Health push in Uganda after mystery disease turns out to be "mossy foot"

A public health campaign has been launched in western Uganda after scientists unexpectedly found the region was afflicted by a tropical disease that causes disfigurement and swelling.

The discovery came to light after experts were dispatched to Kamwenge district to investigate an outbreak of lymphatic filariasis, more commonly known as elephantiasis. A team of specialists from the Ugandan ministry of health, the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was surprised to find that the condition causing limbs to swell was in fact podoconiosis, also known as non-filarial elephantiasis. The disease was previously unknown in the region.

Unlike lymphatic elephantiasis, which is contracted when a parasitic worm is transmitted to humans by mosquitoes, podoconiosis – also known as “mossy foot” because it causes moss-like warts called hyperkeratotic papilloma – is contracted by walking barefoot on irritant volcanic soils. Blood samples taken by scientists from 52 people tested for lymphatic filariasis found no worms present.

Philip Rosenthal, professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, and editor of the American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, which published the findings this month, said: “The study was pioneering in discovering that this syndrome was causing serious morbidity in a part of the world where previously we had no idea that podoconiosis existed. The real key is preventing this in future generations.”

Podoconiosis, a progressive, non-infectious disease with symptoms that include itching, foot pain and swelling, can lay undetected for decades, but is treatable.

Dr Christine Kihembo, a senior field epidemiologist with the Ugandan health ministry and the study’s lead author, said many patients had probably been “suffering silently without help for more than 30 years”.

Kihembo said Kamwenge district was forested until the 1960s, when migrants looking for farmland began tilling the soil. Early symptoms of the disease went undetected because it was never documented in western Uganda.

She said patients may not have associated initial symptoms with soil contact, and that “there was a tendency among those affected to stay at home with their disability and not go to a health facility”.

Gail Davey, professor of global health epidemiology at Brighton and Sussex Medical School and founder of the NGO Footwork, said it was unsurprising the disease had gone unnoticed for decades because it is the very poorest areas that are affected.

Podoconiosis affects an estimated 4 million people globally and is found in the highland areas of Africa, Latin America and south-east Asia.

It is caused by an inflammatory reaction to minerals in volcanic soils. On contact, the minerals penetrate the skin, causing severe itching and pain. They are taken up by white blood cells, triggering inflammation that produces a thickening of scar tissue, causing swelling and ulcerated sores in the lower limbs. Typically, both lower limbs are affected. Unlike parasitic elephantiasis, it rarely affects the genitals.

Many people avoid sufferers because they believe the disease to be infectious. Davey said the disease is “highly stigmatised, probably more so than leprosy”, with sufferers often hidden away in communities, where it is seen as a curse.

Boys work barefoot on a subsistence farm field in Sodo Wolaita, Ethiopia, where podoconiosis has also been found. Photograph: Jake Lyell/Alamy Stock Photo

Sufferers’ inability to work leads to a reduced income, which has a detrimental effect on mental health. Many victims experience depression.

The discovery of podoconiosis in the region has prompted a public health education campaign to highlight the importance of foot hygiene, and Footwork has trained local health workers to treat the condition.

Davey recalls a man she met at a clinic whose marriage ended because the disease left him unable to look after his farm: “He no longer saw his children because they thought it brought shame to the household. For him, just to hear that the condition can be treated was a bit of a light-bulb moment”.

“It is reversible – even the late stages can be improved enormously with careful hygiene and bandaging, and shoes and socks to protect.”

Podoconiosis will be among the neglected tropical diseases discussed at a summit in Geneva this week. Attendees will discuss the development of a global atlas of podoconiosis, which will map the global geography of the disease and inform efforts to eradicate it.

“We believe we can eliminate podoconiosis in our lifetime,” said Wendy Santis, Footwork’s executive director. “We know the cause and how to treat it. Now our most urgent need is for funding so that we can target our efforts to have the greatest impact.”

Health push in Uganda after mystery disease turns out to be "mossy foot"

Republicans push ahead with plans to hinder insurance coverage for abortions

Republicans in Congress are advancing a bill that imposes a far-reaching ban on private insurance coverage for abortion services for as long as the Affordable Care Act remains in effect and would make permanent a longtime ban on the use of Medicaid to cover abortions.

The bill, H R7, would allow Donald Trump to fulfill a promise that helped his volatile presidential campaign secure the support of major anti-abortion rights activists. In an open letter published in September, he vowed to sign the Hyde amendment, a perennial budget rider that Congress has approved every year for 40 years, into permanent law. Since 1976, the Hyde amendment has prevented millions of women who rely on Medicaid, the government-funded insurance for low-income individuals, from using it to cover their abortions.

But if the bill passes, the most immediate changes will be felt on the insurance exchanges where millions of women purchase healthcare coverage.

HR7 prohibits insurance carriers from offering policies that contain abortion coverage on the exchanges set up under Obamacare to sell insurance coverage to individuals. It prohibits low-income women who qualify for a healthcare subsidy from receiving it if they purchase a healthcare plan that covers abortion. And it would withhold the small business tax credit from employers who offer policies with abortion coverage.

