfied with their life; in Korea and Turkey the figure rises to 20%. In Montenegro and Latin American countries, including Colombia, however, more than one in two students reported high satisfaction levels.


The report also shows that despite reported links between eating a good breakfast and improved attainment, almost 30% of 15-year-olds in the UK do not eat breakfast before school – with the figure rising to more than 35% for the most disadvantaged pupils. Girls once again are worse affected, with more than two-thirds skipping breakfast compared with 22% of boys.


Natalie Perera, executive director and head of research at the Education Policy Institute (EPI), which hosted the launch of the report on Wednesday, said the findings on UK teenagers were stark, particularly for those from poorer backgrounds.


“Disadvantaged pupils are more likely to be bullied than their peers, and are more likely to skip breakfast before school – with the gap between the proportion of advantaged and disadvantaged pupils in the UK doing so the second biggest out of all 34 countries.”


Emily Frith, EPI director of mental health, said: “The findings show UK pupils have lower than average levels of life satisfaction, high levels of anxiety in the classroom, and are more likely to be bullied, compared to children in other countries.


“The government should explore how children’s wellbeing can be improved, including through the education system. It should seek to understand the causal relationship between internet use and young people’s wellbeing, and look to implement a strategy help young people develop the resilience and skills they need to live safe, digital lives.”


Responding to the report, a Department for Education spokesperson said: “These findings show young people have the motivation and desire to go as far as their talents can take them and that their parents are supporting them throughout their time at school.


“Assessment is an important part of education but it is also important that the test period is managed so students feel supported throughout. Our reforms have also put a stop to the endless treadmill of exams for young people, giving them more time to gain a greater understanding of the subject.”



British teenagers more competitive than peers but more likely to bullied

17 Mart 2017 Cuma

Why I stood up for British Sign Language in parliament | Dawn Butler

Yesterday I made history by becoming the first member of parliament to ask a question in the House of Commons using British Sign Language (BSL). I have always fought for equality for all, and am pleased to have been able to help raise awareness of BSL. But recognising one struggle should not detract from recognising another – it is important to focus on equality for deaf people and those who are hard of hearing.




I have submitted an early day motion, which I hope will speed the way towards a BSL Act




Tomorrow will be the 14th anniversary of the official recognition of BSL as a language in its own right. But my request yesterday was that BSL be given full legal status in this country, which is why I asked the minister to bring forward a BSL bill. It’s a big concern for a large part of our society. There is a significant BSL community in the UK with an estimated 151,000 BSL users, 87,000 of whom are deaf. A British Sign Language act would give BSL the same status that other languages have in the UK. Deaf people deserve the right to communicate and live their lives with their preferred language.


BSL has been used in the Commons before – but never to question the government. That’s why, as an ambassador for the Brent and Harrow United Deaf Club, in north-west London, I invited some members to watch proceedings from the House of Commons public gallery. I have a level two qualification in BSL, but to deliver a question under that kind of pressure was something else entirely – I was pretty nervous about getting it wrong!


However, I felt it was hugely important to raise this question using BSL, not only so that many deaf people and those hard of hearing could understand what I was asking, but also because it signifies the seriousness of the issue at hand. The MP Rosie Cooper, whose parents are deaf, helped me to rehearse, and Rachael Maskell, another Labour colleague, started signing to me when I sat next to her, which was a nice surprise.


We need to make parliament representative of wider society. One important part of this is to make parliament as open and accessible as possible. Some great steps for equality have been taken in the house, helped by the efforts of our modernising Speaker, John Bercow – but there is still much more to be done. So I’m delighted that asking my question in sign has raised awareness for this cause.


Tomorrow’s 14th anniversary of the official recognition of BSL was a hugely significant moment, and is a date to celebrate with great pride. It gave deaf people the basic recognition they deserve. But we must also acknowledge that there is still a way to go until BSL is equal under the law. The only way to give the deaf community the equality and recognition they deserve is to bring a British Sign Language bill before parliament to address all these issues. Such a law would surely garner support from all sides of the house.


Legal status would ensure that British Sign Language is protected. Information and services would be produced in BSL, therefore giving equal access. It could put BSL on the national curriculum and ensure that it is offered in schools, as other languages are. This would enable BSL users to access education in their first language.


Many won’t even realise that we are currently in the middle of #SignLanguageWeek, with charities raising awareness of the importance that BSL has on hundreds of thousands of lives – hopefully my question can help that cause. Earlier this week I held an event in the Speaker’s apartments to promote the UN international day against race discrimination (for which I will be leading a debate in Westminster Hall this coming Tuesday) – and I invited staff from St Michael’s Nursery, in Brent, who are unique in that they teach their children, aged four and five, sign language. All schools should follow that example and teach basic sign language.


I have submitted an early day motion, which I hope will speed the way towards a BSL Act. And I hope many more MPs will pledge their support to this important campaign in order to enshrine these rights into law. I know that colleagues from the Labour party will support this cause, but in order for such a law to pass, we need the government to get on board too. I hope that it will.



Why I stood up for British Sign Language in parliament | Dawn Butler

1 Mart 2017 Çarşamba

British people unaware of pollution levels in the air they breathe – study

People across the UK are underestimating the impact of the air pollution crisis in their local areas, according to a new survey.


Almost two thirds of respondents said they were concerned about the issue of air pollution, but only one in 10 said they thought the air they breathe is bad.


Last week the Guardian revealed that there are 802 educational institutions in the capital where pupils as young as three are being exposed to illegal levels of air pollution that can cause serious long term health problems.


And government statistics show 38 our of 43 UK “air quality zones” breach legal limits for air pollution.


Friends of the Earth, which carried out the latest survey, said that despite the growing evidence many people – particularly outside London – were still unaware of the dangers of air pollution.


“With only 1 in 10 British adults rating their air quality as poor despite swaths of the country breaking legal limits for air pollution, it seems the message about the scale and danger of air pollution isn’t getting through,” said Oliver Hayes, a Friends of the Earth air pollution campaigner.


“Often you can’t see it or smell it, but it’s there – and air pollution is risking the health of an entire generation of children.”


To coincide with the findings Friends of the Earth has launched what it says will be the “biggest ever citizen science air pollution experiment”. People can apply to the charity for clean air kits, enabling them to test the air quality where they live, and FoE will provide tips on how to avoid air pollution and what people can do to help support the campaign for clean air.


Hayes said: “Our clean air kits help people to find out about the air quality in the places they care about most: on the street where they live, where they work, where their children go to school and at the heart of their communities.


“The results will help us build up a localised picture of the state of our nation’s air to really bring home why everyone, from individuals to businesses and politicians, must do all they can to make the air we breathe safer.”


Air pollution is linked to heart disease, lung cancer, worsening asthma and poor lung development in children and leads to the premature deaths of around 40,000 people every year in the UK.


The Friends of the Earth report coincided with a separate study for the Greater London Authority which found a much higher awareness of air pollution in the capital.


It found that nine out of 10 people in London believe air pollution is at crisis levels and two thirds describe air quality in their local area as bad.


It also found that every London borough has recorded illegally high levels of air pollution in the last two years.


Hayes said: “Whilst Londoners are starting to understand the air pollution crisis, in part due to welcome attention from politicians and the media, outside of the capital it’s a very different story.”


Friends of the Earth said it hoped thousands of people will join in the charity’s experiment so it can create a comprehensive national air pollution picture. It said the data generated will feed into a national map which will help create a “state of the nation” report on air pollution.



