Hairdressers of the world unite against hidden dangers of the salon

Hairdressing is not an obviously dangerous occupation. Yet working in a hair salon or a barber’s shop can provoke skin conditions, musculoskeletal diseases such as arthritis and tendonitis and work-related asthma.

Now Usdaw, the shopworkers’ union which represents many of Britain’s estimated 140,000 hairdressers, is calling for a “new deal” to protect them. Paddy Lillis, the union’s deputy general secretary, said the government needed to give “proper protection” to barbers and hairdressers, the majority of whom are female and younger than 40.

A Europe-wide agreement on health and safety standards for the industry has been blocked by the European commission, under pressure from successive British governments. “It’s time we had a new deal for hairdressers,” Lillis said. “All too often the safety of shopworkers is overlooked in the mistaken belief they work in low-risk environments.

“This is a mistake the UK government made when they scaled back Health and Safety Executive inspections and slashed inspections by local authorities who enforce safety in shops, warehouses and offices. It is time that the government and the European commission took these risks to the health and safety of hairdressers seriously and gave them proper protection.”

Research indicates that hairdressers are at risk from seemingly innocuous activities such as washing hair, cutting hair and using hairspray. Repeatedly washing hands can lead to dermatitis, a non-contagious sensitivity to chemicals that causes painful cracked skin and bleeding, and research has shown that 70% of hairdressers have suffered from skin conditions.

Breathing in hairspray and other chemicals may be linked to asthma, according to some studies. Using scissors day in, day out can provoke arthritis and tendonitis in the hands and thumb, through loss of cartilage.

And hair dye has been blamed for a link between hairdressing and bladder cancer, although Cancer Research UK believes this is more likely to be the result of older hair dye ingredients which have been discontinued. Most of these issues could be solved by wearing appropriate gloves and taking regular breaks.

Rebecca Walker had been a hairdresser for nearly 10 years when she developed arthritis. The first signs were a “really stiff shoulder”. “I thought that maybe I’d been overworking it, but it didn’t go away and the pain moved to my elbow,” she said.

Within two months she had resigned because she was taking too much time off because of the pain in her wrists and hands. “I suppose I’m quite a determined person so I didn’t want to give up,” she said. So in 2011 Walker opened her own salon, quirkydo in Macclesfield, and now employs several other people.

“There have been times I’m not sure how I’m going to get through the day, but if I give myself a break for half an hour between clients, it’s OK,” she said.

The picture is different on the continent where hairdressers are more likely to be employees. Regina Richter has been a hairdresser in Leipzig for 51 years, but for the last 30 years she has suffered major back problems due to standing up for eight hours a day. “It seems to be affecting my younger colleagues more now,” she said. “After four or five years they are starting to experience pain. I think it is because the pressure has increased – now everyone has to cut hair as quickly as possible to get as many clients as possible.”

She believes that sometimes being able to sit down while cutting hair, and using ergonomic scissors and lighter hair dryers, would have prevented or delayed her condition.

In 2012, the union that represents about one million hairdressers across the EU, Uni Europa, was involved in drawing up an agreement for EU member states to sign up to shared health and safety standards for hairdressers. But since Jean-Claude Juncker became president of the European commission, the agreement has been blocked, under pressure led by Britain and some other parts of the EU, according to Oliver Roethig, regional secretary of Uni Europa.

“When we look at hairdressing, it’s the tip of the iceberg,” he said. “Social legislation by the EU has been completely taken off the agenda by the Juncker commission. He said the EU must not be big on the smaller things. But we don’t think that hairdressers having to give up work is a small thing.”

In the UK, where nearly half of all hairdressers are self-employed, it can be difficult for individual stylists to raise health and safety issues in their salon, and given the role of Britain in obstructing progress at a European level, life after Brexit is unlikely to get any easier.

In 2009, the Health and Safety Executive handed over responsibility for its campaign on dermatitis to the Hairdressing and Beauty Industry Authority (Habia) and the National Hairdressers’ Federation.

However, Habia’s website refers to health and safety only from an employers’ perspective and does not offer guidance to hairdressers.

Hilary Hall, chief executive of the National Hairdressers’ Federation, said it did offer guidance to employers on contracting dermatitis and advised staff to wear vinyl gloves when washing hair.

“The directive pretty well captures what is available in the UK,” she said. “The difference is enforcement. The individual is responsible and they could be subject to inspections. We feel it is better to let people choose.”

THE DANGERS

Dermatitis

A study in 2004 revealed that 70% of hairdressers in Britain had suffered from work-related dermatitis, in the form of red, sore and sometimes itchy skin, mainly to the hands and fingers but also to the arms, face and neck.

Asthma

In France, a paper published in 2003 showed that 20% of women affected by work-related asthma were hairdressers, compared with 1% for the general population.

Arthritis

According to the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, musculoskeletal disorders are five times more prevalent among hairdressers than in the general population. Research published in the journal Work in 2009 showed that in a study of 145 hairdressers, 41% experienced ‘work-related upper limb disorders’.

Cancer

An analysis of 42 bladder cancer studies in 2010 showed that hairdressers faced a risk 30 to 35% higher than the general public. However, Cancer Research UK says that because cancer can take many years to develop, this may be due to exposure to older chemicals that are no longer used.

Hairdressers of the world unite against hidden dangers of the salon

Death-trap toilets: the hidden dangers of Mumbai"s poorest slums

On the morning of 4 February, Harish Tikedar, Ganesh Soni, and Mohammed Isafil Ansari waited in a queue to use the community toilet in the Indira Nagar slum in eastern Mumbai. All of a sudden the floor collapsed, plunging Tikedar, Soni and Ansari into the septic tank 15-feet below.

Two others who also fell – Sirajjudin Turat and Ramakant Kanojia – managed to hold on to the sides until they were rescued.

“I was submerged up to my shoulders in the slush,” says Turat. “I could feel it pulling me down but somehow held on to a slab. Then some people pulled me up and I passed out.”

The five men who were pulled out were unrecognisable, covered in faeces. They were all taken to a nearby hospital but Tikedar, Soni and Ansari did not survive.

In Mumbai’s slums, the simple act of relieving oneself is fraught with danger, especially in the slums of M-East ward where population density is high, and the few public amenities are crumbling.

M-East is the poorest and most deficient in civic services of Mumbai’s 24 administrative wards. It has expanded over the last 15 years but has remained on the periphery of the city’s consciousness and governance systems. The differences between the civic amenities available in the smattering of middle-class apartment blocks and the slums, which dominate M-East, are stark.

The majority of slum residents are forced to depend on the thriving informal market for water, operated by a network of local strongmen. Photograph: Rajanish Kakade/AP

Most of the 100 square feet slum houses do not have sanitation and water facilities, either because applications for individual toilets and taps are pending approval or because the slum is on encroached land, which means that the civic body will not provide any services there.

For sanitation, people in Mumbai pay two to three rupees (£0.02-0.04) to use a community toilet, which generate revenues of 3.6bn rupees (£47m) a year, according to a recent report by the Observer Research Foundation. The poorest of the poor pay more than 10m rupees (£120,000) per day for the most basic necessity, yet the facilities are rarely maintained despite complaints.

If it wants, the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation can find a way to provide basic rights

Rais Shaikh

Some 78% of community toilets in Mumbai’s slums lack water supply, 58% have no electricity, and many don’t have proper doors or facilities for women to dispose of sanitary napkins. The statistics are worse in M-East.

“The chief minister [of Maharashtra] should order a structural audit of all community and public toilets. All those found deficient must be demolished and reconstructed,” says Dhaval Desai, author of the Observer Research Foundation report. “The long-term solution is to allow slum dwellers to construct individual toilets inside their houses. About 83% of the people we interviewed said they would spend the money, but the BMC [Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation] denies permission on technical grounds.” Most of the slums appeared after 2005, which makes them illegal.

“That slums post-2005 are not given water is a sham,” says Rais Shaikh an elected representative to the BMC from M-East, and leader of the Samajwadi party. “All of them get water; by what means is an open secret. If it wants, the BMC can find a way to provide basic rights.”

The majority of slum residents are forced to depend on the thriving informal market, operated by a network of local strongmen that supplies water through tankers and via the unfinished pipe system laid by the civic body. The cost depends on demand and supply, from as high as 40 rupees (£0.48) to as low as five rupees (£0.06 ) for a 40-litre can. When the municipal corporation imposes water cuts in the summer, the cost rises considerably.

Where there is a gap in sanitation services, NGOs step in to construct community toilets, or local MLAs (member of legislative assembly) and MPs contribute money from area development funds. A coterie of contractors usually takes up the construction and management of these community toilets. But they have no accountability to either the BMC or residents, and repeated complaints about sinking floors and full septic tanks go unheeded.

After an incident, the MLA or MP comes visiting, often with a cheque. We know life is cheap in Mumbai, but so cheap?

Razzaq Shaikh

The community toilet that collapsed in the Indira Nagar slum was only 10 years old and was built using the local MLA’s area development fund. The contractor was arrested and booked under the Indian Penal Code on charges including culpable homicide not amounting to murder, but he was eventually set free. He was not available for comment.

The accident is not an isolated one. Across Mumbai, seven people have died and one was left disabled in similar incidents in the last three months.

“There must be guidelines that the BMC enforces for construction, otherwise this kind of death will become routine,” says Razzaq Shaikh, who helped rescue the two survivors. “After an incident, the MLA or MP comes visiting, often with a cheque. But what’s the point? We know life is cheap in Mumbai, but so cheap?”

The benchmark for toilets, adopted as part of India’s Swachh Bharat Abhiyaan [Clean India Mission], is one toilet for 25 women or 30 men. In M-East, however, the average is one toilet per 190 people, according to surveys by the Tata Institute of Social Sciences.

“The availability of toilets and tap water is so abysmal that the Swachh Bharat Abhiyaan is laughable,” says Amita Bhide, dean of the institute’s School of Habitat Studies and head of its M-East ward project. “The state and the BMC has to intervene and be innovative, not sit on applications for individual toilets because there aren’t sewer lines to link to.”

Regular water supply is also a perennial election promise, but despite politician’s campaigning, nothing seems to change in Mumbai’s poorest slums.

“All political parties come here using the water issue as their trump card,” says Syed Lateef. “All of them say that when they come to power, water issues will be resolved. Water pipes have been installed and reinstalled, but we don’t get water. We buy it.”

Additional reporting by Suryasarathi Bhattacharya and Jovita Aranha.

A version of this article first appeared on scroll.in and has been republished with permission. Follow the author @urjourno and @scroll_in on Twitter.

Join our community of development professionals and humanitarians. Follow @GuardianGDP on Twitter, and have your say on issues around water in development using #H2Oideas.

Death-trap toilets: the hidden dangers of Mumbai"s poorest slums

Serious Dangers of Synthetic Scents Include Asthma, Cancer and Kidney Damage

Serious Dangers of Synthetic Scents Include Asthma, Cancer and Kidney Damage

Hair-raising tales: beauty parlour syndrome and the dangers of visiting the salon

We all know the pain of a dodgy cut and blow-dry, or the hairdresser who never shuts up (or who never says a word, if that’s your thing). Less known is beauty parlour syndrome – or vertebrobasilar insufficiency – the term for a stroke thought to be caused by getting your hair washed at a salon. Experts believe that the process of tilting the neck backwards over a basin can, on extremely rare occasions, tear the artery, leading to blood clots and strokes.

This is what happened to Dave Tyler, who collapsed in 2011 two days after getting his hair cut at a Brighton salon and has just won £90,000 in compensation. At London’s National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, he was reportedly asked by a consultant if he had had his hair cut recently. Beauty parlour syndrome was coined in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 1993 by Dr Michael Weintraub after he saw five women who had developed serious neurological symptoms following shampoos at hair salons. Complaints included severe dizziness, loss of balance and facial numbness. Four out of five suffered strokes.

“I have never heard of it,” admits my Edinburgh hairdresser, Lesley Moses, who has been in the business for 25 years and has been washing and cutting my hair for nearly 10 of those. “I suppose it has to do with your basin: cheaper ones don’t give the right support. Mostly it’s about the consultation with the client. That’s the point where I assess what needs to happen at the basin and beyond.” Has he ever known anyone to get ill or injured after coming to see him? “No,” he says. “I have had the odd client who has made me aware of neck problems, but then we change the washing position.”

Hairdressing remains an unregulated industry and the UK is one of the only countries in the world that does not have a system of compulsory registration. Hairdressers do not need a formal qualification to shampoo hair. Put that together with sharp instruments, high heat and powerful chemicals and the salon starts to look less like an oasis of calm and more like a barbershop of horrors. Examples given by firms specialising in salon injury claims include chemical, electrical and heat burns, allergic reactions and anaphylactic shock, and poor application of chemicals. One spiel begins: “Did you know the peroxide used to bleach your hair in a high-street salon is the same chemical that was used to propel early rockets?”

On extremely rare occasions, effects can be fatal. In 2012, Julie McCabe died a year after she developed a severe allergic reaction to L’Oréal hair dye, fell into a coma and never regained consciousness. At the inquest, the coroner said he believed it was only the second death in the UK resulting from the use of hair dye. The Guardian’s beauty columnist Sali Hughes has also written about being admitted to hospital with a potentially fatal reaction after her hair was dyed at a salon.

“Clients can become allergic to products that they have not been allergic to before,” Moses explains. “All colour clients should have a regular skin or patch test every six months.”

Hair-raising tales: beauty parlour syndrome and the dangers of visiting the salon

Here Are the Real Dangers of Charging $600 for the EpiPen

If you are like me and rely on an EpiPen to keep you or your child safe from a life-threatening allergic reaction, you’ve probably left the pharmacy thinking, “That’s outrageous for such an essential drug.” 

Now we know exactly how outrageous it is: The price of the EpiPen—an auto-injector of the inexpensive hormone ephinephrine—has skyrocketed by more than 600% since 2008, Money reports, from around $ 100 for the standard two-pack in 2008 to more than $ 735 today. 

Fueling the fury is the fact that the epinephrine itself costs about $ 1, according to Consumerist. Even more disturbing is how much some of the executives at Mylan, EpiPen’s maker, have profited: The compensation of Mylan CEO Heather Bresch, for instance, has soared from $ 2,453,456 in 2007, when Mylan first acquired EpiPen, to $ 18,931,068 in 2015, according to NBC News.

The pressing question now is: Is this legal? Members of Congress including Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar (D) and Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley (R) are demanding Congressional hearings into the pharma company’s pricing practices. They’re joining a growing chorus who say that the steep price is putting some of the nation’s estimated 15 million people with food allergies in grave danger. (The devices are also commonly prescribed for severe allergies to insect stings and latex.) 

RELATED: Your 12 Worst Allergy Mistakes

Mylan has responded with a statement on their website that details the significant investment the company has made in allergy awareness campaigns and patient coupon subsidy programs. It states that the changes in insurance programs are fueling the high sticker price: ”With the current changes in the healthcare insurance landscape, an increasing number of people and families have enrolled in high deductible plans, and deductible amounts continue to rise. This current and ongoing shift has presented new challenges for consumers, and now they are bearing more of the costs.”

But more people are doing without this critical medicine. Some on high deductible plans are leaving the pharmacy without the injector, unable to pay $ 600 or more. Others are making do with just one set—even though allergists instruct you to leave an EpiPen with a school nurse, the teacher, afterschool programs, etc. Relying on expired pens and DIYing epinephrine-delivering syringes are dangerous practices, allergy experts warn.

So how can Mylan can get away with price gouging for an essential drug? EpiPen has no real competition, according to Fortune. A competing device called Auvi-Q was launched by Sanofi US but recalled in 2015 for administering an incorrect amount of the drug, a potentially deadly problem. There may be a competitor on the horizon though: an epinephrine device with a longer shelf-life is expected from Windgap Medical in 2018.

An EpiPen is something you buy and pray you never have to use. If you do need it, it is a literal lifesaver. When given swiftly and properly—you inject it into the thigh and hold for 10 seconds—it can quickly undo the airway swelling, cardiovascular events, tissue swelling, and other dangerous effects of an anaphylactic reaction. If you don’t have enough epinephrine at the ready for prompt injection, the result can be death. Some reactions require more than one injection, which is why the drug comes in a two-pack (and you are supposed to carry both with you; you don’t leave one at school and one at home, as has been reported).

RELATED: 31 Everyday Things You Didn’t Know You Could Be Allergic To

I have used an EpiPen on my younger son, who is highly allergic to tree nuts and peanuts. I know the drill, as all allergy families do: Do not go anywhere without at least two EpiPens. Do not hesitate to use the EpiPen at first signs of severe reaction, and use the second if needed. Call 911, then go straight to the ER. 

I know the benefits firsthand. It works. It saves. It is the fifth member of our family, with us at all times. I am thankful for epinephrine beyond words.