Critics of HR7 fear it could impose a widespread ban on private insurance coverage of abortion by banning abortion coverage in the small subset of private insurance policies that are sold on the Affordable Care Act exchanges.

Because many insurance carriers offer policies to individuals on the exchanges that are similar to the group policies they sell to companies, covering abortion in one case but not the other requires an extra layer of administration.

Health experts said they could not be certain that would be the outcome.

“What that would do to other plans, we don’t really know,” said Laurie Sobel, the associate director for women’s health policy for the Kaiser Family Foundation, a healthcare thinktank. But she noted that after Obamacare began requiring contraceptive coverage in individual policies sold on the exchanges, group policies that did not face the same requirements began to offer identical coverage.

“With very limited exceptions, health insurance companies essentially did the same thing with everybody,” Sobel said. “That is worrisome in terms of, if abortion coverage was restricted in the marketplace, insurance companies might just adopt that policy across the board.”

The ban on using subsidies or tax credits toward policies with abortion coverage could also effect significant changes, because carriers could be reluctant to design plans that so many women or small business owners would be ineligible to purchase. In 2016, there were 871,000 uninsured women eligible to purchase policies containing abortion coverage using subsidies, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Under the bill, tens of thousands more who have already used their subsidies to purchase insurance would lose abortion coverage.

The bill’s restrictions on the health insurance exchanges would cease to apply if and when legislation passed by Republicans in Congress repeals the Affordable Care Act. But the bill is almost certainly a preview of the lengths to which Republicans will go to restrict abortion when they come to replace Obamacare.

“It’s a pretty sweeping bill,” said Destiny Lopez, a director of All Above All, a coalition of abortion rights groups that opposes the Hyde amendment. “It’s an attempt to withhold abortion from nearly all women in the US through burdensome regulation intended to stop insurers from covering abortions. It could restrict abortion for nearly every woman in this country in some way, and do significant harm in particular to low-income women.”

Insurance coverage for abortion is already limited in a way that forces thousands of women to pay for abortions out of pocket. Twenty-five states restrict the sale of insurance policies covering abortion on their state exchanges. And exchanges in six other states don’t offer any plans that cover abortions, possibly because Congress imposed extra administrative hurdles under the ACA for providing abortion coverage.

A 2013 study found that only about a quarter of abortion patients who had insurance used it to cover their procedure. Those who didn’t use their insurance overwhelmingly said their insurance did not cover abortion or they weren’t sure.

The bill would also convert a slew of existing, provisional bans on abortion coverage into permanent law. These include bans on abortion coverage for women on federal insurance, such as many Native American women, women in the Peace Corps, in federal prisons, or those enrolled in Medicare or the Children’s Health Insurance Program, and prohibit the city of Washington DC fromusing its own local funds to subsidize abortion services.

The House of Representatives approved a version of the bill on Tuesday, and the Senate will consider similar legislation next week. But Republicans in that chamber will need to peel off eight Democratic or independent votes for the 60 needed to overcome a filibuster. Unless Republican leaders change the Senate’s rules to eliminate the filibuster, the fate of the bill may lie with Democrats facing re-election in 2018 in states that voted for Trump.

“We’re confident that the Senate will continue to be a firewall on this issue,” said Lopez.

Also on Tuesday, Republicans introduced a federal “heartbeat” bill that they say would effectively “eliminate” abortion, but is less likely to pass even the House.

Despite Hyde’s longevity, progressive lawmakers in recent years have adopted efforts to see it overturned. Even Hillary Clinton, in her 2016 bid for the presidency, promised to attempt to remove Hyde from future budget bills. HR7, although it does not change the fact that women on Medicaid have long been forced to pay for any abortion services out of pocket, would make it harder for a future Democratic Congress or president to do so.

HR7 is titled the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2017. Republican congressman Chris Smith of New Jersey introduced the bill in early January, as he has for several years running.

At an event to announce the bill, Smith said he supports repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act, but that it is necessary to restrict the ways in which the law facilitates abortion coverage until that time.

“No one knows how quickly the replace part will actually occur,” Smith said. “In the meantime, the unborn child is about to be killed with public funding. We need to enact a statute that takes abortion out of [Obamacare].”

Republicans push ahead with plans to hinder insurance coverage for abortions

Council cuts push specialist housing for vulnerable people into the cold

Last November, housing staff at one housing association were confronted with a tenant claiming to have a bomb in his bag; in another incident, an officer from another housing provider claimed to have been held hostage by a man who believed there was an alien outside his home.

In both incidents, the tenants involved had mental health issues. Housing providers are concerned that growing numbers of tenants with mental health issues are ending up in general needs housing, where they do not receive the help provided in specialist supported housing. A recent survey by Inside Housing reveals a 14% fall in spending by councils on people with mental health issues in supported housing since 2011–12, based on 250 English councils that responded to Freedom of Information requests,

Between 2011 and 2017 there will have been a drop of nearly £7.3m in spend on people with mental health in supported housing by the 47 councils in England that responded fully to the survey. In 2011–12, those councils’ combined budget, including both commissioned services and those they pay for directly, was £50.9m; this year’s budget is £43.6m.

This squeeze on council spending has put pressure on other housing providers, including housing associations. “We have noticed councils are seeking to reduce the amount of specialist accommodation they procure for adults with mental illness,” says Alex Reeve, regional director of London supported housing at housing association Family Mosaic.

Supported housing has been operating within a constricted funding environment for years. Supporting People funding – a national programme for housing related support made available to councils in England – dropped from £1.8bn when it started in 2003 to £1.6bn in 2014–15. That equates to a 38% fall in real terms.

Ministers have given supported housing a one-year exemption from the 1% rent reduction announced in last year’s summer budget, while in September the government said it would transfer top-up money to councils for the service to counter its planned housing benefit cap.

But supported housing providers say the threat of funding cuts has already affected business. Among the 250 councils that responded at least in part to Inside Housing’s FOI requests, there is a wide range of provision for tenants with mental health conditions: some have specialist units, some do not; a handful have floating support for their general needs stock, most do not; others have budgets for specific conditions – such as hoarding – while others have no housing budget at all allocated to people with mental health needs

Chris Hampson, chief executive of Look Ahead, which provides care, support and housing services across London and the south-east, says councils are cutting back on supporting those with less serious mental health issues to concentrate on those with more acute needs. “A lot of the preventative services have been cut back,” says Hampson, who believes further cuts are to come.

This, he says, is short-sighted: “If you take money out of the lower-end preventative services, in the long run more money is spent because people end up back on the streets or in hospital.”

Richard Colwill, media manager at mental health charity Sane, says the FOI results show the budgetary crisis across the board for mental health provision, which is of deep concern for the charity. “Mental health has always been a ‘Cinderella service’,” he explains, and cuts to services are a false economy: if what initially appears to be a tenancy problem is not addressed early, it can develop into a much more complex issue and they can find themselves supporting a customer experiencing mental health issues. “Care in the community only works if there is provision for people in the community,” he says. “Housing is a really big issue for us. Losing a home or being in fear of losing your home can be a trigger to push someone into crisis.”

While most councils have cut spending on mental health in supported accommodation, the FOI responses reveal some exceptions. In 2016–17 Ealing spent £1.6m on mental health in supported housing, up from £1.2m in 2011–12. “We recognise the benefits of supported living in enabling people to live as independently as possible in the borough while getting appropriate care from professionals,” a spokesperson for Ealing says. “We also find that supporting people to live in the local area near to family and friends can have a positive impact on their well-being.”

In Yorkshire, Wakefield council is another bucking the trend, with its supported housing mental health budget growing 15% in the past five years. It is also developing an innovative strategy to address the issue. Wakefield and District Housing has partnered with NHS Wakefield Clinical Commissioning Group to employ mental health support workers to work with tenants. The council, which still manages the local housing register, can give applicants with mental health needs extra priority. Jon Feasey, a service manager for vulnerable adults at Wakefield Council, says the council sees tackling mental health as an important frontline service. “It has a preventative outcome that can create real efficiencies by preventing homelessness.”

Feasey believes the right place for people with mental health needs is in the community but that people need support in their homes – including those with less acute mental health needs who can slip through the net. As well as preventing homelessness, the support can also help reduce unplanned hospital admissions, he says.

This is an edited extract from an article originally published by Inside Housing (£).

World Mental Health Day on 10 October focuses this year on psychological first aid and providing support to those in distress

Sign up for your free Guardian Housing network newsletter with news and analysis sent direct to you on the last Friday of the month. Follow us:@GuardianHousing

Council cuts push specialist housing for vulnerable people into the cold

Junior doctors "push for monthly five-day strikes"

Junior doctors are pushing for monthly five-day strikes to be held between now and the end of the year in an escalation of the dispute over their new contract, according to leaked documents.

Senior members of the British Medical Association (BMA) are meeting on Wednesday to decide what industrial action – if any – should take place after a compromise deal on the contract agreed with the government was rejected by its members last month.

The Mail reported that it had seen a 13-page document marked “confidential” which states that the BMA’s junior doctors committee (JDC) is proposing a full withdrawal of labour between 8am and 5pm for five consecutive weekdays in September and then further walkouts of the same duration in each of the remaining months of the year.

The BMA refused to comment on the specifics of the industrial action being considered but a source said “anything is up for discussion”.

Last month, the JDC chair, Ellen McCourt, wrote to members informing them that the committee was planning “a rolling programme of escalated industrial action beginning in early September”.

The decision will ultimately taken by the BMA council, effectively the union’s board of directors, which usually has 34 voting members.

There have been five walkouts by junior doctors to date, the longest lasting for two consecutive days. The first all-out strike, including junior doctors working in emergency departments, took place in April. More than 100,000 operations and outpatient appointments have been cancelled in total as a result of all industrial action to date.