British people unaware of pollution levels in the air they breathe – study

20 Şubat 2017 Pazartesi

NHS at breaking point, according to British Medical Association

The NHS is at “breaking point” with a decline in the number of hospital beds leading to delays and cancelled operations, the British Medical Association (BMA) has warned.


Analysis by the BMA found the number of overnight beds in English hospitals fell by a fifth between 2006-07 and 2015-16. The report found that in the first week of January this year, almost three-quarters of trusts had a bed occupancy rate of 95% on at least one day.


According to the analysis, in 2000 there were an average of 3.8 beds per 1,000 people, but this had dropped to 2.4 beds by 2015. The report said that in November 2016 14.8% of patients spent more than four hours waiting for a hospital bed, having been seen in an A&E department.


“The data demonstrates the increasing pressures on the system. It provides evidence of the underlying cracks within the NHS, such as funding constraints, changes and increases in demand, disjointed care and workforce pressures,” the BMA report said.


It noted that pressures on mental health services were particularly acute, with a 44% decrease in the number of mental health beds since 2000-01.


The document was seized on by opposition politicians, with Labour saying it was a “wake-up call [that] Theresa May must not ignore” and the Liberal Democrats warning the situation was becoming “intolerable”.


The BMA’s chairman, Mark Porter, said: “The UK already has the second lowest number of hospital beds per head in Europe and these figures paint an even bleaker picture of an NHS that is at breaking point.


“High bed occupancy is a symptom of wider pressure and demand on an overstretched and underfunded system. It causes delays in admissions, operations being cancelled and patients being unfairly and sometimes repeatedly let down.


“The delays that vulnerable patients are facing, particularly those with mental health issues, have almost become the norm and this is unacceptable. Failures within the social care system are also having a considerable knock-on effect on an already stretched and underfunded NHS.


“When social care isn’t available, patients experience delays in moving from hospital to appropriate social care settings, which damages patient care and places a significant strain on the NHS.


“In the short term we need to see bed plans that are workable and focused on the quality of care and patient experiences, rather than financial targets. But in the long term we need politicians to take their heads out of the sand and provide a sustainable solution to the funding and capacity challenges that are overwhelming the health service.”


Jonathan Ashworth, shadow health secretary, said: “Thanks to Tory mishandling of our NHS, patient numbers in hospitals are now routinely above the levels recommended for safety. The shameful reality is this overcrowding puts patients at risk and blows apart ministers’ claims to be prioritising safety.


“The number of overnight hospital beds has decreased by over a fifth and combined with Tory neglect and underfunding this has left nine out of 10 hospitals dangerously overcrowded this winter.


“Almost all hospitals have been running over the safe 85% mark for bed occupancy while 60 hospital trusts are over 95% this winter. The response from ministers is to blame others and bury their heads in the sand.


“This government’s mismanagement is failing our NHS and failing patients. The prime minister must wake up to this crisis and ensure that the NHS and social care have the funding and support needed in the budget next month.”


Norman Lamb, the Lib Dem spokesman and former health minister, said: “Chronic bed shortages should be the exception not the rule. The situation is getting intolerable, with more cancelled operations, longer delays and those with mental health issues being systematically let down.


“Ultimately we could reduce the need for hospital beds by improving preventive care. But cutting both preventive services and beds leads to disaster. That is what we are now witnessing.”


An NHS Improvement spokeswoman said: “The NHS has been under real pressure this winter, as it copes with a surge in demand for emergency services the knock-on effects are felt throughout our hospitals.


“Our hospitals are extremely busy but we are working tirelessly alongside providers to help them manage and to support more efficient use of the number of beds available.”


The BMA’s report is published before the NHS Improvement’s figures for the third quarter of 2016-17, which are expected to show the parlous state of trusts’ finances.


NHS Improvement’s chief, Jim Mackey, has acknowledged trusts will miss the £580m deficit “control target” and forecasters have predicted the combined black hole in their finances could reach nearly £1bn by the end of the year.


The Department of Health disputed the BMA’s analysis, insisting figures from before 2010-11 could not be compared with those afterwards; the earlier figures included NHS-provided residential care beds and were compiled on an annual basis, while the more recent figures were published quarterly and only included beds under the care of consultants.


A spokesman said: “This analysis is inaccurate, the figures come from two different time periods when the way of counting beds was different, and so they aren’t comparable.


“Our hospitals are busier than ever but thanks to the hard work of staff, our performances are still amongst the best in the world. We have backed the NHS’s own plan for the future with an extra £10bn by 2020.”



NHS at breaking point, according to British Medical Association

14 Şubat 2017 Salı

65% of British public support new Clean Air Act, says survey

More than half of the British public believe air pollution levels across the UK are damaging to their health and almost two-thirds back proposals for new laws to tackle the issue, according to research.


Canvassing the views of 1,670 adults, the survey found that 58% believed the current levels of air pollution in the UK to be either harmful or very harmful to health, a figure that rose to 73% among Londoners. What’s more, 65% of those polled said they would support a new Clean Air Act to tackle the issue.


The study, undertaken by YouGov, was commissioned by the environmental law organisation ClientEarth on behalf of the campaign for a new Clean Air Act.


Launched this week, the campaign is a coalition of organisations, charities and activists – including Greenpeace, the British Lung Foundation and Sustrans – calling for fresh legislation to reduce air pollution.


“This poll clearly shows that people across the UK want the prime minister to get serious about the toxic and illegal levels of air pollution,” said James Thornton, the chief executive of ClientEarth which is leading the coalition.


“This is an urgent public health crisis over which the prime minister must take personal control,” he added. “She must listen to the country and come up with a credible plan that will reduce air pollution as soon as possible, so we are not choking on illegal levels of pollution until 2025 or beyond. The time for excuses is over.”


Poor air quality is a growing issue in cities around the world and is linked to a host of health problems, including heart failure, strokes and dementia.


“It’s no exaggeration to say that air pollution is a public health crisis. It contributes to up to 40,000 early deaths a year across the UK,” said Dr Penny Woods, chief executive of the British Lung Foundation. “Toxic air is a risk to everyone but hits those with a lung condition, children and the elderly hardest.”


The problem is acute. Last month it was found that parts of London had exceeded their annual legal limits for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in the first five days of the year, while January’s cold, still weather exacerbated problems across swaths of the UK, with multiple regions rated as having high or very high pollution levels, and the capital put on high alert. Last week, the European commission announced it was escalating action against the UK for its failure to keep to agreed limits on air pollution.



James Thornton, the CEO ofClientEarth.


‘The poll shows people want the prime minister to get serious about the toxic and illegal levels of air pollution,’ said James Thornton, CEO of ClientEarth. Photograph: Philip Toscano/PA

But while the study suggests the majority of Britons would back attempts to improve air quality, the fervour appears to be split along Brexit lines. Those who voted to leave the EU were less concerned about air pollution, less likely to support the banning of diesel vehicles in areas of high pollution, and were less inclined to place the burden of addressing the problem on the government’s shoulders; while 67% of remain voters held the government among those chiefly responsible for keeping our air clean, only 47% of leave voters felt the same. By contrast both camps strongly believed the motor industry and other businesses linked to air pollution should lead the way.


What’s more, while half of remain voters said air pollution had worsened over the last eight years, those who voted leave were more sanguine, with only 36% believing the problem had grown.


