think etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
think etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

18 Nisan 2017 Salı

Poppy Jaman: ‘I think there’s a wave of change coming in mental health’

Poppy Jaman, chief executive of the not-for-profit Mental Health First Aid England (MHFAE), believes Theresa May meant business when she pledged in January to make mental health a priority. Despite ministers being accused of breaking their promises after £800m in cash earmarked for mental health was last month redirected to offsetting wider NHS budget problems, Jaman argues that the government will come good.


“I think this government has already set a precedent for change, with two consecutive prime ministers making commitments to improve the outlook for those with mental health issues and attending to the prevention agenda,” says Jaman, referring to NHS England’s Mental Health Taskforce national strategy published in 2016. “I think it’s massively a great step that the current PM has made a public commitment to mental health.”


MHFAE runs training courses in how to identify the warning signs of mental ill health in others and help steer them towards appropriate support. Jaman has headed the social enterprise for almost 10 years, since it evolved from a government initiative within the Department of Health. She says she’s “feeling confident” the Conservatives recognise the significant toll mental health problems can take on individuals and wider society. By way of illustration she points to the imminent roll-out for secondary school staff of a government-funded schools training course delivered by MHFAE to address mental health issues among young people. The goal is to have “mental health first aiders” in place who can help to identify pupils with mental health challenges, ideally before they reach a crisis point. The programme aims to train staff in more than 1,000 schools by 2020.


Evidence over the past decade from MHFAE’s training to more than 150,000 individuals – such as NHS staff, charity workers and employees at large corporations including Unilever and WH Smith – shows it can contribute to the broader “public health prevention” and wellbeing agenda, says Jaman, by “giving people the tools” to recognise signs of mental difficulty.




The jobcentre service needs staff who understand mental health so people get the right support


Poppy Jaman


The mental heath first aid approach is ostensibly an adjunct to standard first aid and Jaman has been campaigning to put the two on a par. This includes supporting a push to amend regulations around first aid within the Health and Work Act, so that all organisations are required to have mental health first aiders in place, and an obligation to deliver mental as well as physical first aid. An early day motion last year calling for such a transformation was backed by about 500 MPs, including Norman Lamb and Frank Field. Implementing it would be “a big leap for equality” and parity of esteem between mental and physical health, Jaman argues.


“I truly believe that making this legislative change would have a big positive impact because it would shift the dial on how employers have to think about the mental and physical health needs of their workforce.”


A third-generation British Bangladeshi, Jaman, 40, says her early grassroots professional work, coupled with having experience of depression as a young woman, helped her to develop an understanding of the challenges facing people with mental health problems, especially among diverse groups. And having grown up in a deprived ward in Portsmouth and left school at 16 (she later got an MBA), she says she is cognisant of how poverty and racial inequalities affect mental wellbeing and access to care. “There is a plethora of data on health outcomes, job outcomes and opportunities for the black and minority ethnic community and when you overlay that with the prevalence of mental ill health and outcomes, the odds are stacked against them.”


Prince William and Lady Gaga discuss mental health for Heads Together – video

So it’s no surprise that Jaman does not underestimate the significant impact of current government policies such as sanctions and fitness-for-work tests for people living with mental health problems. One area in which she is anxious to see improvements is help for people who are unemployed, many of whom have a mental health diagnosis.


She refers to a recent public call by an alliance of mental health professional organisations including the British Psychological Society for a suspension of the government’s sanctions programme because of its negative impact on mental wellbeing and for statutory support for creating psychologically healthy workplaces.


The same group also recommended increased mental health awareness training for jobcentre staff, which Jaman agrees is necessary. “It [the jobcentre] service needs people who understand mental health so that people are getting the right support,” she says. Asked how this is conceivable in a jobseekers system that advocates have repeatedly argued is hostile to mentally vulnerable people, she responds that change needs to come from “the leadership” at the Department for Work and Pensions. “I think there is a wave of change coming around this,” she insists.


When it comes to nudging the government in the right direction, Jaman is clearly a pragmatist. It is important to challenge government policies “where we don’t think things are right”, she argues, but ultimately, “for me it’s about ‘let’s work with whoever we need to work with’.”



Poppy Jaman: ‘I think there’s a wave of change coming in mental health’

15 Mart 2017 Çarşamba

Think Before You Eat

Like everything else in life, eating is a matter of consciously making wise choices. It is something everyone must do to keep the body healthy and alive, which is the practical purpose for eating.


Unfortunately for many, the purpose eating has become centered around satisfying the tastes the tongue has become addicted to. Allowing the tongue’s addiction for the taste of flesh and blood, refined grains, sugar, salt, etc., to dictate what nourishment for body gets, has resulted in what a U.S. Senate report called “. . . a wave of malnutrition” sweeping the country. This is a fact most Americans are aware of. In 1978, a Harris survey showed that only 14% of those polled thought Americans ate a proper diet. That figure has not changed much since then.


Awareness of this problem can motivate us to live more consciously and thus turn a negative into a positive. Rather than live as consumer zombies ultimately controlled by advertising campaigns, being dragged here and there as slaves to our tongues and other senses, we should take our lives into our own hands beginning at home with the basics.


A natural starting point is to choose not to continue as blind food faddists eating newly developed non-foods that are chemically flavored and preserved, or that contain empty calorie, refined flour and sugar products, or that are loaded with saturated fat, cholesterol, MSG and their euphemisms, and aspartame or Splenda.


Most of these foods have become popular in a relatively short period of time. Instead, choose the kinds of healthful, wholesome foods our ancestors thrived on, like whole grains, legumes, nuts and seeds, and fresh produce, which a major portion of the planet still thrives on. Such apparently small, insignificant choices as these benefit not only each individual, but all of society as well.


Though the concern for making new food choices may begin as a limiting, self-centered interest for personal health and well-being, it easily leads to an expanding consciousness and regard for others and the world around us when we understand that thoughtfully choosing the foods we eat actually renders decisions filled with moral and political ramifications about our use of the Earth’s precious resources.


For example, we know that the excessive meat consumption in the United States has been scientifically linked to the increase in heart disease and colon cancer. In addition to that, it has been scientifically and medically established that protein obtained from plant foods is not inferior to the protein obtained from flesh foods, but rather it is a superior choice of protein because it is cholesterol and saturated fat free.


While recognizing the fact that consumption of meat cannot be justified on a nutritional basis, we must not neglect the fact that in America, 14 to 20 pounds of nutritious legumes and whole grains are fed to livestock to obtain 1 pound of meat in return.


This process of turning plant protein, in whole grains and legumes, to animal protein results in a 90% protein loss. If all the grain currently fed to livestock in the United States were consumed directly by people, the number of people who could be fed would be nearly 800 million.


With this information available, the consumption of flesh products is proving to be unhealthy, unnecessary, and in a world where millions suffer from starvation or malnutrition every year, totally unjustifiable. In addition, most of the feed given to the animals is genetically modified, which passes to the consumer, and results in a myriad of diseases the cause of which people cannot understand.


Unfortunately, the revaluation of the purpose of food and its fair distribution probably will not come from the people who are presently making “unhealthy” profits on taste addictions. They justify their non-food scamming as simply supplying the demand, even though this demand was created by their multimillion-dollar advertising campaigns.


This sort of reasoning places the responsibility squarely on the people who have the most to gain from being supplied with more healthful products — you and me!


The fact is, in the marketplace of supply and demand, as long as the product is bought, that guarantees it will continue to be manufactured and marketed. But this also means that we have a choice — to say yes or no.


We can say no by refraining from buying non-nutritious, non-quality “plastic” fad foods, and say yes to buying wholesome, natural foods. In this sense, every time you buy or do not buy a product, you are registering to vote in the marketplace of supply and demand.


It may seem to you that this may have about as much effect on the world’s hunger situation as your voting for the President has on the world situation; but the fact is, individuals making such apparently insignificant choices do make a difference when there are enough of them. Consider the health food aisles that have appeared in supermarkets all over the country within the last few years.


It would be totally naïve and misleading for me to say or even imply that your cutting out the meat and junk food consumption from your diet will solve the world’s hunger problem and create a utopia on earth, because it won’t. The philosophy, politics and economics that affect world’s food distribution are far more complicated than that.


The medical evidence is clear, consistent and overwhelming. Vegetarians and vegans are far less likely to get cancer, heart disease, diabetes, or osteoporosis, and are far less likely to be overweight, have lots more stamina, consume far less pesticides in their food, and have superior immune systems.


The largest epidemiological study ever conducted – the China-Oxford-Cornell study found that those eating the amount of animal foods typical for Americans have 17 times the death rate from heart disease, and, for women, five times the rate of breast cancer, than those who get 5% or less of their protein from animal foods.


Meat contains 14 times the amount of pesticides as plant foods, since pesticides get concentrated as they move up to the food chain, and since they’re more easily stored in fatty tissues. In 1980, six years after the pesticide dieldrin was banned, the USDA destroyed 2 million packages of frozen turkey products contaminated with dieldrin. What’s worse is that such contamination can routinely occur without detection.


In 1974, the Fraud and Drug Administration found dieldrin in 85% of all dairy products and in 99.5% of the American people.


The Environmental Pollution Agency discovered that the breast milk of vegetarian women contained far fewer levels of pesticides than that of average Americans.


A study reported in the New England Journal of Medicine found that “The highest levels of contamination in the breast milk of vegetarian women were lower than the lowest level of contamination in non-vegetarian women. The mean vegetarian levels were only 1 to 2% as high as the average levels in the US”.


Nobody wants animals to suffer, but it’s easy to forget that when we eat them. And this is what we support. The easiest action a person can take to reduce animal suffering is to simply stop eating them.


Over 9 billion animals are killed for food every year in the US alone – a number greater than the entire human population of the planet.


What’s worse, modern agricultural methods mean that animals are raised in cramped confinement operations instead of the pastures that we have seen in our childhood picture books. This is a practice known as factory farming.


Chickens killed for their flesh in the United States are bred and drugged to grow so quickly that their hearts, lungs, and limbs often cannot keep up.


Hen’s used for eggs live 6 or 7 to a battery cage the size of a file drawer, thousands of chickens are stacked tier upon tier in huge, filthy warehouses.


Cattle are castrated, their horns are ripped out of their heads, and third degree burns from branding are inflicted upon them, all without pain relief.


Cows used for their milk or drugged and bred to produce unnatural amounts of milk, to have their babies stolen from them shortly after birth and sent to notoriously cruel veal farms so that humans can drink the calves’ milk.


Mother pigs on factory farms are confined to crates so small that they are unable to turn around or even lie down comfortably.


Fish on aqua farms spend their entire lives in cramped, filthy enclosures, and many suffer from parasitic infections, diseases, and debilitating injuries. Conditions on some farms are so horrendous that’s 40% of the fish may die before farmers can kill and package them for food.


Turkeys’ beaks & toes are burned off with a hot blade. Many suffer heart failure or debilitating leg pain, often becoming crippled under the weight of their genetically manipulated and drugged bodies.


For some, vegetarianism and veganism are easy ways to refuse to participate in this cruelty!


Eating vegetarian saves more land, energy, and water then any other choice you can make. That’s because livestock eat several times more grain then they produce as meat. So, raising livestock uses:


several times as much land to grow the grain to feed them


several times as much energy to harvest the grain and transport it


several times as much water to grow the grain and to water the animals


several times as much pesticides, etc.


Worldwide petroleum reserves would be exhausted in 11 years if the rest of the world ate like the US. The least energy-efficient plant food is 10 times as efficient as the most efficient meat food. A nationwide switch to a vegan diet would allow us to cut our oil imports by 60% or more.


Over half the water used in the US is used to grow feed for livestock. It takes 100 times as much water to produce meat than to produce wheat. The water required to produce a days diet for a typical American is 5000 gallons. It’s 1200 gallons for vegetarians and 300 gallons for vegans. Compared to a vegan diet, three days of the typical American diet requires as much water as you use to shower all year assuming you shower everyday.


US livestock produces 250,000 pounds of waste per second – 20 times as much as humans. A large feedlot produces as much waste as a large city, but without a sewage system. Animal waste washes into rivers and lakes causes increased nitrates, phosphates, ammonia, and bacteria, and decreases the oxygen content. This kills plant and animal life. The meat industry accounts for three times as much harmful organic waste as the rest of the industries in the US combined.


