Peoples’ etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
Peoples’ etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

5 Nisan 2017 Çarşamba

NHS risking people"s health by rationing test strips, Diabetes UK says

The NHS is putting diabetic patients at risk of serious illness by rationing test strips that monitor blood glucose levelsin an attempt to save money, a charity claims. A survey carried out by Diabetes UK found that one in four complained of restrictions placed on the number of test strips they were prescribed by GP practices.


People with diabetes need to test their blood glucose regularly to monitor the condition. If not managed properly, diabetes can lead to health complications such as heart disease, strokes, blindness and amputations.


More than half of those professing problems had type 1 diabetes. Government guidance says this group should test themselves at least four times a day. Older people and those on low incomes were also affected, the charity found. Many said they felt they needed to buy test stripsonline, where quality cannot always be guaranteed.


People with diabetes were given a variety of reasons for the reduced number of strips prescribed, according to the charity. Some respondents to the survey said they had been told they should test less often. Some were told there were “budget constraints”, while others were told it was because they were testing too frequently.


“They said I had my allowance for the month,” said one respondent. Another said: “I was told they were expensive and we should test less. Only need to test four times a day. We use a pump, so need to test every two hours.”


Some said they were having to ask for repeat prescriptions more often. “I now need to order and collect a prescription monthly, or sooner, depending on any issues that crop up,” wrote one. Often when people complained to the practice, their normal prescription was reinstated. But Diabetes UK said they were concerned that people had to challenge the GP practice to get an essential piece of equipment.


Many clinical commissioning groups (CCGs), which have come under fire for rationing other NHS services, have guidance on how often people should test their blood glucose levels and how many boxes of strips should be issued each month. They have also urged GPs to switch patients to cheaper blood glucose meters and strips, sometimes against the patient’s wishes.


Diabetes UK said the rationing was a false economy because the cost of dealing with complications caused by poorly managed diabetes is far higher.


The findings came just weeks after Simon Stevens, the chief executive of NHS England, announced that the health service would stop prescribing some drugs and gluten-free foods to cut spiralling costs.


Diabetes UK’s policy manager, Nikki Joule, said: “These shortsighted cost savings cause people real anguish and potential financial distress. It also means people are struggling to manage their diabetes, which can lead to serious consequences for their health.”


Norman Lamb, the Liberal Democrats’ health spokesman, agreed. “This is more evidence of an insidious creeping retreat of the NHS without any public debate,” he said. “It makes no sense to undermine good preventive care in this way. More people will end up unnecessarily with their health deteriorating.”




It makes no sense to undermine good preventive care in this way


Norman Lamb, Lib Dem health spokesman


Testing strips are part of a kit used to check the condition. Diabetics prick their finger and put drops of blood on a strip, which then goes into a meter that measures blood glucose levels.


Dr Stephen Lawrence, clinical lead for diabetes for the Royal College of GPs, said: “£24m of the scarce NHS budget is spent on diabetes care every day, and it would be irresponsible not to make the most appropriate use of limited resources.”


He added that the need for strips varied between individuals and that doctors should sit down and discuss appropriate treatments with patients. “We urge NHS England to deliver on the pledges made in its GP Forward View for greater investment in general practice – including more GPs – so that we can give more time to all our patients, including those with diabetes,” Lawrence said.


The charity agreed that decisions on testing and access to strips should be made jointly between a patient and their GP. But their research suggested this did not always happen.


Colin Frampton, an 86-year-old pensioner with type 2 diabetes from Winchester, Hampshire, told Diabetes UK he was paying for test strips out of his pension after being restricted to 50 for the year – enough to test his blood glucose just once a week. He said: “If I didn’t challenge my GP, I’d still have to take money out of my pension to help me manage my condition.”


One pregnant woman, who is type 1 diabetic, saw her strips reduced from 300 to 50 a month, although the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (Nice) guidelines suggest testing for pregnant women of 10 times a day or more.


The report also found that family doctors were overburdened and that receptionists and other surgery staff were increasingly preparing prescriptions. Some of these lacked the necessary understanding of diabetes. When a prescription was restricted, it was usually reinstated once challenged.


The charity said it was concerned that some people with type 2 diabetes who would have benefited from testing had been advised they did not need it, and called for a review of government guidance on this.


Professor Jonathan Valabhji, NHS England’s national clinical director for diabetes and obesity, said: “Ultimately, these are decisions for CCGs, but should be informed by best evidence and national guidance where appropriate. We need to ensure adequate provision and that clinicians take into account widely recognised Nice guidelines, which are clear about the need for test strips to support people in particular with type 1 diabetes.”



NHS risking people"s health by rationing test strips, Diabetes UK says

9 Şubat 2017 Perşembe

Five ways Britain wrecks young people’s mental health – and how to stop it | Emily Reynolds

A study from the Varkey Foundation has revealed that young people in the UK suffer from some of the “lowest levels of mental wellbeing in the world” – second only to Japan.


This won’t be a shock to anyone familiar with statistics on child and adolescent mental health in Britain. Some 75% of mental illnesses begin before the age of 18, and the charity MQ estimates that on average, there are three children in every classroom with a diagnosable mental illness. This, combined with a continuing crisis in mental healthcare in Britain, means young people are not getting the help they need or deserve. But how exactly are young people being failed?


Slashing NHS budgets


Cuts to the NHS aren’t new – the Conservative government has been slowly dismantling the health service since 2010. And it shows no sign of slowing – a 2016 investigation by the Guardian and 38 Degrees revealed that trusts around England were “drawing up plans for hospital closures and cutbacks” in an attempt to avoid a £20bn shortfall by 2020.


Mental healthcare has suffered disproportionately: unmanageably long waiting lists for secondary care, to take one example. Referrals to therapy or specialist units are hampered by a lack of available staff or by ward closures – which means that diagnosis of more severe conditions are delayed even further.


This is particularly striking when you consider that most young people wait on average 10 years between the onset of illness and an eventual diagnosis – and means that many are slipping through the cracks with neither diagnosis nor adequate care.


Similarly, cuts to community care have meant that more children than ever – 20,000 in 2015 alone – have been seeking emergency mental healthcare in A&E, in wards that are often staffed by stressed, overstretched teams who have no specialist psychiatric support to help them cope.


Treating children miles away from home


Cuts have led to the closure of many child and adolescent mental health wards – which, combined with a severe shortage of beds, has led to children being admitted to adult psychiatric wards and being sent hundreds of miles away in order to receive outpatient care.


A 2014 investigation from Community Care and BBC News found that 350 under-18s were admitted to adult wards in the first nine months of 2013 – a 36% increase from the previous 12 months; 10 out of 18 NHS trusts surveyed had sent children to units more than 150 miles away from their home in 2013-14, making compassionate and consistent care for young people impossible.


Cuts to school budgets


One of the key themes of Theresa May’s speech on mental health was a focus on the prevention of these problems, particularly in young people. Research backs this up – a recent study published in Lancet Psychiatry suggested that early intervention was a significant factor in presentation of depressive symptoms in young people.


What May’s speech didn’t mention, however, was how exactly this would be implemented, beyond a mention of “mental health first aid training”. Unsurprisingly, May also failed to mention the grimly inevitable cuts to school budgets that will make this strategy near to impossible anyway.


Earlier this week, a TES investigation found that a third of secondary schools are planning to “cut back” the mental health support offered to pupils because of what one headteacher described as “budgets at breaking point”. Early intervention is vital, but if teachers are untrained in mental health – because the resources aren’t there – then it simply isn’t going to happen.




There’s a research budget of just £8 per person affected by mental illness – compared with £178 for cancer




Lack of adequate research


Mental health research is, in general, an underfunded area. In 2014, the UK Clinical Research Collaboration found that mental health was only allocated £112m a year – which sounds like a lot, until you consider the nearly 15 million people in the country affected by mental illness. In context, this means a research budget of just £8 per person affected by mental illness – a startlingly low sum, especially when compared to less common conditions like cancer (£178 per person) or dementia (£110 per person).


Less than 30% of this research is focused on young people – meaning we haven’t even started to understand how to tackle mental illness in young people.


Failing to take adolescent mental health seriously


Young people are now pretty used to being the punchline of unfunny jokes made by Telegraph readers and the over-45s. Millennials, eh? We’re stupid! We’re narcissistic! We look at our phones all the time! We’re mollycoddled snowflakes! We expect to be given the moon on a stick! These might be hilarious ideas to people without crushing student debts and who have the means to own property – sure, but it’s all fairly tiring for young people.


It might sound facile – typical millennials, complaining about nothing – but it is an undeniable fact that young people are not being taken seriously and that this, in some cases, is severely impacting on their mental health. While researching my book, I spoke to young people up and down the country who told me they felt consistently let down by parents, teachers and healthcare professionals who wrote off their symptoms or failed to take action to prevent distress.


There was an understandable sense of reticence, caution and disappointment about the behaviour of supposed adults. This conversation has continued to follow me – only last week, a teenager messaged me on Twitter to eloquently and despairingly talk about how they and their friends had been consistently and systematically let down by their school.


It’s a familiar story to me – even as a confident young adult with a medical history full of psychiatric wards and prescriptions for antipsychotics, I’m often questioned by GPs and support workers on the veracity of my own experiences. The difference is that I’m used to overcoming barriers to care – younger people are not, and often fall at these completely unnecessary hurdles.


This isn’t just a social problem, either – failure to acknowledge symptoms is a structural problem too. In 2015, the NSPCC suggested that nearly 40,000 young people were unable to meet the “too strict” criteria for receiving help – so even if teenagers pluck up the courage to ask for help, they still aren’t getting any.


Interactive

Young people are telling us that they’re unhappy. They are asking for help. What they want is simple too. For a start, don’t send them hundreds of miles away from home for treatment. And they don’t want GPs to tell them that their clinical depression is just “being a teenager”. They certainly don’t want to sit down with their neighbour and have a cup of tea, as Theresa May ridiculously suggested on Time to Talk – their focus, on the whole, is not on stigma at all.


What young people really want is actual, actionable, well-funded support. They want to be taken seriously; they want to receive the help that they need in a timely, compassionate, efficient and effective manner. They’re asking for it already – when are we going to start listening?


Emily Reynolds’ A Beginner’s Guide to Losing Your Mind is out on 23 February



Five ways Britain wrecks young people’s mental health – and how to stop it | Emily Reynolds

8 Şubat 2017 Çarşamba

UK second only to Japan for young people"s poor mental wellbeing

Young people in the UK have the poorest mental wellbeing in the world – with the exception of Japan – and list money, getting on in life and the rise of terrorism among their greatest concerns, according to an international survey of 20,000 youngsters.


The study ranks the UK 19th out of 20 countries in its survey of wellbeing, with young people in the UK aged 15-21 lagging behind comparable cohorts in France and Germany, as well as those in countries such as Israel, Turkey, Russia and China.


Indonesia, India and Nigeria scored highest on the wellbeing scale, with scores of 56.2, 54.4 and 53.9 respectively (the highest possible score being 70), whereas Japan scored the lowest at 41.3, followed by the UK (47.3), New Zealand (47.6), and Australia (47.9).


Mental wellbeing graphic

Just 15% of UK youngsters surveyed felt they had good physical wellbeing, measured by regular exercise, sufficient sleep and time for rest and reflection – which was comparable with France (14%) but lower than most countries including Germany (21%), Italy (21%), and Nigeria which scored highest at 41%.


The report was compiled by the Varkey Foundation education charity and used the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing measure, which asks respondents whether they feel optimistic, confident, loved, and interested in other people. The results found a significantly greater sense of wellbeing among young people in emerging economies compared to those in Europe, North America and Australasia.


Extremism and the rise of global terrorism was the issue which made young people in the UK more fearful for the future than any other factor (83%) – a position shared by young people in 13 of the 20 countries, though young Chinese people who took part in the survey identified climate change as their greatest concern.


Moral outlook graphic

Vikas Pota, chief executive of the Varkey Foundation, said: “At a time of nationalist and populist movements that focus on the differences between people, the evidence shows that young people – whatever their nationality or religion – share a strikingly similar view of the world.


“Teenagers in Nigeria, New Delhi and New York share many of same priorities, fears, ambitions and opinions. There is far more unity among young people than a glance at the headlines would suggest. Young people are passionate believers in the right to live the life that they choose, whatever their background, free of prejudice of all kinds.


“However, they are a generation that is deeply pessimistic about the future of the world. They are not strongly influenced by politicians and think that governments are doing far too little to solve the refugee crisis – one of the greatest challenges of our age.”


On global challenges facing the world, nearly half of young people (48%) in the UK said they thought the government was doing too little to solve the international refugee crisis – compared to 72% in Brazil and 16% in Turkey, which scored the lowest on this measure of any country surveyed.


There were mixed responses to questions about immigration, with 31% of British youngsters in favour of the government making it easier for immigrants to live and work in the UK, while 26% thought it should be more difficult. There was greater support for legal migration in Germany (37%), Italy (38%) and the US (38%), but less in France (27%).


More than half of young people in the UK (54%) said money worries were among their top three causes of anxiety. And asked about their most important value, more UK youngsters chose “working hard and getting on in life”, rather than honesty, tolerance, kindness to others, helping their family, or looking after the world beyond their community.


Fears for the future graphic

Young people in the UK are however noticeably enthusiastic about their country, with more than two-thirds (67%) agreeing it is a good place to live, compared to just 4% who think it is a bad place to live. In France the comparable positive figure was 51%, in Germany 75%, and in Canada 87%.


Nevertheless the report suggests a strong sense of pessimism about the future among young people worldwide with 37% overall convinced that the world is getting worse, compared to 20% who think it is getting better. Young people were at their most pessimistic in France, Italy and Turkey where more than half (53%) feared the world was deteriorating.


In contrast, the most optimistic youngsters are to be found once again in emerging economies – 53% of young people who took part in the survey in China and 49% in India believe that the world is becoming a better place.


And on a positive note, the survey, conducted by Populus, showed widespread support from young people around the world for liberal values of tolerance and equality – 63% support legal same-sex marriage; 89% support equal treatment for men and women and 74% are in favour of equal rights for transgender people.


The report, called What the World’s Young People Think and Feel, compares the experiences of teenagers and adults known as Generation Z, who were born around the turn of the millennium in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Israel, Italy, Japan, New Zealand, Nigeria, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey and the US, as well as the UK. It is thought to be the first international comparative study of the attitudes of young people on this scale.



UK second only to Japan for young people"s poor mental wellbeing

29 Ocak 2017 Pazar

Ginger’s life on the street: a battle with people’s disgust, illness … and the cold

For three days he hadn’t slept, at least not properly. The last time he remembered drifting off was before dawn on Tuesday. It was now 1:40pm on Friday, and Ginger was hunched in his sleeping bag on the freezing slab of north London pavement he called home. His resting place was outside a branch of HSBC, metres from Camden Town tube station. There might be more crowded locales in London but few are more frantic. Around him surged crowds of tourists and revellers starting the weekend early. A bunch of Italians took it in turns to take pictures of Ginger, red-eyed and weary, a very modern face of the capital. Others struggled to hide their pity; some looked plainly disgusted.


But it wasn’t the incessant tumult of Camden that had induced Ginger’s most recent bout of insomnia. “It’s the cold. You can’t sleep. You just lie there, freezing. Even when you turn numb, it’s still painful. And someone stole my gloves,” he shook his hands forcefully to mimic his shivers as the temperature fell to -3C last week.


Ginger said the best thing to kill the cold was heroin. “It’s the only thing that makes you feel warm, from the inside. But it’s been so cold, even that hasn’t worked.”