Although 57% of leave voters support a new Clean Air Act, with mooted measures including reducing traffic and shifting to low-emission vehicles, only 33% felt that when Britain leaves the EU, there should be stronger laws on air quality in Britain. More than half of remain voters said they supported stronger laws.


Simon Birkett, founder and director of Clean Air in London, part of the new coalition, stressed the need for action, adding that any legislation should ensure powers and responsibilities are given to the mayor and local authorities to tackle the problem.


“Sixty years after the first Clean Air Act, which fought respiratory problems from short-term exposure to visible air pollution from coal and wood burning, we need a new Clean Air Act to address newly understood health effects that include heart attacks and strokes from long-term exposure to invisible air pollution from diesel fumes,” he said.


A government spokesperson defended current plans to tackle the issue. “We are firmly committed to improving the UK’s air quality and cutting harmful emissions. We have committed more than £2bn since 2011 to increase the uptake of ultra-low emissions vehicles, we support greener transport schemes, and have set out how we will improve air quality through a new programme of clean air zones.


“In addition, in the autumn statement, we announced a further £290m to support electric vehicles, low-emission buses and taxis, and alternative fuels. We will update our air quality plans in the spring to further improve the nation’s air quality.”


Guardian Cities is dedicating a week to investigating one of the worst preventable causes of death around the world: air pollution. Explore our coverage in The Air We Breathe and follow Guardian Cities on Twitter and Facebook to join the discussion



65% of British public support new Clean Air Act, says survey

6 Ocak 2017 Cuma

NHS faces "humanitarian crisis" as demand rises, British Red Cross warns

The NHS is facing a “humanitarian crisis” as hospitals and ambulance services struggle to keep up with rising demand, the British Red Cross has warned, following the deaths of two patients after long waits on trolleys in hospital corridors.


Worcestershire Royal hospital launched an investigation on Friday into the deaths and did not deny reports that they had occurred after long waits on trolleys in corridors over the new year period.


On Friday, doctors’ leaders warned that more patients could die because of the chaos engulfing the NHS.


The deaths prompted claims that the health service was “broken”, and long waits for care, chronic bed shortages and staff shortages were leading towards what the head of Britain’s A&E doctors called “untold patient misery”.


It is believed that one woman died of a heart attack after waiting for 35 hours on a trolley in a corridor, and another man suffered an aneurysm while on a trolley, and could not be saved.


It is also believed that another patient was found hanged on a ward at the same hospital, which admitted that it was under serious pressure, partly as a result of the extra strain hospitals face during winter. The deaths are said to have happened between New Year’s Day and Tuesday 3 January.


Many other patients who visited Worcestershire Royal hospital this week told the Guardian of long waits in A&E, corridors lined with patients, and overstretched staff doing their best to cope.


Dr Mark Holland, the president of the Society for Acute Medicine, said: “For a long time we have been saying that the NHS is on the edge. But people dying after long spells in hospital corridors shows that the NHS is now broken.


“We have got to the point where the efforts of staff to prop up the system are no longer enough to keep the system afloat. We are asking NHS staff to provide a world-class service, but with third world levels of staffing and third world levels of beds.


“That so many other hospitals in England are facing the same pressures as the one in Worcester means that other fatalities could occur. I would suggest that the same thing could happen in other hospitals, because lots of hospitals are under the same pressures.”


It is also possible that mainly frail elderly patients admitted to hospital over the festive period may have died because they received inadequate care on wards where staff were ill-equipped to deal with their conditions, Holland added.


“At the moment, we have lots of patients in the wrong beds in hospitals. That is, patients admitted as an emergency, but who do not need an operation, being looked after on wards that usually look after patients with surgical care needs,” he said.


“They may not have nurses with the right skill mix or the same level of dedicated medical cover [as general medical wards], so we know that these patients often don’t get the same level of care. Therefore I fear that during the Christmas and new year period, people in non-specialist beds may have come to harm.” Holland added that he could not estimate how many may have died as a result.


Fifty of England’s 152 NHS acute hospital trusts were forced to declare an alert last month, and sometimes temporarily scale back the level of care they offered to patients, because they could not cope with the number of people seeking medical attention, according to analysis by the Nuffield Trust health thinktank. Every hospital in Essex has had to go on “black alert” – the NHS’s highest level – in recent weeks.


In December, seven trusts had to declare the highest level of emergency 15 times, meaning they were unable to give patients comprehensive care. Paramedics have told the Guardian they have had to wait for up to eight hours at a time outside A&E units to discharge a patient into the care of hospital staff, because emergency departments cannot accept any more admissions, thereby lengthening 999 response times.


Dr Taj Hassan, the president of the Royal College of Emergency Medicine, said figures it obtained from hospitals across the UK showed some were treating as little as 50%-60% of A&E patients within four hours, far below the 95% target.


“Figures cannot account for untold patient misery,” he said. “Overcrowded departments, overflowing with patients, can result in avoidable deaths.” Hassan and Holland blamed the government’s underfunding of the NHS and social care systems for contributing to hospitals becoming worryingly full.


“The emergency care system is on its knees, despite the huge efforts of staff who are struggling to cope with the intense demands being put upon them. The situation is intolerable for both staff and patients, who are all too often left in the undignified position of waiting on a trolley in a corridor for a bed to become free,” said Hassan, who is an A&E consultant at two hospitals in Leeds.


Separately, the London Ambulance Service is looking into the possibility that problems when its IT system crashed on New Year’s Day contributed to the death of at least one patient. Staff had to make paper records of 999 calls in what one ambulance crew member described as “a shambles”.


The latest official NHS performance figures, released on Friday, showed that A&E units across England were forced to divert patients to nearby hospitals 57 times over the Christmas period. In addition, 34 hospitals said they had experienced major problems coping with demand.



NHS faces "humanitarian crisis" as demand rises, British Red Cross warns

28 Ekim 2016 Cuma

Disharmony in British yoga community over moves to regulate teachers

Last year, while attempting an advanced yoga move, Chris Flack ruptured a muscle in his back and slipped a disc in his neck. He had set himself a challenge – to achieve the scorpion pose, an advanced position that involves balancing on your hands or forearms, then arching your back and legs over until your toes touch your head, scorpion-like.


“I wasn’t listening to my body. It was a good lesson to me, to slow down. I had come out of some inversions [headstands and handstands] quite badly a few times, and came crashing down on to my neck. It was just irresponsible practice.”


For six months, Flack was in and out of hospital with pain management appointments, and taking morphine. The eventual cure happened shortly before he was due to have a guided cortisone injection, and was less orthodox. After staying off alcohol for months because of the injury, he got a little tipsy at a wedding, and was on the dancefloor at 2am when an elderly woman – “a drunk auntie,” he says with a laugh – jumped on his back and all but fixed him.


He still has to manage the injury, which involves daily physiotherapy and a fortnightly deep tissue massage. As for his yoga practice: “I don’t practice inversions any more. Here in the west we want to push ourselves. It’s a competitive culture where we want to win, to achieve, to be the gold medal winner of the yoga Olympics. I think for me yoga’s a lot more about letting go and being comfortable with just being. It’s quite hard to get that balance. I think it’s dangerous if you’re not really aware.” As a yoga instructor, he says, “I teach very carefully, I don’t want to push people, but the odd thing was I was pushing myself.”