As a working parent fortunate enough to have solid health insurance, I can curse my $ 60 copay (the highest tier in my ”gold” insurance plan, and twice what it was when I started buying EpiPens in 2009) and plunk down a credit card. For back to school, I’ll spend $ 180 on three; with all the other school costs, we feel that. We can swing it though. Many, many, many families cannot.

This isn’t an optional drug, it isn’t a drug that you can safely use past its expiration date, and it shouldn’t be priced out of anyone’s reach.

Here Are the Real Dangers of Charging $600 for the EpiPen

The Dangers of Statins – The Flipside of Cholesterol-Lowering Medications

Statistics show that about a quarter of Americans from age 45 and above are taking statin drugs. This is also the estimated number of Americans who should start asking themselves whether it is still worth it to continue taking the drugs or not.

Muscle Pain and Heart Failure

Muscle pain, along with feeling weak, is the most common side effect associated with statins. In fact, reports state that about 75% of patients using statins suffer from muscle pain. Particularly those who are physically active. Experts assume that this may be due to the decreased energy production in muscles caused by the deteriorating levels of Q10 proteins.

Heart failure also has a direct link to muscle pain. The incidence of heart failure has increased in the past few years. The increase has been related to the affected production of Co-Q₁₀ caused by statin drugs.

The lack of Co-Q₁₀ inhibits the cell’s mitochondria to produce energy, which in turn leads to muscle pain and weakness. Hence, these also make the heart more susceptible to illnesses due to the level of energy it uses to function.

Neuropathy

Statin patients are at risk of nerve damage after taking the drugs for a long time. In most cases, the damage is often irreversible even after the patient stopped taking the drugs.

Polyneuropathy is another neurological problem that patients often complain about. People who develop polyneuropathy experience tingling as well as pain in the hands and feet, weakness, and difficulty walking.

The worst part is that the likelihood of the illness getting worse increases to 9% after a year of using the drug and up to 15% following a two-year intake.

Cancer

A significant number of studies with statins and rodents always resulted in cancer. The problem is, such possibility was not linked to humans because statin trials only go on for up to three years. Even with the fact that cancer takes some time to develop.

However, manufacturers do recognize that statin drugs weaken the immune system, which unfortunately may result in infectious disease and cancer. Still, they recommend its use for transplant patients to act as an immune suppressor, and for inflammatory arthritis.

Type II Diabetes

Statins were made and introduced as an attempt to help protect and improve heart health. However, case studies show that the only thing these drugs do is worsen the patient’s condition.

One good example of that is obesity, which users tend to develop after they begin a statin treatment due to the drugs’ gluttony effect.

Second to that, statin users become highly at risk of developing Type II diabetes. Studies showed that statin users become prone to developing long-term complications related to Type II diabetes. Some of which are eye disease, peripheral nerve disease, and kidney disease.

All these dangers of statins only prove that these drugs may help patients at some point, but it does not take long before something goes wrong.

Science has long explained that cholesterol is not the reason behind the development of heart disease. In fact, cholesterol is essential to human health while lack of exercise, poor eating habits, and obesity are more likely the direct causes of such illness.

To conclude, intake of cholesterol-lowering drugs will not help if you do not support it with lifestyle and dietary changes. If you want to regulate your cholesterol and keep your heart in the best condition, you only need to include a few simple things in your lifestyle.

Perform brisk walking or aerobic exercise at least 30 minutes a day five times a week. Add lecithin-rich foods and herbs in your diet, and eat plenty of heart-healthy foods, like omega-3 fats.

Remember, you can always consult with a healthcare practitioner to improve your heart health naturally if you want to avoid the dangers of statins.

Sources: Dr Hyman, Care2, The Alternative Daily, and The Weston A Price Foundation.

Looking for a way to live a healthy lifestyle while eating delicious, colorful meals and losing or maintaining weight the healthy way? Click here for more info

Download my FREE Book “Amy’s Home Kitchen”, packed with my family’s favorite healthy, clean and delicious recipes. Or connect with me on Facebook or Google+

The Dangers of Statins – The Flipside of Cholesterol-Lowering Medications

"I fell asleep at the wheel": the dangers of doctors driving home

Steven Best was on his way home from work when he crashed and wrote off his car.

The GP, who at the time was a junior doctor working in obstetrics, had just finished his shift at 5pm after starting work at 9am the day before. He was in the fast lane of the dual carriageway when a car in the slow lane crossed into his line of vision and he hit it.

“I don’t remember falling asleep at the wheel but I’ve always thought I was pretty tired. I thought that might have played a part in it,” he says of the incident 32 years ago.

You might think this was an unlucky one-off but new research suggests the opposite. Two in five UK doctors (41%) have fallen asleep at the wheel while driving home after a night shift, according to an online survey of 1,135 doctors from Doctors.net.uk.

The survey respondents also said they knew, on average, six colleagues who had fallen asleep at the wheel. More than one in four knew a doctor who had died in a road traffic accident after a night shift.

One doctor who answered the survey said: “I lost two very good friends within weeks of each other … both had car accidents driving home after a night shift. One on the motorway with no one else involved – the inquest [revealed that she] fell asleep at the wheel … [They were] super people who had so much more to give and so much more life to live.”

The results come soon after the inquest of Dr Ronak Patel that found he fell asleep at the wheel when driving home after his third night shift in a row. Last week, Michael Farquhar, a paediatric consultant sleep specialist, told the British Medical journal that the NHS needs a sizeable culture shift in its attitude to doctors sleeping during night shifts.

Falling asleep while driving isn’t just an issue limited to doctors and there have been reports of nurses dying in road traffic accidents too. The nature of certain jobs in healthcare means that professionals’ working lives are made up of an ever-changing variety of night shifts, day shifts and rest days.

The issue is perhaps more pronounced among junior doctors who change hospital every three to four months, often leading to a lengthy commute home. The average distance reported by respondents to the survey was 25 miles.

Night shifts can be incredibly stressful, especially for a doctor just out of university who is faced with having to make life or death decisions. Driving home afterwards can be equally as worrying, as Thomas Bewerley knows only too well: “When I first qualified and was working near London, some of those journeys home were scary as hell. I’ve never had a near miss but have momentarily fallen asleep at the wheel.”

He added: “The experiences were horrible. You’ve got the windows down and you’re trying to sing along to your favourite songs and it’s not working. You’re on a busy road and it’s not easy to find somewhere convenient to stop. These episodes came out of nowhere. Starting the journey I’d be fine and within five or 10 minutes, I’d be in trouble. I was doing my utmost to stay awake but couldn’t.”

Although the issue is commonplace among the medical profession, the subject remains taboo. Helen Peterson, a junior doctor in psychiatry in the Midlands, said: “It’s known that everyone feels absolutely shattered driving home. In terms of people having fallen asleep at the wheel, it’s not as openly talked about. People worry that it might get around and they will be asked if they should be driving home or that the police might get involved.”

So what’s the answer? The doctors interviewed said they would like to see employers take responsibility. They complained that there were no rest facilities for staff to go when they’re tired. In response to their survey, Doctors.net.uk has launched an e-petition calling on trusts and deaneries to make some provision for on-site accommodation.

Peterson continues: “If a lot of people are raising issues, then employers need to look at what’s happening. I’ve never been asked if this is an issue by my employers. None of my colleagues would bring it up because of the fear around how it might reflect on you. We just suck it up and get on with it.”

All names have been changed

Has anything happened to you after a night shift? Does this need to be talked about more? What would you like to see happen? We want to hear from any healthcare professionals – nurses, paramedics, doctors, healthcare assistants etc – who feel this is an issue. Please comment below the line or email sarah.johnson@theguardian.com

Join the Healthcare Professionals Network to read more pieces like this. And follow us on Twitter (@GdnHealthcare) to keep up with the latest healthcare news and views.

"I fell asleep at the wheel": the dangers of doctors driving home

The top 5 hidden dangers of wellness sanitizers

By and big, folks live in a very germ-aware globe. From the annual threat of the flu to the horrible outbreaks of Ebola in West Africa, individuals are extremely mindful of the reality that there are a lot of microorganisms out there that can trigger sickness and illness – and also that there are ways to assist reduce the chance of infection. That is why folks get flu shots, consider additional Vitamin C or Echinacea capsules and steer clear of contact with men and women whom they know to be sick.

This germ-consciousness also explains the rise in recognition of hand sanitizers in current years. When mostly in hospitals, clinics and other health-related facilities, these sanitizers are now in the bulk of American residences. But although the idea behind sanitizers – that hands need to be clean simply because they are a conduit for germs – is a great a single, there are nevertheless some hidden dangers individuals need to be mindful of.

Several plastic goods men and women get in the retailer today incorporate labels declaring them to be “BPA Free”. This is due to the fact the basic public is beginning to recognize that this chemical, as soon as frequently used in plastics, can cause prolonged-phrase health complications this kind of as damage to the nerves and the reproductive
program. And it has been proven that triclosan, a chemical compound identified in hand sanitizers, makes it easier for the body to absorb BPA in more substantial quantities.

Phthalates and parabens are chemical substances which are known to disrupt the endocrine technique and lead to troubles with sexual/reproductive growth, obesity and fertility problems. Most – however not all –hand sanitizers include 1 or both of these chemicals, nevertheless.

Because of public concern about triclosan, several hand sanitizers have become primarily based on alcohol to destroy of germs instead. Usually, this is an improvement simply because alcohol is a very successful sanitizer but lacks the health dangers of the triclosan. Nonetheless, these sanitizers, if accidentally ingested by youngsters, can run the chance of alcohol poisoning.

Most individuals have probably heard some thing about the rise of “superbugs”, resistant bacteria that does not yield even to powerful antibiotic treatment. Unfortunately, it may nicely be that the wide-spread use of sanitizers can cause bacterial resistance and in fact lead to much more problems with infection than they are attempting to remedy.

Allergy symptoms can be a massive problem for kids – particularly for these who previously have asthma. And it looks as if the dilemma with childhood allergy symptoms is only acquiring worse. 1 of the causes for that could be widespread use of hand sanitizers. A recent research has identified that kids exposed to triclosan were far more
most likely to build environmental allergic reactions.

In short, even though hand sanitizers sound like a great idea, they can truly result in from issues than they remedy, not only triggering certain and serious human well being problems but really generating infections far more critical due to marketing bacterial resistance.

Sources: thestreet.com, thealternativedaily.com, organicauthority.com

More by Christine . S

The top 5 hidden dangers of wellness sanitizers

From anthrax to bird flu the dangers of lax security in illness-management labs

For the danger they posed, the lapses have been appalling. They place lives at threat, that significantly is clear. But they had been surprising, too, due to in which they took place. The US government’s large-security disease-handle laboratories – which property samples of the most harmful germs in the globe – can not afford to screw up.

Very first came news of a single incident. Personnel functioning on deadly bioterrorism agents at the Centres for Condition Manage and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta followed the incorrect method to “inactivate” batches of Bacillus anthracis, the bacterium that brings about anthrax. However probably nonetheless lethal, the bugs had been sent to one more CDC lab in which personnel have been not outfitted to deal with reside spores. A report into the lapse published last week exposed a worrying pattern of employees failures, and found that dozens had been potentially exposed. The CDC doled out antibiotics and anthrax vaccine. Impacted rooms had been sterilised. They had been fortunate: no one particular got the disease. But that is hardly the point.

It was not an isolated occasion. As CDC investigators finalised their report into June’s anthrax scare they unearthed a more alarming incident that had gone unreported. In March, lab workers sent samples of a pretty harmless strain of bird flu to scientists at the US Division of Agriculture. To the agricultural team’s alarm, every single chicken they contaminated with the virus died. It was only soon after 21 birds had succumbed that they discovered why: the CDC samples had been contaminated with a strain of highly lethal H5N1 bird flu. Organic outbreaks of the virus have killed hundreds of folks in Asia.

The director of the CDC, Tom Frieden, took swift action. He closed the CDC’s anthrax and influenza labs and imposed a ban on the shipment of biological material in or out of the CDC’s highest-protection labs even though safety procedures are revamped. At a press conference last week, Frieden mentioned the behaviour of some workers had been “completely unacceptable … Frankly, I’m angry about it.” On Wednesday, Frieden was referred to as ahead of a US Residence oversight committee to describe himself. The chairman, Tim Murphy, did not hold back. The incident was “troubling”, “totally unacceptable”, the CDC’s reputation “tarnished”. Frieden, he mentioned, had referred to as the anthrax scare a “wake-up phone”. But that was a “hazardous understatement”, Murphy warned. “It was a probably really dangerous failure,” he mentioned.

The incidents cast a lengthy shadow more than the organisation charged with defending the US public. But a third incident points to a broader failure in US biosecurity. In early July, 6 vials of smallpox have been identified in a storage area at an unguarded FDA lab in Maryland that after belonged to the US Nationwide Institutes of Wellness. Following the eradication of smallpox, a horrific disease that kills 30% of individuals it infects, official stocks are stored only at the CDC in Atlanta and at the Russian Vector lab in Novosibirsk. The samples located in the NIH lab probably date back to the 1950s, but tests at the CDC discovered that despite their age, smallpox in two of the 6 vials was even now alive and hazardous. (The last fatal situation of smallpox in the United kingdom took place in 1978, when the virus escaped from a laboratory at the University of Birmingham.) The bad news did not finish there. On Wednesday, federal investigators reported far more harmful materials from the very same room. In all, they found twelve boxes containing 327 vials labelled with a variety of unpleasant pathogens, from influenza and dengue fever to rickettsia and Q fever.

CDC director Tom Frieden was named just before a US Property oversight committee to explain the current lapses, which he admitted had been ‘totally unacceptable’. Photograph: Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Pictures

It was the NIH’s turn to apologise. Its director, Francis Collins, stated that “overlooking such a sample collection for years is obviously unacceptable”. He ordered a total search of all fridges, freezers, cold rooms, storage shelves and cabinets, as properly as offices linked to laboratories, in case other unsafe agents had gone missing. To the outdoors globe, the most trusted keepers of lethal germs had proven themselves to be dangerously incompetent.

The failings will have direct consequences at the CDC and NIH, but the fallout from the lapses will be felt far past the US. There are main lessons to be discovered about human error that even the most vigilant high-safety labs in Europe, Asia and elsewhere must heed. But for some scientists, the incidents contact for a lot more drastic action. Some want the variety of laboratories holding lethal bugs to be slashed, to minimise the chance of a catastrophic accident. Other people want the highest-risk experiments curtailed, arguing that the fresh understanding they bring is not well worth the actual danger of an accidental outbreak.

“This is not just getting noticed as some thing across the Atlantic. There will be knock-on considerations, there have to be,” said John McCauley, director of the WHO influenza centre at the National Institute for Health-related Analysis in London. “These incidents remind us that accidents, even though incredibly uncommon, can take place, and we need to be conscious of how they occurred so we can minimise or even eliminate that kind of accident occurring elsewhere.”

Eight labs in the United kingdom are permitted to function with the most dangerous pathogens, and aside from two animal vaccine makers, all are government-sponsored. Some, which includes the military labs at Porton Down, are planet class, but other people, this kind of as the Institute for Animal health at Pirbright are reportedly much more run-down. The 2007 outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease practically certainly came from the Pirbright lab, in accordance to a Commons science committee report.

At Wednesday’s US hearing on the CDC anthrax scare, Richard Ebright, a biosafety specialist at Rutgers University, known as for a dramatic reduction in the quantity of labs permitted to perform on the bugs, from one,500 or so in the US to nearer 50, in order to minimise the risk of a severe accident. He urged the government to set up an independent federal company to regulate the operate, one particular with actual powers to shut down labs that operated dangerously.

The US government is unlikely to embrace Ebright’s plan. On Sunday evening, the NIH sacked half of its biosafety panel by e-mail. The move ousted 11 of the government’s authentic advisers, who in the previous had raised issues about experiments to produce hazardous new pathogens. Critics are now waiting to see who will exchange the fired advisers. A single advised the Guardian the replacements would be “yes guys”.

Anthrax bacteria related to individuals transported among US CDC labs in violation of security protocol last month Photograph: EPA

Ron Fouchier, a virologist at Erasmus health care centre in Rotterdam, mentioned slashing the number of labs working with dangerous pathogens would be a huge blunder. “The cause so many labs are undertaking pathogen analysis is due to the fact there is so significantly to be investigated, in the curiosity of public and animal wellness,” he stated. The number of organisms that need to have higher-protection labs is growing. There are ongoing outbreaks of anthrax, various strains of bird flu, Ebola, and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), which has killed hundreds in the Middle East, and a handful more in Africa, Asia, Britain, France and Germany. “I locate it difficult to believe theat Dr Frieden or Dr Ebright may well consider that some of the work is not necessary and can be hence be lowered,” Fouchier advised the Guardian. He mentioned his lab currently employed harmful pathogens only when there was no alterative. Working in large-safety labs “is not exciting, and is extremely high-priced”.