An articulate and incisive character, Ginger is one of Britain’s growing cohort of rough sleepers, among the 960 identified in London last year. Last week government figures showed that the number of rough sleepers in England had risen for the sixth year in a row, up 16% on the previous year, nearly double the number since 2010. Across the country 4,134 people were forced to sleep outside. Ginger describes it as a life of extremes, an existence that brings out the best and the worst of people. “Some people try to bully you, try to pick a fight, some spit at you or shout at you to get a job or get some benefits. Mostly they tend to stick their nose up at you.


“And then a lady will walk by and give you a helping of homemade stew that she’s made especially – that happened yesterday,” he smiles. Considering his profound fatigue, Ginger looks well, although he admits he feels “much older” than his 41 years. The average age of death for rough sleepers is 47. The lowest average life expectancy in the world is in west Africa’s Sierra Leone: 44.4 years.


Ginger, born in upper Clapton, east London, in March 1975, describes his life’s journey as a string of squandered opportunities, bad luck, bad decisions, substance abuse and ultimately the shocking murder of a loved one. His first setback occurred at the age of six and a half. Ginger’s mother walked out on him and his father. He has not spoken to her since. “She didn’t want anything to do with me.” His father, now 67, brought him up single handedly and, according to Ginger, remains supportive.


After leaving school aged 16, Ginger went to live with his uncle in the Irish city of Limerick. There, he fell in love with the outdoors. In the River Shannon he caught his first salmon. He went rabbit hunting in the fields below the Slieve Felim mountains. “I became a keen fisherman, I really took to the life.” But the lure of London drew him back and, aged 19, Ginger found work as a painter and decorator in Camden, making £50 a day cash in hand, a grand a month. “That was big money in those days,” he said. But his disposable income was invested disastrously. Ginger began drinking heavily in Camden pubs like the World’s End – opposite where he now sleeps – or the Camden Head. “The problem was that I was drinking with the wrong crowd.”


Cannabis use rapidly evolved into crack and heroin addiction. His job suffered, his income evaporated. In 2000 Ginger received his first custodial sentence for robbery. For the following eight years life became a blur of prison and heroin use. He served time in Pentonville, Wandsworth and Portland, among others. Amid the chaos, Ginger managed to maintain a seven-year-relationship. He and his partner had two daughters and a son between 2002 and 2006. The family lived in a two-bedroom flat in a yellow tower block behind Euston station. “I had everything I ever wanted. I thought I’d made it.”


But in 2008 the relationship broken down. Ginger went clean but he has not heard from his partner or children since. His loss prompted a period where he tried to build a new life, and Ginger is adamant he would have never ended up on Camden’s streets had it not been for the brutal murder of his Irish uncle in 2015. An intruder attacked and viciously beat the 74-year-old in his Limerick home. “I was asked to go to the funeral but had to say no. I couldn’t bear to see him in the open coffin. I wanted to remember him as he was,” said Ginger, still visibly grief-stricken. Heroin anaesthetised the pain. By the summer of 2016 Ginger had lost everything and was a rough sleeper. “Once you’re back on the heroin, it’s hard to get straight,” he said, describing his current heroin intake as “dabbling”.


Spice – synthetic cannabis – is the narcotic of choice among Camden’s rough sleepers now. “Everyone’s on it. It just knocks you out,” said Ginger. Last May the government made spice illegal, and the only people to benefit have been the dealers. Before then, Ginger could procure five grams for £25 from a local shop. Now dealers cut the substance and charge £10 for half a gram.


Camden could be a violent place for a rough sleeper, he said. He is wary of the surrounding streets, recounting a drunken night in 2003 when he got into a mindless squabble with a stranger in a nearby alley. They began fighting. Initially Ginger thought his assailant had punched him in the leg. “Then I realised I’d been stabbed. You live in fear that that can happen at any time.”


Ginger also admitted that he was a danger to himself. In 2008 he was taken to St Pancras hospital in handcuffs after a psychotic episode. Once there, he sliced himself open with a craft knife he had hidden in his pants. Yanking up his jacket, he reveals two parallel lines of knotted scar tissue 30cm long, running across his lower stomach. “It was the voices that told me to do it.” He was diagnosed as a paranoid schizophrenic and currently receives a fortnightly injection to control his condition. Research by charity St Mungo’s shows that four in 10 people who sleep rough have a mental health problem.


But street life is not unswervingly bleak. Ginger’s survival relies on daily acts of unsolicited generosity. “Some people sit down for a chinwag and ask how I am. Others give me money, even 20p, for which I’m always grateful. People bring sandwiches or visit a local shop to buy me lunch, and local restaurants often bring leftover meals.”


Staff from the McDonald’s on Camden High Street bring over a quarterpounder with cheese, Ginger’s favourite. If not, there is the nearby soup kitchen which, in a sign of the times, can “become very crowded”.


Ginger talks fondly of his fellow rough sleepers, how they will defend each other if attacked or from new faces they don’t trust. In the past Ginger has befriended strangers and woken up without his shoelaces. Even so, rough sleeping is fundamentally wearying. Days begin around 5am, when the city starts waking up, and Ginger says he can only fully relax after 3am when Camden’s nightlife fades. His alternative “homes” – a doorway close to the American Apparel store across the high street and an alley behind the World’s End – are hardly more peaceful.


Ginger often thinks of the day he’ll be able to leave Camden’s streets. Like all rough sleepers his primary ambition is a permanent home. Without an address, securing a job and saving money is almost impossible.


But Ginger is also scared that he’ll never fully conquer the internal voices that he said prevented him from moving forward. “The medication is working in the sense that I can only hear mumbling. I can’t quite make out the voices but they are there, coming from behind my back. If they stop, I’ll be able to think more clearly.”


HOMELESSNESS FACTFILE


Using a different methodology to the government figures, the Combined Homelessness and Information Network, found that 8,096 people slept rough at some point in London during 2015/16, an increase of 7% one the previous year.


Of these, 5,276 people were new rough sleepers.


85% were male, with the proportion of women rising slightly over the last two years by 1%


Many rough sleepers have pressing support needs: 43% have alcohol problems; 31% have drug addictions and 46% mental health issues. The proportion of rough sleepers with no support needs is around a quarter.


A third of people seen rough sleeping in 2015/16 had served time in prison, while one in 10 had experience of the care system. Eight per cent had been in the armed forces.


Where nationality was recorded, 3,271 people rough-sleeping were UK nationals – 41% of the total.



Ginger’s life on the street: a battle with people’s disgust, illness … and the cold

18 Ocak 2017 Çarşamba

Young people’s mental health services need cash not empty promises | Clare Allan

It’s good to talk, and at the moment there’s a lot of talk about mental health and, in particular, about the mental health of young people.


I’m thinking, of course, of Theresa May’s recent speech, in which she announced a government green paper on children and young people’s mental health services, mental health first aid training for schools and a few other measures – to be funded apparently out of thin air – because mental health has been “a hidden injustice in this country” for far too long. From whom this injustice has been hidden was not specified.


BBC Radio 1, 1Xtra and Asian Network on Wednesday launched a year-long campaign “to encourage young people to explore issues surrounding their mental health”. My Mind and Me aims “to get young people talking about mental health, to reduce stigma around mental illness, and to raise awareness and understanding of mental health issues that affect young people”.


To assist them in this, they have partnered with the National Citizen Service (NCS) to create a group of “social action champions”, a group of young people from across the UK, who will work with the stations to help shape the campaign, sharing their own experience and leading discussions on “the key issues around mental health”.


Giving young people a platform to discuss these issues is certainly important. There is nothing more powerful than hearing directly from people about their experience, especially from people who are far too often stereotyped or simply ignored altogether. To hear an individual talk on their own terms and in their own words allows for a human-to-human connection that cuts through cliches and stereotypes. The result can be transforming. And as Ben Cooper, controller at Radio 1, 1Xtra and Asian Network, put it:“From prime ministers to our young listeners, we all recognise the need to change attitudes to mental health.”


It’s good to talk, but I cannot help feeling there is something of an elephant in the room. I confess that I listened to Theresa May’s speech, and much of the discussion that followed it, with my jaw hanging apishly open.


