Chemicals etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
Chemicals etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

8 Mayıs 2017 Pazartesi

E-cigarette companies fined over false claims about toxic chemicals

Australia’s competition regulator has become the first in the world to successfully take legal action against e-cigarette companies for making false and misleading claims about the carcinogens in their products.


Federal court Justice John Gilmour ordered three online e-cigarette retailers – The Joystick Company Pty Ltd, Social-Lites Pty Ltd and Elusion Australia Ltd – and their individual CEOs and directors to pay penalties for breaching consumer law.


In separate proceedings the court found each of the companies had claimed their products did not contain harmful carcinogens and toxins, when this was not the case. It also found that the directors of Joystick and Elusion, and the CEO of Social-Lites, were knowingly involved in this deception.


Joystick and Social-Lites have been ordered to pay a penalty of $ 50,000, while the company heads have been ordered to pay $ 10,000. Elusion has been ordered to pay $ 40,000 and its director $ 15,000.


All three retailers admitted the conduct alleged by the ACCC and consented to the amounts of the penalties.


According to the case brought by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), statements on the company websites led consumers to believe they would not be exposed to the harmful chemicals found in ordinary cigarettes.


However independent testing commissioned by the ACCC identified the presence of carcinogens and toxic chemicals, such as formaldehyde, acetaldehyde and acrolein in the products of Joystick, Social-Lites and Elusion, as well as acetone in Social-Lites’ products.


Formaldehyde is classified by the World Health Organisation International Agency for Research on Cancer as a Group 1A carcinogen, meaning it causes cancer, while acetaldehyde is classified as possibly carcinogenic. Acrolein is classified as a toxic chemical.


Dr Becky Freeman, a tobacco control researcher with the University of Sydney’s school of public health, said some consumers thought e-cigarette companies were “small artisan companies interested in improving health” when in fact most were owned by big tobacco.


Many advertisements for e-cigarettes and related products claimed they were less toxic and therefore less harmful than tobacco, she said. “But I’d challenge you to find something that isn’t less toxic than tobacco,” Freeman said. “We have no long-term data on e-cigarettes to show that they’ve help people quit for good or that they’re safe.”


The federal court ruling was “enormously significant”, said Simon Chapman, an emeritus professor of public health. He was aware that other complaints about e-cigarette advertising have been made to the ACCC. “These are by no means isolated examples,” Chapman said.


“Tobacco companies want to walk on both sides of the street. They try to argue that e-cigarettes are simply an ordinary consumer product and not a therapeutic device and therefore shouldn’t be subject to the same regulations, yet they often make statements that these things are excellent ways of quitting.”


He said it was “insulting to science” to claim the products were harmless or safe given the lack of evidence about long-term effects.


“Of course they don’t have all the products of combustion that tobacco products have, as they are vaporised and not burned. So while they’re likely to be less harmful, we do not yet know the magnitude of their harm, we just have no accurate way of estimating that yet,” said Chapman.


The ACCC’s acting chair, Delia Rickard, said businesses, including those online, must ensure they provide accurate information to customers and have a reasonable basis for making any claims. “This is particularly important for products that may cause harm to the health of consumers,” she said.



E-cigarette companies fined over false claims about toxic chemicals

21 Mart 2017 Salı

Plight of child workers facing cocktail of toxic chemicals exposed by report

Children as young as eight, working in the tanneries of Bangladesh producing leather that is in demand across Europe and the USA, are exposed to toxic chemical cocktails that are likely to shorten their lives, according to a new report.


Approximately 90% of those who live and work in the overcrowded urban slums of Hazaribagh and Kamrangirchar, where hazardous chemicals are discharged into the air, streets and river, die before they reach 50, according to the World Health Organisation.


Their plight spurred the volunteer doctors of Médicines Sans Frontières (MSF) to set up clinics in the area to diagnose and treat those who are the victims of their workplace. It is, says a paper published in BMJ Case Reports, “the first time they have intervened in an area for reasons other than natural disasters or war”.


MSF’s intervention was triggered by “the widespread industrial negligence and apathy of owners of tanneries and other hazardous material factories” towards the more than 600,000 largely migrant population who have no access to government-funded healthcare.


MSF set up and ran four main clinics for 5,000 workers in 2015, located in the centre of communities involved in four different manufacturing processes at factories for tanning, plastics recycling, garment-making and metals.


The hazards of the 250 or so tanneries in Hazaribagh – which are 30 to 35 years old and discharge 6,000 cubic metres of toxic effluent and 10 tonnes of solid waste every day – are best known. In 2012, Human Rights Watch produced a report called “Toxic Tanneries” which revealed the flouting of Bangladesh’s own laws as well as international law in the employment of children under 18 in work that is harmful or hazardous.


The factories douse animal skins in cauldrons of chemicals as part of the processing of “Bengali black” leather, which is exported to European leather goods manufacturers in Italy, Spain and elsewhere.


“Apart from heavy metals like chromium, cadmium, lead and mercury, a conglomerate of chemicals are discharged by the tanneries into the environment,” says the paper. “Workers aged eight and older are soaked to the skin, breathing the fumes for most of the day and eat and live in these surroundings throughout the year. Personal protective equipment [is] not provided.”


Child workers clad in no more than loin cloths and wellington boots are exposed to chemicals including formaldehyde, hydrogen sulphide and sulphuric acid, write Venkiteswaran Muralidhar, associate professor at the Sri Balaji Medical college in Chennai, and colleagues.


The other factories– for plastics recycling, garments and metals – are in Kamrangirchar, an urban slum which is not officially part of Dhaka city. “In these, there are complex risk hazards from cotton dust, heavy metals and chemicals like mercury, phthalates, acids and dioxins and ergonomic hazards,” says the paper.


Chronic skin and lung diseases are common, say the authors. Within six months of the setting up of the clinics, 3,200 of the 5,000 eligible workers had come forward for at least one consultation. Among them, 468 (14.6%) were diagnosed with suspected work-related diseases, and 30 (0.9%) had work-related injuries.


The figures do not reflect the overall harm to the population, however, said Muralidhar. Those who are severely injured by chemicals or accidents would not go to one of the clinics. “They will probably be taken by rickshaw to a hospital in Dhaka,” he told the Guardian. And the clinics were only open four days a week, during the daytime, and workers needed the owner’s permission to go for a consultation.


He feels strongly that a hospital should be set up in the slum to help its people. “They are the most horrible conditions you can imagine,” he told the Guardian. “I work in this area. I have never seen anything as bad as this.”



Plight of child workers facing cocktail of toxic chemicals exposed by report

23 Ocak 2017 Pazartesi

Sex toys "safer" than children"s toys, Swedish chemicals study finds

Fewer sex toys than children’s toys contain dangerous chemicals, according to a new report by a Swedish inspection authority.


In its study conducted in 2016, 2% of the 44 surveyed sex toys that had been imported to Sweden contained banned chemicals, the Swedish Chemicals Agency (SCA) said. In a separate study the year before, the agency tested 112 children’s toys in Sweden and found 15% contained banned chemical substances, including lead.


“This was a bit surprising,” Frida Ramstrom, an inspector for the agency, told AFP. “This was the first time we did such a study.”


Of the 44 sex toys examined, only one plastic dildo was found to contain a banned substance: chlorinated paraffins, which is suspected of causing cancer, the SCA said. It said it was difficult to determine why more children’s toys contained dangerous chemicals.


But one contributing factor was that sex toys were often imported by larger companies, which could exert more pressure on manufacturers to avoid harmful chemicals, whereas children’s toys were more often imported by smaller companies which had less power to make such demands, according to Björn Malmström, a spokesman for the SCA.


Swedish law stipulates that chemicals in children’s toys “must never pose a risk to human health”.


Three of the 44 examined sex toys, made of artificial leather and bondage tape, contained a type of phthalates used as a plasticiser at levels above a 0.1% threshold, the agency said.


That specific type of phthalates is not banned in sex toys but is on the EU list of chemicals of “very high concern” as it can affect the body’s hormonal balance and cause infertility. Companies are therefore required to inform consumers if a product contains more than 0.1%.


The global market for sex products is estimated at about $ 20bn (£16bn) a year, according to British market research group Technavio. It is expected to grow by nearly 7% a year between 2016 and 2020.


People in the US and China are among the biggest consumers of sex toys, according to Technavio.



Sex toys "safer" than children"s toys, Swedish chemicals study finds

28 Eylül 2016 Çarşamba

Tattoo ink contains cancer-causing chemicals – so why isn"t it regulated?

Americans love tattoos. Nearly a quarter of them have gotten inked, compared with 12% in Europe. The personal expression that is skin deep is particularly popular with young people: 40% of American teenagers sport tattoos. Women are also more likely than men to get one.