A breakthrough in the dispute appeared to have occurred in May, when the JDC and health secretary, Jeremy Hunt, agreed a revised contract. However, almost six in 10 junior doctors – all doctors below consultant level – and medical students (58%) who belong to the British Medical Association refused to accept the compromise deal, with only 42% endorsing it.

About 37,000 BMA members, or 68% of the 54,000 trainee doctors and final and penultimate-year medical students who were eligible to vote, took part in the ballot.

After the vote, the JDC chair, Dr Johann Malawana, who had recommended the revised terms and conditions as the best settlement junior doctors could get, resigned from his position. He was replaced by McCourt.

A BMA spokeswoman said: “Junior doctors have been clear in their rejection of Jeremy Hunt’s imposed contract. It should come as no surprise that BMA council are discussing the issue of further industrial action. But at this stage, no decisions have been made.”

Junior doctors "push for monthly five-day strikes"

AMA, Medical professional Allies Push CVS Rivals To Finish Tobacco Sales

The American Healthcare Association and allied physician groups this week are exacting extra pressure on pharmacies and other folks that promote wellness goods to join CVS’ move to cease peddling cigarettes and other tobacco items.

Earlier this year, CVS grabbed global kudos that incorporated acclaim from the White Residence for the giant pharmacy chain’s selection to cease marketing cigarettes and other tobacco items in all of its much more than 7,600 shops by October 1, according to its mother or father company, CVS/Caremark (CVS).

Public overall health advocates said CVS’ move was notably notable given its drugstores would be sacrificing $ two billion in yearly revenue for public well being and future growth.

Now, the biggest medical professional group in the U.S. and affiliated state and nationwide health care societies are voicing a more unified chorus towards retail income of tobacco goods at the AMA’s annual policy-generating House of Delegates meeting that runs by means of Tuesday in Chicago.

Several physician groups explained Sunday that they want the AMA to push pharmacies and “providers of health solutions and products” to stop-offering cigarettes and tobacco items or perform to pressure them to restrict product sales of such products. An AMA reference committee Sunday regarded two resolutions urging the organization to stage up the pressure on pharmacies and other merchants.

The American School of Cardiology, for example, said even limiting tobacco has led to its diminished use.

“We urge retailers that promote health related products to comply with the example set by CVS Caremark CVS Caremark and discontinue the sale of all tobacco products,” stated Dr. L. Samuel Wann, an AMA delegate representing the American College of Cardiology. The ACC supports all achievable action to lessen tobacco access and use, specially when it comes to our nation’s youth.”

The resolutions prior to the AMA did not identify merchants specifically. CVS rivals Wal-Mart (WMT) and Walgreen Walgreen (WAG) proceed to promote tobacco items.

The AMA reference committee in the long run reaffirmed the organization’s existing policy which opposes “the sale of tobacco at any facility where wellness services are provided.” 

The AMA’s yearly Home of Delegates’ meeting serves as far more of a bully pulpit for health issues than anything.

“The energy of the AMA is in its function as a single umbrella organization that covers all physicians, across specialty, geography, practice type or profession stage,” Dr. Robert Wah, the incoming AMA president, said in a statement at the meeting’s open. “We have the potential to convene all the events that require to come to the table to operate on solutions to the challenges physicians face right now. It is the bringing collectively of distinct perspectives that can make the organization more powerful.”

Wondering how Obamacare will have an effect on public wellness? The Forbes eBook Inside Obamacare: The Repair For America’s Ailing Well being Care System answers that question and much more. Accessible now at Amazon and Apple.

 

Marlboro Cigarettes (Photograph credit score: Wikipedia)

AMA, Medical professional Allies Push CVS Rivals To Finish Tobacco Sales

Fruit juice and cereals push youngsters over sugar limits

For ladies below 10, 28 per cent of added sugar came from drinks, such as 12 per cent from fruit juice, according to the National Diet plan and Nutrition Survey, which covers the 4 many years from 2008 to 2012.

As young children received older, the proportions rose nonetheless more, to 42 per cent for boys, and 38 per cent for girls, the figures show, with soft drinks responsible for most of the added sugar.

Public health officials stated young children ought to be allowed fruit juice – but that it ought to be limited to a single drink per day, with a meal.

Overall health campaigners explained a lot of parents did not realise how much sugar is contained in fruit jucies and soft drinks and referred to as for clearer labelling on goods to tackle Britain’s obesity timebomb.

Nutritionist Kawther Hashem from Action on Sugar stated, “The large amount of sugar additional to foods and drink products which includes fruit juice, soft drinks and breakfast cereals offers us calories with no nutritional value.”

“The government must stop acting in the greatest interests of the food and drink industry rather than men and women, and take action on sugar now.”

The report mentioned cereals and cereal items have been the 2nd main contributor to sugar in children’s diets.

The class – covering breakfast cereals and bars, as effectively as biscuits and cakes – was responsible for all around a single quarter of daily added sugars, the report identified.

The nationwide survey, based on in-depth study involving 1,000 people a 12 months, discovered minor alter in Britain’s consuming habits, with most folks failing to meet any of the nationwide tips on a healthful diet program.