Which goes to show even conscientious yoga teachers can get it wrong when it comes to their own practice. But it’s the ones who encourage their students to go too far who are currently under scrutiny. Now the British Wheel of Yoga has begun a year-long consultation with a view to regulating yoga teachers and introducing National Occupational Standards. Is there really a problem with bad, even dangerous, teachers? “We think so,” says Paul Fox, the organisation’s chair, which won’t be a surprise to anyone who has ever taken a dodgy yoga class (in my first class in a south London leisure centre, the teacher encouraged me to do a headstand).


In a now infamous (among the yoga community) excerpt from science journalist William J Broad’s book The Science of Yoga: the risks and rewards, he highlighted how yoga had been linked to knee, back and shoulder injuries and even strokes. Others have reported repetitive strain injury, torn ligaments, and damaged wrists and hips caused by yoga.


But there isn’t really any evidence to suggest yoga is more dangerous than any other physical activity.


Fox concedes most of the evidence is anecdotal, but says good teaching will minimise any risks. “If you’re going to take members of the public through a set of yoga poses, you do have a duty of care towards them. You do have to do a risk assessment, and know how to modify postures and how to deal with people who have lower back pain, arthritis, high blood pressure or any number of common ailments. Many good yoga teacher training courses will cover that.”


In gyms and leisure centres, yoga teachers have to join the Register of Exercise Professionals (REPs), in the same way spin and aerobics instructors do, but privately anyone can set themselves up as a yoga teacher. And the problem with REPs, say many within the yoga community, including Yoga Alliance, which represents and accredits instructors, is that its standards are so low. The new proposal is to improve standards, but it has been criticised as needless bureaucracy and financially beneficial for the bodies involved, the BWY among them. Yoga Alliance describes it as “a cosy little arrangement”.


Is it a money-making scheme? “I think it’s the opposite,” says Fox. The BWY trains teachers, which takes a minimum of 18 months; some courses take three years. “Because it’s unregulated, a lot of people run [sub-standard] teacher training courses and charge pretty much what we charge. They’re the ones making a lot of money out of it.” But people within the yoga community are not happy. At the recent first meeting, says Fox, the mood was “rather un-yogic”.


The problem is that it’s not entirely clear what yoga is. For a start, there are a variety of disciplines. Then there are some who believe it’s a spiritual or religious practice (and probably one that should not be taught by western instructors to white people in designer gymwear) and as such shouldn’t be regulated. Or that it’s a creative art and can’t be controlled.


“The other school of thought,” says Sarah Shone, a chartered physiotherapist who is also a yoga teacher, “is that yoga is more of a physical practice and physical practices do run the risk of having a negative effect on the body. There is a risk of injury with any physical activity that any of us undertake.”


In yoga, she says, the most common injuries are often to do with overstretching and that can apply to any joint of the body. “People who are put into poor alignment can overstretch ligaments and tendons and can flare up problems that are already there. Yoga is a very safe form of physical activity for the vast majority of people, and as long as they are sensible and take responsibility for their own practice and always make sure the yoga instructor is aware of any pains and injuries so they can take that into consideration.” She is undecided on whether it needs more regulation.


“Anybody can call themselves a yoga teacher because there isn’t a central governing body. But then is there a governing body for every other form of exercise? And there isn’t.”



Disharmony in British yoga community over moves to regulate teachers

19 Ekim 2016 Çarşamba

British doctors and health professionals call for rapid coal phase-out

Groups representing Britain’s 600,000 doctors and health professionals say it is “imperative” to phase out coal rapidly to improve health and reduce NHS costs.


The doctors and nurses say tackling outdoor air pollution from traffic and power stations would cut climate emissions, reduce air pollution, and deliver a powerful boost to the nation’s health.


“Climate change and air pollution are both major health threats,” says the UK Health Alliance on Climate Change in a report. “They share a common driver: the combustion of fossil fuels. Pollution from coal plants alone costs the UK as much as £3.1bn each year in human health impacts.”


The group of 15 health bodies includes seven royal colleges of medicine and the British Medical Association.


Pollution from coal plants causes many serious health conditions including stroke, coronary heart disease and lung cancer. It disproportionally affects children and kills more people than road accidents , says the report.


The government has said it intends to phase out coal power plants by 2025 but the doctors say they are alarmed that no consultation papers looking at how this could be achieved have been published in more than a year.


“Ending the use of coal is a simple, no-regrets public health intervention. The rapid phase-out of coal fired stations is an imperative first step. Coal is the most carbon-intensive source of power generation, and is a key focus for reducing the risks of climate change.


“In the UK, burning coal is linked to 1,600 premature deaths, 68,000 additional days of medication, 363,266 working days lost and more than 1m incidents of lower respiratory symptoms,” says the report.


It urges politicians not to tackle air pollution and climate individually, as has been done in the past. “The UK has witnessed … policies that encouraged the use of diesel cars which inadvertently worsened air quality. Considering air pollution and climate change together can limit adverse health effects.


“Some strategies can be good for both air quality and climate change, for instance wind, solar and tidal energy. Acting on ones that are beneficial to both is advantageous to health. Indeed, joining up policies on health, air pollution and climate change can offset the costs of climate mitigation policies through the health benefits that they bring.”


Air pollution is the second biggest public health threat in the UK after smoking and kills 40,000 people a year in Britain, said Prof John Middleton, president of the Faculty of Public Health. “Coal-fired energy is particularly damaging through its invisible particulates and because it is a driver of climate change,” he said.


“The phase-out of coal use is an essential step towards creating a sustainable energy policy for the UK,” said Dr Richard Horton, editor-in-chief of the Lancet medical journal. “It is also a vital co-benefit for health – ending coal use will deliver long-lasting health and dividends for the British population. Life expectancies will be prolonged, disease and disabilities reduced, and future risks to health diminished. This is an opportunity to be seized.”


Jonathan Griggs, professor of paediatric respiratory and environmental medicine and fellow of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health said that children were particularly vulnerable to burning coal.


“Air pollution from burning coal has been linked to low birth weight and pre-term delivery as a result of maternal exposure during pregnancy,” he said. “The phase-out of coal is a double win for tackling the twin health threats of air pollution and climate change.”


“Tackling air pollution and climate change will have numerous health benefits but it requires a joined-up approach from government to ensure the health impacts are better recognised and fully realised,” said Janet Davies, the Royal College of Nursing’s chief executive and general secretary.



British doctors and health professionals call for rapid coal phase-out

12 Ekim 2016 Çarşamba

British women, please rally to support decriminalisation of abortion | Letters

In Poland mass protests have forced the government to drop plans to tighten its already draconian abortion laws. Yet here in Britain most people are unaware that women still live under the threat of being sentenced to life imprisonment if they end their own pregnancies by buying pills on the internet. Doctors also face harsh penalties if they do not fill in the correct forms before terminating a pregnancy.


Back in 1967 our law was changed to allow the legal ending of pregnancies if certain conditions were met. Otherwise the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act remained in place; and so it still is today – nearly half a century later.


On Wednesday 24 October a ten-minute rule bill is to be introduced to the House of Commons proposing that abortion in Britain is decriminalised. To do so would not only allow speedier and much less bureaucratic use of modern medical procedures, but would save a huge amount of NHS money while bringing us into line with countries such as Canada where medical abortion was decriminalised nearly three decades ago.


In Britain one in three women will have an abortion. Yet the views of the small but vociferous anti-abortion lobby garner most of the publicity and continue to dominate public argument. If only a small proportion of the millions of women who have benefited from the 1967 Act were to write to their MPs now asking them to be in the Commons on 24 October and to give support to this proposal, perhaps this punitive Victorian legislation would have a chance of being brought up to date.


Back in the 1960s when I was an abortion law reform activist, the Guardian and its readers did much to facilitate the liberalisation of the law. They now need to mobilise again so that their children and grandchildren can benefit in the same way that they already have from the activities of my generation.
Diane Munday
Wheathampstead, Hertfordshire


Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com



British women, please rally to support decriminalisation of abortion | Letters

6 Ekim 2016 Perşembe

Councils failing to monitor most British schools for dangerous air pollution

Councils are failing to monitor most schools in Britain for dangerous air pollution despite government advice, freedom of information requests have revealed.


All Britain’s 433 local councils were asked by the British Lung Foundation (BLF) whether they placed pollution monitors within 10 metres of school grounds. Of the 322 which replied, only 140 said they did.


In urban areas identified by the World Health Organisation as having harmful levels of particulate pollution, nearly half were found to be monitoring only one or two schools. Less than one in three local authorities monitored more than two schools.


Air quality monitoring guidance for the UK is drawn up by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). The government does not insist that schools are monitored and local authorities are left to implement and interpret results and take action where needed.


The survey showed “alarming discrepancies” in council behaviour, said a BLF spokeswoman. Some used very simple diffusion tubes to measure only NO2 gas, but others monitored for different-sized particles called PM10s and 2.5s which are spewed out by traffic and industry, she said.


Equally, some authorities monitored the air close to school playgrounds, but others measured air quality hundreds of metres away.


“The guidance on monitoring that Defra gives local authorities needs to be revised and strengthened. Parents should be able to tell what their children are breathing, especially if they have conditions like asthma,” the spokeswoman said.


Concern about children’s health has grown following new scientific research which has shown lung capacity can be permanently impaired by pollution at very early ages.


A study of 2,400 children at 25 schools across east London found children had 5-10% less lung capacity, with an increased risk of diseases such as asthma and bronchitis.


According to the BLF, nearly 1 million schoolchildren up to 15 years old have been diagnosed with lung conditions.


“Children and teaching staff are not being made fully aware of the health risks posed by air pollution. Local authorities need clear guidance to monitor the air that children breathe as well as more resources and funding to tackle it,” said Russell Hobby, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers.


“Children’s lung health is particularly vulnerable to air pollution, yet they are not being protected by the government’s air quality monitoring guidance. There is a huge discrepancy in the levels of monitoring outside schools across the country, with many schools in the most harmfully polluted places not being monitored,” said Dr Penny Woods, chief executive of British Lung Foundation.


A an LGA spokesman said: “Councils follow guidelines on monitoring air pollution which are laid down by central government. These are to take a risk-based approach – monitoring those locations where members of the public might be regularly exposed.


“As well as schools this could also include residential properties, hospitals and care homes – depending on which area is at greatest risk. Many schools are actually some distance from busy roads and therefore unlikely to have high air pollution levels.”


He added that the “real issue” was for councils to move from monitoring pollution to acting on it, which would take government support.


A report that was commissioned but not published by London city hall under Boris Johnson showed that the number of primary schools in the capital breaching EU pollution levels had fallen from 433 in 2010 to 357 in 2013.


Another report, for the mayor of London, found children at nearly 90 secondary schools in London regularly breathed illegal and dangerous levels of air pollution.


Research by the Campaign for Clean Air found that 1,148 schools in London are within 150 metres of roads carrying 10,000 or more vehicles per day, and a total of 2,270 schools are within 400m of such roads.


“Children across the UK are exposed to illegal levels of air pollution on a daily basis. Air pollution is an invisible problem and parents have a right to know if their children are breathing dirty air, so it should be monitored,” said Andrea Lee, healthy air campaigner at environmental law firm ClientEarth.



Councils failing to monitor most British schools for dangerous air pollution

3 Ekim 2016 Pazartesi

British Vogue ditches models in favour of "real" women – for one issue

The new issue of British Vogue is to be a “model-free zone” after editors decided to use only “real” women to showcase the designer clothes featured in the magazine.


Among the women included in the issue are the architectural historian Shumi Bose, the charity director Brita Fernandez Schmidt, Hello Love Studio creative director and Hello Beautiful founder Jane Hutchison, and ice-cream brand creator Kitty Travers, as well as some of the women behind London’s Crossrail project.


Alexandra Shulman, the editor of British Vogue, said she commissioned the project because she felt strongly that professional women, or women in positions of authority or power, should be able to indulge their interest in fashion without it seeming frivolous. “In this country, there is still a stigma attached to clearly enjoying how you look and experimenting with it if you are a woman in the public eye and not in the fashion or entertainment business,” she told the Telegraph.


Shulman has edited British Vogue since 1992 and is venerated for her egalitarian attitude to body image. She does not publish stories about diets or cosmetic surgery, and in 2009 wrote a letter to all major designers arguing that the tiny sample sizes they offered for shoots encouraged models to be unhealthily thin. “I was also frustrated by a few designers’ PRs choosing only to lend their clothes if they approved of the appearance of the subject to be photographed rather than what they did,” she said.


The cover of the new Vogue issue, out on 6 October, may been seen to contradict Shulman’s previous claims that readers do not want a “real person” on the front of the magazine. In an interview for BBC Radio 2 in 2014, the editor told guest presenter Lily Allen: “People always say, ‘Why do you have thin models? That’s not what real people look like,’ but nobody really wants to see a real person looking like a real person on the cover of Vogue.


“I think Vogue is a magazine that’s about fantasy to some extent, and dreams, and an escape from real life. People don’t want to buy a magazine like Vogue to see what they see when they look in a mirror. They can do that for free.”


Shulman defended the choice of the actor Emily Blunt as the cover star of the “real” issue by pointing out that she plays an everyday woman in her new film, The Girl on the Train. According to Vogue, Blunt joked about appearing on her first cover: “It took three hours of hair and makeup to get me looking this real!”


The issue comes after H&M used the 60-year-old Scottish stylist Gillean McLeod as the face of its swimwear range and US brand J Crew used staff members and their friends instead of models to showcase its clothes at New York fashion week.



Women’s Equality party leader Sophie Walker


Women’s Equality party leader Sophie Walker has spoken out against ‘systematic malnutrition’ in the fashion industry. Photograph: Suki Dhanda for the Observer

The Women’s Equality party, meanwhile, is campaigning to change the fashion industry’s approach to body image by calling for designers showing in London to display at least two sample sizes, one of which must be more than a UK size 12.


Sophie Walker, the party’s leader, told the Guardian last month that these “tiny, tiny little clothes are such that normal-sized women have to starve themselves to fit into them. And we’re not talking a three-day soup diet here, which would be bad enough; we’re talking weeks and weeks of systematic malnutrition, for which young women are paid to fit into these tiny little sizes.”


Last week, four US Vogue editors were branded “jealous and hypocritical” after complaining about the presence of “pathetic” and “desperate” fashion bloggers at Milan fashion week.


Shulman distanced herself from the row, tweeting:


Alexandra Shulman (@AShulman2)

Can I just be CLEAR. The current Bloggersgate furore is via American Vogue not @BritishVogue.


October 3, 2016



British Vogue ditches models in favour of "real" women – for one issue

Revealed: MRSA variant found in British pork at Asda and Sainsbury"s

Meat produced from British pigs has been shown to be infected with a livestock strain of MRSA, the Guardian can reveal, raising concerns that the UK is on the brink of another food scandal.


Tests on a sample of 97 UK-produced pork products from supermarkets show that three – sold at Asda and Sainsbury’s – were contaminated with the superbug strain which can cause serious health problems.


