Group etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
Group etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

11 Mayıs 2017 Perşembe

Facebook censors group that helps women obtain abortion pills

Facebook has censored the page of an organization that helps women obtain abortion pills, citing its policy against the “promotion or encouragement of drug use”.


Women on Web, which is based in Amsterdam, helps connect women with doctors who can provide abortion pills if they live in countries where abortion access is restricted. It is a sister organization to Women on Waves, which provides abortions and other reproductive health services on a ship in international waters.


Women on Waves announced that the page had been “unpublished” on its own Facebook account, writing: “Women on Web provides life-saving information to thousands of women worldwide. Its Facebook page publishes news, scientific information and the protocols of the World Health Organization and Women on Web has answered over half a million emails with women who needed scientific, accurate information essential for their health and life.


“We expect Facebook will [undo] this action soon enough, as access to information is a human right.”


This is the second censorship row between Facebook and Women on Web. In January 2012, Facebook deleted the profile photograph of the group’s founder and director, Dr Rebecca Gomperts. The image contained instructions for inducing an abortion using Misoprostol. Gomperts was locked out of her account for two days after re-posting the image, but Facebook subsequently apologized and reinstated both the image and her account.




We expect Facebook will [undo] this action soon enough, as access to information is a human right




Facebook did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


With nearly 2bn users, the social media site plays a crucial role in disseminating news and information around the world. But Facebook has struggled to meet competing demands to allow for the free flow of information while cracking down on graphic material (such as the livestreamed murder of a baby in Thailand in April).


In 2016, the company faced international condemnation over its decision to censor the iconic Vietnam War photograph of a naked girl fleeing a Napalm attack. Facebook subsequently altered its policy to allow for editorial judgments about newsworthiness.


On 3 May, amid criticism over its handling of graphic videos, Facebook announced that it would hire 3,000 more content reviewers. Such content reviewers are tasked with applying the company’s “community standards”, often with uneven results.


Facebook’s has faced particular difficulty enforcing its rules for “regulated goods” – prescription drugs, marijuana, firearms, and ammunition. The company bars “attempts by private individuals to purchase, sell, or trade” such items, but has struggled to halt gun sales.


The company has cracked down aggressively on pages related to legal medical marijuana, however. In 2015, the site temporarily banned business publication Crain’s for promoting a cover story about medical marijuana.



Facebook censors group that helps women obtain abortion pills

19 Nisan 2017 Çarşamba

When therapists also need therapists: "Suffering is not unique to one group"

Britain’s Prince Harry has earned praise in recent days for speaking up about his personal issues with mental health, the need to not stay silent about emotions, and the benefits of seeking therapy.


Describing how he arrived at a breaking point in an interview with the Telegraph, he explained it was listening to other people’s problems and realizing he was unable to be as helpful as he wanted to be that pushed him to seek help.


“You park your own issues because of what you’re confronted with, and all you want to do is help and listen, but then you walk away and go, hang on a second, how the hell am I supposed to process this?”


He then added that for every three hours of listening to people, psychologists take half an hour to process it themselves with someone else. He’s right: one of the most important traditions within the mental health world. Therapists also need therapy.


We asked four psychotherapists with extensive experience in the field to open up about how they, too, use therapists.


David Lopez, practitioner for 15 years, Connecticut


David Lopez, a former president of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, says there are a few different reasons why therapists will seek therapy.


The first is during the training process, when therapists in training will have a supervisor and often a therapist of their own.


“Typically, people who want to become therapists have an interest in connecting with people. When they are doing therapy that need needs to be redirected, to be tamed so that it does not get in the way of not being objective,” Lopez elucidates.


What needs to be addressed in training is something called “countertransference”, Lopez explains. While a client transferring emotions they would have for someone in their outside lives onto their therapist (called “transference”) is generally considered a good thing, a therapist transferring emotions onto their client is to be avoided.


If a therapist in training was orphaned young, they may emotionally react to stories their clients bring into sessions about parents and loss, for instance. The challenge for the therapist is then not necessarily to get rid of the feelings related to loss and parenting, but to become very aware of them and become intimately acquainted with these “blind spots”.


A common blind spot might simply be witnessing a patient struggle with some kind of grief and watch them cry: a therapist may want to go and hug them, and be their friend.


“You may wish to connect with a patient for your own need, instead of applying the tools that you have been taught. But they’re not paying you to be their friends, even if a hug in that moment may feel good to give.”


Elena Lister, private practitioner for 30 years, New York


“Shockingly enough, therapists are also people,” Elena Lister says, not without a considerable amount of irony.


Lister, a psychiatrist, analyst and professor who teaches at Cornell and Columbia universities, says that there is nothing particularly mysterious leading therapists to seek treatment of their own, beyond the initial training requirements during the early years. The answer is it’s life, and life’s trying and often painful events.


Lister herself sought therapy when she lost her six year-old child to leukemia. At the time, the help she found did not adequately meet her needs, she says. Identifying this lacuna in her own field convinced her to specialize in grief and loss, meaning she could seek to be there for others in a way she had not been able to professionally find herself.


Treating patients (including patients who are therapists) who are undergoing such extreme pain means developing an ability to leave what has happened during a therapy session in the room once it is over.


“You have to be able to keep it in boundaries. Some people have gone through such tremendous suffering. You have to be fully present in the room. But if I am going to do this, it’s my mandate to not carry it to the next room. I have a duty not to.”


To keep herself upbeat and in the right mental space for all her patients, as well as of for herself, Lister says she has to do “all sorts of things. I talk to friends, to myself, to my husband. I exercise, I meditate”.


Leslie Prusnofsky, private practitioner for 35 years, New York


Leslie Prusnofsky, a psychiatrist, psychoanalyst and faculty member at Columbia University, says that in some ways treating therapists is no different than treating non-therapists.


“You’re dealing with a lot of people’s pain. Whether it is therapists or lay patients, pain is human, and human suffering is not unique to one group.”


But Prusnofsky says that treating therapists does sometimes come with its own particular obstacles.


“It can result in more walls that have to be pulled down,” he explains. This will be the case even if the therapist-patients are very willing to engage in treatment.


Part of the therapy process is trying to break through to things that are naturally being protected, he explains. There is “an unconscious resistance” that can be found in everyone, Prusnofsky says, but therapists who know the jargon may be even better than others at hiding the real root of their problems.


“Using the jargon is one of the cover-ups to stay away from the depths of what they [the therapist-patient] actually need to explore.


“If someone comes in saying they have a lot of ‘repressed anger’, you may find with time, the deeper you go, that the anger turns into sadness. What is revealed is a sense of loss or of deprivation that is harder for the person to deal with.”


David Forrest, practitioner for 50 years, New York


For David Forrest, a clinical professor of psychiatry at Columbia University, and a trained psychotherapist and psychoanalyst who also holds a private practice in Midtown Manhattan, one of the most interesting – and tough – questions that therapists go to therapy for is when it’s time to call it quits.


Forrest, whose work includes research and teaching in the field of neurology, says that asking the question of when a psychotherapist should retire is a particularly fascinating one.


“To ask how does a psychotherapist know when it it time to hang up their spurs, asks us to define the mental capacities necessary to be a psychotherapist in the first place,” Forrest poses.


A surgeon may no longer physically be able to withstand the arduous hours, or may suffer from an injury that prevents them from operating, but so long as a psychotherapist’s brain is going, when do they know to stop? Doesn’t an older therapist mean a more experienced therapist, an attribute one would seek?


Memory loss or small mental failings can affect the mind as one gets older and negatively impact remembering a patient’s complex history.


But other things may start to go with age, too, Forrest says, elements that might be just as crucial to quality therapy-giving.


Deciphering what is funny and not, for example, sometimes morphs with age.


If someone contracts frontotemporal dementia, their sense of humor tends to degrade from the more elaborate sensitivities, Forrest says. A therapist with this kind of affliction may develop a new kind of sense of humor – that is less suitable in a therapy room.


“It [the sense of humor] would no longer be deadpan and dry. It would sink to slapstick and sadistic, and the brain would enjoy low-quality humor.”


“The pun is a low sense of humor,” the psychiatrist explains, helpfully.


As for Forrest himself, a veteran of the profession: have decades and decades of practice and inquiry into the human brain started to wear him out? Such a question is one more adapted to younger professionals, he responds.


“For someone like me, there is no question of burnout.”



When therapists also need therapists: "Suffering is not unique to one group"

3 Nisan 2017 Pazartesi

Anti-abortion group in tampon tax row removes death penalty comparison

A charity that has been given £250,000 from the government’s so-called tampon tax fund has scrubbed language describing abortion after rape as a “death penalty” from its website after being challenged on it.


The Life charity has now said it will do a full review of its website to remove offensive language, after the Guardian pointed out that the same article referred to abortion in cases of disability as a “death sentence”.


Life, which campaigns against abortion, was among 70 organisations working with women and girls to receive funding from the £12m tampon tax fund set up by George Osborne.


The £250,000 funding will go into housing and counselling services run by Life for homeless pregnant women in west London, the government announced. But the decision to award Life funding provoked concern among some women’s groups.


On Monday, Life’s education director Anne Scanlan was challenged on the BBC Radio 4’s Today programme about a piece on the charity’s website in which abortion after rape was described as a “death penalty”.


Ann Furedi, of the British Pregnancy Advisory Service, brought up the phrasing and said: “You cannot be saying on one hand that you provide an unbiased, non-judgemental approach to dealing with women when this is the ideological motivation of your organisation.”


Scanlan responded: “I cannot believe we use that terminology at all, we would absolutely never use that kind of language face to face when dealing with women.”


The article was swiftly edited on Monday morning to remove the description. However, the same article still referred to abortion in cases of disability as a “death sentence”.


When the Guardian pointed this out, Scanlan said the language was inappropriate and offensive, and pledged to review all content on the website. “Where inappropriate language was used, we will amend it or remove it,” she said.


“We offer help and support to women. We certainly don’t want anything on the website that’s offensive,” Scanlan said. “We are not going to shy away from it: we are an anti-abortion organisation. But I was genuinely surprised to find out that language was being used on our website.”


Scanlan said she did not know how long the article had been online but believed it was written before she arrived at Life six years ago and had slipped through the net when the website was revamped last year. “Unfortunately a whole swathe of briefing papers have been moved from the old website without being adequately checked,” she said.


She denied that the group’s opposition to abortion made it unsuitable to receive the tampon tax funding. “We never, ever try to push our views onto anybody else,” she said, adding Life provides “non-directive counselling” that avoids recommending any particular course of action. “When it comes to providing support for women, we’re not debating the issue: we are just providing support,” she added.


Furedi told the Guardian she did not believe it was possible to separate Life’s opposition to abortion from the advice it provides to women. “Organisations are led by their values, and that runs through advocacy and campaigning, but it also runs through the way services are delivered,” she said, adding: “What they are saying is abortion has, as far as they are concerned, no place in the management of problem pregnancy.”


The government’s decision to provide funding to an anti-abortion organisation was a “slap in the face” to public opinion, which is increasingly supportive of choice, Furedi said, pointing out that the £250,000 was among the largest grants handed out: “Every woman who’s buying sanitary protection is being caused to effectively make a donation [to Life]”. The charity has a turnover of £3.6m a year.


A spokesperson for the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, which determines how the tampon tax fund is distributed, said the money is being spent to “help improve the lives of disadvantaged women and girls, including those who have been affected by violence,” adding: “Life has been awarded £250,000 to fund a specific project in west London that will help homeless and other at risk women who are pregnant by providing housing, counselling and life skills training.”


The government declined to comment on whether it had any concerns about providing significant funding to an avowedly pro-life organisation.



Anti-abortion group in tampon tax row removes death penalty comparison

2 Nisan 2017 Pazar

Anger as tampon tax is used to help fund anti-abortion group

A new row has broken out over the so-called tampon tax after it emerged that a quarter of a million pounds from a controversial levy on women’s sanitary products is to be given to an anti-abortion organisation.


Under pressure from campaigners after failing to honour a pledge to scrap the 5% VAT on sanitary products, former chancellor George Osborne said that more than £10m a year would be redistributed from the tax receipts to women’s charities.


But there was consternation on Saturday night among women’s groups and politicians who had campaigned on the issue after it emerged that £250,000 of that money is going to Life, a charity that campaigns against abortion and has been at the centre of controversy over the information provided by a network of unregulated pregnancy counselling centres.


A spokesperson for the End Violence Against Women Coalition said: “We are surprised to see that Life is the recipient of a very significant tampon tax grant. The government set out clearly that this money would be spent in ways that would address women’s specific needs and inequalities. It is hard to understand how a service offering counselling based on the fundamental premise that abortion is wrong, to vulnerable women, can do that.”


The government announced last Friday that 70 organisations across the country would share £12m from the tampon-tax fund, which it said would improve the lives of disadvantaged women and girls across the country.


Rob Wilson, the minister for civil society, gave details of the funding on a visit to the Suzy Lamplugh Trust, which is to receive £200,000 to help increase its casework support service for women who are being stalked.


Four other charities, ranging from the Women’s Rape and Sexual Abuse Centre Cornwall, which is getting £179,157, to Black Country Women’s Aid (£240,401), were highlighted in a press notice from the Department for Culture, Media & Sport.


No mention was made of Life, but the organisation appears on a separate long list, which says it will receive £250,000 for “housing, practical help, counselling, emotional support and life skills training for young pregnant women who are homeless”. There has been surprise not just at the award, but at its size: it is one of the largest donations on the list.


Life describes itself as unique, combining “pro-life advocacy and education work with nationwide services providing positive alternatives to abortion”. It served notice last year of plans to increase its online presence to compete with established service providers such as Marie Stopes and the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS).


Among others who criticised the grant was Labour MP Paula Sherriff, whose successful amendment to last year’s budget led to the government pledging to abolish the tax.


“It will seem bitterly ironic to many women if we are taxed for our biology, only for the government to hand over that money to organisations that don’t even believe we should have control over our own bodies, especially when so many are left without basic sanitary protection,” she said.


“Just this Thursday, I led a Commons debate on period poverty and discussed terrible cases like the homeless women who can’t afford tampons and whose health is at risk, the girls in Leeds who play truant during their periods and a charity that provides free sanitary products to Africa now getting requests from schools in Britain because so many female pupils cannot afford them.


“Tackling these issues would surely be a better use of the tampon tax fund. The minister agreed on Thursday to look at funding for sanitary protection in schools and homeless shelters, and I will be asking the government to review their allocation of the tampon tax fund urgently.”


There was also criticism from the Women’s Equality Party. Its leader, Sophie Walker, said: “We consider any restriction on women’s reproductive rights as violence against us and thus it was a shock to learn the government has used the tampon tax fund to support a charity whose mission is anti-choice and aims to ‘make abortion a thing of the past’.


“While we appreciate the work Life does to support homeless pregnant women and care for children with life-limiting or terminal illnesses, we are very disappointed to see the allocation of such significant funds to this one charity while many others struggle, particularly those supporting black and minority ethnic women and disabled women who experience some of the highest rates of violence against them and yet are consistently at the bottom of the list for funding.


The government had originally faced a potential rebellion over the issue, after an amendment tabled by Sherriff won the backing of Eurosceptics keen to assert Britain’s power to set its own tax rates. Osborne had originally pledged to remove the tampon tax in November 2015, but was unable to do so due to regulations applied by the European Commission that prevented member states from doing so.


The government said on Friday that it is committed to continuing the fund until EU rules allow a zero rate of VAT to be applied to women’s sanitary products and that a decision will be made on the future of the Fund once this has been achieved.


Wilson said at the launch of the fund: “From Cornwall to Dundee, the tampon tax fund continues to benefit organisations in every corner of the UK working to improve the lives of disadvantaged women and girls, including those who’ve been affected by violence.


“This fund is helping to improve lives, supporting our ambition to create a fairer, shared society for everyone. I’m glad that so many worthwhile organisations will benefit from this money.”


A spokesperson for Life said: “We believe that our support services for women are not a luxury but are essential for them to have the space to look at options for continuing their pregnancies with support.”



Anger as tampon tax is used to help fund anti-abortion group

20 Ekim 2016 Perşembe

How a cancer group thwarted Facebook"s censorship: square breasts

The Swedish Cancer Society has come up with a new strategy to evade Facebook’s censorship of female anatomy: make round breasts square.


The not-for-profit organization’s breast cancer awareness video, featuring animated images and information on how to conduct breast exams, was taken down by Facebook this week.


Facebook’s explanation for the deletion was, “Your ad can not market sex products or services nor adults products or services,” the organization told the Guardian.


Facebook did not immediately respond to the Guardian’s request for comment.


In response to the censorship, the group has issued an open letter to Facebook that features a revised cartoon image. This time, the pair of breasts, areolae, and nipples are constructed of pink squares rather than pink circles.




We find it incomprehensible and strange how one can perceive medical information as offensive


Lena Biornstad, Cancerfonden spokeswoman


The “breast self-examination school” was “not meant to offend”, the organization states, adding:


We understand that you have to have rules about the content published on your platform. But you must also understand that one of our main tasks is to disseminate important information about cancer – in this case breast cancer.


After trying to meet your control for several days without success, we have now come up with a solution that will hopefully make you happy: Two pink squares!


This can not possibly offend you, or anyone. Now we can continue to spread our important breast school without upsetting you.



Facebook’s policy on nudity “restrict[s] some images of female breasts if they include the nipple” but “always allow[s] photos of women actively engaged in breastfeeding or showing breasts with post-mastectomy scarring”. The company also restricts “digitally created” representations of nudity “unless the content is posted for educational, humorous, or satirical purposes”.


“We find it incomprehensible and strange how one can perceive medical information as offensive,” Cancerfonden spokeswoman Lena Biornstad told Agence France-Presse.


[embedded content]

The censorship has caught the attention of Swedish MP Åsa Eriksson, according to Swedish public broadcaster SVT. Eriksson is seeking a meeting with Facebook representatives to discuss its “incomprehensible” standards, she wrote on her personal blog.


Facebook’s incredible global dominance over the dissemination of news and information has placed it at the center of frequent censorship rows.


In September, the social network backed down from its decision to censor the iconic photograph of a naked girl fleeing a napalm attack during the Vietnam war, after the editor of Norway’s largest newspaper published a front-page open letter accusing Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg of “abusing your power”.



How a cancer group thwarted Facebook"s censorship: square breasts

13 Eylül 2016 Salı

All-party group calls for legalisation of cannabis for medicinal uses

Cannabis should be made legal in Britain for medicinal uses, according to a cross-party group of MPs and peers who led an inquiry into the drug’s potential to help patients.


The recommendation from the group chaired by Lady Meacher would put the UK in line with at least 11 other European countries and 24 US states where laws already allow people to use the drug to alleviate chronic pain and other symptoms.


In a report published on Tuesday, the group calls on the government to introduce a system that grants people access to cannabis for medical reasons, and to decriminalise the growing of small amounts at home for the same purposes.


The group took evidence from more than 600 patients and medical professionals on the use of cannabis as a medicine and commissioned a consultant neurologist, Prof Mike Barnes, to review published research on the drug’s potential to alleviate medical problems.


His review found “good evidence” that cannabis can help with chronic pain, muscle spasms often associated with multiple sclerosis, the management of anxiety, and nausea and vomiting, particularly when caused as a side-effect of chemotherapy.


The inquiry heard that scores of patients had sought out cannabis to relieve their symptoms even though it was illegal, and that users often found it impossible to get expert medical guidance or supervision as to how they should take the drug. The report claims 30,000 people in the UK use cannabis as a medicine, but adds that the figure could be as high as 1 million, according to the campaign group End Our Pain.


“In Professor Barnes’s report we now have irrefutable evidence that cannabis is an effective medicine for very large numbers of people,” Meacher told the Guardian. “These are people who are suffering the most appalling chronic illness involving severe neuropathic pain, interminable nausea, and anxiety, and all these conditions can be helped, not in every case, but in many cases where prescribed medicines do not work or because there are such appalling side-effects that the person is worse off with prescribed medicine than without.


“About 30,000 patients in the UK currently risk arrest and in some cases are being arrested for buying their medicine from illegal drug dealers, and that is an appalling state of affairs,” Meacher added. “This money goes to drug dealers and terrorists, and we could avoid putting this money into the hands of these people by legalising cannabis for medicinal uses.”


The report, Access to Medicinal Cannabis: Meeting Patient Needs, from the all-party parliamentary group for drug policy reform, challenges the government’s classification of cannabis under schedule 1, which is reserved for drugs that have no recognised medicinal uses. Under the scheme, the production, possession and supply of cannabis, along with LSD and mescaline, is allowed only for research and other special purposes.


Caroline Lucas, the co-leader of the Green party and an author of the report, said: “The case for legalising the production and use of medicinal cannabis is overwhelming. Doing so would give immediate relief to people in pain, and the evidence from around the world shows that it can be done without increasing drug-related harms.”


David Nutt, formerly the government’s chief drugs adviser and now a professor of neuropsychopharmacology at Imperial College London, said it was “outrageous” that the government had “dragged its heels” over legalising cannabis for medicinal uses. The pursuit of patients who used the drug to alleviate pain and other symptoms caused harm and wasted vast amounts of taxpayers’ money in police and court time, he added.


“Cannabis has been a medicine for more than 4,000 years, and in the UK was in the pharmacopoeia until 1971 when the USA forced us to remove it as part of the war on drugs. Now, over 200 million Americans have access to medicinal cannabis whereas we do not,” Nutt said.


Mark Ware, a medical cannabis researcher at McGill University in Montreal, said that if the UK was serious about legalising medicinal cannabis, it would do well to learn from the Canadian legal framework.


“We have encountered many of the issues that the UK will inevitably face,” he said, citing the supply of quality-controlled cannabis with a choice of varieties and routes of administration, education on using the drug, and health risks. “Medical cannabis access is an issue that should be faced head-on, openly and collaboratively,” he said. “It is not an issue that patients or health professionals can afford to ignore.”



All-party group calls for legalisation of cannabis for medicinal uses

7 Eylül 2016 Çarşamba

Largest active veterans group calls for legalizing marijuana to treat PTSD

Faced with stark numbers of brain trauma and psychological distress cases among combat veterans, the nation’s largest active veteran’s organization has thrown its weight behind the growing movement to push for relaxing federal restrictions on marijuana.


The American Legion, the nation’s largest wartime veterans organization, took a position on medical marijuana for the first time last week. At its national convention, it passed a resolution calling on Congress to amend its laws to “at a minimum … recognize cannabis as a drug with potential medical value”.


Marijuana is currently classified by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as a Schedule 1 drug, putting it alongside drugs such as heroin and cocaine. The designation, which the DEA reaffirmed last month, means that the federal government officially believes there is no “accepted medical use” for the drug.


“It’s a tool in a toolbox,” said William Detweiler, who serves as the chairman of the American Legion’s traumatic brain injuries (TBI) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) committee and who is a past national commander of the organization. “We’re not advocating the use of marijuana or any other drugs,” but he said veterans “have a right to anything that may help them”.


The American Legion’s new policy platform comes amid greater medical understanding and scientific research in recent years on the causes and consequences of TBI and PTSD.


In the aftermath of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the incidence of PTSD and TBI among veterans has rapidly increased, leading to a national crisis that has also coincided with alarming rates of depression and suicide.


The Department of Veterans Affairs estimates that 22% of combat casualties from the post-9/11 conflicts are brain injuries, compared to 12% for Vietnam veterans. It also estimates that between 60% and 80% of combat vets who have blast injuries may also have brain trauma.


A large and growing body of literature suggests that cannabis can be an effective medical treatment to alleviate the worst effects of PTSD. About two decades ago, scientists discovered the presence of an endocannabinoid system in the brain which responds to some 60 chemicals that are found in marijuana.


Detweiler said he and the organization as a whole were convinced of the case for allowing more study into the possible effects of treating PTSD and TBI with marijuana after coming into contact with the work or Dr Sue Sisley, a medical researcher who has pushed to reform cannabis laws so she can study the potential of cannabis for treating PTSD.


Detweiler admitted that he was initially concerned about how the push into the terrain of medical marijuana would be received, but he said those concerns were quickly allayed once people heard the case on its merits. “I’ve heard nothing but good things” from fellow Legion members and combat vets who urged the organization to consider taking a position on medical cannabis, he said.


In April, after seven years of trying to get the necessary federal approval, Sisley and other researchers were given a DEA license to begin a private study into the correlation between cannabis and PTSD, although the DEA’s official position remains that there is no medical value for the drug. The study is the first of its kind, involving a randomized, controlled study that uses actual marijuana plants, rather than oils or synthetic forms of the drug.


To that end, the American Legion’s resolution also calls on the DEA to “license privately-funded medical marijuana production operations in the United States to enable safe and efficient cannabis drug development research”.


“I consider this a major breakthrough for such a conservative veterans organization,” Sisley said after the vote. “Suddenly the American Legion has a tangible policy statement on cannabis that will allow them to lobby and add this to their core legislative agenda. The organization has a massive amount of influence at all levels.”


According to a major survey released in July by Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, one of the nation’s largest veterans empowerment groups, some 68% of combat veterans support medical marijuana legalization in their states, while a further 75% said that the Department of Veterans Affairs ought to allow medical cannabis as a treatment option.


Marijuana reform groups have hailed the American Legion’s decision.


“Medical marijuana has been found to be a safe and effective treatment for PTSD, chronic pain, and other conditions that often affect veterans,” said Mason Tvert, director of communications at the Marijuana Policy Project. “Those who serve in our nation’s armed forces deserve access to every medical treatment option that could help them live a healthier and more productive life.”



Largest active veterans group calls for legalizing marijuana to treat PTSD

1 Eylül 2016 Perşembe

Pregnant and diagnosed with HIV: the group providing support for mothers

Thirteen years ago, when Babalwa Mbono was eight months pregnant with her second child, she went to her clinic in Cape Town, South Africa, to have a routine HIV test.


“I went with confidence because my first child was negative and I was negative then,” she says. When the test came back positive, Mbono couldn’t believe it. “When the counsellor who tested me showed me the results I thought, ‘you’re joking!’ I even asked her if she was sure.”


Mbono left the clinic in a daze and went home to reflect on the news, still in denial. She looked healthy and well, unlike her sister who had died three years previously from Aids-related tuberculosis. “For me, [the result] was something that was not real,” Mbono adds.


Nowadays many people in South Africa know about HIV. The country has the biggest and most high-profile epidemic in the world, with an estimated 7 million people living with the condition, according to UNAids figures. But in 2003 it was not a big topic, and discussions usually revolved around death, says Mbono. The fear of what having HIV might mean for her unborn child started to creep in, and she worried that she would not live long enough to care for a baby who might be infected.


When Mbono found out that she had HIV, South Africa’s government was still deciding whether to make antiretroviral treatment (ARVs) available to all, despite a third of pregnant women testing positive. Today, 48% of infected South African adults are on ARVs.


Back at the clinic, Mbono was linked up to a mentor mother through Johnson & Johnson’s mothers2mothers (M2M) programme. The scheme started in 2001 and has helped 1.4 million HIV-positive mothers in nine sub-Saharan African countries. It currently operates in Kenya, South Africa, Malawi, Lesotho, Uganda, Swaziland and Zambia – seven countries where it has virtually eliminated mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) among its patients, with a 2.1% transmission rate (the UN classifies virtual elimination as less than 5%).


Mbono’s HIV-positive mentor allayed her fears about death and her anger towards her husband, whom she blamed for giving her HIV after he tested positive with a much higher viral load. Through M2M,Mbono learned about taking ARVs to reduce the risk of MTCT in the womb and during breastfeeding, and about how to change her lifestyle to live a long and happy life with her children.


Last year, South Africa was one of six priority countries (all in sub-Saharan Africa) to meet a Global Plan target of reducing MTCT by 90%, with 95% of pregnant women with HIV on ARVs and an 84% reduction in new HIV infections among children.


Over the past year, Cuba, Belarus, Armenia and Thailand – non-priority countries – managed to eliminate MTCT altogether. In South Africa, mother-to-child transmission of HIV has fallen to 3.5%, putting the country within reach of eliminating paediatric infections, although maternal mortality remains high.


The M2M programme “makes the person feel supported”, Mbono says. “It’s a sisterhood, and it makes you feel like you have a family to cry on.” Through counselling, which helps to breaks down the stigma still attached to HIV/Aids in South Africa despite its high prevalence, Mbono also found the courage to confide in her parents and siblings.


And six months ago, she decided to disclose her HIV status to her daughter Anathi, who had just turned 13. “It really felt shocking,” says Anathi, who feared that there would be no one to look after her seven-year-old brother, who was born HIV negative. “I was afraid that she would leave us.”


Mbono reassured her daughter that she had tested negative when she was 18 months old, but Anathi decided to go alone to the clinic and be tested anyway, where she also accessed free counselling from health workers.


“I was so, so scared, but eventually they just sat with me and told me to not freak out and to not think negative things about my mum,” Anathi says. Over the two days she waited for her results, she spent time with her mother and learned more about M2M, even reading her mentoring books.


Mbono’s experience with M2M made her give up unhealthy habits, such as not eating properly and drinking alcohol, and inspired her to become a mentor mother in 2003. “The [programme] gave me the strength to go out there and tell people about HIV and correct the mistakes that people are making and [that] I also made when I didn’t have any information.”


She has gone from counselling others on HIV/Aids and family planning, to training other mentors and seeing them become nurses, social workers and students.


“What makes me most happy [is] when I see a woman who had broken up in pieces when she was told about HIV … and when you see her on the next visit she is much better than the day she left.”


Some 95% of babies in M2M’s South Africa programme test negative for HIV at 18 months, and that also makes Mbono proud. “That makes me feel that I’ve done my job, because 18 months is a long time for the mother to be supported and to be educated. There are so many challenges that they come across, and we are there [for them].”


Anathi set up a counselling group at school to discuss HIV and sex with 18 girls and five teachers, as well as a drama group to perform plays to parents and pupils that discuss staying HIV negative and breaking down stigma.


“Most people don’t talk about it … Young people are not getting enough information about HIV,” she says. Anathi has a friend who she says became a recluse after she found out she is positive, and she knows two girls who have gone off the rails since their mothers recently died of Aids.


But for Anathi, dealing with her mother’s HIV has made them stronger and brought them closer together.


She still worries about how well her mother has slept or eaten when they are apart, even though learning about ARVs has lessened her fears of her mother falling ill and not recovering. “I just worry too much and I call,” she says. “She is like my daughter.”


Join our community of development professionals and humanitarians. Follow @GuardianGDP on Twitter.



Pregnant and diagnosed with HIV: the group providing support for mothers

28 Temmuz 2016 Perşembe

Savoury dips are "salt and fat traps", warns health group

Many healthy-sounding savoury products that are also popular as snacking foods are “salt and fat traps” laden with excess calories, a health group has warned.


Three-quarters of hummus products (74%) carry a so-called “traffic light” label red warning for fat, while a serving of Asda’s own-brand taramasalata was singled out for packing in as much salt as 13 Ritz crackers, according to a survey by Consensus Action on Salt and Health (Cash).


Researchers analysed 210 popular chilled dips – including hummus, guacamole, salsa, tzatziki and taramasalata – sold by the major supermarkets.


Taramasalata, which is made from salted or smoked cod roe, was the saltiest, with an average salt content of 1.25g per 100g, compared with tomato salsa, which was the least salty, containing an average 0.49g per 100g.


The most popular dip is hummus, which is made predominantly from chickpeas. It is far from the healthiest, with not one of the 108 products in the survey carrying a green label for salt. A 100g serving of the dip contains an average of 280 calories – almost 15% of the recommended daily intake for women, Cash found.


One of the saltiest hummus products was Tesco’s caramelised onion hummus (1.6g per 100g), while 100g of Marks & Spencer’s version contained 1.53g of salt – more than is found in four packets of ready salted crisps.


NHS guidelines say adults should eat no more than 6g of salt a day – the equivalent of one teaspoon’s worth. However, Cash, which campaigns to raise awareness of the dangers of “hidden” salt, says overall consumption can be difficult to monitor, since three-quarters of salt consumed is already in foods such as bread, breakfast cereals and ready meals.


Salt and fat content of UK dips
Source: Consensus Action on Salt and Health

“Once again we demonstrate the unnecessary amounts of salt and fat being added by the food industry to what could be a healthy product,” said Prof Graham MacGregor, a professor of cardiovascular medicine at Queen Mary University of London and the chairman of Cash. “A diet high in salt leads to strokes and heart disease, the commonest cause of death in the UK.”


An Asda spokesperson said: “Our customers wouldn’t be surprised that the ingredients used to make some dips, such as a traditional Greek taramasalata, are naturally higher in salt than some of our other dips. All the salt in this dip comes from cod roe … we do not add any additional salt.”


The supermarket said it takes its responsibility as a retailer seriously “and believe[s] in giving customers choice and encouraging healthy, balanced lifestyles, which is why we offer a range of products”.


Cash has called on Theresa May’s government to produce a robust obesity strategy that includes reducing salt and fat in people’s diets.


“Reducing salt is the most cost-effective measure to reduce the number of people suffering, which is why it is imperative the government announces a new, robust plan for reducing salt in our diet,” said MacGregor.


Sonia Pombo, a nutritionist and a campaign manager for Cash, urged shoppers to “read the label carefully and opt for healthier brands”.


“Also, remember to swap unhealthy sides (crisps and biscuits etc) with vegetables, eg carrots, peppers and tomatoes, for [an] added bonus,” she added.


Cash urged consumers to try to exercise portion control and avoid eating an entire tub in one go. It also advised people to choose products with less fat and salt, such as salsa or vegetable-based dips, rather than sour-cream or cheese-based versions, which are higher in fat and saturates.


A healthier alternative, Cash said, is to make your own dips using plain, low-fat yogurt and fresh herbs.


High levels of salt (per 100g)


  • Tesco caramelised onion hummus – 1.6g

  • Sabra baba ganoush – 1.6g

  • Marks & Spencer caramelised onion hummus – 1.53g

  • Marks & Spencer taramasalata – 1.5g

  • Moorish Baba Ghanoush-ish aubergine dip – 1.4g

Low levels of salt (per 100g)


  • Essential Waitrose reduced fat sour cream and chive dip – 0.25g

  • The Co-operative salsa – 0.3g

  • Tesco tzatziki – 0.4g

  • Waitrose creamy and refreshing guacamole – 0.4g

  • Lidl red pepper hummus – 0.43g


Savoury dips are "salt and fat traps", warns health group

16 Ağustos 2015 Pazar

E-cigarette use growing amid British youths, campaign group research demonstrates

Experimentation with e-cigarettes is increasing among eleven- to 18-year-olds in Britain but is most common amid people who currently smoke or who have completed in the past, according to anti-tobacco group Action on Smoking and Health (Ash).


It says outcomes from its third annual on the web survey of youthful people’s attitudes to e-cigarettes suggest that it is “unlikely” they are currently acting as a gateway to tobacco.


Although 10% of virtually 2,300 surveyed for Ash by YouGov in March said they had experimented with e-cigarettes “once or twice”, up from four% two years in the past, standard use remained rare.


Only two.four% mentioned they used them at least once a month and virtually all have been young men and women who explained they had been, or have been still, normal tobacco smokers. The increases in use have took place as regular tobacco smoking by 11- to 15-12 months-olds has dropped to a reduced of 3%.


Ash is concerned, however, that a expanding proportion of young folks believe vaping is as dangerous as smoking cigarettes – a figure that has enhanced from 11% in 2013 to 21% this yr, even if most accurately considered e-cigarettes significantly less damaging.


The discovering comes just days soon after the Royal Society for Public Well being referred to as for a public education campaign that may possibly support smokers not nevertheless ready to give up their nicotine habit switch to e-cigarettes, because these did not also have the much more hazardous chemicals, this kind of as tar and arsenic, discovered in tobacco cigarettes.


Final results from Ash’s 2015 survey coincided with analysis, in the journal Public Health, of its 2013 and 2014 statistics by personnel at Public Well being England (PHE), Ash, the Uk Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, and other experts.


Authors of the journal report, although it only covers the very first two surveys, also express issues at the rising proportion of young individuals perceiving e-cigarettes to be as hazardous as tobacco ones. This, it warns, may possibly reduce numbers of young men and women “willing to attempt and/or use what is evidently a considerably much less hazardous supply of nicotine”.


They also even so say youthful folks are “still relatively inexperienced” in the use of e-cigarettes and recognise worries above their attraction to young folks. Shut surveillance have to proceed on any romantic relationship in between e-cigarette use and that of traditional cigarettes, “and the extent to which engagement in 1 use precedes or replaces the other”.


Hazel Cheeseman, director of policy at Ash, stated: “These outcomes need to reassure the public that electronic cigarettes are not linked with any rise in youthful men and women smoking. Although more young men and women are making an attempt electronic cigarettes and numerous a lot more younger folks are aware of them, this has not led to widespread typical use or an increase in smoking.”


A new law will prohibit their sale to beneath-18s in England and Wales from 1 October and Scotland is planning to adhere to suit quickly. In Wales, e-cigarette use will also be banned in enclosed public locations, as tobacco smoking previously is.


Kevin Fenton, national director for health and wellbeing at PHE, explained this would “further reduce youngsters accessibility to these goods and will reinforce the message that they are meant for adult smokers who want to minimize down or stop smoking”.


The Welsh government said: “We are concerned the use of e-cigarettes could re-normalise smoking, especially for a generation who have grown up in a largely smoke-cost-free society.


“We are not alone in our worries – the Globe Health Organisation and other global bodies have known as for better regulation of e-cigarettes and forty other nations have previously taken equivalent steps.”



E-cigarette use growing amid British youths, campaign group research demonstrates

12 Temmuz 2014 Cumartesi

Ought to A Drug Improvement Group Ever Throw In The Towel?

Drug improvement is all about failure.  It is the rule, good results the uncommon exception.  The extraordinarily substantial price of drug advancement is largely driven by the higher frequency of failures, and by the time and price it requires to figure out the molecule you are establishing isn’t going to make it.


You really do not have to be an pricey management consultant to realize that it would be helpful for the industry to kill doomed tasks sooner (although all have said it).


There’s just the prickly tiny issue of figuring out how to do this.  Even though it is easy to point to pricey failures and criticize organizations for not pulling the plug sooner, it’s also real that just about every single successful drug faced some legitimate existential crisis along the way — at some stage throughout its growth , there was a plausible cause to destroy the plan, and a person had to battle like hell to preserve it going.


The question at the heart of the industry’s productivity struggles is the extent to which it is even achievable to select the winners (or the losers), and figuring out far better methods of managing this threat.


I was struck by two starkly contrasting approaches to this dilemma suggested by two of the smartest R&ampD thinkers I know – David Grainger, of Index Ventures, and Mike Gilman of Atlas Ventures.  While the two venture companies are acknowledged for their asset-focused biopharma investing method, Grainger and Gilman supply really different perspectives on the part of venture teams.


At the heart of Grainger’s see (described right here, and reiterated in a recent e-mail) is the see that a staff with skin the game is very best positioned to assess a project’s good results.  Create quite tiny, asset-targeted companies comprised of team members who have each elected to bet years of their lives doing work on just this system, says Grainger, and they have genuine skin in the game.  They will have the best visibility into each the options and possible issues, and if it would seem futile, they’ll want to pull the rip cord so they can dedicate their efforts to a a lot more promising initiative. At its core, the notion is that individuals concerned in execution are also concerned in determining whether or not to proceed.


Not so quickly, Gilman says.  In his see (shared, most lately, at a BIO2014 panel in which we both participated), the task of a undertaking group need to be relentless execution.  They should constantly try to uncover some way forward, some path that could lead to achievement.  In his see, it’s not useful for the staff to continuously inquire “should we or shouldn’t we.”  That selection, he feels, ought to rest completely with management (in the case of bigger company) or traders (in the case of a startup) as lengthy as resources are accessible, says Gilman, the team must seem for achievement.  The place there is life, there’s hope.


What Gilman’s perspective speaks to is the very genuine challenge, maybe impossibility, of considering and executing at the same time.  As Rosenzweig has mentioned, there’s a great deal of proof suggesting that optimal functionality requires disproportionate self-assurance in execution – an at-occasions unreasonable belief that you can accomplish the nearly not possible.


Grainger does not fully disagree he also feels that a crew ought to be relentlessly focused on execution – right up to the level where they stop believing it tends to make sense.


That is the question: in drug development (and in the prosecution of tasks a lot more normally), is it far better for the project team to very own contemplation as effectively as execution?


The upside of owning contemplation is that you know absolutely everyone doing work on a undertaking believes in it, and brings a distinctive level of passion and commitment – the type of vitality that’s typically associated with a startup, or with considerably academic research.  The problem, of course, is that your ability to execute can be hampered by Hamlet-esque contemplation.


Teams targeted solely on execution have a tendency not to endure from the Hamlet dilemma, and in general are regarded as more expert.  It’s unquestionably what most companies, and particularly firms of any considerable scale, are looking for.  It’s also, frankly, what I believe you discover in most big organizations, specifically amid the staff who’ve caught around the longest.  You are offered a process, your task is to do it (and not complain about how it does not meet your expectations for self-actualization).


I’ve observed examples of execution concentrate top to extraordinary outcomes – benefits that exceeded the authentic expectations of the crew, and may possibly not have been achievable if the group voted, rather than executed.  On the other hand, engaged does not suggest productive — take into account Colonel Nicholson foremost his men to develop a bridge for the enemy in the 1957 classic The Bridge On The River Kwai.   Ultimately, most of us are also familiar with the death march, the experience of being caught executing a task that appears hopeless or pointless this can be soul-crushing.


Does empowering a crew to make go/no-go choices lead to far better selections in the course of drug development?


The response likely depends on context.  The good results of an execution-focused staff would look to reflect the good quality of oversight with poor supervision, such teams can rack up huge costs with no doing the organization very a lot great.  On the other hand, unless teams empowered to make decisions are capable to suspend disbelief long ample to give challenging tasks a likelihood, they might make small headway, and flit from undertaking to project.


It’s also possible that the locus of choice-producing is not an particularly important factor in drug development probably success depends to a far higher extent on luck since you can construct a narrative about lucky teams doesn’t imply you realize or can replicate their good results.



Ought to A Drug Improvement Group Ever Throw In The Towel?

22 Haziran 2014 Pazar

Doctor Group Requires Actions To Fulfill The Promise Of Telemedicine

The American Medical Association (AMA) seems very proud of their new,  just announced policy “for ensuring the appropriate coverage of and payment for telemedicine services.”  They believe telemedicine, properly implemented according to their guidelines, can “strengthen the patient-physician relationship,” increase quality of care, improve health outcomes, and save money. Wow. Who would not be in favor of that? But is this one of those instances when something that seems to good to be true, is?  A closer look at the policy report from AMA’s Council on Medical Service  shows that while much optimism is totally justified and appropriate, many reasons for caution remain.


First, a little background on the players and concepts. The Council on Medical Service (CMS) “recommends AMA policies and actions for consideration by the AMA House of Delegates on the socioeconomic factors that influence the practice of medicine.” In this instance, on June 11, 2014 at the AMA annual meeting in Chicago, the AMA voted to adopt a report of the CMS titled, “REPORT 7 OF THE COUNCIL ON MEDICAL SERVICE (A-14): Coverage of and Payment for Telemedicine.” Furthermore, in the report, telemedicine is defined to include all “three broad categories of telemedicine technologies: store-and-forward, remote monitoring, and (real-time) interactive services.” Now let’s look closer at the details.



Statuette of ancient Egyptian physician Imhote...

Statuette of ancient Egyptian physician Imhotep, the first physician from antiquity known by name. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)




While the report articulates 8 specific recommendations, the actual standards of care and practice guidelines are to be left to the “national medical specialty societies and state medical associations.” In other words, what’s good for the dermatologists may not be good for the radiologists. Plus, a rural state in need of additional medical expertise may adopt more telemedicine-friendly policies than a state with large numbers of physicians looking to protect turf. The potential for confusion rather than coordination across specialities and state lines is significant. I think this requires more attention than given it by current AMA policy.


Our techno-future is so compelling we tend to forget how seductive it can be. Technologically-enabled utopian visions abound, including in telehealth. The American Telemedicine Association is a good example of all benefit and no cost, gain without loss. But there is never a free lunch, even in a world of abundance. And the CMS report did a nice job balancing promise and peril. It keeps an eye on both the promise inherent in “future innovation in the use of telemedicine” and the peril of diminished quality of care, impaired physician-patient relationship, and breaches of confidentiality.


The best part of the report was their emphasis on research. One of the 8 specific recommendations is to “encourage additional research to develop a stronger evidence base for telemedicine.” After all, telemedicine is great idea with tremendous game-changing promise. But who knows? As messy and difficult as science can be, it is still the best way we have of finding out what works, what harms, and what is just ineffective. You don’t want to bet your life, or someone else’s, on just a great idea. The history of healthcare is replete with things that seemed like a great idea at the time only to be shown by later research to be, well, not so hot. And telemedicine is bound to be full of such practices.


To their credit, they also emphasized protecting the physician-patient relationship.  In telemedicine, the CMS report asserts a “valid patient-physician relationship must be established, through at minimum a face-to-face examination, if a face-to-face encounter would otherwise be required in the provision of the same service not delivered via telemedicine.” This will prevent, for example, prescribing some medications based on simply filling out a web form.


Unfortunately, the report goes on to state the “face-to-face encounter could occur in person or virtually through real-time audio and video technology.” Such an assumption of functional equivalence between being bodies together and meeting each other as 2-D representations on screens is just wrong. And dangerous.


First, diagnostically relevant dimensions of interaction are blocked with video. I remember one patient in my psychology practice at an initial consultation who was well and carefully dressed. He denied problems. I would have wondered what he was doing in my office at all except for the fact that he smelled bad, like he hadn’t showered in many days, which he had not. Might I have missed this and missed the significant depression he was trying to hide had the interview been done via “real-time audio and video technology.” Perhaps. And for a physician, olfaction can be an even more important dimension of diagnostic information.


Second, and more dangerous and important for a physician, are the different limits each kind of interaction has. Simply put, there is no possibility of touching on video. A physician cannot follow-up a complaint by, for example, palpating lymph nodes. And because of that maybe a patient will not bother to even complain in the first place. The idea that hands-off medicine is functionally the same as hands-on medicine is not just wrong, it also undermines the physician-patient relationship and diminishes us all.


Finally, hope is a fragile thing; placebos a powerful medicine. Equating being bodies together with video interactions seems like trying to get nutrition from a recipe. Sometimes you need the actual meal for full effect. And the power of hope shows us that the representation of a relationship may not heal the same way as do actual relationships.


So, we should appreciate the AMA’s effort, despite some issues. The significant promise of telemedicine deserves care and tending. It just needs to be said we will most likely fulfill that promise by focussing on both what technologies can do and what they can not do. And assuming a video chat is functionally equivalent to sitting in a room with someone is a dangerous mistake that will likely interfere with the ongoing evolution of telehealth.


For updates on “Managing Mental Wealth” and related news and links follow me on Twitter. To contact me click the mail icon above.



Doctor Group Requires Actions To Fulfill The Promise Of Telemedicine

12 Haziran 2014 Perşembe

BPA A Concern For Breast Cancer? Not According To Research By Top Environmental Group

A enormous synthesis of information from the National Toxicology Plan and consensus reports from worldwide cancer authorities has recognized 102 chemical substances as critical for breast cancer research and prevention. The listing, compiled by researchers from the Silent Spring Institute and the Harvard College of Public Health, is derived from studies of chemical exposures and mammary gland tumors in rodents and how these might translate into human exposures, and cancer hazards, as measured by biomarkers in blood, urine, saliva, breast milk, and hair.


The Silent Spring Institute, named in honor of the crusading environmentalist Rachel Carson, who died of breast cancer, describes the study as “a street map for breast cancer prevention by identifying large-priority chemical substances and evaluating resources to measure exposure.”


And as this kind of, it will come as a shock to many girls concerned about such risks—or at least repeatedly warned about them by the media—that bisphenol A (BPA), a ubiquitous element in cans and plastics, is not on the list, even although there is a section for “endocrine disrupting” chemical compounds. Alternatively, the review draws interest to much much more potent estrogenic chemicals than BPA, such as Estradiol-17b, a component of oral contraceptives and hormone therapies, which has entered domestic wastewater—and potentially consuming water—via urination.



Birth control pill

The contraceptive pill – are we all drinking its hormonally active waste goods? (Photograph credit score: Wikipedia)




The research rebuffs dogged attempts by a handful of researchers to indict BPA as a set off for breast cancer in the encounter of mind-boggling research by the Environmental Protection Company (EPA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that it poses no such danger. Last year, researchers at Tuft’s researchers had been forced to backtrack on a declare that they had demonstrated that BPA induced breast cancer in rats soon after their statistical proof fell apart underneath scrutiny. Both the Silent Spring study and the Tufts’ study had been published in the same journal, Environmental Wellness Perspectives, which is published by the National Institute of Environmental Wellness Sciences (NIEHS).


While a handful of of the chemical substances in the Silent Spring examine will be familiar to the public—for instance, acrylamide, a merchandise developed when some starches are cooked—many will not, even even though exposures are through acquainted routes, this kind of as cigarette smoke or diesel exhaust fumes. Similarly, most girls will be unaware of the unintentional environmental consequences of oral contraceptives.


There is, even so, a lengthy journey from identifying priority carcinogens based on rodent scientific studies and human biomarkers to proving real carcinogenicity in people, specifically as exposure to these chemical compounds is generally really reduced. Whilst there is great proof that acrylamide is carcinogenic in rodents, research has, so far, failed to show related proof in people. One particular essential methodological issue: provided the ubiquity of cooked meals in people’s diet programs, how do you uncover a population that hasn’t been exposed to acrylamide?


And given, as the review authors note, that even the “best-established chance variables for breast cancer are related with pretty modest increases in risk” (i.e., “HRT, alcohol, bodily inactivity, reproductive historical past, and loved ones history of breast cancer”) weak associations based on lengthy-phrase chemical exposures are going to be very challenging to detect, and danger generating several false positives.


Nonetheless, it can make sense to focus on the chemicals for which there is a consensus that they could pose a hazard (with BPA, there is a very modest group of NIEHS-funded scientists on 1 side, and virtually each and every other regulatory agency in the world on the other).


2nd, this review is a reminder that Susan Komen for the Remedy, which also discounted the breast cancer risk from BPA was appropriate to do so, even as it faced expenses from Mom Jones magazine that it was only carrying out so at the behest of industry funding.


Third, and possibly the most essential policy and media implication rising from this examine, is that there are 102 much better candidates for research funding than BPA. In accordance to figures circulating on Capitol Hill, the NIEHS alone has invested 179 million dollars on researching the chemical more than the past decade. If anything at all, the EPA and FDA, which has spent uncounted hundreds of thousands carrying out they’re personal research, are now more specified than ever that BPA does not pose a risk to customers, regardless of whether young or old. With more and more constrained government funding, it is time to think about the chance fees for other consensus-driven public overall health priorities, when the return on investment in BPA investigation increasingly looks like a diminishing commodity.



BPA A Concern For Breast Cancer? Not According To Research By Top Environmental Group

5 Haziran 2014 Perşembe

Meet The Newest Member Of Your Private Healthcare Group

As most patients in the American healthcare technique know, it’s gotten harder and more difficult to keep typical, detailed communication with your medical professional.  At least in terms of medication, pharmacists have begun to handle this gap through typical, direct contact with their patients.  In Medication Therapy Management (MTM), a pharmacist evaluates a patient’s prescriptions and how the patient is feeling to identify and resolve issues including: untreated circumstances, drug interactions, adverse drug reactions, inappropriate medicines or doses, and regardless of whether a patient is taking the drugs as prescribed.  The nearby pharmacist is swiftly becoming the newest member of your individual healthcare group.


MTM has the prospective to alleviate some glaring issues in America’s healthcare technique.  For example, about one particular-third of men and women above age 65 who take five or much more medicines experience some sort of adverse drug event, such as a bone-breaking fall, disorientation, inability to urinate, or heart failure.


Portion of this problem is the price of hospital readmissions, which is generally defined as a patient currently being hospitalized within 30 days of an original hospital keep.  If a hospital has a higher proportion of sufferers readmitted inside a quick time frame, it could be an indication of inadequate high quality of care in the hospital or a lack of appropriate coordination of publish-discharge care.


The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Solutions (CMS) estimate hospital readmissions value the system $ 17.five billion a yr, at an regular of $ ten,000 – $ 13,000 per patient readmitted.  In several circumstances, readmissions are the result of adverse results of medicine therapies due to improper or non-adherence to medicine regimens.  Reflecting the value of that last stage, in October 2012, CMS started reducing Medicare payments for hospitals with excess readmissions (as compared to other hospitals with equivalent patient profiles).   Simply because of this, there is a renewed focus on hospitals to continue to minimize their readmission charge.



Pharmacist

(Photo credit: Wikipedia)




To support deal with these problems, a new review evaluated the effectiveness of MTM on lowering hospital readmissions utilizing phone calls to sufferers from their pharmacist.  Dr. Alan Zillich, research co-lead and Associate Professor of Pharmacy, Purdue University, explains the need driving this research.  “Enhancing the quality of care for sufferers has always been the purpose of healthcare suppliers, but the growing costs of Medicare and healthcare in basic have place an even brighter spotlight on strategies to improve patient outcomes and minimize needless charges.”


The study recognized 232 out of 895 sufferers, or 26%, as “risk-level 1 patients” who are capable of basic functions, which includes the capability to dress themselves, reply the phone, etc.  A single of the essential findings was that chance-degree 1 patients in the MTM group seasoned an 86% reduction in readmissions in contrast to the handle group.  To place it an additional way, the group getting MTM was 3 times a lot more probably to stay out of the hospital soon after 60 days.  Patrick Dunham, review co-writer and CEO of Curant Wellness, calls this “another strong evidence point for the worth of MTM and its capability to simultaneously lessen charges and boost care across the healthcare continuum.”


When extrapolated to the complete Medicare population (minus costs incurred to supply MTM providers) it is sensible to estimate net savings approaching $ 3 billion.  By any measure, that is a Great deal of cash.  Dunham sums up the takeaway:  “Medicare and other policy makers need to think about cost-sharing and chance-primarily based payment versions for medication treatment management services, probably by way of the newly produced Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) and the bundled payment demonstration tasks.  We know that MTM improves adherence, improves outcomes, and improves lives.”


It ought to also be noted that there are some respectable considerations about MTM.  Is having a pharmacist far more directly involved in patient care equal or preferable to freeing up doctors’ time to better tackle the patient’s demands?  Could sharing much more data with pharmacists and, more importantly, pharmacies, increase further privacy issues?


In any situation, a significant conversation about MTM is really worth possessing.  It addresses present difficulties in our healthcare program with a new technique, and evidence is emerging that it performs.


Robert J. Szczerba is the CEO of X Tech Ventures and writer of the Forbes column “Rocket Science Meets Brain Surgical procedure.” Adhere to him via Twitter, Facebook, or LinkedIn.



Meet The Newest Member Of Your Private Healthcare Group

16 Nisan 2014 Çarşamba

NHS group considers fees for crutches and neck braces

Patients could be asked to shell out for their own crutches, walking sticks and neck braces underneath proposals drawn up by an NHS organisation to introduce expenses for companies that are at present free.


GPs in south Warwickshire have sparked controversy by examining how individuals who are disabled or recovering from an accident or operation could be asked to contribute in direction of the value of devices that are important to their mobility.


Critics mentioned the proposals had been “the thin end of the wedge” and could lead to sufferers currently being charged to entry core NHS providers, hitting disabled and poorer folks hardest.


If implemented, the proposals from the GP-led NHS South Warwickshire clinical commissioning group (CCG) could also influence patients struggling from whiplash, a hernia or sore hip or knee, or who have fractured their spine or who need to have support getting out of bed.


Even though many sufferers in England presently pay out for dental treatment, prescriptions, glasses and hearing aids, all fundamental NHS providers are totally free. Ministers and NHS England have created clear that they are opposed to new costs for care.


Sue Lear, a “services design and style and innovation” official working on behalf of the CCG, advised its patient and public participation group last week that it was keen to reduce its annual £421,000 bill for devices that are identified generically as orthotics. Its overall annual spending budget is £304m and it commissions and money treatment method for the 270,000 individuals within its borders.


Her presentation to about twenty elected patient representatives from different GP surgeries in the area posed concerns about the viability of introducing charges. “Would it be realistic to ask people to contribute to the value of orthotics, aids and appliances? If so, which objects and how could we agree this? If so, what criteria should be utilized, eg lower-cost objects beneath a specified threshold?”


Lear also listed 15 various types of aids or products to which expenses, or contributions from patients, may well be utilized. They were: ankle foot orthoses, ie foot drop splints wrist splints trusses, eg for hernias spinal supports knee braces hip braces lumbar/sacral/stomach supports spinal assistance, eg for fractures cervical help – collars helmets toilet aids &amp products perching stools strolling aids – strolling sticks, crutches, frames bed mobility aids – sticks, beds, grab handles and bath seats.


Several this kind of pieces of tools are never returned by individuals when they have finished with them and so can not be reused, rising costs at a time when money is tight, Lear stated. Even so, patient representatives told her that costs would deter some who needed this kind of gadgets from getting them and that any indicates-testing would demonstrate extremely complex to administer.


The move, uncovered by the anti-cuts group False Economic system, is believed to be the 1st time that any supplier of NHS care has looked seriously into introducing fees. Two current reviews from the Reform and King’s Fund thinktanks advocating charging for GP visits and hospital appointments or a £10 monthly fee to aid the NHS cope with increasing demand for healthcare have prompted a debate about whether or not the NHS must abandon the key principle that it is free of charge at the point of use.


These present at the meeting said the proposal, which Lear described as “tentative”, was offered a hostile reception. The CCG wanted to gauge reaction to the possibility of introducing what she referred to as “self-funding for orthotics”, which suggests that it could anticipate at least some individuals to pay the full cost of their device.


NHS England criticised the CCG’s proposal. “NHS companies are totally free of charge, except in restricted circumstances sanctioned by parliament. An approach like this would appear not to meet these criteria”, a spokesman said.


Frances O’Grady, the TUC common secretary, mentioned: “The thought of charging for the use of essential objects like mobility aids and braces runs contrary to every little thing the NHS stands for. What started out out as an idea floating about rightwing thinktanks is now raising its head in clinical commissioning groups inside the heart of the NHS.”


Christina McAnea, head of overall health at the union Unison, stated: “Charging sufferers for vital items this kind of as crutches is the thin finish of the wedge. Where do we go from here?”.


Liz Sayce, chief executive of Disability Rights United kingdom, mentioned: “Charging for vital equipment is counter-productive and unfair and will also jeopardise independence by putting some men and women off receiving vital products. And public funding is supposed legally to help proactive methods to obtain greater equality for disabled people. This would do the opposite.”


The British Medical Association, the doctors’ union, also criticised the move. “The NHS is dealing with a difficult financial climate, but charging patients for important health care products is completely the wrong way to tackle the health service’s financial problems”, mentioned Dr Chaand Nagpaul, chair of its GP committee.


“If walking sticks, knee braces or other objects are issued to individuals it is because there is a clear clinical require for them. They can substantially lessen soreness and increase a patient’s wellbeing. By attaching a charge to these products, we run the danger that vulnerable people, particularly the growing numbers of individuals in excess of 70, and those in minimal incomes, will not be able to afford them. It could also deter all patients from in search of care,” he mentioned.


“In the extended term, this measure will really finish up costing the NHS much more funds as individuals without having health-related tools will invariably have to go to their GP or check out the hospital more typically because of ache, decreased mobility or suffering falls.”


The CCG refused to answer inquiries about what it referred to as a “quite early-stage” proposal, such as who had come up with the concept. In a statement it stressed its need to have to conserve cash.


“NHS South Warwickshire CCG is committed to the NHS’s important principle of free of charge at the stage of use. At our most recent patient and public participation group, a single of our discussions was about how to increase top quality and value for income of our orthotics service,” a spokeswoman mentioned.


“A variety of avenues were mentioned, in certain helpful feedback about the products returns method and regardless of whether charging for equipment must be considered. This has not been mentioned more within the CCG since the meeting and no proposals exist to build this more.”



NHS group considers fees for crutches and neck braces

4 Nisan 2014 Cuma

5 minutes with the chief healthcare officer of Emis Group

Shaun O

Shaun determined he needed to be a doctor soon after suffering from from a critical kidney issue as a kid. Photograph: Shaun O’Hanlon




Describe your function in a single sentence: To guarantee that we continue to develop integrated healthcare IT that delivers actual advantage to patients and connects clinicians across the entire healthcare economic climate – not just elements of it.


Why did you want to function in healthcare? I had a severe kidney problem – Henoch-Schönlein purpura – as a four-yr-old and vowed then to grow to be a doctor to assist enhance people’s lives. I suspect my single mindedness irritated the careers employees at school as I refused to think about any other options.


How do you want to see the sector change in the up coming five many years? I want to see far more efficient, joined up, patient-centred healthcare. I want to see patients asked a query only as soon as as they travel across healthcare settings and their clinicians realizing their background and why they are seeing them. I want to see fewer errors and much better, safer clinical care. I want to see the patient currently being witnessed as a accurate spouse in their care. All are achievable by way of better use of healthcare IT that connects clinicians, assists them to share data, and transforms patient experience.


My proudest achievement at perform was … operating with a extremely dedicated group to create and then launch Emis Net. It is now the most broadly utilised GP system in the Uk and is extending into local community, mental well being and kid healthcare. Over 4 million consultations are now recorded on EMIS Web every single week.


The greatest challenge facing the NHS is … the little one boom generation, advancing healthcare engineering, large expectations, short-term political goals and management overload. The largest challenge is the gulf between the overall funding and individuals’ expectation of the support.


The men and women I work with are … committed, talented, entertaining and passionate about strengthening patients’ lives. We recently acquired Ascribe to lengthen into acute care and I discovered the identical ethos in their folks. It’s all about the folks – and I firmly believe that you can do anything with the correct group.


I do what I do simply because … I want to make people’s lives greater and longer through enabling enhanced clinical care. I am also passionate about patient empowerment Emis Group established patient.co.uk much more than ten years in the past and it is now visited by some eleven million people a month who go there not only to see trusted health care details but also to partake in life-style programmes and accessibility their GP record by means of Patient Accessibility.


Occasionally men and women believe that I am … somewhat picky about detail, but this is component of the secret mix that differentiates Emis Group from the rest of the marketplace. With Emis Net, the way the screens are laid out, the ease of executing typical functions, and the total appear and come to feel are underpinned by clinical relevance and an absolute emphasis on clinical security and information security. It is a big responsibility supporting our difficult-working front-line clinicians and one we get really critically.


Appropriate now I want to … engage more with patients, empowering them to turn out to be partners in their care. With partnership comes rewards and accountability and that could underpin the remedy to a lot of of the problems dealing with the NHS. I see IT as getting crucial to enabling and maintaining that partnership.


At work I am always learning … how important it is to remember the place we are going. Possessing a strategy is essential to delivering our goals. We get plenty of distractions and some are well worth pursuing, but you usually need to step back and ensure that the all round direction is right and strategic aims are becoming met.


The one point often on my mind at work is … taking accountability. Our major care techniques alone are accountable for supporting the healthcare of much more than 39 million citizens in the Uk. It truly is a challenge we relish and never get for granted. We have a powerful target on clinical security, details governance, method stability and information security which is important provided this obligation.


If I could go back ten many years and meet my former self, I’d tell him … about the explosion that was set to come about in mobile technological innovation through smartphones and tablets. Mobile technologies and the ethos of usability is revolutionising healthcare IT and the way secure healthcare can be delivered, both in the neighborhood and more and more in hospitals.


If I could meet my long term self I would assume him to be … older and wiser but even now passionate about bettering clinical care through the use of IT. I’d anticipate him to have many examples of how personal and population wellness has been enhanced by way of the use of the IT platforms we have developed and implemented. I’d also assume him to be displaying me how engineering has empowered sufferers to get ownership of their well being and wellbeing.


What is the very best part of your task? It’s absolutely hearing from consumers who have utilized our methods to boost the care that they supply. For illustration, the Sheffield University Wellness Support utilizes Patient Accessibility to pre-register about five,000 students and recognize individuals who might want additional healthcare help all through their time at university. Final year, 59% of college students joining were identified as candidates for added help, ranging from those who had psychological or bodily overall health conditions, to people who might advantage from well being intervention exercise like smoking cessation or fat-reduction advice.


What is the worst portion of your occupation? Apart from currently being away from my household for 3 or four days a week, the most difficult factor is prioritising the tasks on our roadmap understanding that all can provide direct patient advantage but accepting that to do it properly, we can only do a finite quantity at any one time.


What tends to make you smile? Blackadder.


What keeps you awake at night? Many folks lie in bed and question their all round strategy and no matter whether or not it is correct I have in no way carried out this as I actually think in the path we are heading. I am typically exhausted so am out like a light but when I do not sleep I am more concerned about day-to-day family members issues.


Join the Healthcare Professionals Network to receive standard emails and exclusive delivers.




5 minutes with the chief healthcare officer of Emis Group

1 Nisan 2014 Salı

White men and women the least healthful ethnic group in Britain

The figures, based on a survey performed in 2012, have been launched on Tuesday as the final portion of a series of scientific studies by the ONS examining the way of life of Britons.


The “non-white” category incorporated men and women categorised as Asian, black and Chinese, as effectively as those of mixed race.


This is imagined to be the very first time that official statisticians have examined the comparative probability of suffering extended-standing illnesses between individuals from various ethnic backgrounds.


An ONS spokesman stated the researchers were “curious as to what was driving the difference” but the review did not offer an explanation.


Prof Kennedy Cruickshank, professor of diabetes and cardiovascular medication at King’s School London, mentioned the differing ages in the white population in contrast to individuals groups described by the ONS as “non-white”, could be a “main issue” behind the trend.


Previous ONS research have identified that white groups have a tendency to be older than these from other ethnic backgrounds and this analysis found that older people have been significantly far more very likely to have LLIs or disabilities.


In 2012, 67 per cent of people aged 75 or in excess of had this kind of illnesses, in contrast to 14 per cent of people aged amongst sixteen and 24.


The ONS mentioned that when variable factors this kind of as age have been taken into account the distinction among the two groups grew to become “smaller sized” but the proportion of white folks with limiting LLIs was nevertheless double that of non-white groups.


Prof Cruickshank also stated that previous studies had shown that some newer immigrants had been more “reticent” about divulging personalized data for surveys, which could also have impacted the outcomes.


The examine comes following well being specialists explained that a wholesome diet regime ought to consist of 10 portions of fruit and greens a day, doubling the existing five-a-day official advice.


Investigation by University College London, which involved a 12-yr-examine, identified that eating large quantities of fruit and vegetables significantly lowered the threat of premature death.


The research also exhibits that unemployed people hunting for perform have been almost twice as very likely as these with jobs to have a limiting long-standing illness (LLI) or disability.


Amid the jobless, 17 per cent had such an sickness, compared to nine per cent of those in operate.


People with increased incomes were far less most likely to suffer from a disability or prolonged-term illness that limited their action – with only 6 per cent of folks with an cash flow of £50,000 or a lot more falling into this category.


By contrast eleven per cent of people with incomes of much less than £10,000 suffered from LLIs.



White men and women the least healthful ethnic group in Britain