All age groups exceeded suggestions that average saturated body fat consumption must not exceeed 11 per cent of foods energy, with an typical of twelve.6 per cent for grownups.

Salt intake was one.2g a day greater than the suggested greatest everyday restrict of 6g/day.

Typical salt consumption in kids aged four to 18 years also exceeded recommendations for every age group except for children aged seven to ten many years.

In spite of considerably publicised guidelines advising the public to consume 5-a-day fruit and veg, on common, children are consuming far much less, the analysis identified.

Just 10 per cent of boys and 7 per cent of girls aged amongst 11 to 18 met the suggestions. On average boys had 3 portions a day, although girls had two.7 portions, the statistics show.

Grownups fared better.

Individuals aged 19 to 64 many years consumed an average of 4.1 portions per day whilst older grownups are consuming the most fruit and greens, the information displays, with an common of 4.six portions a day amid grownups aged 65 and above.

Dr Alison Tedstone, chief nutritionist at Public Overall health England, stated: “The new NDNS information highlights that kids are consuming also several sugary drinks. The greatest drinks for school-aged kids are water and reduced fat milk. Fruit juice is also a excellent decision as it can be incorporated as one particular of your 5 portions of fruit and veggies per day. Nevertheless it must only be drunk when a day and with a meal due to the fact it can be higher in sugar and can cause tooth decay.”

She said the information covering four years showed little alter over the time period.

Dr Tedstone said: “The findings, from the 4 years covered by the survey, confirm that eating routines do not modify quickly. It is clear that we all need to function with each other to support individuals boost their diet programs.”

Fruit juice and cereals push youngsters over sugar limits

Product sales reps in NHS maternity wards are a advertising and marketing push too far for mothers

From earliest childhood, it really is made clear to us that a main alter in daily life is very best tackled by a trip to the outlets. New school many years are dealt with by the acquire, in August, of pencil instances, lunchboxes and also-long trousers. Starting up a new task? Head down the large street for something non-crease and expert-searching. Moving into your very first flat? Hello, Ikea.

As we get older, we can come to view the shopping sprees that arise in advance of considerable daily life events as an integral element of the events themselves. There’s some thing reassuringly organised and adult about heading to the shops with a list of essentials ahead of embarking on a new project – a kind of true-globe expression of the Scouts’ motto. If you happen to be outfitted, the considering goes, you are by definition ready, and given that there is no lifestyle occasion for which we feel more flailingly unprepared than the arrival of a very first child, logic dictates that the very best form of preparation is a commensurately large purchasing expedition.

All of which explains why new mothers and fathers are uniquely susceptible to the blandishments of businesses seeking to component them from their income. You’ve never ever had a little one prior to, after all – and infants, much a lot more than 1st flats or new schools, perform on our emotions as well as our ignorance.

If someone implies that you are going to permanently endanger your child’s health and wellbeing if you don’t supply them with a Zaky Hand Pillow (“designed to imitate the seem and feel of a parent’s hand”), who are you to argue?

The good news is, these days, we’re not as alone in our ignorance as we used to be. When it comes to laying in retailers for the baby’s arrival, we’re no longer obliged to rely on the guidance of our own mother and father, which tends to fall into 1 of two unhelpful camps: “We put you to rest in a bottom drawer and it by no means did you any harm” or “what do you imply, you haven’t purchased a child hairbrush?” If you’re dithering more than regardless of whether or not you ought to get a Moses basket as well as a cot, or how much you should commit on a pushchair, you can go on the web and beg for tips from individuals a minor additional down the road.

Over the years, and the program of several discussions, mothers and fathers on Mumsnet have come up with a rough checklist of essentials for new mother and father, the considering behind which is best summed up by the sentence “just because some thing exists, does not imply you are actually going to require it”. And even if you need it, you do not have to get a brand new a single (with a couple of exceptions, this kind of as vehicle seats and cot mattresses).

With the benefit of encounter, they have boiled the necessities down to a quite quick list: a secure sleeping place for your child (although a drawer may possibly be pushing it), nappies, a pram, a vehicle seat and wipes or cotton wool for wiping extraneous substances off the new centre of your world. Perhaps a sling or a bouncer if you are feeling flush – and, of program, bottles and sterilisers if you are bottle feeding. Every thing else is an optional extra.

There’s no query that marketing departments especially set out to exploit the truth that new dad and mom have a tendency to be each emotionally labile and green as grass – but at the end of the day, when it comes to getting little one kit, we all have the choice to put down the infant-wipe warmer, leave the shop and put the income we’ve avoided investing in a financial savings account for our child to use 1 day to spend for a few hrs of higher schooling, or put down a deposit on a garden shed. We have the option to stroll away. Where we don’t have that option, though, is in maternity wards.

For decades Bounty, a data-marketing and advertising company, has been purchasing accessibility to NHS maternity wards, the place its representatives (typically paid on a commission-only basis) strategy new mothers and ask them for their individual details. This data is then sold on to an limitless quantity of companies which have a business interest in reaching new mothers and fathers.

When you outline this circumstance to any person who hasn’t had cause to grow to be acquainted with NHS maternity services, there is normally some preliminary resistance to the probability that this can be occurring: absolutely we don’t enable commercial product sales reps to wander NHS wards at will?

Effectively, yes, we do it truly is accepted practice in many NHS trusts and, in the case of Her Majesty’s Income and Customs, we really shell out Bounty for the privilege, due to the fact kid-advantage declare varieties – along with samples of business items – are incorporated in the packs provided out at bedsides. The reality that these varieties are freely accessible on the internet and by phone, and could be handed out by local community midwives or birth registrars, looks to lower no ice with HMRC, which is estimated to have paid Bounty in excess of half a million lbs in the previous five years.

These business reps – whose revenue is dependent on how a lot of sets of patient information they can harvest – have entry to new mums who are frequently bed-bound and recovering from what is at ideal a demanding bodily experience, at worst a deeply traumatic 1.

Most of these women will be exhausted several will be feeling the results of powerful medicines administered for the duration of and following the birth huge numbers have had key abdominal surgical procedure in the previous 24 hrs.

If an NHS believe in proposed these days that it was going to introduce Viagra product sales reps into men’s genitourinary wards, or reps for walking aids to orthopaedic wards, the really least you’d anticipate would be some stout resistance.

It is a measure of the power of the association amongst “motherhood” and “buying things” that the presence of industrial representatives on maternity wards has been tolerated for so lengthy.

You have just had a little one and 28 stitches in your nethers? Why on earth would you not want a snappy salesperson wandering up and asking for your email tackle, your deal with and postcode, and your date of birth, so that this useful personal information can be sold on to myriad organizations? Hey, you get a tiny pot of Sudocrem in exchange.

Stories abound of Bounty representatives barging in on females who are attempting to set up breastfeeding, or just making an attempt to catch some rest. Numerous females feel the reps to be healthcare assistants, and only realise that they have handed their data to an unrelated organisation when the mountains of spam begin to create up.

Dad and mom whose babies die can devote many years attempting to eliminate their information from the marketing lists of companies who have purchased their information. When asked how they justify it, trust managers say that number of individuals complain. Bounty’s very own statistics present that to be true. But, as the consumer organisation Which? mentioned this month, one-third of men and women who had a dilemma with the NHS inside the last 12 months didn’t complain simply because they just did not know how, and the initial number of months of a baby’s lifestyle tend to be a time when non-crucial admin (such as wrestling with your well being trust) goes by the board.

Galvanised by our members’ irritation at the practice, and together with some redoubtable GPs and midwives, Mumsnet launched a campaign against the presence of income reps on maternity wards last 12 months, and in time we hope to see this pernicious practice end. (If you’d like to add your voice and consider some action, check out our “Bounty mutiny” webpage.)

Most of us appreciate the chance for a spending spree and, of program, anyone who needs to drop some cash in exchange for non-vital fripperies must do just that, with the typical disclaimers about sensible economic management, consideration of your available floor room, and the desirability of recyclable packaging. But in their function as customers, mother and father deserve the identical rights to informed option and great data as every person else – and not to be subjected, by NHS mandate, to the hard sell at a hospital bedside.

Sarah Crown is editor of mumsnet.com

Product sales reps in NHS maternity wards are a advertising and marketing push too far for mothers

Bill wants push to sweep away "inflexible" healthcare regulation framework

‘If this bill is not portion of the Queen’s Speech on three June all of the healthcare regulators will be caught with “outdated and inflexible” frameworks.’ Photograph: Pool/REUTERS

The publication this month of the draft law commission bill, regulation of overall health and social care professionals, was a crucial milestone for individuals, the public, and the healthcare regulators whose frameworks it will revolutionise.

The Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC), of which I am the chief executive and registrar, is hampered by a framework that has not adjusted to the modern day age.

The prime minister, in his response to the Francis inquiry report final 12 months, promised that the law commission bill would “sweep away our outdated and inflexible framework” and its publication goes someway to performing that, but we are not there however. In its initial response to the bill, the government has only “committed to legislate on this important situation when parliamentary time permits”.

This is not excellent sufficient. We are investing far more than £44m – which is nearly 80% of our spending budget – on fitness to practise hearings. We are holding 22 hearings a day, which is equal to Birmingham and Southwark crown courts put together. This is unsustainable inside of our present framework.

We need to have the law commission bill to be picked up in the ultimate session of this parliament if the NMC is to introduce new ways of disposing of situations, with a assortment of sanctions more acceptable to the present day era. It is also important if we are to meet our commitment to conclude 90% of our cases inside of 15 months. It is in the greatest interests of the public and nurses and midwives that the NMC is in a position to conclude situations as rapidly feasible and in the most successful way.

In the command paper Enabling Excellence: Autonomy and Accountability for Healthcare Staff, Social Staff and Social Care Employees, published in 2011, the government acknowledged that the existing legislative frameworks for all of the overall health and social care regulators are “high-priced, complex and need continuous government intervention to maintain them up to date.”