It takes 10 times as much land to produce food for an average American compared to a vegan. An acre of land can produce 20,000 pounds of potatoes, but only 165 pounds of meat. In the US, 260 million acres of forest have been destroyed for use as agricultural land to support the meat diet. That’s over 1 acre per person. Since 1967, the rate of deforestation has been one acre every 5 seconds. For every acre cleared for urban development, 7 acres are cleared to graze animals or grow the feed for them.


About 85% of topsoil loss is directly associated with raising livestock. The US Department of Assholes says that crop productivity is down 70% as a result up topsoil loss, and it takes nature 500 years to build an inch of topsoil. Vegan diets make less than 5% of the demands on the soil as meat-based diets.


Making the change in the way we live our personal lives can be the beginning of a real commitment to work on another level to help solve the world hunger problem, beyond just spouting slogans or intellectually nodding our approval while living as hypocrites whose real lives contradict real solutions.


Is change easy? For some yes, for some no. But we all have to look at the big picture to see what is of the utmost importance. If the dictates of your tongue and your senses are more important and the health of the planet, you will be content to stay the way you are. If your consciousness is such that you care about the world you live in but you might want to consider these things to help it stay the way it is until Monsanto, Dow, DuPont, and Syngenta start opening Soylent Green factories.


Besides making wise choices about the basic activity of eating, we can also make choices in so many other little ways in our daily lives: growing more of our own food simply by growing sprouts, hanging clothes on the line instead of using the dryer, walking places when driving isn’t necessary, recycling what we can, refraining from buying things we don’t need, etc. Such choices will not only make our lives happier and healthier, but will ensure the health and well being of future generations as well.


In this new year of 2017 where we have made endless resolutions like we do every year, but don’t follow, why not make one now that has far more reaching value, quality and meaning than any other? Eat wisely!


Aloha!


Sources:
www.countinganimals.com
www.vegansouls.com
www.naturallysavvy.com
www.tinybuddha.com
www.peta.org
www.jw.org
www.medicalexpress.com


To learn more about Hesh, listen to and read hundreds of health related radio shows and articles, and learn about how to stay healthy and reverse degenerative diseases through the use of organic sulfur crystals and the most incredible bee pollen ever, please visit www.healthtalkhawaii.com, or email me at heshgoldstein@gmail.com or call me at (808) 258-1177. Since going on the radio in 1981 these are the only products I began to sell because they work.
Oh yeah, going to www.asanediet.com will allow you to read various parts of my book – “A Sane Diet For An Insane World”, containing a wonderful comment by Mike Adams.
In Hawaii, the TV stations interview local authors about the books they write and the newspapers all do book reviews. Not one would touch “A Sane Diet For An Insane World”. Why? Because it goes against their advertising dollars.



Think Before You Eat

13 Mart 2017 Pazartesi

Think Before You Eat

Like everything else in life, eating is a matter of consciously making wise choices. It is something everyone must do to keep the body healthy and alive, which is the practical purpose for eating.


Unfortunately for many, the purpose eating has become centered around satisfying the tastes the tongue has become addicted to. Allowing the tongue’s addiction for the taste of flesh and blood, refined grains, sugar, salt, etc., to dictate what nourishment for body gets, has resulted in what a U.S. Senate report called “. . . a wave of malnutrition” sweeping the country. This is a fact most Americans are aware of. In 1978, a Harris survey showed that only 14% of those polled thought Americans ate a proper diet. That figure has not changed much since then.


Awareness of this problem can motivate us to live more consciously and thus turn a negative into a positive. Rather than live as consumer zombies ultimately controlled by advertising campaigns, being dragged here and there as slaves to our tongues and other senses, we should take our lives into our own hands beginning at home with the basics.


A natural starting point is to choose not to continue as blind food faddists eating newly developed non-foods that are chemically flavored and preserved, or that contain empty calorie, refined flour and sugar products, or that are loaded with saturated fat, cholesterol, MSG and their euphemisms, and aspartame or Splenda.


Most of these foods have become popular in a relatively short period of time. Instead, choose the kinds of healthful, wholesome foods our ancestors thrived on, like whole grains, legumes, nuts and seeds, and fresh produce, which a major portion of the planet still thrives on. Such apparently small, insignificant choices as these benefit not only each individual, but all of society as well.


Though the concern for making new food choices may begin as a limiting, self-centered interest for personal health and well-being, it easily leads to an expanding consciousness and regard for others and the world around us when we understand that thoughtfully choosing the foods we eat actually renders decisions filled with moral and political ramifications about our use of the Earth’s precious resources.


For example, we know that the excessive meat consumption in the United States has been scientifically linked to the increase in heart disease and colon cancer. In addition to that, it has been scientifically and medically established that protein obtained from plant foods is not inferior to the protein obtained from flesh foods, but rather it is a superior choice of protein because it is cholesterol and saturated fat free.


While recognizing the fact that consumption of meat cannot be justified on a nutritional basis, we must not neglect the fact that in America, 14 to 20 pounds of nutritious legumes and whole grains are fed to livestock to obtain 1 pound of meat in return.


This process of turning plant protein, in whole grains and legumes, to animal protein results in a 90% protein loss. If all the grain currently fed to livestock in the United States were consumed directly by people, the number of people who could be fed would be nearly 800 million.


With this information available, the consumption of flesh products is proving to be unhealthy, unnecessary, and in a world where millions suffer from starvation or malnutrition every year, totally unjustifiable. In addition, most of the feed given to the animals is genetically modified, which passes to the consumer, and results in a myriad of diseases the cause of which people cannot understand.


Unfortunately, the revaluation of the purpose of food and its fair distribution probably will not come from the people who are presently making “unhealthy” profits on taste addictions. They justify their non-food scamming as simply supplying the demand, even though this demand was created by their multimillion-dollar advertising campaigns.


This sort of reasoning places the responsibility squarely on the people who have the most to gain from being supplied with more healthful products — you and me!


The fact is, in the marketplace of supply and demand, as long as the product is bought, that guarantees it will continue to be manufactured and marketed. But this also means that we have a choice — to say yes or no.