The Guardian, working with the Bureau of Investigative Journalism (BIJ), has also established that a loophole in import regulations is leaving an open door for MRSA CC398-infected live pigs from countries such as Denmark, where the disease is rife.


The findings have serious implications for human health. MRSA CC398 is a potentially deadly bacteria which can be resistant to even the strongest antibiotics. It is less harmful to humans than the MRSA bug that kills about 300 people in hospitals in England and Wales each year. But it causes unpleasant persistent infections and can seriously harm people with compromised immune systems, such as those already suffering other illness.


It is known to have been responsible for at least six deaths in Denmark, though that is likely to be the tip of the iceberg. People can contract the disease from infected meat, and from infected animals.


The superbug, like other foodborne germs, is killed by thorough cooking – but it can be passed on through lapses in hygiene. Workers on pig farms can also catch the disease from infected animals and pass it on to other people.


Without action to halt it, the spread of the bug could follow the pattern in Denmark, where MRSA CC398 became established over a decade, now afflicts about two-thirds of pig farms and is viewed as a major public health crisis, with 12,000 people believed to have contracted it. Currently, there is no screening programme for MRSA CC398 on British farms.


Prof Tim Lang, of the Centre for Food Policy at City University in London, said: “If we don’t have tight infection control and we don’t try to control the movement of live animals, infection can spread. The British are up in arms about the movement of people, but the EU also has a large movement of animals. We need biosecurity, we need to tighten up this livestock movement. You may get cheap meat, but in the long term it’s going to add to your public health problems.”


Prof Erik Millstone of Sussex University added that the emergence of antibiotic-resistant superbugs from agriculture was “a huge threat to human health” and that there was a clear risk that MRSA CC398 could spread among British livestock herds and to people. He anticipated that the government would downplay this risk but warned: “While the [government] tries its customary tactics of blaming the victim, it won’t work.”


The tests were carried out by Dr Mark Holmes, director of studies in clinical veterinary medicine at Churchill College, Cambridge University, and commissioned by the Alliance to Save Our Antibiotics, founded by the Soil Association, Compassion in World Farming and Sustain. Two samples of minced pork from Asda and one from Sainsbury’s were found positive.


Last year, tests by the Guardian on 100 samples of pork in UK supermarkets, including a mix of imported and UK-bred meat, found nine contained the superbug. However, all but one of the infected products were of Danish origin, the other Irish. That investigation marked the first time MRSA CC398 had been publicly found in products in UK supermarkets.


Today’s follow-up tests are the first to name supermarkets whose UK-produced pork has been contaminated with the superbug. It is not possible to say whether these products originally came from imported pigs, or whether UK pig herds have been infected through imports. Either way, imports are likely to be the main agent spreading the disease, as the UK’s pork production has remained relatively free from MRSA CC398 until now, and the main method of spreading the disease is from animal-to-animal contact on farms.


At least one regular Danish supplier of imported pigs to the UK was found to be contaminated with the drug-resistant bacteria in 2014, the Bureau of Investigative Journalism has established. The company –Breeding Centre Rønshauge A/S – refused to say how many pigs it had exported to the UK and whether they could have been contaminated. But official export figures show that the company supplied 41 pigs to the UK in July this year, 65 in 2013 and 16 in 2012.


But the UK government does not screen for the infection in imported animals, citing a low risk of serious illness. The main initial effect is a nasty skin infection that is disfiguring, unpleasant and highly infectious, but not fatal.


Emma Rose, from the Alliance to Save Our Antibiotics, said: “It is extremely worrying to find LA [livestock-associated]-MRSA in British-produced pork.”


“Scientists are now warning that the extensive MRSA reservoir in animals could ultimately lead to a pandemic spread in the human population. LA-MRSA is able to cause serious and potentially fatal infections in humans, and as the bacteria is resistant to antibiotics, it is extremely difficult to treat. What’s more, even more dangerous variations are emerging as the superbug evolves.”


The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) said: “Livestock-associated MRSA is not the same as MRSA strains that can cause healthcare-associated infections and if meat is handled and prepared properly the risk to people is low. Defra and the National Pig Association recommend that pigs imported to Britain are screened for LA-MRSA.


“The government is reviewing options for surveillance, which will be proportionate to the very low health risk posed by livestock-associated MRSA.”


Asda declined to comment on the test findings. Sainsbury’s told the Guardian that MRSA CC398 was “very uncommon” in British pork and that it worked with farmers “to ensure antibiotics are used responsibly and are taking advice from leading industry experts”.


The rise of the CC398 variant has been linked to the overuse of antibiotics in factory farming, where often cramped and dirty conditions allow disease to flourish and farmers become dependent on frequent doses of antibiotics.


The threat from imports of live animals has been overlooked, according to experts. When animals are imported, they have to undergo screening for a variety of other diseases, but screening for MRSA CC398 is purely voluntary. As a result, there is no way of knowing how many infected animals may have been brought to Britain.


Watch the Guardian’s investigation into how intensive pig farming is accelerating an antibiotic crisis.

There have been at least two confirmed cases of the disease found at UK pig farms, one of them in Northern Ireland and the other in eastern England. However, as no systematic tests are carried out on UK farms, it is impossible to know how many may harbour the bug.


Defra does not collate statistics on the number of farm animals imported, but figures from the Danish government show the UK imported more than 3,000 breeding pigs from the country in the past six years, including 916 in 2013, 598 the following year and 283 last year.


In the last three years, the UK food industry has been rocked with revelations from the Guardian of campylobacter in chicken, which can cause serious illness, stronger versions of salmonella with greater resistance, and of drug-resistant forms of E coli, recently found in one in four supermarket chickens, that thwart all but the strongest antibiotics. Most of the problems are thought to be down to the pressure towards factory farms producing the cheapest possible meat.



Revealed: MRSA variant found in British pork at Asda and Sainsbury"s

22 Eylül 2016 Perşembe

Self-harming among British military personnel up by a third

The number of UK armed forces personnel deliberately self-harming has jumped by more than a third over five years.


Figures released by the Ministry of Defence revealed a 36% increase in servicemen and women who self-harmed at least once between 2010/11 and 2014/15.


There were 383 recordings of deliberate self-harming (DSH) – including self-injury and self-poisoning – for navy, army and air force personnel in 2014/15, up from 339 in 2010/11.


The data excludes servicemen and women who had thoughts of DSH or suicide.


Women, army personnel and those aged under 24 were most at risk, the figures suggested.


Those aged under 20 were around 10 times more likely to self-harm than those aged 45 and over, while women were around twice as likely as men to be at risk.


The MoD said the risk groups in the armed forces were in line with those in the general population.


Improved methods of capturing DSH data could have attributed to the reported rise in incidents, the MoD added.


The data included regular armed forces personnel, mobilised reservists, full-time reservists and non-regular permanent staff alongside trained and untrained personnel.



Self-harming among British military personnel up by a third

7 Ağustos 2016 Pazar

British Olympic chiefs criticised for Strongbow sponsorship of Team GB

British Olympic chiefs have been accused of encouraging underage drinking following their decision to allow the cider brand Strongbow to sponsor Team GB at the Rio Games.


Doctors, public health experts and alcohol groups are warning that Strongbow’s high-profile association with the exploits of British athletes in Brazil could lead to teenagers starting to drink and increase the amount of alcohol-related harm.