Yet very little is known about the effects of modern day tattoo ink on the human body. The lack of research and data is worrisome because some of the key ingredients are known to make people sick or die. It also makes it difficult to regulate them.


A recent report from the European Commission warns that tattoo ink often contains “hazardous chemicals” such as heavy metals and preservatives that could have serious health consequences, including bacterial infections. A separate study issued earlier this month by the Australian government reveals that 22% of the inks tested contained chemical compounds known to cause cancer.


The European report notes that regulators are especially wary of imports from the US, which supplies the majority of tattoo inks to the world. The report highlights the health risks and provides European countries with scientific evidence so they can decide if better oversight of tattoo inks is necessary.


“The question is, what’s in the tattoo and what can it do to the body?” said Tyler Hollmig, director of Laser and Aesthetic Dermatology at Stanford University Health Care. “The answer is, we just don’t know.”


Tattoos work by injecting the ink into the second layer of skin known as the dermis, where the ink remains permanently unless it is removed using laser technology.


“The skin is very active in protecting the body from infection, and white blood cells try to eat up tattoo ink,” said Hollmig. “The body treats the ink as a foreign substance.”


The Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) doesn’t need to approve tattoo inks before they go on the market. The agency can regulate the pigments used by screening them beforehand, but it seldom does so “because of other competing public health priorities and a pervasive lack of evidence of safety problems specifically associated with these pigments,” said Lauren Sucher, an FDA spokesperson.


The agency will investigate an ink only when a safety issue is reported. This happened last year, when Miami-based company, A Thousand Inks voluntarily recalled some of its products after the FDA found bacterial contamination in unopened bottles of the firm’s grey wash shades. The FDA tested the ink following an outbreak of skin infections in people who had recently got tattoos in Florida. The FDA warned tattoo artists that using the contaminated inks could lead to skin irritation such as redness and swelling, and could spread throughout the body, resulting in swollen lymph nodes and even sepsis, a life threatening blood infection.


“These infections may be severe and may require extensive treatment with antibiotics, hospitalization or surgery,” warned the FDA.


This kind of public health scare and the popularity of tattoos and emergence of health problems are forcing the FDA to consider more oversight over this $ 2.3bn industry. It’s currently investigating how tattoo ink is broken down in the body and its long term safety at the National Center for Toxicological Research in Arkansas. Researchers are examining some pigments, like Yellow 74, which fade in the sunlight.


“We want to know what happens to the ink,” said Paul Howard, the lead research chemist. “Where does the pigment go?” Howard said the pigment may still be there, and that it could be toxic. His team is also looking at the possibility that the body digests and secretes ink in the same way that it destroys bacteria when fighting infection.


Meanwhile, ink manufacturers already have to contend with rules from some state or local governments. In 2005, a California judge ruled that two major tattoo ink makers – Huck Spaulding Enterprises and Superior Tattoo Equipment – must include a label on their products warning California customers the ink contains heavy metals that could cause “cancer, birth defects and reproductive harm”.


Some companies claim to use safer ingredients in their ink. Kuro Sumi, a Japanese manufacturer, and US-based Eternal Ink say they use organic pigments that are vegan-friendly. But since there are no industry regulations for terms like “organic” and “natural”, it’s hard to know whether products containing these ingredients are indeed safer.


Tattoo ink is generally sold ready-to-use, and typically contains a number of ingredients, including colorants, preservatives, binding agents and fillers. Colorants, more commonly called pigments, can constitute up to 60% of an ink by weight, according to the EU study. The pigments used by manufacturers aren’t specifically made for use in tattoos, and many are “industrial-grade colors suitable for printers’ ink or automobile paint”, according to the FDA.


The overall longevity and potential toxicity may differ depending on the color. To make black ink, for instance, manufacturers might use soot or powdered jet, or cinnabar and common rust to make red. Some of the ink ingredients, like the metal cadmium, are known carcinogens, while others, like carbon black, are “possibly carcinogenic”, according to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, an arm of the World Health Organization (Who).


Yet this doesn’t necessarily mean those ingredients are dangerous to human health, said Hayley Goldbach, a resident physician in dermatology at UCLA Health, a healthcare system affiliated with the University of California at Los Angeles.


“Just because something can cause cancer doesn’t mean that it does,” she said. “As far as I know there have not been any studies convincingly or conclusively linking tattoo pigment to an increased risk for cancer.”


A 2012 paper by Finnish researchers, who analyzed previous studies, found the number of skin cancers inside tattoos was “seemingly low”, and that any link had to be considered “thus far as coincidental”.


Tattoos can camouflage moles, however, making it difficult to monitor tattooed patients for skin cancer. And tattoo ink ingredients like cadmium have been found in lymph nodes, which help filter waste from the body. According to the EU study, these substances could spread from the lymph nodes to the rest of the body, although more research is needed to support this theory, wrote the authors.


Hollmig said he sees skin cancer in and around tattoos, but it’s hard to say whether it’s the ink causing the illness.


“You figure that you inject the carcinogen and skin cancer grows there, but we don’t have data on that,” he said.


The most common tattoo-related complaints he sees in his practice are skin irritations, usually caused by red ink, which typically contains mercury, a known allergen.


“Just the red area of the tattoo would have swollen, tender and really itchy reactions,” he said, adding that these adverse health effects can occur months and even years after a person gets the tattoo.


A 2015 study from New York University’s Langone Medical Center found that at least 6% of tattooed New Yorkers suffered a serious reaction like swelling and severe itching that lasted for more than four months. Almost half of these reactions were to red ink, while one-third of the cases were linked to black ink.


As for tattoo artists, most do care about the safety of the pigments that they use on their clients, said Mike Martin, a veteran tattoo artist and president of the Alliance of Professional Tattooists, a nonprofit that promotes safe tattooing.


“Pigments are super important to the finished product and our products are what people judge us on,” said Martin. “Great color, great line work, quick healing, trouble-free, no weird skin reactions – these are all hallmarks of good professional tattooing.”


Without strong regulations, however, problematic inks will continue to show up at tattoo parlors. For example, tattoo manufacturers can use different recipes and make their own blends, which could contain different levels of carcinogens and allergens. This makes it “very hard to study them for safety”, said Goldbach.


“The composition of tattoo ink has changed over time so it also means that new and potentially dangerous agents could be introduced into tattoo ink at any time,” she said.



Tattoo ink contains cancer-causing chemicals – so why isn"t it regulated?

14 Eylül 2016 Çarşamba

Toxic chemicals in household dust linked to cancer and infertility

[unable to retrieve full-text content]


Scientists find scores of harmful chemicals in indoor dust including phthalates linked to developmental problems in babies


Household dust harbours a cocktail of toxic chemicals that have been linked to an increased risk of a range of health hazards, from cancer to problems with fertility, researchers in the US have found.


The chemicals are shed from a host of common products, from flooring to electrical goods as well as beauty and cleaning products.


Related: Seven deadly poisons – and a law that won’t protect you fast enough


Related: Research lags on the health risks of women’s exposure to chemicals


Related: Toxic chemicals in outdoor products of leading brands, Greenpeace study finds


Continue reading…



Toxic chemicals in household dust linked to cancer and infertility

5 Ağustos 2016 Cuma

Make Your Own Fabric Softener to Avoid Toxic Chemicals

I personally like homemade fabric softeners. Homemade eco-friendly fabric softener helps fluff and freshen your clothes without artificial fragrances or ingredients and leave behind that strange chemical softness that dryer sheets do. Homemade fabric softener create a completely harmless and effective product and best part it is free from toxic chemicals, such as benzyl acetate which is linked to pancreatic and skin cancer, which can become absorbed into the skin or inhaled.


Here are 3 frugal recipe ideas that make use of vinegar’s ability to work as a homemade fabric softener.


Homemade Fabric Softener Recipes


Recipe #1


Ingredients:


6 cups water
3 cups white vinegar
2 cups hair conditioner


Directions:


Mix water, vinegar, and hair conditioner in a 1 gallon container; stir.
Do not shake it; it will cause foaming.
Use the same amount you normally use in a rinse cycle or spritz it on a wash cloth and throw in dryer.


Recipe #2


This is simple method for softening clothing. All you need is a little baking soda added in during the rinse cycle and your good to go. It’s simple and it works great. It combines the power of both baking soda and vinegar into one super fabric softener.


Ingredients:


6 cups vinegar
1 cup baking soda
15 drops essential oil (optional)


Directions:


Pour the vinegar into a large bowl.
Add your essential oil, if using.
Add baking soda.
When fizz has settled, pour into storage container of choice.
Use up to 1 cup (depending on load size) per load.
After pouring in the baking soda and letting it dissolve, the oil no longer sat at the top.