But the breaches in the US have fuelled concerns about some of the far more intense studies that scientists do. When the CDC declared its anthrax incident, Marc Lipsitch, professor of epidemiology at the Harvard College of Public Well being, explained we should be glad it was only anthrax. He fears that scientists, Fouchier incorporated, pose far greater dangers to the public by intentionally making harmful pathogens. In 2011, Fouchier announced that he had mutated bird flu to make it spread very easily in animals by way of coughs and sneezes. Advocates for these experiments, recognized as gain-of-function research, say they give scientists essential insights into the varieties of viruses to concern in nature. To Lipsitch and several other individuals, the irony is all as well clear. In striving to avoid the next pandemic, they say Fouchier and his colleagues make a disastrous outbreak more most likely.

Earlier this week, Lipsitch convened more than a dozen researchers who shared his considerations. The end result of their meeting was the Cambridge Working Group consensus statement calling on the US government to “curtail” experiments that produce probably pandemic pathogens, right up until proper danger assessments have been carried out. Even though Fouchier and other folks describe that they have previously been by means of numerous risk assessments, and operate underneath very tight protection, their critics are not reassured.

A single of the signatories of the Cambridge Operating Group statement is Sir Richard Roberts, a British scientist and Nobel prize winner, who now works at New England Biolabs in Massachusetts. Roberts hasn’t seen the risk assessments for Fouchier’s experiments, but notes that even the CDC labs, “which were typically regarded as to be the safest labs out there”, had had problems. “How can you believe in anyone? Humans are human. Men and women make problems.”

Lipsitch’s group desires to convene a meeting that brings together scientists and other professionals to debate the possible hazards of creating unsafe pathogens, and to draw up binding suggestions to ensure that potential experiments are safe. The program mirrors the landmark Asilomar conference in California in 1975, which was largely driven by younger scientists who had concerns over the unknown risks of swapping genes in and out of various organisms. The meeting set critical ground guidelines – like the introduction of biosafety containment levels all around the world – for genetic scientific studies to this day.

Vincent Racaniello, a virologist at Columbia University in New York, explained the Cambridge Operating Group was “infuriating” due to the fact it misled folks into believing that viruses created in laboratories were a serious risk to the public. But because the experiments are done in ferrets, he argues, it is not possible to know if the bugs would spread in men and women, and how unsafe they may possibly be. He added that determining which experiments went ahead on the basis of a risk-benefit analysis was “absurd”, since it was typically unattainable to know the positive aspects of an experiment beforehand.

McCauley largely supports the experiments at the centre of the controversy, arguing that they reveal how viruses in the wild transform from harmless strains to far more unsafe types. “I need to have to be in a position to advise folks,” he said. “And it tends to make me really feel a whole good deal happier being aware of a lot more.”

Roberts, however, is having none of it. “The dangers are massive and the positive aspects, to my mind, are non-existent,” he said. “If I recommended that you consider to make the most virulent and harmful virus that we can picture, some thing that could destroy a quarter of the world’s population if it received out, does that look a sensible factor to do? That strikes me as being definitely ridiculous.”

From anthrax to bird flu the dangers of lax security in illness-management labs

Councils and NHS companies should function collectively to share dangers and savings

Public health, social care and neighborhood government solutions must prioritise reductions in emergency admissions, says Richard Vize. Photograph: Getty Photos

The most significant ever push to integrate wellness and social care is in critical problems. What has gone wrong with the Better Care Fund and can it be fixed?

The issues stems from the reality that half of the basic £3.8bn fund, meant to support integration tasks in 2015-16, has been stripped out of budgets for acute health services. The hospital lobby argued that this risked pushing companies additional into monetary difficulty. The government has responded with a clawback mechanism which will keep £1bn of it largely in the NHS and make it dependent on achieving locally agreed reductions in hospital admissions.

In response, David Sparks, in his very first speech as the new Labour leader of the Neighborhood Government Association (LGA), advised its yearly conference on Tuesday: “We are seeing Whitehall striving to strangle [the fund] at birth.”

The increasingly bitter tone of the dispute displays the substantial fiscal stress facing each the NHS and nearby government. It is akin to drowning sailors fighting in excess of a lifebelt. But it is also a clash of cultures and perspectives.

Neighborhood government resents that, even though it has been coping with a loss in government grant of nearly 30% with the bare minimal of shroud-waving, hospitals have gone bleating to ministers the 1st time they have to deal with something approaching a lower. Councils are baffled by the way growing numbers of trusts are operating deficit budgets instead of obtaining sustainable solutions. They bristle at social providers getting handled as an extension of the hospital discharge technique. They can’t realize why trusts are so inward hunting alternatively of seeing the larger picture.

Trusts are annoyed that the mirage of ring-fenced and even growing funding is obscuring deep cuts in acute services’ revenue. They have tiny faith in schemes that guarantee to throw many years of development in A&ampE admissions into fast reverse in a matter of weeks. Some companies have observed their nearby council turn into a rallying stage for opposition to badly necessary reconfiguration ideas, paralysing change in nearby well being economies that desperately need to have reform. Unlike social care, the NHS cannot control demand by raising eligibility criteria – it largely has to treat what comes through the door.

The true function has not even began. Relationships across the method need to be received back on track before the fund goes dwell next April. The option is to permit the inevitable difficulties and setbacks to trigger recriminations and division.

There requirements to be agreement on what integrated care implies, and it has to be broader than just decreasing emergency admissions and speeding up discharge from hospital. It needs to be developed about empowering the patient and giving them a coordinated service. Excessive claims about cutting admissions require to be replaced with realism. In numerous locations, just stopping growth would be a triumph.

Simplistic assumptions about substituting low-cost social care for expensive medical care must be replaced by an understanding that the two are largely complementary.

Public overall health, social care and the entire variety of nearby government services need to prioritise reductions in emergency admissions, particularly through reducing obesity and alcohol abuse and escalating physical exercise.

Crucially, the two NHS trust regulators, Keep track of and the NHS Believe in Improvement Authority, need to cease judging providers largely in isolation from each other and the wider care method. Driving NHS leaders to think in terms of institutions rather than programs is obstructing integration and encouraging fragmentation.

A lot more demands to be carried out to share risks and cost savings among health and nearby government. Nearby organisations need to have greatest freedom to agree their personal solutions to this. The offer by NHS England chief executive Simon Stevens, speaking at the LGA conference, to create pooled personal budgets for four groups – people with extended-phrase conditions, kids with complex needs, folks with understanding disabilities and these with serious and enduring psychological health issues – is a promising move. It will inspire integration strategies to focus on the support consumer rather than institutions and promotes technique thinking.

Above all, councils and neighborhood NHS companies require to unite close to shared objectives that tackle the most hard issues confronting them. There merely isn’t the money to do anything else.

Are you a member of our on the web community? Join the Healthcare Experts Network to acquire regular emails and unique provides.

Councils and NHS companies should function collectively to share dangers and savings

Dangers of donor egg pregnancies uncovered

Almost 18 per cent of girls who became pregnant following egg donation suffered substantial blood stress, the research found, compared with five per cent of other females undergoing fertility treatment method.

The risk of pre-eclampsia – a problem linked to high blood pressure, which can be fatal, rose from two.eight per cent to 11.two per cent.

Researchers mentioned it was attainable that the problems stemmed from changes in the embryo’s immune tolerance when it encountered female genes with different traits to those of the egg recipient.

In long term, it may possibly be possible that egg donors and recipients would be matched on genetic aspects, to boost immune tolerance, doctors explained.

Dr Helene Letur from the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris in Paris mentioned: “Our aim was to locate out no matter whether pregnancies from egg donation are genuinely linked with a greater danger of hypertension and pre-eclampsia than people from remedies employing the patient’s very own eggs.

“We would have to conclude from the results that egg donation itself is a threat factor for pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia.”

“This has expanding relevance due to the fact of the increasing number of egg donations.”

The French study’s findings presented to the annual meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology in Munich examined 580 pregnancies between 2005 and 2011, including 217 in which the egg was donated.

Age manufactured only a little difference, whilst other variables, such as whether ladies had previously been pregnant or undergone IVF had no important result.

Researchers stated the substantial prevalence of large blood stress in the egg donation group meant doctors and individuals want to be a lot more conscious of the dangers.

Feasible biological explanations for the findings consist of modifications in the immune tolerance of the embryo, whose complete genome is not concordant with the recipient’s.

Dr Letur said the rise in blood strain could be an try by the entire body to boost exchanges in nutrients and oxygen amongst mom and foetus.

Dangers of donor egg pregnancies uncovered

Indigenous wellness and schooling dangers impartiality by move to PMs office

The outgoing chair of the Council of Australian Governments reform council has warned of the loss of an independent voice on Indigenous health and training when the prime minister’s workplace requires on the process of reporting outcomes from the Closing the Gap campaign.

The council’s final report, a supplement that focuses on well being outcomes for Indigenous individuals, was launched on Thursday, with the council chairman, John Brumby, warning the proposed $ seven co-payment to see a GP could lead to worsening overall health in the Indigenous community.

The council is currently being wound up on 30 June as portion of the government’s price range measures and the prime minister’s office will presume accountability for reporting on Closing the Gap outcomes. Brumby mentioned the council’s reviews had kept the government accountable and assisted emphasis efforts in Indigenous education and overall health, but also showed there was still a long way to go.

“I have a fantastic deal of respect for the Division of the Prime Minister and Cabinet and I’m confident there are individuals with the skills to do that in PM&ampC. However, what the COAG reform council did that was particularly particular was hold governments to account on the promises they have produced, but did so independently of any 1 government,” he mentioned.

“We report independently on the progress of all nine of Australia’s governments – the commonwealth, the states and the territories – in closing the gap. That independence ensured that our reporting was impartial and aim. Who will do this in the long term?”

The report identified lung cancer prices amongst Indigenous folks had been still twice as substantial as amid the non-Indigenous population Indigenous men and women had been waiting longer for elective surgery and to get into nursing residences and were drinking considerably much more alcohol in single sessions.

A ten-year gap remains in existence expectancy but youngster mortality and immunisation costs have improved greatly.

Brumby warned the government towards spending budget measures which could harm the possibilities of reaching Closing the Gap targets and lead to specific struggling between Indigenous individuals.

“As you know, the expense of healthcare is quite topical at the second. Australians are becoming asked to contemplate what they would pay for accessibility to a major care physician,” he mentioned on Thursday in Melbourne.

In accordance to the council, 12% of Indigenous people previously delayed or determined against a check out to a GP because of value and 34.6% delayed or did not gather prescribed medicine due to expense.

“When people begin to avoid going to their primary or neighborhood care supplier due to the fact of price or other reasons, they frequently finish up in hospital,” Brumby mentioned.

“And what we identified was that costs of potentially preventable hospitalisations for Indigenous folks were previously 3 to 4 occasions greater than charges for other Australians. These benefits provide context for governments when they are considering policies close to entry to principal care.”

He added: “Governments ought to be cautious that they do not place up barriers to healthcare access for Indigenous folks as it may undo the very good work that has been accomplished in this room in excess of 5 years and finish up creating a distinct burden on the hospital program.”

According to the council’s report, in 2011–13 the Indigenous grownup smoking price was 41.1% even though the non-Indigenous charge was sixteen% and rates for the two groups had fallen given that 2008.

Of Indigenous 5-year-olds, 89.eight% are entirely immunised, compared with 90.eight% of all children. In 2012, Indigenous one particular-year-olds had been behind other a single-12 months-olds in currently being entirely immunised but they caught up from when they had been about two years previous.

Indigenous people waited an common of forty days for elective surgical treatment in 2012–13, while other Australians waited an regular of 36 days.

The report says 14.2% of Indigenous folks waited nine months or a lot more for a nursing property location in 2012-13 whilst 11.seven% of non-Indigenous folks waited far more than nine months. This was an improvement on 2011-twelve, when 18% of Indigenous individuals waited nine months or much more.

Even though there was no considerable variation in the risk of long-term harm from alcohol, the report identified Indigenous people tended to drink a lot more in a session.

Of individuals who had drunk alcohol in the previous year, 44% of Indigenous guys reported drinking 11 or a lot more common drinks in one session, in contrast with 33.five% of non-Indigenous guys. Of Indigenous girls, thirty.eight% reported they had drunk 7 or much more regular drinks in a session, compared with 21.% of non-Indigenous ladies.

“What we identified was that Indigenous people had been three times as very likely to die of an avoidable cause. This indicates that 3-quarters of deaths of Indigenous folks aged under 75 have been avoidable both by means of early prevention or remedy,” Brumby said.

“By way of comparison, two-thirds of all Australians died from avoidable triggers. It is a tragedy to think of all of those taken just before their time purely because they did not acquire care early adequate or did not make the lifestyle alterations to stop ailment.”

Indigenous wellness and schooling dangers impartiality by move to PMs office

Good: Aspirin has all of the dangers but few of the advantages

New medical suggestions warn that the capsules are ineffective in reducing the danger for those suffering heart rhythm issues and that the danger of side-effects outweighs their positive aspects.

Dr Campbell Cowan, chairman of Nice’s guideline development group, mentioned: “We now know it is not safer and it is questionable whether it has any effect at all.” Good stated atrial fibrillation led to an estimated 12,500 strokes every single year.

“Any stroke taking place in a patient with atrial fibrillation is a tragedy because it was preventable.”

Good: Aspirin has all of the dangers but few of the advantages

Statins scaremongering dangers lives, heart medical doctor warns

About 7 million individuals in the United kingdom are at the moment prescribed statins.

The authors, Dr John Abramson from Harvard Healthcare School and Uk cardiologist Dr Aseem Malhotra, wrote their critique of the medication in the BMJ final autumn, as health-related watchdogs had been drawing up controversial plans to recommend far wider use of the medicine to guard towards strokes and heart ailment.

Sir Rory stated he complained right away in excess of claims in the pieces that a single in 5 of those on the medicines suffered side-effects, a claim which was not supported by the research they quoted.

He mentioned big scale randomised managed trials of much more than 100,000 folks showed the threat of this kind of effects was much less than 1 per cent.

He explained: “This sort of scaremongering is really difficult to undo if sufferers are persuaded to stop taking statins since of gross exaggerations of the side-results the consequences are naturally very serious – this could have very grave public wellness outcomes and it is surely a catastrophe for any personal who suffers a heart assault or a stroke which might have been averted.”

He said it was also soon to know no matter whether the posts had resulted in any reduction in the quantity of sufferers taking their everyday tablets, or in GPs choosing against prescribing them.

The cardiologist urged the journal to withdraw the whole piece, which he explained was “riddled with errors” and “entirely misleading.”

Dr Fiona Godlee, BMJ editor-in-chief, stated the journal would have preferred to act far more swiftly but did not acquire total specifics of Sir Rory’s worries till six weeks ago, and necessary to totally investigate them.

She mentioned the mistakes had not been picked up by editors or authorities who peer-reviewed them prior to publication in October.

Creating in Thursday’s edition of the BMJ, Dr Godlee stated it wished to alert readers, the media, and the public to the withdrawal of the statements “so that patients who could advantage from statins are not wrongly deterred from starting up or continuing therapy due to the fact of exaggerated considerations above side effects”.

She said the independent panel would examine the merits of the full content articles, which produced other points about statins that had been worthy of debate.

The authors had analysed data which located that for these with a much less than twenty per cent danger of heart condition in a decade, death costs have been no decrease among people taking statins than individuals who are not. This finding has not been challenged.

Dr Godlee said: “The other question about statins is with regard to the advantage of them. We are not able to shut down this debate it is a large decision to place a complete load of healthier men and women on a drug so we want to have this debate in public.”

The BMJ is calling for a lot more information to be published about the particulars of trial findings, particularly with regard to side-effects, and stated not adequate details was published and open to scrutiny.

Wellness watchdogs are at present drawing up suggestions which could see the numbers advised to consider statins doubling, with the vast majority of men more than 50 and ladies above 60 suggested to take drugs to guard towards strokes and heart condition.

Draft guidance by the Nationwide Institute for Health and Care Excellence proposes cutting the “risk threshold” for this kind of medicines in half – which means that hundreds of thousands a lot more individuals with a relatively low danger of heart disease will in potential be urged to consider cholesterol-reducing medication.

Experts said the alterations indicate the quantity of sufferers recommended to take the medication is very likely to rise from seven million to 12 million, leaving a single in four grownups on the medicine.

Present health-related guidance says anyone with a twenty per cent threat of developing cardiovascular ailment inside of 10 many years ought to be presented statins.