This government and the previous one have presided over the decimation of mental health services – “a car crash”, according to Prof Dame Sue Bailey, former president of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, speaking in 2014. She was just one of a chorus of voices, from patient groups to professional bodies, carers and mental health charities, all shouting the loudest, most urgent of warnings – it certainly wasn’t hidden from the government.


And between 2010 and 2015 funding for Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (Camhs) was slashed by £50m, despite massively increasing demand.


Even setting aside both of those things, consider how, as a society, we are failing our young people.


However inconvenient the fact may be, mental health is not some discrete entity. The mental wellbeing of young people cannot be considered in isolation from the issues that affect their lives: the education system, benefits, housing, employment practices. In all these areas, the needs of young people have been trampled on over and over again by the boots of political expediency. And now they are supposed to believe we care about their mental wellbeing.


It may be that My Mind and Me is going to address these issues and I very much hope it does.


In 2016, winners of Radio 1’s Teen Awards, which included a mental health category, were invited to meet the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, who praised their “inspirational work”. All fine, except that mental health problems have repeatedly been shown to be most prevalent in those countries with the highest levels of financial and social inequality.


And I know it seems churlish to point that out, but it would really be the bitterest of ironies if raising awareness of mental health issues became a means of avoiding confronting the factors that contribute to them.



Young people’s mental health services need cash not empty promises | Clare Allan

13 Ocak 2017 Cuma

Library cuts harm young people"s mental health services, warns lobby

Public libraries’ significant role supporting the mental health of young people risks being undermined by swingeing budget cuts forced on local authorities, the head of their professional body warned this week. He added that, if funding is not protected, the work of libraries as frontline information resources for young people in need will be pushed on to the already overstretched police, health and social services.


It is estimated that one in 10 UK children experience mental health problems, as do one in four adults. Nick Poole, head of the Chartered Institute of Librarians and Information Professionals (Cilip) providers, told the Guardian that cuts to local library services would “continue to bite the availability of dedicated resources such as advice on anxiety, stress, exams and bullying”.


He warned: “Under-investing in our libraries simply pushes costs elsewhere and means that a young person growing up today has less help and is more vulnerable to the impact of mental health problems on their life.”


His comments follow prime minister Theresa May’s announcement this week of a raft of measures to “transform” attitudes towards mental health, including an extra £15m for community care, extra training for teachers and improved workplace support.


Wellbeing initiatives run by libraries around the country include the Association of Senior Children’s and Education Librarians’ autism–friendly libraries, the Cilip-backed reading for pleasure and empowerment scheme as well as yoga and mindfulness sessions run as part of Oldham libraries’ mental health and wellbeing support. Birmingham, Devon and Bolton city councils are also among library authorities that run dedicated mental health services.




I would like to think that the powers that be recognised the role of libraries in helping vulnerable people.


Sarah Lungley, Suffolk libraries mental health coordinator


The Shelf Help scheme, which is dedicated to children and young people and was launched in 2016 by the Reading Agency, provides a list of 35 books selected by mental health experts and young readers that range from self-help and information guides to comics, memoirs and novels including The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark Haddon and The Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky. Subjects covered range from body image to depression and self-esteem.


Suffolk library authority said that 68% of the books on the scheme had a 30% or higher loan status than other stock. Last year, 10,000 wellbeing inquiries were handled by the county’s libraries. Although it did not have an official breakdown of who sought help through its branches, Sarah Lungley, mental health and wellbeing coordinator, said anecdotal evidence suggested that the majority of enquiries came from concerned parents of young people experiencing difficulties.


“We are in a really good position to connect people to the help and services that they need,” Lungley said. “I would like to think that the powers that be recognised the role of libraries in helping vulnerable people. A lot of people in the community who struggle with mental health will be left vulnerable and lonely if their local library shuts.”


Poole added: “Children, young people and their parents are simply going to find it harder to find a well-stocked library where they can find information about the issues they face.” Without access to professional librarians trained in mental health resources, he said, those struggling would be more reliant on unmediated internet searches to gain information. “As a parent myself, I would be worried about my children using Google like that.”


Public libraries have been caught in the crossfire of a ferocious funding battle being fought between local councils and central government. Official figures released at the end of 2016 revealed that library budgets had fallen by £25m in a year, as a result of councils raiding their resources to shore up frontline services such as social care.


According to an annual survey of library authorities in the UK undertaken by the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (Cipfa), total expenditure for the sector fell from £944m to £919m over the year, a 2.6% fall. Over the same period, 121 libraries closed, taking the total number open down to 3,850.


Before Christmas Poole predicted that over the next five years, a further 340 libraries will face closure if proposed cuts go ahead. Libraries in Warrington, Lancashire, Edinburgh, Denbigh and Swindon are among those facing the most severe losses.


Poole said: “We have to find a way of making our political stakeholders understand that a big part of what libraries do is making sure that people with a whole range of issues feel safe and can access information.


“If we remove that function from communities, all you are doing is pushing those library users on to the police and healthcare professionals. If Theresa May isn’t aware of that, her comments are nothing more than an empty soundbite.”


‘The library was a calm, quiet and safe place for me to be’


Fifteen-year-old Josh is adamant that his local library has saved his life. A year-and-a-half ago, school felt like a prison for him, as he struggled to keep up with his classmates due to a variety of issues including severe anxiety and Irlen syndrome, a problem that affects his ability to read and process information. He was also suspected to be on the autism spectrum.


Two years earlier, anxiety attacks and vulnerable feelings had begun to make him dread each school day. “School became an oppressive place to be,” he says. “I was scared and upset and everything just became too much. Everything made me worried and afraid.”


The troubled teen was not a victim of bullying, but the normal noise and chaos to be found in any classroom were a daily nightmare he had to confront.


Only one place made him comfortable: his local library. “The library was a calm, quiet and safe place for me to be,” he says.


Already a regular user, Josh welcomed the available support and guidance when he needed it. Based in a deprived part of Suffolk, his library benefits from a coordinated county-wide health and wellbeing policy funded by the Mental Health Pooled Fund, which is a combination of Suffolk County Council and Suffolk’s Clinical Commissioning Group.


He was eventually allowed to swap school days for days in the library – and the impact on his learning has been considerable: “Because I don’t have to go into school much, I use the library to do my revision. It’s quiet and I find it much easier to study. I am relaxed and calm when I am working because I can take as much time as I want without being constantly rushed.”


When stuck on a difficult maths or English problem, librarians are at hand to guide him towards answers. “They have really supported me,” he says. “They are always there to talk to and help me through a basic part of a question and then will find me a book to help me with the rest. It has given me a lot more confidence.”


A sign of how positive an experience it has been for Josh is that he has now begun volunteering, leading groups of eight to 12-year-olds who have been bullied by older children. “I wanted them to get off the street and come into the library and have a safe space to be,” he says. His idea was to set up an after-school club; by the end of 2016, 20 children were attending every Wednesday.


“It’s great,” says the teenager. “It has given them their own space where they aren’t being picked on by the older children. Before it was a struggle to talk to people because it really scared me. But now I am much more calm and confident.” He smiles: “I seem to be smiling a lot more and am feeling a lot better about life.”



Library cuts harm young people"s mental health services, warns lobby

30 Kasım 2016 Çarşamba

Growing crisis in children and young people"s mental health demands action

Self-harm among young people, particularly girls, has rocketed in the last decade. The number of girls admitted to hospital after cutting themselves has quadrupled, incidents of poisoning have risen by more than 40%, and demand for university counselling services has mushroomed. Behind these figures are young people and families struggling to cope with toxic levels of mental distress.


In part these numbers reflect a greater awareness of mental health and willingness to seek help but more is going on than that. These figures are also evidence that the today’s generation of young people are facing unprecedented levels of social pressure leading to serious psychological distress. Our response, as a society, has not, as yet, been anywhere near sufficient to answer this cry for help.


At the Tavistock and Portman specialist mental health trust, we have been engaged for nearly 100 years in understanding the causes of psychological distress among young people and, in particular, the impact of childhood experience, relationships and trauma, on mental health. It is why we feel strongly that it was the right thing to do to let the cameras in and help tell the story of young people, their families and clinicians working with them.