Recipe #3


Ingredients:


Large jar or container with lid
16 ounces distilled white vinegar
Essential oil
Fresh herbs


Directions:


Simply measure and add four cups of vinegar to a jar and 10 to 12 drops of your favorite essential oil.
Simply shake and add 1/4 cup to your washing machine’s fabric softener dispenser per load of laundry.
For an extra boost of scent, add a sprig of fresh rosemary, lavender, or mint.


Sources:


[1] http://thehomemadeexperiment.com/homemade-fabric-softener-recipes/


[2] http://www.voxnature.com/diy/clean-your-home-with-all-natural-homemade-household-cleaners/


[3] http://livesimply.me/2016/01/27/homemade-liquid-fabric-softener/


More Articles By Author:



Make Your Own Fabric Softener to Avoid Toxic Chemicals

1 Nisan 2014 Salı

Are You Acquiring These: 66 Chemicals of Large Concern to Young children

Dad and mom naturally want to purchase items that are secure for their young children and most buyers think when something is produced and made offered that it does not have hazardous chemicals.


But the actuality is that the United States’ toxic chemical laws are so weak and ineffective that far as well several hazardous chemical compounds are present in an alarming number of items.  One state made the decision to get some serious action to demand that children’s product manufacturers must report if any of “66 Chemicals of High Concern to Children” are in the items they are marketing. Washington State passed the Children’s Secure Goods Act in 2008 (CSPA).  Manufacturer reporting began phasing-in these tougher requirements in 2012.


Washington’s reporting law has opened the eyes of numerous customers to these hazards. More states should be passing these laws so households have chemical data about merchandise getting sold the place they live. Retailers need to be produced to get rid of merchandise containing toxic chemical compounds from their offerings. If the public stopped buying these products, organizations would phase these chemicals out of use.  We need to have to ask Congress to strengthen and update the federal Toxic Substances Control Act which has not had a lot updates to it since its inception 37 years ago. Households like yours can support carry about these changes by taking action. Developing marketplace demand for safer chemicals and an rising variety of state laws to restrict toxic chemical compounds will carry on to drive the require for federal TSCA reform.


Toxic World, Toxic Folks: The Important Manual to Overall health, Happiness, Parenting and Aware Residing


 The critical facts:


1. Children’s items could expose children to chemicals linked to harmful health effects.


Washington’s 66 Chemical substances of Higher Concern to Young children were selected for reporting due to the fact scientific evidence links them to serious overall health effects and because young children are likely to be exposed to them. The chemical substances reported to Washington State more than this 6-month period contain carcinogens, endocrine disruptors, and developmental and reproductive toxicants.


two. Toxic chemical compounds are widespread in children’s goods.


In this 6-month period 78 manufacturers submitted four,605 reviews of 49 hazardous chemical substances in children’s items beneath Washington State’s chemical reporting law. Goods reported contain children’s tableware, toys, clothes and footwear, bedding, and little one merchandise. This data is in depth and there is a lot more to come.


three. Chemical disclosure supplies essential information and companies are in a position to offer it. Chemical disclosure ought to spur policymakers and buyers to request new concerns about chemicals in everyday item and to recognize priorities for action.


Get the total report right here: http://watoxics.org/publications/whatsonyourlist_report_ultimate.pdf/at_download/file


Take ACTION :&gt&gt http://www.saferchemicals.org/join/get_involved.html


Visit our Healthful Residing Weblog for All-natural Remedies and Healthy Recipes



Are You Acquiring These: 66 Chemicals of Large Concern to Young children

15 Şubat 2014 Cumartesi

eleven Toxic Chemicals Afffecting Brain Development In Kids

The listing of chemical substances that can impact brain growth in young children has grown. In a study out nowadays in The Lancet Neurology, researchers outline new chemical compounds that may possibly be contributing to what they dub the “global, silent pandemic of neurodevelopmental toxicity.” In 2006, the group had released a checklist of five neurotoxins that could contribute to everything from cognitive deficits to interest issues. Now that record is expanded, primarily based on new analysis that has because accumulated on chemicals linked to developmental problems in young children. These days, they outline 6 more.


“The biggest concern is the massive numbers of children who are impacted by toxic harm to brain improvement in the absence of a formal diagnosis,” explained research writer Philippe Grandjean, of the Harvard College of Public Well being. “They suffer reduced interest span, delayed improvement, and bad school functionality. Industrial chemical substances are now emerging as most likely triggers.”