Below the proposed changes, individuals with a ten per cent risk of this kind of ailment inside of a decade will be advised to take the medication.

Statins scaremongering dangers lives, heart medical doctor warns

"Decisive" Writer Chip Heath On Physicians, Diet programs And The Dangers Of Overconfidence

Chip Heath is a Stanford Graduate College of Enterprise professor who has consulted with organizations like Google, Gap and the American Heart Association. He and his brother Dan have co-authored The New York Occasions bestsellers “Switch,” and “Made To Stick.”

In a latest interview, I asked Chip to apply his company and organizational savvy to American overall health care, the role of physicians and how Americans can live healthier lives.

Why Medical doctors Often Get It Wrong

In Chip and Dan’s newest book, “Decisive: How to Make Far better Decisions in Existence and Work,” they make the situation that human choices are usually clouded by a single straightforward truth: we’re overconfident.

And it turns out that medical doctors are no exception. Chip referenced studies that suggest that the first diagnoses produced by doctors typically are wrong. But getting reached that conclusion, they turn out to be more and more confident in their solution and fail to contemplate other options, foremost to medical error.

“Doctors are the most godlike figures in our society these days,” he said. “They have handle in excess of existence and death. They have distinguished themselves in learning and they get the respect accorded to individuals who know a lot.”

“Decisive” co-writer Chip Heath applies his new WRAP procedure to American overall health care. (Image credit score:  Amazon.com)

But doctors are individuals too. And men and women make blunders. Regrettably, finding out and growing from errors can be challenging, specially when you’re the skilled.

“I consider anybody who’s gutsy ample to open up somebody’s entire body has to be assured with a fairly good sense of their personal competence,” Chip stated. “Having manufactured a determination to proceed with surgery, it’s relatively challenging to change because it undermines the abilities and self-confidence you have worked so challenging to build.”

That stated, figuring out how to support medical doctors adjust their minds – or at least enhance their receptiveness to change and other perspectives – could be one particular important to bettering well being care.

Chip noted a pilot system at Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, Stanford’s pediatric hospital, that brought with each other all of the physicians caring for a single, complicated patient. Though they practiced in the very same facility, this was the 1st time the 13 health care professionals right exchanged clinical details as a group. The knowledge was so optimistic that the health care employees began hosting these meetings regularly. By escalating their communication – and encouraging them to pay attention and discover from each other’s knowledge – the good quality of their patient care and clinical outcomes improved.

“What’s extraordinary about that image is that it is rather simple to do,” Chip explained.

He mentioned this method of bringing various groups of men and women with each other to remedy complex issues isn’t exclusive to health care.

Cockpit crews that haven’t previously flown collectively have worse security records than ones that have. And basic managers of major development projects uncover it hard to integrate the work of dozens of subcontractors. Chip located in his study that the profitable construction firms brought the architects, basic contractors and front-line tradespeople with each other. Clear communication is an crucial ingredient for coordinating and solving complicated challenges, regardless of the field.

He added, “This analysis assisted me recognize why integrated multi-specialty healthcare groups attain superior clinical final results. When a main care physician can talk in man or woman with specialists and coordinate the patient’s care, rather than just referring the man or woman, we would assume fewer errors.”

Why Americans Keep Falling Off The Well being Wagon

"Decisive" Writer Chip Heath On Physicians, Diet programs And The Dangers Of Overconfidence

Donor organs from cancer individuals need to be transplanted regardless of dangers

The report, from an advisory committee to the Division of Overall health, said between April 2003 and March 2013, there were 506 donors with a historical past of cancer or cancer listed as a cause of death and 358 of these had a least 1 organ transplanted.

More than a ten yr time period, 18 recipients created cancer in their donated organ which could have been by likelihood or could have been undetected at the time of transplant.

A further 15 contracted cancer from their donor. 6 were kidney cancer, 5 lung cancer, two lymphomas, one particular cancer of the hormone and nervous program and a single colon cancer. Three of them died.

None of the donors were acknowledged to have cancer at the time their organs have been eliminated.

The report said that donors lively cancer in the blood must in no way be used along with sufferers whose cancer has spread to the brain.

Even so in most other situations, it is up to transplant surgeons to determine if the danger of cancer transmission is well worth it for their sufferers.

The threat of cancer transmission need to be weighed towards the danger of dying although waiting for yet another likely donor, Prof James Neuberger, associate medical director of NHS Blood and Transplant stated.

He explained: “In the case of liver transplant sufferers, 1 in six will die although on the waiting checklist. Though the numbers of donors has improved substantially in the last five many years we are even now not meeting the requirements of folks who require a transplant.

“All organs carry some threat, we can mitigate that chance but we are not able to abolish it.

“If there have been an limitless supply of organs we could be a whole lot more selective.”

He mentioned surgeons make individual selections based mostly on what they know about the organ donor and the cancer and balance that towards the condition of their recipient.

“A person who is very likely to die in the next 24 or 48 hours is far more probably to accept a greater danger organ than somebody who can afford to wait a bit longer,” he said.

Joyce Robins, of the campaign group Patient Concern, explained: “This truly is on the cusp of permissible. I certainly wouldn’t want an organ from a cancer patient for my husband but then other individuals may possibly.

“As long as the choice lies with the recipient and their loved ones than we have to accept their choice.”

Transplant surgeon Prof Andrew Bradley, Prof of surgery at Addenbrooke’s hospital in Cambridge, stated one particular of the department’s sufferers contracted cancer from a liver transplant and later on died.

“It is a quite challenging situation, somebody in their 60s or 70s may well accept an organ that a younger recipient may possibly refuse.

“If there had been far more organs available than by and huge it would be safer.”

There are at the moment 7,002 individuals waiting for a transplant and all around 3,500 transplants are carried out a 12 months.

A Department of Well being spokesman stated: “The risk of obtaining cancer from a donated organ in the United kingdom is really small – at the moment .06 per cent.

“One thousand individuals die every single 12 months waiting for an organ transplant so it is crucial to weigh up the risks of receiving cancer from the donated organ against the risk of dying without having a transplant.

“It’s Crucial that medical professionals go over the dangers of cancer transmission with their individuals when they are listed for a transplant and individuals can say whether or not they would be willing to accept an organ from a donor with cancer.”

Donor organs from cancer individuals need to be transplanted regardless of dangers

Michael Gove writes to every single college in England about dangers of FGM

The petition calling on Michael Gove to highlight the practice of FGM received assistance from hundreds of 1000′s of concerned members of the public. Photograph: Oli Scarff/Getty Pictures

The education secretary, Michael Gove, has written to every single college in England warning them to be alert to the dangers of female genital mutilation (FGM) soon after a Guardian campaign to carry the problem into schools attracted the support of more than 230,000 people.

The petition calling on Gove to highlight the practice, which requires removing element or all of a girl’s outer sexual organs and is carried out in many African countries as nicely as places of the Middle East, obtained help from the UN secretary general, Ban Ki-moon, and Pakistani schoolgirl Malala Yousafzai, as effectively as hundreds of 1000′s of concerned members of the public.

After meeting 17-yr-old Brighton schoolgirl Fahma Mohamed, who led the campaign, Gove has sent a letter to all headteachers in England alerting them to new suggestions designed to preserve youngsters risk-free, which consists of guidance on FGM. A spokeswoman for the Department for Education informed the Guardian that the training secretary would preserve up stress on schools by flagging up the dangers of FGM once more in his yearly “back to college” letter in September.

For the initial time, the safeguarding tips include certain mention of FGM and urge teachers to be vigilant. An estimated 66,000 women and girls in the United kingdom have been victims of FGM, with up to 24,000 girls beneath the age of 15 believed to be at risk.

Retaining Kids Safe in Schooling outlines the measures all colleges have to consider to safeguard their pupils, in accordance to the letter from the DfE, seen by the Guardian.

In the letter the schooling secretary tells all teachers and colleges to consider, when considering safeguarding issues, “it could take place right here”. The advice contains an eight-webpage segment that should be distributed and study by all college workers, so they can identity neglect and abuse this kind of as FGM. It will, in accordance to the letter, “inform them how to refer a child … to the acceptable company and it will direct them to even more, comprehensive info on certain safeguarding matters which includes female genital mutilation, little one sexual exploitation, cyberbullying, mental health, and radicalisation”.

It clearly states that all pros “require to be alert to the likelihood of a woman getting at chance of FGM, or presently having suffered FGM”, noting that teachers should be specifically vigilant with ladies known to come from communities the place FGM is practised. If employees suspect FGM might have taken place they must get in touch with police and social solutions quickly, it says.