Channel 4’s documentary Kids on the Edge, screened over the last month, is the result. For us it has captured, with great sensitivity, the challenges faced by young people and their families, and which our services are working through on a daily basis. Some of what is shown is shocking but not in a sensationalist way. Only by better understanding, both intellectually and emotionally, the level of distress that can drive a young person to self-harm or to think of taking their own life can we begin to move forward.



Ash, featured in Channel 4’s documentary Kids on the Edge


Ash, featured in Channel 4’s documentary Kids on the Edge. Photograph: Jude Edginton/Channel 4

There is a growing crisis in children and young people’s mental health. It demands a response, it requires urgent action. We would highlight three priorities.


First, demand for help is outstripping supply. A target has been set that 30,000 more young people are able to access help by 2020. That is welcome. However, the treatment gap is enormous. It is estimated that only 25-35% of young people who need help for mental health difficulties receive it. If this was true for cancer there would be a public outrage. Furthermore many services are seeing year-on-year increases in demand of more than 10%, often combined with a rise in case complexity. If the goal is to get good quality and timely help to the young people who need it, the new money promised by the government for children’s mental health must reach the frontline. So far the story on this has been mixed.


Second, dealing with emotional and mental distress is part of the day-to-day business of teachers, social workers and other professionals. This workforce need the right skills, recognition and support to help build resilience in children and keep them engaged with education.


This is more than just mindfulness, helpful though that might be. Some of these challenges were brought into focus by the programme in our school, Gloucester House, which supports some of the most troubled children who have been excluded from other parts of the educational system.


As a society we must acknowledge the negative impact growing social pressures and targets are having on our children and young people, and the part our education system plays in turning up that pressure. A child’s wellbeing should never be sacrificed in the pursuit of educational achievement.


The third issue, graphically illustrated in the final programme, is the difficulty of supporting a young person in transition between adolescent and adult services. An arbitrary age cut-off can do untold harm. Mental healthcare relies on strong therapeutic relationships between service users and clinicians. Care should be organised around an individual’s circumstances not the arbitrary diktats of service boundaries and funding.


There is, in our view, no area of work in the NHS more valuable and rewarding than investing in the health and wellbeing of young people. They are our future and when we get things right there is a lifetime of benefit to be gained for individuals and society.


We have opened our doors at the Tavistock and Portman because we wanted to create a platform for the young people and families using the services and the clinicians who work with them. There is a growing public demand for children and young people’s mental health to be awarded the priority and the investment it needs. This government has made important commitments, but for kids on the edge turning sympathy into action cannot come too quickly.


Paul Jenkins is chief executive of the Tavistock and Portman NHS trust. Paul Burstow chairs the Tavistock and Portman NHS trust and previously served as minister for mental health.


Join the Social Care Network to read more pieces like this. Follow us on Twitter (@GdnSocialCare) and like us on Facebook to keep up with the latest social care news and views.



Growing crisis in children and young people"s mental health demands action

21 Kasım 2016 Pazartesi

Four in five UK councils struggle to provide older people"s care – survey

Four in five UK local authorities have insufficient care for older people in their area, with the shortage most acute for some of the most vulnerable in society, research suggests.


The Family and Childcare Trust surveyed councils across the country and found they are struggling to meet needs amid a background of growing demand, budget cuts and recruitment difficulties.


The survey is published on the same day as an undercover investigation by BBC Panorama is to be broadcast, exposing shocking neglect at two Cornwall care homes, including vulnerable people being left unattended and a nurse saying she will use morphine to “shut up” a resident.


The deficit identified by the Family and Childcare Trust means more than 6.4 million people aged 65 and over are living in areas that do not have enough older people’s care to meet demand.


Only one in five councils reported having enough older people’s care in their area to meet demand, the survey found.


Just under half (48%) of the 182 councils (out of 211) that responded said they had sufficient availability of home care and a similar proportion (44%) reported having enough places in extra care homes, which allow people to live independently with 24-hour emergency or on-site support.


Only a third of local authorities said they have enough nursing homes with specialist support for dementia, which is predicted to affect one million people in the UK by 2025.


Claire Harding, head of research at the Family and Childcare Trust, which works closely with the government and local authorities, said: “It is inexcusable that vulnerable people are left unable to find the care that they need.


“We urge government to make sure there is enough care for everyone who needs it. In order to do this, we need robust data on where there are gaps in care, a funding system that truly meets the cost of providing care, and clear information for families.


“Without these steps, families will continue to struggle to find care and to meet the numerous care costs on their shoulders.”


The survey also highlighted large regional variations, with just 7% of outer London councils reporting enough older people’s care to meet demand. The only area where more than half of local authorities reported sufficient care was the north-east, where 57% responded positively.


The findings will add to the sense of crisis surrounding social care, with delayed transfers of care – when patients are medically fit to leave hospital but unable to be safely discharged – at record levels.


Council and NHS leaders, as well as the Care Quality Commission, have called for urgent action, with the chancellor, Philip Hammond, facing pressure to increase social funding in Wednesday’s autumn statement.


Inner London councils pay the highest rates for residential care for older people, at £649 a week per place, compared with the lowest rate of £464 in north-west England, according to the survey. The UK average for a residential place was revealed to be £27,113 a year.


A Department of Health spokeswoman said: “This government is committed to making sure older people throughout the country get affordable and dignified care. That is why we are significantly increasing the amount of money local authorities have access to for social care, by up to £3.5bn by 2020.”


Monday’s Panorama sees reporters go undercover at Clinton House in St Austell, and St Theresa’s, in Callington, near Plymouth, both owned by the Morleigh Group.


Hidden camera footage captured one resident left on a bed pan for 40 minutes and an out-of-date prescription supplement relabelled for use by another resident.


Clinton House is being closed as a result of safety concerns and St Theresa’s is under investigation by authorities along with two other Moreleigh Group homes.


Moreleigh Group said it had already removed the staff involved and reviewed its systems and procedures, prior to receiving information from Panorma. Cornwall council apologised for the failings.



Four in five UK councils struggle to provide older people"s care – survey

16 Ekim 2016 Pazar

My father died alone in hospital. Our campaign is restoring people’s dignity

A little more than two years ago, I was in the kitchen with my friend, Julia Jones, in a state of helpless sorrow. My father, John, was still alive then, although he was in his desolating last stages. His slow-motion dying had gone on for months and would continue for several more. While it endured we half wanted him gone, and when it ended, of course we wanted him back – a living ghost rather than a dead man who might haunt us but would never return.


My father’s drawn-out death lasted nine months: he went into hospital as someone living well with dementia; he came out quite lost and broken, and all the love in the world couldn’t have found him or put him together again.


It was Julia who suggested (and why hadn’t I thought of this before; why hadn’t it been obvious?) that carers of people living with dementia should have the same right to accompany them in hospital as the parents of sick children: that they should be welcomed by the bedside, to feed them, talk to them, hold their hand, stroke their hair, meet their gaze, be their memory, keep them safe, take them home whole. And after my father died, it was the Observer – which had 50 years earlier championed the demand by parents to be able do just that for their children – which gave me a place where my voice could be heard, and where sorrow, guilt and regret could be redeemed into change and rescue.


My father was beyond all help, but there are thousands of men and women with dementia who go into hospital each year and who come out diminished, through no fault of nurses and doctors, but because hospital is a hazardous place for those who are frail.


It was nearly two years since I wrote the piece in the Observer that launched John’s Campaign. Founded and run by Julia and me, its aim is simply that carers should be made welcome in hospital. Its beginnings were in a kitchen, but it is now part of a great movement for more enlightened and compassionate care for those with dementia.


At a conference last Wednesday dedicated to the campaign, tribute was paid to the paper’s honourable tradition of giving a voice to the voiceless, power to the powerless, hope to those in despair. The hall was full of generous people who had helped us on our journey – people with influence and connections, NHS leaders, consultants, chief nurses, heads of charities – but at the heart of the conference were the people whose voices are not usually heard, whose sorrow and anger and passion get drowned out in the great noise of the world.


As James Munro, chief executive of Patient Opinion, said: “Listening is the beating heart of healthcare” and in the act of listening “both speaker and listener are changed”.


In a session entitled “Voices”, 10 people, many of whom had never spoken in public before, courageously told of their experiences and were listened to. Sometimes what they said was hard to hear. Their stories, both the ones of anguish and the ones of kindness and optimism, illustrated why we started the campaign.


Tommy Dunne, who lives with dementia, described what it feels like to be in hospital, a “strange place surrounded by strangers”, where something tight squeezes your arm and something cold is put into your mouth; where a chicken pie is placed in front of you and then taken away, a mug of tea loudly offered and then removed; where, startled and scared, “you become dehydrated and delirium sets in … and the quick decline in your health begins. Yet no one knows or understands why.”


Several carers – partners, children, grandchildren, people who, as one of them had it, were the “voice and the memory” of the person with dementia – spoke about their experiences of heartbreak.


Teresa Canale-Parola’s partner, John, was 60 when he died. The hospital in which he spent his final days was too far away for her and her daughters to visit regularly, and – in spite of their battle to get this reversed – there were strict visiting hours, so that for much of the time he was quite alone. In his dementia, John had become violent and was placed under a mental health order. He was medicated and, even when he was placid, he was restrained.


He stopped eating and drinking. Soon he could no longer walk. Thirty-five days after his admission, Teresa had a call to say his health had deteriorated: she and her daughters found John, by now starved and badly dehydrated, “restrained in a chair, dying” . It was a brutal way for a man to go.


The death of someone with advanced dementia can be a sad blessing for those who have loved them, restoring that person to all the selves they have ever been – but a bad or lonely death makes mourning painfully difficult, full of anger and regret and terrible failure, of almost unendurable memories of distress. Not to be with them, not to comfort them, not to rescue them from abandonment and fear, not to accompany them up to the threshold.


Alongside stories of anguish, there were ones of hope: a junior geriatrician (of whom I am the proud aunt) spoke about being part of a cultural change in hospitals. Liz Charalambous – a nurse who has been fighting to get unrestricted visiting for carers for years – said that “one day we will look back in astonishment” at the time when carers were not made welcome.


Rebecca Myers, a health professional whose mother had dementia at a cruelly young age, spoke movingly about the “pragmatic empathy” that lies at the heart of healthcare: “One human being connected to another, in the moment, in the environment, for a shared purpose – to take care, of and with, each other.”


And Theresa Clarke, a former nurse from Northern Ireland now living with dementia, spoke with clarity and spirit about how people with the condition “need to be part of the conversation … not just spoken about, like an object, but talked with and to”. She certainly did not like her diagnosis, she said, and being left in hospital was “deadly, like being in deep space”, but she urged us all to remember that “we can live well with dementia, we can still contribute to society, our family and the world beyond”.


Seeing Theresa, this diminutive firecracker of a woman, hearing her talk, hearing Tommy’s vivid account, was a forceful reminder that people with dementia – who we often reduce to statistics, to costs, to problems, even (horrible words) to “bed blockers”, are not “them” but “us”, valuable and human and precious, with stories to tell and voices to be listened to.


The session ended with Kate Kellaway, of the Observer, beautifully and tenderly describing her father’s last weeks. Her words, republished here, illustrate the ideals of our campaign and show how, up and down the country, nurses and doctors are bringing extraordinary compassion and empathy to the lives of people who are vulnerable, and to their deaths: to live as well as we possibly can; to have, as they say in Ireland, a gentle passing.



Kate Kellaway and her father on his 90th birthday, two months before he died.


Kate Kellaway and her father on his 90th birthday, two months before he died. Photograph: Courtesy of Kate Kellaway

‘My dad’s care made us believe in the goodness of people’


My father died five months ago at Whittington hospital in Archway, north London – he’d had a fall, broken a hip, had an operation, recovered and been discharged. Then he had another fall and had to be readmitted and it turned out he’d had a silent heart attack. He was 90. He had for some time suffered from chronic kidney disease.


So – a medley of misfortunes, including, towards the end, dementia. He had an intermittent belief he was back in the war and that there was a soldier in the bed next to him – he was determined to know the soldier’s name. I helplessly selected “Jim”, which seemed to pacify Dad. But, of course there was no bed and no soldier other than Dad himself, gallantly fighting on.


When it was clear he was dying, the Whittington found him a room to himself. And that was just the first of the blessings of being in that hospital during Dad’s final three weeks.


The care was, in every way, exemplary. The staff were happy to waive visiting hours without question. We could come and go as we pleased and sit up all night with Dad if that was what we wanted to do. The number of visitors at any one time was left to our discretion.


My brother, sister and I were bowled over by one nurse in particular and the compassionate intelligence with which she grasped the emotional picture. Sam Hunt talked to Dad with warmth, respect and gentle humour. She tried to find out how he was feeling. At one point, he admitted he was frightened and she listened, smiled and reassured. And she reassured us too – she made us believe in the goodness of which people are capable.


The doctor, Dr Mitchell, was outstanding – a model of intelligence, sympathy and tact. She was exceptionally clear in her information – impressive, in particular, in telling us what she was not sure of as well as informing us about whatever she knew.


Towards the end of his life, Dad had given us instructions about not prolonging his life unnecessarily – we had power of attorney. The staff listened to us but as Dad became less and less able to speak, Dr Mitchell never neglected to address him first: “Mr Kellaway, I’m just talking to your daughters about how we can try to make you more comfortable…”


The palliative care team was first rate: educating us in the art, or science, of dying comfortably.


And when Dad gently breathed his last – it seemed to me that it resembled what a friend of mine once described as pushing your boat out – I was with him, and when he was gone, it was the nurse and doctor I embraced. They had retained the necessary professional distance and yet had allowed us to feel, if only for a moment, that they were – almost – family.


Kate Kellaway



My father died alone in hospital. Our campaign is restoring people’s dignity

4 Ekim 2016 Salı

Seven in 10 nurses say young people"s mental healthcare is inadequate

Seven out of 10 specialist nurses caring for the growing number of young people struggling with mental health problems believe that NHS services are insufficient.


Half of all mental health nurses working with troubled young people say child and adolescent mental health services (Camhs) are inadequate and another 20% say they are highly inadequate, according to a poll undertaken by the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) for the Guardian. Only 13% believe they are good or very good, while the rest say they are adequate.


Young people’s mental healthcare survey

The survey found serious concern among frontline nurses that the rationing of access to care and shortage of beds are so acute that young people risk harming or killing themselves.


Of the 631 mental health nurses working in Camhs, 43% said services were getting worse, despite government promises of extra investment and assurances that more young people would be able to receive care.


Young people’s mental healthcare survey

“This vital service has been totally underfunded for years. The pressure on the service is not only appalling for children, young people and their families, but staff morale and mental health too,” one nurse said.


Another nurse said: “Children and their families are suffering due to poor Camhs, support and availability. The criteria for referral means children are having to attempt or threaten to take their own lives before receiving support.”


Asked to list what they saw as the main problems with Camhs, 73% of respondents cited too few nurses, 72% said delays in patients getting appointments, 69% pointed to young people being sent “out of area” to get inpatient care, because of bed shortages in their area, and 59% cited the inability of staff to give patients as many appointments or as much care as they need.


Young people’s mental healthcare survey

Fiona Smith, the RCN’s professional lead for children and young people’s nursing, said the survey showed that services for seriously troubled young people are “completely overstretched” in the face of growing demand for care.


“These results tell us that things are seriously poor. Mental health nurses working in children’s services tell me that they have never known it so bad,” she said.


Young people’s mental healthcare survey

“We are failing young people with mental health problems by not providing services and interventions in a timely manner. It’s foolish of the NHS and the government not to really focus on meeting these young people’s needs, because we know that with [the] three out of four adults with mental health problems, their symptoms began in childhood.”


The Liberal Democrat MP and former health minister Norman Lamb said the findings showed that NHS services for troubled young people “are buckling under the pressure. The truth is that we are letting down a whole generation of young people by failing to invest in essential support.


“We have to end the historic underinvestment in children’s mental health. It makes no sense to spend just 6% of the total mental health budget on children and young people when we know that 75% of adult mental ill health starts before the age of 18.”


Sarah Brennan, the chief executive of the charity Young Minds, said lengthening waiting lists for care and higher thresholds for troubled children to qualify for treatment were likely to exacerbate their suffering.


“Without treatment, problems are very likely to escalate and children are more likely to self-harm or become suicidal, to be violent and aggressive, or to drop out of school, which can ruin their prospects for the future.


“Delays can also have a disastrous effect on families, with parents forced to leave their jobs to look after their children.”


The Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government promised to invest an extra £1.4bn in children’s mental health services by 2020. But frontline staff, the Royal College of Psychiatrists and mental health charities are sceptical about whether this funding is being delivered. “Too much of that money has been diverted elsewhere and is not getting through to where it is desperately needed,” Lamb said.


Official NHS workforce figures provided to the Lib Dem MP by the House of Commons library show that the number of consultant psychiatrists working with children in England has only gone up slightly over the past six years, despite the far greater recognition of young people’s psychological and psychiatric issues.


The number of full-time equivalent consultant psychiatrists rose from 622 in May 2010 to 649 in May this year.


The number of non-consultant doctors working in Camhs fell over the same period, from 367 full-time equivalents in May 2010 to 314 in May 2016.


The number of specialist mental health nurses working in NHS hospitals went down by 10% between 2011 and 2016.



Seven in 10 nurses say young people"s mental healthcare is inadequate

31 Ağustos 2016 Çarşamba

MPs say cuts are "false economy" in drive to improve poor people"s health

MPs are calling on the prime minister to fulfil her pledge to end the “burning injustice” of shorter lifespans for the poor by boosting public health, after the missed opportunity of the childhood obesity strategy.


But the health select committee is saying in a hard-hitting report that cuts to public health funding since responsibility was handed to local authorities in 2013 will make this more difficult. Cuts are “a false economy”, because keeping people healthy in their communities protects the NHS from the expensive consequences of treating diabetes, heart disease and other chronic illnesses in times to come.


Dr Sarah Wollaston, Tory chair of the committee, said people were rightly scathing about the government’s recent watered-down childhood obesity strategy, which “demonstrates the gap in joined-up evidence-based policy to improve health and wellbeing”.


“Government must match the rhetoric on reducing health inequality with a resolve to take on big industry interests and will need to be prepared to go further if it is serious about achieving its stated aims.”


Speaking to the Guardian, she said people were “hugely disappointed because it was the opportunity to signal intent that this wasn’t going to be business as usual”.


Wollaston added: “People were hugely encouraged by Theresa May’s words and determination. I don’t doubt her intent. What I feel is now at risk is that the people who are going to be tasked with making a difference won’t have the tools to do the job, and at a time of shrinking health budgets it’s even more difficult for them to narrow health inequality.”


Although the childhood obesity figures appear to be levelling off – with about a third of kids overweight or obese by the time they leave primary school – the truth is that the change is in the children of affluent families. The gap between rich and poor children is widening.


“Childhood obesity is this huge future growing disaster not only for these individual children but for the NHS in terms of costs from managing type 2 diabetes,” Wollaston said.


She urged the government to listen to the criticism and act. Linking public health to planning and licensing applications, thereby allowing local authorities to say no to more fast food outlets and off-licences, “would send a very strong signal”, Wollaston said.


She believes the government should also rethink the absence of restrictions on advertising and marketing junk food to children. “There’s nothing there about advergames – the deliberate targeting of children where they think they are playing a game when they are actually having stuff flogged to them. And [it’s] particularly disappointing that there was nothing about the saturation advertising to children and the use of cartoon characters,” she said.


“There was very clear evidence that Public Health England presented about impulse purchases and pester power and end of aisle displays and checkout displays. Everyone recognised that it wasn’t just a single hit here. You had to look at it across the board, yet whole tranches of public health messaging are going to be undermined by the fact that advertising hasn’t been touched at all.”


Funds to local authorities for public health were slashed by £200m last year and more cuts are to come. The report says this is short-sighted and talks of “a growing mismatch” between spending on public health and the significance attached to prevention in NHS chief executive Simon Stevens’s plan. Keeping people well and out of hospital is fundamental to the sustainability of the NHS in his plan.


The report calls for a Cabinet Office minister to be given responsibility for embedding the interests of health in every government department, a proposal welcomed by the Royal Society for Public Health. “A ‘health in all policies’ approach is key to addressing wider determinants of health and health inequalities, such as housing, education and employment, and enhanced cross-departmental working at a national level will help enable this,” said Shirley Cramer, its chief executive.


The Kings Fund agreed. “The government’s weak plan on childhood obesity underlines the need for a minister at the centre of government to coordinate public health policy across departments but, more importantly, to hold departments strongly to account for their actions. Funding reductions are already resulting in significant cuts to key services such as sexual health services and support for people who want to stop smoking,” said David Buck, senior fellow, public health and health inequalities.


Prof John Middleton, president of the Faculty of Public Health, said the report “demonstrates the false economy of cutting local authority public health budgets because of the added pressures this puts on NHS resources. Councils in England have worked extremely hard for many years to maintain the services they offer their communities with reduced funding. Nevertheless, sexual health services, drug treatment clinics and other health services funded by councils have been hit hard by these cuts.”



MPs say cuts are "false economy" in drive to improve poor people"s health

30 Temmuz 2014 Çarşamba

People"s Choice: In This Fall"s Open Enrollment More Health Care Via Private Exchanges

Walgreen Walgreen


By 2018 more people will use so-called private exchanges than similar ones created by the Affordable Care Act, according to a recent analysis by Accenture. 


Walgreen, Sears and Aon Aon Hewitt, among the earlier pioneers in this new approach, give employees a credit to buy insurance in an online marketplace.


Already an estimated 3 million Americans are getting insurance from their employers this way, which is triple the number of active employees that were buying from private exchanges a year ago, according to Accenture Accenture, which projects 40 million Americans will be buying on private exchanges in 2018. Employees get a credit or subsidy, and are sent to buy a plan on a private market place akin to Amazon.com Amazon.com or Orbitz in their respective industries.


Aon Hewitt, the largest manager of a private insurance exchange, says that the approach reduced growth in health insurance costs for its clients’ active employees to 5 percent, compared to 7 percent for most large employers.


So far, Walgreen has been the largest company to disclose participation by workers in its private exchange. The pharmacy giant says more than 220,000 workers and their dependents are getting coverage through the Walgreen proprietary “Live Well Benefits Store,” a marketplace that is an outsourced solution through Aon Hewitt Corporate Health Exchange.


Aon Hewitt, Mercer and Towers Watson (TW) are the leading consultancies pushing the exchange approach for both active employees and retirees with IBM (IBM), AT &T (T) and Time Warner moving their workers to retiree private exchanges. And the consultants are on the verge of having more competition as health insurance companies get into the act like Cigna (CI), Aetna (AET) and others.


“We continue to work to develop our own proprietary exchange called, the Aetna Marketplace, which we believe will offer an attractive alternative to existing multi-carrier exchanges and the current defined benefit model for health benefits,” Aetna chairman and chief executive officer Mark Bertolini told analysts and investors Tuesday on the company’s second-quarter earnings call.


Wondering how private exchanges or Obamacare exchanges will affect your health care? The Forbes eBook Inside Obamacare: The Fix For America’s Ailing Health Care System answers that question and more. Available now at Amazon and Apple.



People"s Choice: In This Fall"s Open Enrollment More Health Care Via Private Exchanges

22 Temmuz 2014 Salı

Procedure to produce babies with 3 people"s DNA could be legalised in April

Newborn baby

A newborn little one. Photograph: Danny Lawson/PA




Britain’s fertility regulator could enable physicians to create the first babies to have 3 people’s DNA from following April right after the government pressed ahead with ideas to legalise the procedure.