Neurobehavioral difficulties, like autism, ADHD, and dyslexia, influence about 10-15% of little ones born nowadays, the authors say. Genes play a huge role in some of these problems – but not that large. Only about 30-40% of the situations of the issues can be accounted for by genes alone, so setting have to make up the other part. Outlining those compounds can be challenging, but the research is mounting, and pointing to a growing listing of chemical compounds that we must keep away from.


Since of the frequency with which these chemical substances are existing in our each day lives – even banned ones – and the rising charges of developmental issues in young children, the authors say that urgent alter must get spot: “A new framework of action is needed.”


Here are the 11chemicals for which there is robust evidence of connection to neurodevelopmental issues in young children:


Lead–This is one of the most extensively researched compounds in terms of neurodevelopment, and has been persistently linked to severe deficits, including minimal IQ. Its effects seem to be to be permanent, foremost to the conclusion that there is no protected degree of exposure.


Methylmercury–Affecting the neurological improvement of the fetus,publicity frequently comes from maternal consumption of fish containing substantial ranges of mercury, according to the Globe Overall health Organization and the EPA.


Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) – This household of chemicals has routinely been associated with decreased cognitive function in infancy and childhood. It is typically existing in food items, particularly fish, and can be passed along in breast milk.


Arsenic – When absorbed via consuming water, this chemical has been linked to reduced cognitive perform in schoolchildren. Follow-up studies from the Morinaga milk poisoning incident have linked it to neurological disease in adulthood.


Toluene – Utilised as a solvent, maternal exposure has been linked to brain growth difficulties and consideration deficit in the little one, in accordance to the EPA and OSHA.


Manganese – In the consuming water in Bangladesh, for instance, this chemical has been linked to decrease scores in math, diminished intellectual perform, and ADHD.


Fluoride – Increased levels of this chemical has been connected with a seven-level lessen in IQ in kids.


Chlorpyrifos and DDT (pesticides) – Linked to structural abnormalities of the brain and neurodevelopmental issues that persist up to age seven. These pesticides are banned in numerous parts of the world (U.S. integrated), but even now utilised in several decrease-revenue countries. They have lately been linked to Alzheimer’s illness as well.


Tetrachloroethylene (AKAperchlorethylene)– These solvents have been linked to hyperactivity and aggressive conduct, and increased danger of psychiatric diagnosis. Mothers in specified specialist roles, like nurse, chemist, cleaner, hairdresser, and beautician had greater ranges of exposure.


The polybrominateddiphenyl ethers – These flame retardants are banned now, but believed to be neurotoxins. Prenatal exposure has been linked to neurodevelopmental ailments in the little one.


Two a lot more compounds of concern are bisphenol A (BPA), a common plastics additive, and phthalate, identified in numerous cosmetics. BPA is an endocrine (hormone) disruptor, and, strongly suspected to affect neurodevelopment in kids, it has been banned in infant bottles and sippy cups. Phthalates, which are common in private items like nail polish and hair spray, have been routinely linked to shortened interest span and impaired social interactions in young children.



eleven Toxic Chemicals Afffecting Brain Development In Kids

31 Ocak 2014 Cuma

Chemicals in Consumer Items: New Progress in Transparency

The states of Washington and California are breaking new ground by offering consumers with details on potentially hazardous chemicals in the items they get and use on a daily basis. Washington’s emphasis is on items meant for young children California’s law spotlights cosmetics.


Each states demand organizations to submit data on certain known or suspected carcinogens, reproductive toxins and developmental toxins Washington exclusively adds endocrine disruptors. They’ve published the resulting databases on their state websites — with much of the data previously unavailable.


Why did Washington and California get these initiatives, and why are other states now contemplating following the exact same path? Significant motivations include the rapidly expanding sum of scientific info available on chemical hazards and overall health impacts, the increasing understanding of the ubiquitous presence of several of these chemicals in our setting and our bodies, and increasing buyer pressure for safer items.


Not a Fairly Image


The data Washington and California have gathered from companies and reported on their internet sites previously provides a wealth of details for customers about potential threats:



  • Formaldehyde in 22 children’s products and 89 cosmetic items, which includes hair conditioners, skin moisturizers and anti-wrinkle products

  • Phthalates in goods this kind of as footwear, perfumes, fragrances and nail polish.

  • Parabens — which includes two the European Union has proposed banning for young children below 3 — in child lotion, physique wash, and lip balm for youngsters, with the highest concentrations in Halloween makeup.

  • Lead acetate in hair styling and coloring items.

  • Methyl ethyl ketone in clothing.


For children’s toys, clothing, footwear, bibs, and so forth., possessing a extensive database of hazardous chemicals in specific products is fully new. But what about cosmetics? Even though Meals and Drug Administration (FDA) rules call for listing of cosmetic ingredients, they exempt fragrances. In order to defend the secrets of their scents, companies might simply specify ‘fragrances’ on the label rather than listing the fragrance’s elements.


So what can shoppers discover from searching at California’s database that isn’t already clear from the item labels?


Initial, whilst the California rules call for companies to report the presence in cosmetics of any of the toxic chemical substances, when including those in fragrances that are on the state’s checklist, organizations may possibly declare trade secrecy to keep away from listing a specific fragrance ingredient. The California database contains the solution and lists the ingredient as “trade secret” with the following comment:


If “trade secret” is listed as an ingredient for a merchandise on this web site, it means that 1 or much more components have been reported as a acknowledged or suspected carcinogen or reproductive/developmental toxin, but that the reporting business has elected to designate the information as “trade secret.”


California’s database lists 1,456 products from 22 firms with this kind of “trade secret” ingredients. Whilst not specifically transparent, this nonetheless provides consumers with otherwise unavailable hazard details — and possibly a sense of unease that may lead to demands for safer alternatives.


Second, the lists of elements on a lot of cosmetic products are hard to interpret. By listing only those chemical substances in the solution that meet distinct toxicity worries, and supplying information on the chemical’s pertinent hazard, the California database supplies buyers with a lot more usable info.


These state initiatives are not the only databases supplying higher transparency on chemical ingredients in customer merchandise. Other organizations have also been operating to educate buyers on possible hazards. One particular prominent instance is Skin Deep, a publicly available database on chemical components in cosmetics designed by the Environmental Operating Group. But Washington and California have raised the visibility and credibility of this data for numerous buyers, with transparent choices on which chemical hazards to contain in their programs based on established governmental and worldwide lists of health hazards.


Even though the lists offer essential info for customers, each sector spokesmen and Washington Department of Ecology scientists agree that the mere presence of a toxic chemical in a merchandise does not suggest that it poses any danger. Both the concentrations and bioavailability of the ingredients are essential concerns. But in addition to aiding consumers, these databases might help spur added study. Cobalt, for instance, is the most frequently reported chemical in the Washington database. A scientist who researches chemical results on brain advancement commented: “I do not consider I have ever noticed a review on its possible toxicity in young children — or adults. If it is a typical exposure and it is bioavailable, then it ought to be looked at.”


Major companies are acting


Many main companies, rather than debating the extent to which chemical hazards are acceptable, have led the way in developing alternatives. Johnson &amp Johnson, for illustration, has just announced the release of a reformulated little one shampoo that eliminates 1,four-dioxane and chemical compounds that generate formaldehyde. In addition, J&ampJ ideas to reformulate other products to move away from phthalates, parabens and triclosan by the finish of 2015. P&ampG is in the process of eliminating phthalates, phosphates and triclosan from all of its products this yr. And major merchants Walmart and Target have also announced programs to minimize or eradicate many chemicals of concern from the items they sell. Some of the world’s strongest companies are shifting to a new paradigm that recognizes and embraces consumers’ worries about the safety of the merchandise they use.


Washington and California have made main contributions to the new age of chemical transparency with an method that provides simple info to customers, offering them the opportunity to make safer alternatives for themselves and their families. In doing so, they have also shifted the ground principles on transparency for chemical elements in client items, and offered a basis for broader consumer-education initiatives in the long term. Even in as technically complex an region as chemical hazards, knowledge is power. Armed with this expertise, consumers are probably to demand nevertheless much more information and — the ultimate goal here — safer ingredients.


Jordan Markuson is the Founder of Aqua Wellness Labs. He has been a nutritionist, author and entrepreneur for more than 10 many years. He is an activist supporting consumption of raw, renewable, and natural foods. Jordan believes that based on all available scientific proof, as soon as food is cooked it loses the vast majority of its crucial nutrients. He is really interested in marine-primarily based phytoplankton as a fish oil substitute since of the pure omega-three crucial fatty acids it generates.


Particular Thanks to Bob Kerr of www.sustainablebrands.com for his contribution.



Chemicals in Consumer Items: New Progress in Transparency