We can say no by refraining from buying non-nutritious, non-quality “plastic” fad foods, and say yes to buying wholesome, natural foods. In this sense, every time you buy or do not buy a product, you are registering to vote in the marketplace of supply and demand.


It may seem to you that this may have about as much effect on the world’s hunger situation as your voting for the President has on the world situation; but the fact is, individuals making such apparently insignificant choices do make a difference when there are enough of them. Consider the health food aisles that have appeared in supermarkets all over the country within the last few years.


It would be totally naïve and misleading for me to say or even imply that your cutting out the meat and junk food consumption from your diet will solve the world’s hunger problem and create a utopia on earth, because it won’t. The philosophy, politics and economics that affect world’s food distribution are far more complicated than that.


The medical evidence is clear, consistent and overwhelming. Vegetarians and vegans are far less likely to get cancer, heart disease, diabetes, or osteoporosis, and are far less likely to be overweight, have lots more stamina, consume far less pesticides in their food, and have superior immune systems.


The largest epidemiological study ever conducted – the China-Oxford-Cornell study found that those eating the amount of animal foods typical for Americans have 17 times the death rate from heart disease, and, for women, five times the rate of breast cancer, than those who get 5% or less of their protein from animal foods.


Meat contains 14 times the amount of pesticides as plant foods, since pesticides get concentrated as they move up to the food chain, and since they’re more easily stored in fatty tissues. In 1980, six years after the pesticide dieldrin was banned, the USDA destroyed 2 million packages of frozen turkey products contaminated with dieldrin. What’s worse is that such contamination can routinely occur without detection.


In 1974, the Fraud and Drug Administration found dieldrin in 85% of all dairy products and in 99.5% of the American people.


The Environmental Pollution Agency discovered that the breast milk of vegetarian women contained far fewer levels of pesticides than that of average Americans.


A study reported in the New England Journal of Medicine found that “The highest levels of contamination in the breast milk of vegetarian women were lower than the lowest level of contamination in non-vegetarian women. The mean vegetarian levels were only 1 to 2% as high as the average levels in the US”.


Nobody wants animals to suffer, but it’s easy to forget that when we eat them. And this is what we support. The easiest action a person can take to reduce animal suffering is to simply stop eating them.


Over 9 billion animals are killed for food every year in the US alone – a number greater than the entire human population of the planet.


What’s worse, modern agricultural methods mean that animals are raised in cramped confinement operations instead of the pastures that we have seen in our childhood picture books. This is a practice known as factory farming.


Chickens killed for their flesh in the United States are bred and drugged to grow so quickly that their hearts, lungs, and limbs often cannot keep up.


Hen’s used for eggs live 6 or 7 to a battery cage the size of a file drawer, thousands of chickens are stacked tier upon tier in huge, filthy warehouses.


Cattle are castrated, their horns are ripped out of their heads, and third degree burns from branding are inflicted upon them, all without pain relief.


Cows used for their milk or drugged and bred to produce unnatural amounts of milk, to have their babies stolen from them shortly after birth and sent to notoriously cruel veal farms so that humans can drink the calves’ milk.


Mother pigs on factory farms are confined to crates so small that they are unable to turn around or even lie down comfortably.


Fish on aqua farms spend their entire lives in cramped, filthy enclosures, and many suffer from parasitic infections, diseases, and debilitating injuries. Conditions on some farms are so horrendous that’s 40% of the fish may die before farmers can kill and package them for food.


Turkeys’ beaks & toes are burned off with a hot blade. Many suffer heart failure or debilitating leg pain, often becoming crippled under the weight of their genetically manipulated and drugged bodies.


For some, vegetarianism and veganism are easy ways to refuse to participate in this cruelty!


Eating vegetarian saves more land, energy, and water then any other choice you can make. That’s because livestock eat several times more grain then they produce as meat. So, raising livestock uses:


several times as much land to grow the grain to feed them


several times as much energy to harvest the grain and transport it


several times as much water to grow the grain and to water the animals


several times as much pesticides, etc.


Worldwide petroleum reserves would be exhausted in 11 years if the rest of the world ate like the US. The least energy-efficient plant food is 10 times as efficient as the most efficient meat food. A nationwide switch to a vegan diet would allow us to cut our oil imports by 60% or more.


Over half the water used in the US is used to grow feed for livestock. It takes 100 times as much water to produce meat than to produce wheat. The water required to produce a days diet for a typical American is 5000 gallons. It’s 1200 gallons for vegetarians and 300 gallons for vegans. Compared to a vegan diet, three days of the typical American diet requires as much water as you use to shower all year assuming you shower everyday.


US livestock produces 250,000 pounds of waste per second – 20 times as much as humans. A large feedlot produces as much waste as a large city, but without a sewage system. Animal waste washes into rivers and lakes causes increased nitrates, phosphates, ammonia, and bacteria, and decreases the oxygen content. This kills plant and animal life. The meat industry accounts for three times as much harmful organic waste as the rest of the industries in the US combined.


It takes 10 times as much land to produce food for an average American compared to a vegan. An acre of land can produce 20,000 pounds of potatoes, but only 165 pounds of meat. In the US, 260 million acres of forest have been destroyed for use as agricultural land to support the meat diet. That’s over 1 acre per person. Since 1967, the rate of deforestation has been one acre every 5 seconds. For every acre cleared for urban development, 7 acres are cleared to graze animals or grow the feed for them.


About 85% of topsoil loss is directly associated with raising livestock. The US Department of Assholes says that crop productivity is down 70% as a result up topsoil loss, and it takes nature 500 years to build an inch of topsoil. Vegan diets make less than 5% of the demands on the soil as meat-based diets.


Making the change in the way we live our personal lives can be the beginning of a real commitment to work on another level to help solve the world hunger problem, beyond just spouting slogans or intellectually nodding our approval while living as hypocrites whose real lives contradict real solutions.


Is change easy? For some yes, for some no. But we all have to look at the big picture to see what is of the utmost importance. If the dictates of your tongue and your senses are more important and the health of the planet, you will be content to stay the way you are. If your consciousness is such that you care about the world you live in but you might want to consider these things to help it stay the way it is until Monsanto, Dow, DuPont, and Syngenta start opening Soylent Green factories.


Besides making wise choices about the basic activity of eating, we can also make choices in so many other little ways in our daily lives: growing more of our own food simply by growing sprouts, hanging clothes on the line instead of using the dryer, walking places when driving isn’t necessary, recycling what we can, refraining from buying things we don’t need, etc. Such choices will not only make our lives happier and healthier, but will ensure the health and well being of future generations as well.


In this new year of 2017 where we have made endless resolutions like we do every year, but don’t follow, why not make one now that has far more reaching value, quality and meaning than any other? Eat wisely!


Aloha!


Sources:
www.countinganimals.com
www.vegansouls.com
www.naturallysavvy.com
www.tinybuddha.com
www.peta.org
www.jw.org
www.medicalexpress.com


To learn more about Hesh, listen to and read hundreds of health related radio shows and articles, and learn about how to stay healthy and reverse degenerative diseases through the use of organic sulfur crystals and the most incredible bee pollen ever, please visit www.healthtalkhawaii.com, or email me at heshgoldstein@gmail.com or call me at (808) 258-1177. Since going on the radio in 1981 these are the only products I began to sell because they work.
Oh yeah, going to www.asanediet.com will allow you to read various parts of my book – “A Sane Diet For An Insane World”, containing a wonderful comment by Mike Adams.
In Hawaii, the TV stations interview local authors about the books they write and the newspapers all do book reviews. Not one would touch “A Sane Diet For An Insane World”. Why? Because it goes against their advertising dollars.



Think Before You Eat

5 Mart 2017 Pazar

NHS poll finds public think service getting worse

Growing numbers of Britons think the NHS is getting worse and fear for its future, a survey has found.


Ipsos Mori polling last month found that 57% of people believe that the NHS’s ability to deliver the care and services it provides worsened over the last six months, up from 52% in January. One in four (24%) said it had got “much worse”, 33% “slightly worse”. Only 8% said “better”. The same proportion – 57% – were pessimistic about the NHS’s future. Asked how they expected it to fare in the next few years, 37% said “worse” and another 20% “much worse”; 21% said better.


The polling may reflect the NHS’s worst winter crisis in years. Record numbers of patients were forced to endure long waits – often on a trolley – and more than half of hospitals went on alert because they could not cope.


The over-75s were the only group in which more people thought the NHS would get better (41%) than worse (35%). Conservatives were less pessimistic (50%) than Labour voters (61%).


“This survey shows the public is realising that the NHS is buckling under the strain of meeting rising demand for services and maintaining standards of care,” said Chris Ham, chief executive of the King’s Fund health thinktank.



Chris Ham of the King


Chris Ham, chief executive of the King’s Fund health thinktank. Photograph: Frank Baron for the Guardian

A separate international study by Ipsos Mori found that Britons are more pessimistic about their healthcare system than people in 22 other countries. Almost half (47%) of Britons believe the quality of the healthcare they and their families can access will get worse in coming years.


However, Britons are also among the most positive internationally about the care they currently receive. Some 69% say that they and their family get good quality healthcare, well above the 47% seen across the 23 countries.


“Britain’s love for the NHS is one of our defining characteristics, and we remain among the most positive countries in the world about the quality of care we receive. But we’re also the most worried for the future of the service. This fear has been growing and is now at record levels”, said Kate Duxbury, Ipsos Mori’s head of healthcare research.


A spokesman for NHS England said: “It’s welcome news that a far higher proportion of people in Britain than in other countries rate the quality of their healthcare highly. And it’s noticeable that those people who use the NHS most and who therefore know most about it – the over-75s – are in fact the most optimistic about its future.”


He pointed to the very high scores recorded by 12 different types of NHS services in December under the “friends and family” ratings test. Dental care got the highest patient satisfaction rating, at 97%, while even the lowest scores – 86% for both A&E and mental health care – were still high.


Meanwhile, doctors and hospital bosses want some of the £700m-£1bn of extra government money expected to be given to social care in this week’s budget to be used to help cover the cost of “bed blocking”. They want to ensure that local councils do not use the cash to fill other holes in their budgets and ensure that any extra funding benefits both social care and the NHS.


The call has come from NHS Providers, which speaks for hospitals, and medical royal colleges representing A&E doctors, surgeons and hospital physicians. They want Philip Hammond, the chancellor, to make the money conditional on councils spending it on people who have had a spell in hospital, so that it reduces the 723,000 bed-days a year lost because patients who are medically fit to leave cannot be safely discharged for lack of social care support.


“If extra money is coming into social care it should either be spent on local authority packages of care or, if this doesn’t happen, on the alternative – the cost of keeping patients in hospital,” the four organisations said, in a joint statement to the Observer.


“Any solution to benefit NHS patients must be clear, simple and not capable of being manipulated. Local authorities would receive more funding if they support the NHS and less if they don’t.”



NHS poll finds public think service getting worse

19 Şubat 2017 Pazar

Compulsive behaviour? It may make more sense than you think

There are endless motivations for human behaviour, from the basic drives for food and sex to more complicated ones, such as compassion, envy and anger. But none of these explain behaviours that we feel irresistibly, often inexplicably, driven to engage in – compulsions.


Compulsions come from a need that is desperate and tortured. They may bring relief, but they bring little enjoyment, and while one part of our brain desperately wishes to stop them, another is afraid of stopping.


We describe as “compulsive” someone who reads, tweets, steals, cleans, watches birds, lies, blogs, shops, checks Facebook, eats or Snapchats etc not only frequently but with the urgency of one who is not fully in control of their behaviour.


Compulsions, according to a growing body of scientific evidence, are a response to anxiety. We grab hold of any behaviour that offers relief by providing even an illusion of control. Against tectonic social and economic forces that feel as uncontrollable as King Canute’s tides, we seize on anything that might restore a sense of agency.




I used to view compulsions as foreign and almost frightening




I used to view life-altering compulsions as foreign and almost frightening. But in the course of my research, two things happened. First, when I got to know people who were compulsive, their behaviour didn’t seem unreasonable at all. It seemed like an understandable response to angst that would otherwise eat them alive. Second, I realised that although people with the most extreme compulsions seem like outliers, the anxiety that drives them to those extremes is universal – and underlies milder compulsions, too. Actively behaving to allay anxiety is a deep and ancient impulse.


Over any year, 1% of us suffer from obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Even more of us find ourselves in the grip of a compulsion that falls short of something that is disabling enough to qualify as a mental disorder – in fact, some compulsions are adaptive, helping us lead our lives or perform our jobs more effectively.


Like many people, maybe you feel compelled to reach for your smart phone as soon as you wake up in the morning. Fortunately a growing number of experts have begun to succeed in distinguishing addictions from poor impulse control from compulsions.


An addiction begins with a flash of pleasure overlaid by an itch for danger; it’s fun to gamble or to drink, and it also puts you at risk. Impulsive behaviours involve acting without planning or even thought, driven by an urge for immediate gratification.


Compulsions, in contrast, are all about avoiding unpleasant outcomes. They are repetitive behaviours we engage in to alleviate the angst brought on by the possibility of negative consequences. But the actual behaviour is often unpleasant – or at least not particularly rewarding, especially after umpteen rounds of it. At its simplest, the anxiety takes the form of the thought: “If I don’t do this, something terrible will happen.” If I do not check my fiancé’s web history, I will not know whether he is cheating. If I do not religiously organise my cupboards, my home will be engulfed in chaos.


Underlying every compulsion is the need to avoid what causes you pain or angst. Compulsive behaviour is not necessarily a mental disorder. Some forms of it can be, and people in its clutches deserve to be diagnosed and helped. But many are expressions of psychological needs we all feel: to be at peace and in control, to feel connected and to matter. And if those are mental illnesses, we’re all crazy.


Can’t. Just. Stop. An Investigation of Compulsions by Sharon Begley is published by Robinson Books at £14.99



Compulsive behaviour? It may make more sense than you think

16 Ocak 2017 Pazartesi

"Can I speak to a serial killer?": there"s more to NHS comms than you"d think

“Can I speak to Peter Sutcliffe?”


The journalist was perfectly serious. I was working in communications at Broadmoor hospital and he saw me as a route to people he thought were patients there. He wanted Sutcliffe’s “take” on a series of recent “Ripper style” murders in the Ipswich area. I explained – while trying to not audibly gasp – that Broadmoor could not confirm who its patients were, let alone put them up for press interviews.


Every so often, an FOI request asks how much the NHS spends on “communications”. The easy headline is that the NHS needs real doctors, not spin doctors. But it is only when you look at the range of activities that communications cover that you wonder if the real spin doctors are those writing the story.


To some, communications is just shorthand for public relations and spin. In fact, responding to media queries (and FOI requests) – which the NHS is rightly expected to do as a public service – is a tiny proportion of our work.


Much of it is about making sure staff know what’s going on in their organisation, that information for patients is clear and easy to access and that MPs, local councils, regulators and community organisations are kept informed and involved in what the NHS is doing.


I have worked at a large trust where there was no system in place for briefing staff on the wards about things they needed to know. I’ve worked in places where every department was producing its own, homemade newsletter that was badly written, misspelt and missed out the information patients needed. I have had to advocate for people’s right to know about changes to local services and to develop plans to reach people who don’t read newspapers, rarely visit their GP and certainly don’t attend NHS meetings.


Part of the job is to manage press and public interest in the event of a major incident. This involves careful planning, working with other emergency services. How do you keep people informed, including your own staff, concerned members of the public and relatives of those impacted? Where do they all go in a busy working hospital? And major incidents come in different shapes and sizes. If a high-profile patient dies in your hospital, you need to be able to manage not just a potential media scrum disrupting your hospital, but the needs of the family too. I recall liaising with one very high-profile family after their son died, because they wanted to visit the hospital morgue without being accosted by the press.


Then there is the navigation issue. How does a person find their way around a hospital, let alone the whole NHS? Part of our job is to make sure that patients can get to the service they need as quickly as possible. How do we reach every potential patient to achieve this? How do we describe different services to the public? (spoiler: not always very helpfully).


I don’t deny that the odd Amateur Alistair surfaces, desperate to turn their job running comms for a cottage hospital into The Thick of It. But they are a rare breed. The majority of us see our job as helping the public, the media and a huge range of stakeholders to understand how the NHS works, the challenges it is facing and how they might be able to help. If you think about the huge numbers of services we provide, the many different communities we serve and the amount of information that implies, this is far from easy.


In recent years we have seen the beginnings of a sea change in the way the NHS talks to patients and the public. Expertise in consultation and community engagement is increasingly valued, not just because these things are required of the NHS, but because we know that involving patients in the development of services improves those services no end.


Some of the best conversations I have had about the NHS have been with the public. Most people understand the challenges presented by an ageing society, flat funding and increasingly expensive treatments. While they will not always agree with each other – or the NHS – on the best solutions, I am yet to attend an NHS public engagement event where I didn’t hear several good ideas. Of course, there is the odd moment – one man went around each person on a table, asked them their background and announced none of them were as qualified as him to talk about “his NHS” – but we should not underestimate the positive contribution patients and the public can make.


If you would like to write a blogpost for Views from the NHS frontline, read our guidelines and get in touch by emailing sarah.johnson@theguardian.com.


Join the Healthcare Professionals Network to read more pieces like this. And follow us on Twitter (@GdnHealthcare) to keep up with the latest healthcare news and views.



"Can I speak to a serial killer?": there"s more to NHS comms than you"d think

8 Ocak 2017 Pazar

Buddha branding is everywhere – but what do Buddhists think?

New year, new tenuously legitimate diet rooted in spirituality. The Buddha diet is one of January’s horde. Ostensibly rooted in sensible, restrictive eating, it’s also one of the latest examples of consumer society co-opting asceticism to sell stuff. The book Buddha’s Diet is climbing bestseller lists; Buddha bowls, the once left-field food-truck lunches, are coming to Marks & Spencer (branded as nourish bowls); and the 15-strong chain of Buddha Bars has just celebrated its 20th anniversary. Nothing, it seems, is safe from this blasphemous gravy train.


“It’s hardly surprising that people are trying to sell things attached to the concept of Buddhism,” says Singhamanas, who was ordained into the Triratna Buddhist order in 2012 and now works at the London Buddhist Centre. “It’s the idea that something can give you peace, ease, energy – something mysterious, something holy but not religious.”


Semantically, it’s a logical next step on from mindfulness, which has mutated from meditative practice to a post-lunch app, and gone mass. Accountability lies with the “clever PR gurus” who have cottoned on to this, says Singhamanas. “In this economic system, all it takes is someone to apply that word to something and it suddenly seems very attractive.”


Tucked away, though, there is method here. The co-author of Buddha’s Diet, Dan Zigmond, is an ordained monk, and intermittent fasting has always been key to Buddhism. Given our propensity towards extremes “Buddha’s ‘middle way’ of moderation might have particular relevance” now, he suggests. It’s a good diet: avoid processed foods, eat more protein, dine slowly and not late. There are even cheat days when you can gorge, so forgiving is the religion.



a Buddha bowl


Going mainstream … a Buddha bowl

In fairness, Buddhism has long had healthy eating nailed. The Buddha effigy – cuddly, pot-bellied – is actually a 1,000-year-old Chinese monk. “The real Buddha was quite fit,” says Singhamanas. Equally, Buddha Bowls (vegetarian medleys in, yes, bowls) have authenticity, being loosely based on the practice of ōryōki – meditative eating – and the bowls are modelled on Buddha’s head.


As you might expect from a Buddhist, Singhamanas is relatively tolerant about the rebranding. “Most Buddhists are pretty easy-going – I haven’t heard anyone pontificating over M&S ,” he says, “but it might be a little misleading.”


He is more offended by the chain of Buddha Bars. Named, it is thought, because the original space was not dissimilar to a temple and the music played to customers considered to be “Zen-like”, there was a small outcry, some protests in Jakarta and blacking out of the bar’s CDs in Dubai over fears of idolatry. To Singhamanas “it’s not ethical. Buddhism promotes clarity and awareness, something the alcohol industry isn’t exactly behind.” Equally, consumerism is contradictory to the basic tenet of Buddhism: the idea of ending suffering through detachment. James Shaheen, editor of the Buddhist Review, agrees: “If you’re selling something a buyer doesn’t really need, it helps to imbue it with some promise of spiritual fulfilment or peace. It works for the seller. The buyer often regrets it.”


So why now, why 2017? One could blame post-Brexit vote/pre-Trump anxiety. “Judging by the number of people coming through the doors now, I’d say people aren’t looking forward to the new year,” says Singhamanas. “With regards to politics and the environment, they are feeling apprehensive and are looking for something to ground them.” He’s sceptical as to whether a healthy snack from M&S can save us from existential crisis: “If a bowl were able to give you all that – if it were that easy – I wouldn’t be doing what I’m doing.”



Buddha branding is everywhere – but what do Buddhists think?

Changing the way you think | Dan Glaser

Many of us may already be struggling with our New Year’s resolutions, but at least we can take comfort in modern neuroscience. Forty years ago, we’d have been less hopeful.


Back then neuroscience would say that the brain was fixed after early childhood. One famous experiment in the 1960s showed that if kittens were placed in a visually deprived environment in the days and weeks after birth, their sight as older cats would be impaired.


Similar experiences later in life did not have this effect, which fitted with the idea that what happens in early childhood changes our brains fundamentally, but they’re fixed after that point.


However, since then, more evidence has been found for the growth of new nerve cells in adult brains. Knowing this may help us to break bad habits and make new ones. So neuroscience has caught up with common sense and accepts the idea that new brain circuits can form as a result of experience. And if you take one thing away from this column, it’s because something in the structure of your brain has changed.


Dr Daniel Glaser is director of the Science Gallery at King’s College London



Changing the way you think | Dan Glaser

30 Aralık 2016 Cuma

Eight charts that show 2016 wasn"t as bad as you think

2016 is likely to be remembered as an annus horribilis for so many reasons that it’s tempting to think everything is doomed.


But things are not always as they seem. There are silver linings. You just have to look hard to find them.


Death in conflict


Overall, 2016 looks set to have slightly fewer deaths through armed conflict than 2015, when 167,000 people died. Hardly numbers to celebrate.


But narrow the focus and pockets of progress can be found. According to the International Institute for Strategic Studies, the death toll from the war with Boko Haram in Nigeria has fallen sharply, as Nigerian government troops retake territory.



Boko Haram.


Boko Haram. Photograph: AP

“The group’s operational capacity within Nigeria was weakened,” notes Anastasia Voronkova, IISS research fellow for armed conflict. “At least 4,500 civilians held captive by the group were rescued in 2015 alone; another around 5,000 people were freed by June 2016. 2016 fatalities are expected to be noticeably lower than the 11,000 recorded in 2015.”


Nigeria death toll

Death tolls are also expected to be lower from internal conflicts in the Philippines, Myanmar and India, according to the IISS. Mark Rice-Oxley


Emissions


Carbon is flatlining, and our planet has breathing space. After more than a century and a half of nearly unbroken growth, the quantity of greenhouse gases we pour into the atmosphere each year has stalled for the third year running. Burning fossil fuels and chopping down forests released about 40 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide last year, roughly the same amount as in the previous two years.


What is more, this plateau in emissions is taking place against a background of quickening economic growth, showing that increasing prosperity and lifting people out of poverty need not come at the expense of the climate.



A disused mine in Pumarabule, Spain.


A disused mine in Pumarabule, Spain, where the struggling coal mining industry is on its way out. Photograph: David Ramos/Getty Images

These are big reasons to be cheerful, and we need them. We are coming to the end of the hottest year ever recorded. The Arctic ice cap is 20C above its normal winter temperatures, a heating that scientists are calling “literally off the charts”, and may soon result in more rapid melting than anything yet seen. Donald Trump is hellbent on destroying the Paris agreement, boosting the coal industry and defunding Nasa’s ground-breaking climate research in favour of sending people into space. But at least our global warming emissions are abating. It has only taken 25 years to achieve.


Carbon emissions

Stalling emissions should also spell better health, because coal burning in particular pollutes the air with lung-shredding particles and choking chemicals. Finished celebrating? Good. There’s work to do. Flatlining emissions are not enough. Carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere are still at the highest levels since humans first walked the earth. That invisible stock of carbon in the air is what causes warming, so even if we stopped burning fossil fuels tomorrow the climate would continue to change because of the greenhouse gases already there.


We are not going to stop burning fossil fuels tomorrow, and emissions need to come down by as much as 80% to have a chance of keeping warming under control. That will take decades. Every molecule of carbon dioxide we release stays in the air for up to 100 years, all the while trapping heat on the planet’s surface. Every tonne of carbon emitted puts the goal of halting climate change just a bit further out of reach. We are not out of the rapidly dwindling woods yet.


For now, we still have a chance of saving the planet from runaway warming, if we act fast to save energy and invest in clean sources. So cheer the carbon slowdown and put up more windmills. Fiona Harvey, environment correspondent


Crime


While violent crime ticked up in the UK in 2016, the overall level of offences continued its long-term decline to the lowest level since 1981. The Office for National Statistics said there were an estimated 6.5m incidents in the year to June 2016.


crime

Various reasons are given for the long-term decline: better security against car and home theft, the drop in the jobless claimant count and a broader sociological shift towards greater civility in richer countries.



Cybercrime.


Cybercrime. Photograph: Cultura/Rex/Shutterstock

But police also report a rise in the number of reported rapes, while hate crime increased after the Brexit referendum in June and cybercrime poses an ever greater threat.


Connectivity


Connectivity is taken for granted in the western world, where smartphone and internet use rise inexorably year on year.


Now there are strong signs that this take-up is at last being mirrored in poorer parts of the world, with positive outcomes for growth, health and democratic participation.


Africa in particular is experiencing the sharpest growth anywhere of smartphone proliferation: by 2020 there will be more than 700m smartphone connections in Africa – more than twice the projected number in North America, according to GSMA, an association of phone operators. In Nigeria alone in 2016, an estimated 16 smartphones are sold every minute.


smartphones

The mobile industry will account for 8% of GDP by 2020 – double what it will be in the rest of the world. And internet penetration is rising faster than anywhere else as costs of data and devices fall.


Population


Could 2016 go down as the year that the great global population surge finally showed signs of slowing?


The number of people around the world increases by about 80 million every year, and forecasts predict that the global population will continue to mount through this century, to hit about 11 billion people by 2100.


But much depends on behaviour and attitudes in parts of the world that have yet to experience the sudden drop in birthrates that swept across rich countries in the three decades after the second world war.


In January, the latest figures published by the UN showed more women than ever are now using some form of contraception. Some 64% of women aged between 15 and 49 who are married or living with a partner are now using traditional or modern forms of family planning, up from 36% in 1970.


Contraception

Poorer regions of the world – particularly Asia and Africa, where access to contraception has been a barrier to development – have witnessed the fastest pace of growth. The UN predicts that Africa, a continent with the largest demand for contraceptives but the worst access to services, will record the highest rates of growth over the next 15 years.


In November, the Family Planning 2020 initiative reported that the number of women using contraceptives in its 69 target countries had leapt by 30 million in the past four years alone.



A reproductive health volunteer gives a condom demonstration to a young family in Kasese, Uganda.


A reproductive health volunteer gives a condom demonstration to a young family in Kasese, Uganda. Photograph: Jake Lyell/Alamy

This is not only good news for women and their families: the increase in family planning could cut projections of population growth by as much as 1 billion over the coming years. Jagdish Upadhyay, of the UN population fund, said if by 2030 the average family size was down by the equivalent of one child, then by 2030 the world population would be approximately 8 billion rather than 9 billion. Liz Ford


Homicide


Murder rates have been in decline in western democracies for years, but had persisted at stubbornly high levels in parts of central America. However, 2016 could go down as a good year in El Salvador, for years one of the most murderous places in the world.


The July-September period produced a year-on-year drop in homicides of almost 50%, according to data gathered for the Guardian by the IISS.


Death toll

“This decline can be attributed to the government’s tightened security policies at prisons, the creation of a new paramilitary force comprising 600 members of the military and 400 police officers, as well as a negotiated truce between the leaders of the three main gangs,” said Anastasia Voronkova at the IISS.



Gang members at maximum security prison in El Salvador.


Gang members are escorted after their arrival at the maximum security prison in Zacatecoluca El Salvador. Photograph: Marvin Recinos/AFP/Getty Images

“The timing of the announcement by the gangs seemed to match the downward homicide trend: homicides fell by 42% in April 2016 in comparison with March [from 611 to 353], and have remained stable since then.”


Disease


The standout news in 2016 was that Sri Lanka had become the latest country to be declared malaria free. More than 30 countries that are collectively home to some 2 billion people are hopeful that they might follow suit in the next four years.


Malaria

The task of reducing the toll of malaria in sub-Saharan Africa, which has 90% of cases and 92% of deaths, is hard and needs more resources. But 2016 brought good news from other quarters: the World Health Organisation declared that measles had been eradicated from the Americas; death rates fell in the developed world from some forms of cancer, and the number of people getting Aids treatments continued to rise, from negligible levels in 2000 towards a target of 30m by 2020.


The global assault on infectious diseases has led to ever longer lifespans: life expectancy is on average 10 years longer in 2016 than it was in 1980.


Poverty


The number of people living in extreme poverty has yet to be estimated for 2016, but the long-term trend is a happy one, describing steep decline.


Numbers have more than halved since 1993, despite a growth in the world population of almost 1.9 billion.


Poverty

Statistically, as economies grow and middle classes expand, almost 50 million people escape poverty every year in net terms — a population equivalent to Colombia or Korea. Put even more simply, every single day over the past 25 years, the number of people living in extreme poverty has declined by 137,000.


According to the newest figures, the east Asia and Pacific region accounted for the greatest reduction in extreme poverty over the 23-year measuring period, based on a $ 1.90-per-day poverty line.


In just one year alone – 2012 to 2013 – the number of poor in east Asia and the Pacific declined by 71 million, while in south Asia the number of poor dropped by 37 million.


Declining poverty in extreme terms has shown significant regional fluctuations, however. In 2013, Sub-Saharan Africa accounted for nearly 51% of the global poor (389m people), but in 1990, it was east Asia and the Pacific that accounted for half of the global poor.


While the UN aims to eradicate extreme poverty by 2030, the World Bank report warns that economic growth has to be more equally distributed – in other words, the rich can’t keep getting richer – and says that extreme poverty trends depend on the economic success of Sub-Saharan Africa.



Eight charts that show 2016 wasn"t as bad as you think