The method, recognized as mitochondrial transfer, provides hope to families impacted by a broad assortment of conditions, this kind of as muscular dystroyphy, triggered by faulty DNA becoming passed down from mom to youngster.


The experimental process replaces faulty genetic materials located in mitochondria, the modest cellular batteries that energy human cells, with healthier DNA taken from a donor lady.


About a single in six,500 young children in the United kingdom every year are born with a critical mitochondrial DNA disorder. Many of the situations have an effect on energy-hungry organs this kind of as the brain, muscle groups and heart, and often worsen with age. A lot of children are disabled and die younger from their illnesses.


The Department of Well being announced plans on Tuesday to press ahead with laws following a 3-month public consultation which drew 1,850 responses. The draft regulations are due to go to parliament for debate in the autumn, with a ultimate vote on modifying the law expected in April.


But there are a number of hurdles that could delay the decision in parliament. The UK’s fertilty watchdog, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), should perform out an approvals approach for families who wish to have the procedure. Meanwhile, an skilled panel convened by the regulator is awaiting the final results of far more scientific experiments on the security of the technique.


Once the HFEA is happy that it can proceed, the laws will be looked above by the government’s joint committee of statutory instruments and the secondary legislation scrutiny committee just before parliament will have its say.


“I am happy that this is moving forward,” explained Doug Turnbull, who created the procedure at the Wellcome Believe in centre for mitochondrial analysis at Newcastle University. “The essential point now is that it will get into parliament this session.


“My concern is that if this is delayed, we are into a new government, and we are not able to know the shape or support of that government, and it could be delayed for a prolonged time. Individuals in the Uk would miss out.”


Mitochondrial transfer is controversial since the healthy donor DNA is inserted into IVF embryos. That indicates the genetic material is not only carried by the kid that grows from the embryo, but is passed down the female line to all long term generations. So far there is no evidence that the method is unsafe, but unknown side-results could emerge and influence all of the generations that carry the donor DNA.


The volume of mitochondrial DNA that comes from the donor is minuscule – just 37 genes, or close to .two% of a human’s complete genetic makeup. These genes are only concerned in producing vitality for cells, and are held individually from the 23,000 genes identified in cell nuclei that impact physical appearance, behaviour and other traits.


Families impacted by mitochondrial ailments are usually oblivious until finally one of their young children is diagnosed with a condition. To stay away from obtaining other youngsters who are at danger, they have to both adopt or have IVF with donor eggs.


Turnbull stated: “My individuals are creating selections all the time. Some do not want to have far more youngsters due to the fact of the danger. Other folks have egg donation. There is going to be a danger with any type of new approach, but every thing that is been done so far suggests the hazards will be much less than with passing these conditions on.”


Jeremy Farrar, director of the Wellcome Believe in, mentioned: “As the government’s most current consultation has again shown, there is broad public support for producing mitochondrial replacement treatment obtainable to individuals. There is now no excuse for the government not to table laws for debate as soon as parliament returns this autumn, so that the HFEA can licence clinics to deal with impacted households with out delay once it is content that any risks are acceptable.”


Robert Meadowcroft, of the Muscular Dystrophy Campaign, mentioned: “It is now up to the government to make certain that these regulations are regarded and accredited by parliament just before the following standard election in May 2015, or risk shedding the progress that has been made in the direction of taking this pioneering approach forward. We require to see a company dedication to debating this situation in parliament prior to the finish of the 12 months.”


Sarah Norcross, director of the Progress Educational Believe in, a charity that promotes public engagement in genetics, assisted conception and embryo research, welcomed the government’s announcement, but stated the process was taking also long. “The folks who oppose this will be saying it truly is too fast, why the rush, but inevitably the delay is passed on to folks who want to keep away from passing on these devastating circumstances to their kids.”




Procedure to produce babies with 3 people"s DNA could be legalised in April

18 Haziran 2014 Çarşamba

Plastic surgery is not only about seems to be people"s wellbeing is at stake | Patrick Strudwick

John Hurt as The Elephant Man

John Harm as The Elephant Man (1980). Photograph: Allstar/BrooksFilm/Sportsphoto Ltd/Allstar




The well being secretary, Jeremy Hunt, whose knowledge of medicine stretches virtually as far as David Cameron’s information of jellied eels, would like NHS surgeons to end performing “purely cosmetic perform” on sufferers. He hence faces a encounter-off with facial surgeons – for they know, as I do, that there is no this kind of point. Cosmetic surgery, like racism, is by no means purely skin deep. 1 wonders of course no matter whether the prolonged checklist of Conservative MPs with financial interests in personal health, which feasts on unregulated cosmetic perform, may have applied stress right here, but let us be charitable and presume Hunt is capable of “purely” independent considered, devoid of agenda. He is right to highlight the financial pressures on our overall health service. Nevertheless, like an idiot on a sun bed, he grasps short-term gain in denial of lengthy-term harm.


I have twice lain in hospital while NHS surgeons took to my encounter – paid for completely by taxpayers. The 1st event I was 18, two years soon after I went to my GP and told her my protruding ears, sticking out at 90 degrees, have been troubling me. I was struggling from depression and, what I now know to be body dysmorphia, and had been obtaining counselling given that I was 14 to deal with these. Psychotherapy has limits. I know this due to the fact soon after four many years of it I nevertheless could not stomach my look, and right after one particular easy process, and a fetching week-lengthy turban bandage, I felt transformed. No single event in my daily life has so boosted my self-esteem. My connection with my reflection grew to become manageable, even positive at times. I did not want additional therapy to be able to cope with mirrors. How considerably may possibly that have saved the NHS in cognitive behavioural treatment or psychodynamic psychotherapy?


On the 2nd occasion, two many years later on, I had been brutally attacked in my house by burglars who beat me to a blood-soaked pulp (realising I was gay fuelled their violence), a single wound from which was my teeth cutting via the left side of my encounter. At A&ampE they could have simply grabbed a passing doctor to sew me up, but instead they recommended I return the following day when a plastic surgeon would be on duty. He did a stunning task, bringing the two flaps of my cheek collectively with skilled precision. Now when I look in the mirror I can’t see a victim, and I can’t see the detest my attackers attempted to brand on to my encounter. Again I would urge Hunt to believe of the lengthy-term cost savings in NHS psychotherapy. He does at least acknowledge “there will be times when there is a psychological overall health require” for NHS cosmetic surgery. As this kind of, far more men and women need to be supplied it, not fewer.


Final month I went to Ethiopia with the film actor John Hurt, famed for his function in The Elephant Man – about the egregiously disfigured Joseph Merrick – to report on the perform of a British charity called Undertaking Harar. Every yr it sends a crew of NHS surgeons – for the duration of their yearly depart – to Addis Ababa to carry out operations on younger people with severe facial disfigurements. These can be cleft palates, grapefruit-sized tumours, noma (holes in the encounter from a bacteria prompted by malnutrition), or scarring from animal attacks. I anticipated to be most horrified by the extreme distortions and protrusions. What struck me, and my companion who is the charity’s patron, however, was the visceral isolation emanating from patients. Young children have been shunned for currently being diverse, for getting deformed, kept within as it brings “shame” on the loved ones, locked out from schools, denied friends, sometimes sent into the wilderness, believed to be demonic.


When I clasped the hand of one particular young woman who had had a large tumour removed from her cheek, she squeezed my fingers with this kind of cautious excitement, and then with such relief to merely be touched by an additional human becoming that it reminded me, starkly, after once more that there is no such thing as “purely” cosmetic, skin deep. Our appears, judged now much more than ever, and in the west even much more so, matter just as our bodily well being does. And to deny this, to deny the social, psychological, even economic implications (excellent-hunting folks earn more) of our faces is to be blinded by the resulting impact on our health and welfare solutions. The unsightly actuality, Mr Hunt, is staring you, and all of us, in the face.




Plastic surgery is not only about seems to be people"s wellbeing is at stake | Patrick Strudwick