The move comes after the secretary of state came underneath increasing pressure to target focus on FGM in schools following the Guardian launched an online petition with Alter.org, headed by Fahma, a Bristol schoolgirl.

The petition, launched on the UN’s day of action against FGM, referred to as on Gove to publish to the leaders of all main and secondary schools, urging them to flag up the dangers of FGM just before the summertime holidays, when ladies are at the greatest risk. It became a single of the fastest growing Uk petitions on Adjust.org and aided secure a meeting among the schooling secretary and Fahma and members of the youth group Integrate Bristol, who have played a important position in raising awareness of FGM.

Campaigners welcomed the move, but called for more specific guidance and action on FGM. “I am actually pleased that the letter has been sent and I know headteachers are more conscious of FGM now,” Fahma stated. “But I would have liked much more specifics. It’s a fantastic step forward but there is still far more to be done, so we are not giving up the battle but.”

Lisa Zimmermann, the group’s founder, mentioned Integrate Bristol had asked Gove to set up a meeting in between it and the head of Ofsted, Sir Michael Wilshaw, in purchase to urge him to inform inspectors to verify that function to tackle FGM was going on in all colleges. “This is certainly a victory for Fahma and the Guardian, but we would have liked the guidance and language employed to be stronger and we would like to see true education of teachers to aid them recognise the warning indicators of FGM,” stated Zimmermann.

Efua Dorkenoo, FGM adviser at Equality Now, praised Gove’s dedication to joining “the multi-pronged method to ending FGM in the United kingdom by mentioning FGM especially in the DfE’s child safeguarding recommendations”. She extra: “The letter and recommendations are a wonderful start but what we need to have now is urgent action to implement the policy successfully so that all women at threat are safeguarded.” Chance indicators had to be manufactured clearer to teachers, who ought to all be qualified to appear out for warning signs, she said.

Nimko Ali said Gove needed to offer far more assurance that youngster survivors of FGM would be listened to and supported. “These young children who have been failed like me by the state are searching for safety, and are asking to be respected like any other kid who has suffered this kind of child abuse.”

Michael Gove writes to every single college in England about dangers of FGM

Statins for all: do the positive aspects outweigh the dangers?

7 million folks are currently on statins in England – and if draft NHS advice is confirmed, popping the cholesterol-lowering drugs will become practically a rite of passage in middle age. Some medical professionals think we need to offer them to every man over 50 and each girl above 60. Nevertheless controversy over their advantages and alleged hazards is raging and some fiercely oppose the mass “medicalisation” of men and women who are not ill.

Statins, which were very first licensed in the 1980s, are now low-cost. They are strong drugs that lower levels of “bad” LDL cholesterol in the blood. Heart disease and strokes, linked for decades to high cholesterol, are the foremost lead to of death in most of the western planet.

In February, the National Institute for Well being and Care Excellence (Great) suggested in draft advice that numerous a lot more people must be place on the drugs, in result for lifestyle. The outdated guidance was that they be prescribed for anybody with a twenty% risk of heart condition above the following 10 many years. Nice proposes that figure should halve to ten%. The tips was based on a major analysis of the information from 27 drug business trials, which was published in the Lancet in October 2012.

It was previously accepted that statins safeguard people who have had a heart assault or stroke from getting a second. Few now argue more than the wisdom of prescribing statins for them. But this evaluation looked at regardless of whether the drugs could also protect men and women with a lower risk of cardiovascular ailment. These are men and women who may be overweight or have raised blood pressure. They possibly do not have signs and symptoms. They are not ill.

The Lancet research concerned data from much more than 150,000 individuals whose chance of a heart assault or stroke was much less than 10% above the subsequent five years. It identified that statins cut the variety of such “events” and the stronger the dose, the larger the reduction. “This advantage tremendously exceeds any acknowledged hazards of statin therapy,” it said, and suggested reconsideration of the guidelines, which Great duly did.

The review was completed by the Cholesterol Treatment method Trialists’ Collaboration (CTTC), which was set up in 1994 by Oxford University’s clinical trials services unit, co-directed by Professor Sir Rory Collins, to reply questions about this sort of drug.

The collaboration, which is ongoing, draws with each other data from all the drug company trials. Collins and his team have noticed the information. But the firms will not allow anybody else access to it.

So, even though Wonderful has now endorsed the 2012 study, there is powerful resistance from medical doctors and other folks suspicious of the proof and worried about dosing healthy individuals for life. Critics argue that there are side results, that the published information does not show plainly the harm the medicines can do – as properly as the advantages – and even that cholesterol is the incorrect target.

Interactive: how statins perform

A swift guide to how statins minimize the manufacturing of ‘bad’ LDL cholesterol in the liver

Collins was angered by a current commentary from cardiologist Aseem Malhotra in the British Healthcare Journal which argued that tablets have been a bad replacement for greater diet regime and more workout – for lifestyle adjust, rather than tablets.

Malhotra claimed the demonisation of saturated fat in our diet, going back to Ancel Keys’ 7 Countries seminal study in 1970, which prompted alterations in US guidelines on excess fat, had sparked a mistaken obsession with cholesterol, “which has led to the overmedication of millions of individuals with statins”. The cardiologist thinks our dietary problems lie in an additional path – he is science director of the newly formed Action On Sugar campaign.

Saturated unwanted fat is not constantly negative for you, according to Malhotra, though it may possibly rely on the kind of food. Dairy products have nutritional vitamins A and D, which could aid protect the heart.

A review led by Cambridge University and published final week in the Annals of Internal Medication identified the very same issue: that there appears to be no general association between consuming meals which includes higher amounts of saturated excess fat, such as meat and butter, and heart illness. But the researchers say the proof is not conclusive: it is challenging to do dietary scientific studies due to the fact individuals both do not remember what they have eaten or they lie about it. If saturated fat is not such a major problem, then some say the role of cholesterol in heart illness is in query.

Collins and his staff say this is categorically incorrect. The trials data shows the relative chance of cardiovascular illness goes down as the dose of statin goes up, he says. Any other interpretation is mistaken. He says heart attacks and strokes are prevented and lives are saved.

His critics refuse to feel it. Dr Malcolm Kendrick, Scottish GP and writer of The Great Cholesterol Con, insists physicians are not able to know what harm statins can do – for instance in contributing to liver or kidney failure – due to the fact they are not able to examine the information, and the Oxford group have not reported on it. “Either they really do not have a huge chunk of information or they do and they are not publishing it,” he explained. He is not prepared to accept the analy­sis of the Oxford crew who have witnessed the data at encounter value just since “they are large and important and professors at Oxford University”, he said.

Possibly the biggest fight is over the side results. All drugs have side effects of some sort and the advantages have to be weighed towards the dangers. In unusual instances, statins can affect the liver, so folks must have a liver function test before starting up to get them. In about a single in 10,000 instances they can lead to the significant issue rhabdomyolysis, which affects the kidneys. There can also be muscle weakness.

Many people complain of other side effects, such as nausea, muscle ache, sleeplessness, fatigue, erectile dysfunction and abdomen difficulties. Some GPs – which includes Kendrick – give anecdotal accounts of individuals who finish up in hospital but recover when taken off the pills. That, they say, is unacceptable in somebody who was not unwell to commence with. But two current big reviews have not identified side results to be really common or severe.

Giving up smoking and bettering the diet are considered to aid lower cholesterol ranges. Photograph: Graham Turner

You can reduce your cholesterol by not smoking, eating a healthful diet plan and taking enough exercising, but, say the advocates of statins, that’s difficult for most people. Collins says it is practically extremely hard for any individual living in the Uk these days to reduce their LDL-cholesterol to the desired level by means of diet program.

“It is extremely hard to modify life style and produce substantial reductions in chance aspect ranges. If you have the totally non-meat, non-dairy diet plan of the rural Chinese from some time in the past, you have the kind of cholesterol amounts you are born with,” he mentioned. “To get folks to change their diet to get the cholesterol levels of a Chinese peasant is quite tricky, whereas a statin will do that and it is pretty clean and effective,” he stated.

Proponents stage out that no person will be forced to consider a statin: it is an alternative for those who want it. “We want to give men and women the option and not mislead them with claims of a side-impact which are not supported by trustworthy evidence,” said Collins. “As somebody in their 50s, I would think about a statin. I went to persuade my GP it was a great concept.” But he was informed there have been side results and that Great did not advocate them for men and women at his level of threat.

Statins for all: do the positive aspects outweigh the dangers?