This “continuous government intervention” has meant the two the NMC and all of the other regulators have struggled to adapt rapidly adequate to reflect the ever-modifying healthcare landscape. To adjust our legislation now calls for agreement from the Division of Overall health followed by privy council and parliamentary approval. This slow and cumbersome method takes on typical amongst 18 months and two years. This impedes our capacity to make crucial improvements quickly.

The bill would also enable all 9 of the healthcare profession regulators to operate collectively a lot much more closely and even, if wanted, to share functions. Francis himself manufactured this a essential recommendation in his report into the failings at Mid Staffordshire NHS basis trust.

Sadly, I dread that if this hugely important bill is not component of the Queen’s speech on three June all of the healthcare profession regulators will be caught with “outdated and inflexible” frameworks that do not serve to shield the public in the most effective and productive way.

Jackie Smith is chief executive and registrar of the Nursing and Midwifery Council

Join the Guardian Healthcare Pros Network to get regular emails and unique delivers.

Bill wants push to sweep away "inflexible" healthcare regulation framework

Ultimate push to reinstate wellness meals rating web site fails

A last push to reinstate the wellness food rating web site which was pulled down by the assistant overall health minister’s office has failed in a closed-door meeting.

The Front-of-Pack Labelling (FoPL) Oversight Committee met on Monday to examine the implementation of the wellness foods rating method which could see foods rated on its nutrition utilizing stars. The system nevertheless hinges on a choice to be manufactured by state and federal health ministers in June.

It is understood there was a push in the meeting by some to reinstate the well being foods rating internet site but it was shot down with the final decision getting it would not be re-launched right up until at least June.

Opponents of the site’s launch argued that without a style manual the foods rating site could be complicated for buyers and companies.

The assistant well being minister, Fiona Nash’s chief of employees Alastair Furnival resigned last month following intervening to have the internet site pulled when it went live for a number of hours. It emerged he had a stakeholding in his wife’s lobbying firm which represented junk food businesses.

There has been speculation the entire food rating program – commenced by the former Labor government – will be scrapped or watered down but members of the committee emerged optimistic right after meeting for about 6 hours.

Geoff Dobb from the Australian Healthcare Association stated it was “certainly possible” the meals labels could begin to be introduced on goods by the middle of the year.

“The meeting was in the spirit of co-operation with a concentrate on getting the meals star rating program completed by the middle of this 12 months,” he explained.

When asked about the website Dodd mentioned the committee was not on a “witch hunt” and there was “recognition there was some incomplete details, in particular in the design manual, which was a fundamental part of the system”.

“People require the type guidebook so they know what they’re hunting for and what it implies,” he said.

“There’s nonetheless more operate to be completed on finalising the type guide.”

Dodd explained there had been some “minor anomalies” that needed to be worked out prior to the wholesome meals star rating program was ready to be launched.

When asked for an illustration he said there have been issues with how dairy items have been rated that required to be worked out with some things such as custard receiving larger star ratings than merchandise such as cheese.

“We now have in location a procedure to get us via that and see if there are in truth anomalies and how to resolve them,” he explained.

A price-benefit evaluation is currently being undertaken which the ministers will discuss at their June meeting.

Dodd said the cost-advantage evaluation was not going to be a “show stopper” but it has garnered some criticism from other members of the committee.

One particular member, who did not want to be named, stated the analysis was getting viewed with considerably scepticism by supporters of the meals rating technique.

“How do you do a quality cost/advantage examination when the benefit in preventative well being is so difficult to quantify and the expense to to food organizations is so effortless to quantify?” they told Guardian Australia. They said they were content overall with the direction of the meeting.

A spokesman for the Australian Meals and Grocery Council, which represents packaged meals, drink and grocery goods, stated the committee was working in direction of implementing the technique.

“There was a constructive agreement to set up a framework for addressing the anomalies in the algorithm, the design guide and design,” he mentioned.

A spokeswoman for client group Decision echoed the sentiment saying they had been satisfied a framework was getting implemented to deal with anomalies in the method.

The committee is also manufactured up of representatives from government departments of health as well as the Public Health Association of Australia, the Australian Nationwide Retailers Association and the Australian Business Group.

Ultimate push to reinstate wellness meals rating web site fails

Ambulance-chasers push NHS fees bill to £200m

The price of compensation claims towards the NHS last 12 months reached £680 million, including £196 million for claimants’ solicitors.

Unscrupulous compensation attorneys are frequently named “ambulance chasers” simply because of their aggressive pursuit of claims on a no-win, no-charge basis.

The rising bill for compensation claims is especially damaging at a time when the NHS is dealing with serious economic pressures.

The NHS Litigation Authority, the physique that oversees the health service’s response to claims produced against it, is calling for the Government to cap the level of expenses for attorneys representing individuals.

Catherine Dixon, the head of the authority, explained: “They [some attorneys] are making an attempt to maximise their revenue. It would seem to me that it is out of kilter with the degree of damages they are in search of to recover from their clientele and defence costs.

“I really don’t believe that charging drastically higher expenses is acceptable, notably against a physique like the NHS which is searching after the well being of the nation.

“Access to justice is important, and it is appropriate that claimants’ solicitors are paid a honest sum for the perform they do. But I would rather see the extreme quantities we’re spending on costs going into patient care.”

Last yr, the legal fees of solicitors representing individuals have been three times higher than these for lawyers acting on behalf of the NHS.

Sufferers obtained £438 million in damages, but their solicitors were paid £196  million in charges. The bill for the NHS’s personal lawyers came to £46 million.

In circumstances in which the damages paid have been significantly less than £10,000, claimants’ solicitors were paid a complete of £23 million. This is more than twice the total of £9.eight million paid in damages beneath such instances.

Mrs Dixon mentioned the NHS could save £69 million each year if the price of lawyers representing patients was capped at the same degree as the price of the health service’s attorneys, plus an extra 20 per cent.

She extra that many solicitors are “front-loading” charges by hiring expert witnesses and conducting in depth investigations for fairly low-worth claims. “The concern for us is that there is an potential to incur a whole lot of value before the NHS is notified of the claim and there is no management above that,” she stated. “They will go away, they will ask for health care records from the hospital, and often consider expert [tips] preparing witness statements.

“There is a whole lot of scope for them to incur a whole lot of price on a case before we see it, even when the damages are very low. We’ve also seen an rising variety of poorly put collectively claims. It means that much more than 50 per cent of all the claims we see are resolved without having any damages or claimant solicitor fees currently being paid.”

The authority has offered The Sunday Telegraph with a listing of the law companies whose claims for costs have been substantially reduced following negotiations or court action.

One particular company, Fast Response Solicitors, based mostly in Hull, has claimed £2 million in fees for 47 situations over the past three many years. The claims were settled at £539,563.

Yet another company, Express Solicitors in Manchester, has claimed £1.four million in costs for thirty cases because 2010. The charges have been diminished to £779,063 after negotiations.

Mrs Dixon stated a developing variety of solicitors from the personal injury market are moving to NHS circumstances since they think the work is a lot more rewarding.

Ambulance-chasers push NHS fees bill to £200m

Not Halfway To seven Million Signup Goal, Obamacare Requirements Push

The Obama administration’s announcement this week that far more than one.one million people signed up for a health prepare on the federal exchange from October one to December 24 signifies a massive push will be necessary in the last 3 months for the 7 million enrollment objective to be met.

In addition to these one.one million that the Centers for Medicare &amp Medicaid Solutions said signed up by means of the federal exchange, analysts estimate an added 800,000 t0 one million others signed up on the far more than two dozen state-run exchanges. The Obama administration has yet to comment on what the complete count is in between the federal and state exchanges for newly insured Americans taking advantage of broader coverage that begins Wednesday, New Year’s Day, beneath the Reasonably priced Care Act.

But it’s clear to this level that the administration isn’t nevertheless to the halfway point of the 7 million that the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Workplace projected in a September memo linked here. Even the CBO report, written prior to the disastrous launch of healthcare.gov, predicted a December spike in enrollment amid people eligible for subsidies to get wellness benefits from a personal insurance business.

“We project that Marketplace enrollment will start off slowly, with significant peaks in December,” the CBO memo said.

The objective is inside reach, say several analysts.

The Washington Post’s Wonkblog touted “Obamacare just may well net its seven million sign-ups.” And other analysts in different reviews this

President Barack Obama’s signature on the health insurance reform bill at the White Home, March 23, 2010. The President signed the bill with 22 various pens. (Photograph credit score: Wikipedia)

week have mentioned they had been impressed with the more than 975,000 Americans who signed up from December 1 until the Christmas Eve deadline for coverage slated to commence Jan. one.

The Obama administration does not seem anxious.

“We are in the middle of a sustained, 6-month open enrollment time period that we expect to see enrollment ramp up in excess of time, a lot like other historic implementation efforts we’ve noticed in Massachusetts and Medicare Element D,” Marilyn Tavenner, administrator, Centers for Medicare &amp Medicaid Solutions stated of the slow enrollment starts for the two the Medicare drug advantage and the Massachusetts state wellness insurance coverage system.

Each well being insurance programs are now deemed a good results in the amount of participants enrolled.

But critics of the law say the administration’s numbers may not really place a dent in the quantity of uninsured Americans offered there have been four million or far more individuals who had their policies cancelled since their programs didn’t comply with the law’s crucial health benefit provisions and other guidelines.

Americans can still indicator up for coverage through the finish of March. Buyers who missed the Christmas Eve deadline to get coverage that starts Thursday of this week can signal up and be covered as of Feb. one, the administration said final week.

Under the law, hundreds of thousands of Americans can get a subsidy of up to $ five,000 to buy an array of overall health plan alternatives that contain individuals offered by Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans, Aetna (AET), Cigna (CI), Humana (HUM), UnitedHealth Group (UNH).

Not Halfway To seven Million Signup Goal, Obamacare Requirements Push