In a letter to the Guardian, members of the Alcohol Health Alliance (AHA)say that the sponsorship of Team GB by a cider brand will “promote the idea of drinking to our young people”.


The signatories include Dr Clifford Mann, the president of the Royal College of Emergency Medicine, which represents A&E doctors, Sarah Toule of the World Cancer Research Fund and experts in liver health. They say: “We are concerned that children will be encouraged to drink as a result. There is strong evidence that exposure to alcohol marketing leads young people to drink at an earlier age.


“We know from the research that exposure to alcohol messages increases the likelihood that non-drinking young people will start to drink, and increases the likelihood that existing young drinkers will drink more alcohol, and in a more risky fashion. This exposure also leads to more positive beliefs among young people about alcohol.”


Under the deal, Strongbow is featuring official Team GB branding on its products and spending several million pounds promoting its “supporting the supporters” campaign aimed at sports fans in Britain.


Heineken, the drinks multinational which makes Strongbow, has not disclosed how much it is paying the British Olympic Association (BOA), which did not have an alcohol sponsor when the Games was held in London four years ago.


But Strongbow rejected the AHA’s concerns and said its tie-up with Team GB and promotional campaign was aimed entirely at adults and would not involve any individual British competitor endorsing the drink.


“Our partnership is exclusively focussed on the adult fans who will be cheering on Team GB over the next two weeks. Strongbow will not be sold or promoted at Games venues, feature in TV coverage, or be linked to any individual member of Team GB,” said a spokesman.


The AHA letter adds: “A study of school children aged 13-14 from four EU countries found exposure to alcohol sports sponsorship through viewing a major football tournament was linked to a 70% increased chance of underage drinking.


“The later we can delay the uptake of drinking among young people, the better. We know that the younger people start to drink, the more chance there is that they will become dependent drinkers, with all the harm that causes to individuals, their families and society.”


When the sponsorship deal was agreed in April, Bill Sweeney, the BOA’s chief executive, said:“The fans made the difference in 2012 and with the team competing some 6,000 miles away in Rio we want to make sure they know they have the whole nation behind them all over again. Strongbow’s commitment to supporting the supporters and celebrating success is a great way of embracing that passion for our Olympians.”


The Portman Group, the alcohol industry trade body, defended the deal. “Alcohol sponsorship makes a significant contribution to the economy, supports major sporting events and provides essential investment for grassroots programmes. In the UK marketing alcohol to children is prohibited and alcohol sponsorship is strictly controlled. The strict rules are supported by all major sports organisations, alcohol producers and have been welcomed by the UK governments,” said a spokesman.



British Olympic chiefs criticised for Strongbow sponsorship of Team GB

20 Ağustos 2015 Perşembe

The culture of presenteeism is going to destroy British staff | Archie Bland

It’s the middle of the doing work day, and you’re at your desk. A person is paying you to be there. But instead of the crucial business you’ve been tasked with, you’re studying the Guardian.


Associated: Working longer hrs increases stroke threat, significant study finds


Screw the boss, you may possibly say: I want a break. However, however, it would seem that even slacking at function may possibly not be doing you any excellent. A comprehensive new examine has proven that people who function very extended hours encounter a 33% increased danger of stroke. Nor is this the 1st proof of the wellness hazards connected with overwork. No wonder you need to switch off for a bit.


Here’s the striking issue, although: the dilemma diagnosed here is not doing work tougher: it is functioning longer. A lot of the danger is related with bodily inactivity, and the review does not differentiate in between the worker completing a spreadsheet and the one particular liking Facebook photographs of babies. The danger doesn’t lie in what you’re sitting there doing. It lies in the fact that you’re sitting there at all.



It is greater to look occupied and have a stroke, we truly feel, than to get issues accomplished then switch off.



Oh dear, you fret, we’re all going to keel over. Then you flip to yet another story about the UK’s enormous productivity dilemma and wonder how on earth we’re going to resolve that. And then you think about possibly doing a spot of perform ahead of lunch.


It surely doesn’t take a presentation from Heather in HR to stage out the absurdity of this. It is intuitively clear that the longer you are anticipated to drudge, the significantly less productive your drudgery is most likely to be. And this isn’t just a hunch: there is a sturdy correlation in between nations working longer hrs and being significantly less productive.


And but we remain instinctive presenteeists. Anecdotes in the NYT investigation into Amazon’s functioning culture this week may possibly have been excessive – no time for slacking off there – but particular components sounded acquainted for several of us, specifically the late night emailing. It is better to look hectic and have a stroke, we truly feel, than to get issues accomplished then switch off.


How to repair this? Properly, for an enlightened employer, it wouldn’t be so difficult. Have an automated hometime reminder from the CEO pop up on each and every screen when six o’clock rolls about ban electronic mail soon after 8pm except in genuine emergencies. When a person finishes a project early, reward them with the afternoon off.


At the moment, this utopian situation appears unlikely. We continue to be in the grip of a political narrative that heralds the strivers and scorns the shirkers David Cameron was reported to have manufactured an opt-out from the doing work hrs directive a single of his goals in renegotiating our membership of the EU. And if our leaders are not ready to declare that the 1am email need to go unanswered, it is tough to see any person else carrying out so. They may well start off by reforming their own culture – for there are handful of workplaces a lot more addicted to this macho nonsense than Westminster. But I really don’t suppose any of them will be studying this. They are all as well bloody hectic.



The culture of presenteeism is going to destroy British staff | Archie Bland

18 Ağustos 2015 Salı

British smokers urged to start vaping by well being officials


Britain’s eight million smokers have been urged to start off ‘vaping’ soon after a government-backed report identified that the electronic gadgets are 20 times much less dangerous than traditional cigarettes.




So far no electronic cigarette has been licensed by the Medicines and Healthcare merchandise Regulatory Company (MHRA) or the National Institute for Overall health and Care Excellence (Nice).




But a new report launched these days by Public Well being England, Kings College London and Queen Mary London, discovered e-cigarettes carry just 5 per cent of the risk of tobacco and must be broadly adopted by smokers.




If each smoker in Britain switched to vaping, all around 75,000 lives a year could be saved, they estimate. The authorities known as for e-cigarettes to be prescribed on the NHS as soon as regulated.




Nagy Memes Szabolcz and Georgia Samuels at Vapefest, Shrewsbury


Nevertheless several scientific studies have identified that the flavours employed in e-cigarettes may result in respiratory issues and damage the immune technique while analysis published on Tuesday by the University of Southern California advised they could encourage youngsters to take up smoking.


“E-cigarettes are not completely threat totally free but when compared to smoking , evidence displays they carry just a fraction of the harm,” mentioned Professor Kevin Fenton, Director of Well being and Well-getting, at PHE.


“We’re encouraging smokers to look at e-cigarettes as a way to help them to lessen publicity to harm from smoking.


“At the moment there are no licensed goods that can be utilized for medicinal purposes and that’s why we are extremely supportive of the MRHA seeking at the pathway for making certain that there are safe and regulated e-cigarettes that can be promoted for health care purposes.


“Smoking continues to result in the biggest numbers of preventable deaths every single 12 months. Our ambition remains to see the 1st smoke free of charge generation by 2025.”





“Concerns do remain as to the prolonged-phrase well being impact of e-cigarettes…”

Penny Woods, Chief Executive of the British Lung Basis




British smokers urged to start vaping by well being officials

16 Ağustos 2015 Pazar

E-cigarette use growing amid British youths, campaign group research demonstrates

Experimentation with e-cigarettes is increasing among eleven- to 18-year-olds in Britain but is most common amid people who currently smoke or who have completed in the past, according to anti-tobacco group Action on Smoking and Health (Ash).


It says outcomes from its third annual on the web survey of youthful people’s attitudes to e-cigarettes suggest that it is “unlikely” they are currently acting as a gateway to tobacco.


Although 10% of virtually 2,300 surveyed for Ash by YouGov in March said they had experimented with e-cigarettes “once or twice”, up from four% two years in the past, standard use remained rare.


Only two.four% mentioned they used them at least once a month and virtually all have been young men and women who explained they had been, or have been still, normal tobacco smokers. The increases in use have took place as regular tobacco smoking by 11- to 15-12 months-olds has dropped to a reduced of 3%.


Ash is concerned, however, that a expanding proportion of young folks believe vaping is as dangerous as smoking cigarettes – a figure that has enhanced from 11% in 2013 to 21% this yr, even if most accurately considered e-cigarettes significantly less damaging.


The discovering comes just days soon after the Royal Society for Public Well being referred to as for a public education campaign that may possibly support smokers not nevertheless ready to give up their nicotine habit switch to e-cigarettes, because these did not also have the much more hazardous chemicals, this kind of as tar and arsenic, discovered in tobacco cigarettes.


Final results from Ash’s 2015 survey coincided with analysis, in the journal Public Health, of its 2013 and 2014 statistics by personnel at Public Well being England (PHE), Ash, the Uk Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, and other experts.


Authors of the journal report, although it only covers the very first two surveys, also express issues at the rising proportion of young individuals perceiving e-cigarettes to be as hazardous as tobacco ones. This, it warns, may possibly reduce numbers of young men and women “willing to attempt and/or use what is evidently a considerably much less hazardous supply of nicotine”.


They also even so say youthful folks are “still relatively inexperienced” in the use of e-cigarettes and recognise worries above their attraction to young folks. Shut surveillance have to proceed on any romantic relationship in between e-cigarette use and that of traditional cigarettes, “and the extent to which engagement in 1 use precedes or replaces the other”.


Hazel Cheeseman, director of policy at Ash, stated: “These outcomes need to reassure the public that electronic cigarettes are not linked with any rise in youthful men and women smoking. Although more young men and women are making an attempt electronic cigarettes and numerous a lot more younger folks are aware of them, this has not led to widespread typical use or an increase in smoking.”


A new law will prohibit their sale to beneath-18s in England and Wales from 1 October and Scotland is planning to adhere to suit quickly. In Wales, e-cigarette use will also be banned in enclosed public locations, as tobacco smoking previously is.


Kevin Fenton, national director for health and wellbeing at PHE, explained this would “further reduce youngsters accessibility to these goods and will reinforce the message that they are meant for adult smokers who want to minimize down or stop smoking”.


The Welsh government said: “We are concerned the use of e-cigarettes could re-normalise smoking, especially for a generation who have grown up in a largely smoke-cost-free society.


“We are not alone in our worries – the Globe Health Organisation and other global bodies have known as for better regulation of e-cigarettes and forty other nations have previously taken equivalent steps.”



E-cigarette use growing amid British youths, campaign group research demonstrates

14 Temmuz 2014 Pazartesi

Why should the British public care about FGM?

image from Plan

Strategy are making use of the rose motif as a shocking metaphor for female genital mutilation with out being graphic or offensive. Photograph: Prepare Uk




The latest Worldwide summit to end sexual violence in London was exclusive in its ambition not only in efforts to bring sexual violence in conflict to an end, but also in trying to engage the public in a difficult problem about which they had minor prior expertise and mostly no personal encounter or connection. The public came to understand about the effect of sexual violence in conflict, and the function that is becoming completed to end it as survivors conveyed their stories, there was a effective sense that together, men and women from about the globe were standing up against the perpetrators of these crimes.


As the United kingdom manager of a worldwide campaign for girls’ rights, Due to the fact I am a Lady, knowing and fostering this sense of solidarity is crucial. I have turn into keenly conscious of this as we re-launch our campaign this month, opening with a concentrate on violence towards ladies and girls and, in certain, female genital mutilation (FGM).


FGM is an issue that provokes strong reactions the visual appeal of an ‘us and them’ mentality is a threat. Men and women from communities affected by FGM may truly feel that other aspects of their culture are currently being challenged or degraded while these in unaffected communities could consider FGM as evidence of ‘alien’ values, feeding negative stereotyping.


For Strategy United kingdom, which is why it truly is all the far more essential that we deal with FGM as we do any other human rights violation. It should be stopped, and everybody – each girl, female, boy and man in every portion of the planet – can perform a element in making that happen.


No-one particular would disagree that the movement to finish FGM ought to be led from inside of the 29 nations in which the bulk of instances take place. Our focus is always to support the operate of nearby communities in identifying the underlying social norms that underpin FGM and difficult their persistence. But we ought to be clear that this isn’t going to – or should not – indicate that people in other components of the world can’t include their assistance.


An powerful campaign provides a voice to individuals affected by a problem and then encourages other people to amplify that voice. It recognises that rights are invalid if they are not respected universally and fought for across communities, cultures and continents.


A valuable comparison right here is campaigning on little one marriage. Like FGM, this is an concern that does influence folks in the Uk, but that does not pervade society in the identical way as it does elsewhere in the globe. Little one marriage will only be brought to an end by campaigns driven from inside of the nations of prevalence. But via our Take the Vow campaign, which ran in 2011, we asked the British public to declare their opposition to this practice on social media. This accomplished two things: first, we showed that folks can and need to care about issues that will not immediately affect them or even their local community. Second, it was made clear to decision-makers in the United kingdom that this was an problem on which voters desired action.


Rather than, as some might argue, undermining the indigenous campaigns, these routines assisted area the concern on the agenda. The UK’s Division for International Growth took much more discover of kid marriage when it saw that men and women in the Uk cared.


The sensitivities all around FGM make the public discussion more charged, but the exact same logic applies to this problem as to child marriage. The United kingdom public should not be afraid to increase its voice. Longstanding campaigners on the issue, each in the Uk and the global south, can draw strength from this assistance.


With this summer’s #FGMRose campaign, we developed a quick, shareable video, supporting a burst of social media activity with deliveries of roses to people who could influence modify and handouts to the public in central London. The rose motif is shocking with out currently being graphic or offensive. It has provoked robust reactions, and quite usually from men and women who had by no means just before regarded as what FGM was or how damaging a practice it is. Our aim was for the Uk public to feel differently about FGM and for that reason not be put off campaigning about it, fearing it is some kind of ‘niche issue’ that is greatest avoided. It’s now our most viewed video on YouTube by some distance.


At next week’s Woman Summit, David Cameron will seek to galvanise worldwide action to finish FGM and kid marriage in a generation. The Uk public are exhibiting they care – and the government understands it must respond. So when I am asked, as I have been, “why must ‘middle England’ care about FGM?” my response is clear: due to the fact it can make a distinction in ending it.


Colin Walker is campaigns manager at Prepare United kingdom. Comply with @colinwalkerplan on Twitter.


Go through a lot more stories like this:


• #BringBackOurGirls: the verdict


• #fastfortheclimate: gimmick or potent climate alter campaign?


• 6 innovations for ending violence towards ladies


Join the neighborhood of worldwide advancement specialists and professionals. Turn into a GDPN member to get much more stories like this direct to your inbox




Why should the British public care about FGM?