The soft-drink market is standing by its position that Australian sugar consumption has declined in the wake of an investigation casting doubt on the claims.
ABC radio’s Background Briefing program on Sunday aired a documentary criticising the Australian Paradox, a Sydney University examine which argued that despite a rise in Australia’s obesity prices more than the past thirty many years, refined sugar consumption per person had undergone a “substantial and consistent decline”.
The review concluded the function of sugar in fuelling obesity charges was overblown.
The examine, co-written by renowned nutritionist Professor Jennie Brand-Miller, has been employed by the Australian soft-drink market to ward off public-well being initiatives aimed at curbing soft-drink consumption. A single this kind of measure was attempted in New York final 12 months when the sale of soft drinks in measures bigger than 16oz (473ml) was banned. The measure was later overturned by a state court.
The ABC’s investigation was based mostly on analysis by former Reserve Bank economist Rory Robertson, a longtime critic of the evidence backing the Australian Paradox research.
In the documentary Robertson pointed to one particular chart in Brand-Miller’s review displaying a rise in complete-sugar soft-drink revenue from 35 litres per person in 1994 to 45 litres per individual in 2006.
“In the paper they describe it as a 10% decline, which is nonsense – certainly it’s a thirty% boost,” Robertson advised the ABC.
But Australian Beverage Council chief executive Geoff Parker told Guardian Australia the controversial study was just “one of a number of distinct papers that we reference”.
“We really don’t seem to one specific source of information in figuring out our place, we seem at a selection of sources,” Parker said.
“There’s enough data out there for us to have the place that consumption of full-sugar sweets and drinks has been on the decline on the final 10 or 15 years,” he explained.
Sydney University has launched an inquiry into Robertson’s complaints, but a spokeswoman for the university stressed that, at this stage, “there have been no substantiated claims against the function of any academic at the university, nor indeed has there been any obtaining that the complaints warrant any additional investigation”.
Parker said he would await the results of the university’s inquiry into the paper just before he would think about taking it down from the Beverage Council’s web site.
Soft-drink business resists sugar consumption evidence in documentary
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder