solidarity etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
solidarity etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

2 Şubat 2017 Perşembe

On Time to Talk day, solidarity on mental health would be better than sympathy | Mark Brown

If you have been inundated today with people on Facebook, Twitter and daytime television imploring you to discuss mental health, that is because it is Time to Talk day. Mired in politeness and caution, people with mental health difficulties across the UK have gently requested kindness and understanding. Perhaps you’ve made the right noises and nodded sympathetically. You’ll probably feel you did the right thing, but unfortunately your compassion will not be enough to change anything.


In his novel Things Can Only Get Better, John O’Farrell recalls having the Jamaican poet Michael Smith as a guest at an early 80s university radical poetry evening. Afterwards Smith was turned away from a club for being black. Back at a student house Smith exclaimed: “I want justice!” to be answered by a young woman saying “I can’t give you justice but I can give you a hug.” This is where we’re at with mental health in the UK.


Anyone can endorse nice sentiments. Theresa May raised the issue of the importance of such conversations just last month. But the fact is that people with mental health difficulties often experience shorter, poorer, unhappier lives. In the UK, people diagnosed with schizophrenia run the risk of dying 20 years earlier than the average British person. Those who have psychological problems during childhood earn 25% less than those who didn’t by the age of 50.


Experiencing mental health issues often leads to exclusion. You either take yourself away from others or others take themselves away from you. Suddenly relationships you thought you were driving career into the central reservation at high speed in a tangle of steel and glass. Work, school or college might go wrong. But none of these things cause exclusion. How society treats and stigmatises a person when that happens is what causes exclusion.


If you care about people with mental health difficulties then you have to be prepared to make changes, not just to your attitude but in the way you want your country to work. As a starting point, it would be wise to stop telling people to seek help and support that you know isn’t there. Austerity has gutted our communities of organisations that can make life liveable with mental health issues. Admit that it is not mental ill health that plunges people into crisis, it is the lack of support, protection and assistance that does that.


Mental health treatment is underfunded, so society needs to start paying for it. If people have to leave work because they are in distress do not punish them by forcing them into poverty and then make them beg for the tiniest crumbs of financial support in the form of benefits.


The country we live in does not give second chances and is unlikely to do so without pressure. Opportunities for education, opportunities to find a comfortable place to live, opportunities to progress: all take investment and the political will to pay for them instead of something else. If you really care about people with mental health difficulties think about what you would be prepared to give up in return for their safety, their security and for them to thrive.


We talk about fighting cuts but the money to achieve equality for people with mental health difficulties has never been there. We need to be fighting for a future where supporting and protecting the lives of those experiencing mental distress is not an optional act of kindness but an obligation hard-wired into all of structures and thinking. The man on the street might say that sounds like special treatment, like whining instead of pulling your socks up. But the man on the street will keep saying that until we seize the political initiative. Or until his brain flips over one night and he can’t trust his own thoughts and feelings and suddenly he discovers the world doesn’t work for him any more.


Being in distress hurts. Finding you are treated unequally at such a time even more so. So it’s understandable that people will try to end the pain of exclusion by asking politely to be let back into “normal life” without any fuss. The imbalance of power remains when a dominant majority thinks it is doing a favour by bestowing benevolent and charitable understanding upon an insecure minority. But until that majority is prepared to alter structures, laws and practices that they benefit in favour of those they discriminate against, all we have is warm sentiments.


On this Time to Talk day, fight the rosy glow you’ll feel at having listened to someone’s hard life and remember it is possible to be a lovely person in a discriminatory system. Reflect on what you have heard then think about what must change. Because while your sympathy is welcome, your solidarity and political voice as part of the dominant majority will go further.



On Time to Talk day, solidarity on mental health would be better than sympathy | Mark Brown

10 Mart 2014 Pazartesi

A scream of solidarity to my fellow ladies everywhere | Cara Park

Is mise Cara Park.


I am used to speaking publicly but I am a little nervous about this speech as it is so essential to me.


I have constantly desired to do this and I am not sure if I will get the opportunity once again so if you could humour me, I want to let out a scream.


A scream of disappointment.


A scream of solidarity to my fellow lady who are not able to express themselves in this kind of a vogue, who are suffering injustice and discrimination.


If you would join in a cry/a keen for other women who are suffering.


Thank you.


I stand ahead of you today as a female unfree, in spite of the area of my birth here in the European Union, a colony of the British empire, the island of Ireland, Eire.


This is since I do not have the identical rights as my sisters in other elements of these conglomerate nations. I am officially a citizen of the United Kingdom but the same freedom of reproductive decision is not awarded to me.


An bhfuil sin cothrom? [Is this fair?]


I was going to put on a chastity belt right now as a symbol of sexual slavery but I do not want to use a gimmicky prop to signify a severe act of oppression towards the female population of this island.


I am wearing quite little clothing.


By dressing like this, does that right away make me a “slut”, a “slag”, a “dolly bird”, a “whore”, a “loose” woman?


Am I letting the side down by sporting lipstick, fake tan, dyeing my hair, exhibiting my nipples?


I am expressing my femininity.


My sexuality.


My youth.


My body.


Does that make me superficial?


Need to I be in a position to dress how I like and not face discrimination?


This could seem like a superficial, trivial matter, but it is not.


Men and females have fought and some have died in the suffragist struggle to award me this kind of freedom of expression.


Other women in the planet are not so lucky.


Some men in this society are not so lucky.


This is a symptom of a really severe difficulty.


Branding individuals.


Putting them in boxes.


Identifying with symbols.


Flags, groups, teams, sides.


What side are you on?


I am a solution of the two the Protestant and Catholic communities.


I relate to the two and belong to neither.


I am not a republican. I am not a unionist. I am a humanist.


I feel we are so distracted by tribal rituals that we overlook to address the genuine inequalities, oppression, racism, gender discrimination that some of our laws uphold.


For instance, the gay blood ban.


Discriminatory.


The fact that I can not talk my native language in a court area.


Discriminatory.


An bhfuil sin cothrom?


The truth that I am objectified, vilified if I appear overtly sexual.


Sex is a dirty word, we do not speak about sex right here. Hush, hush.


Well possibly we need to.


Intercourse.


I have intercourse.


I am a attractive girl.


I explained it.


I am not ashamed.


We all are born of intercourse.


Hiding the reality helps no a single.


Probably if we have been much more open about sex, if it was not deemed a mortal sin and young children have been offered suitable, informative sex education, then so numerous rapists would not have gotten away with sexually abusing our ladies, males and young children more than the years.


It is the shame that has guarded rapists and sadists who have carried out hideous sexual acts against victims.


The shame of confessing, the dirty strategies, the lifetimes ruined by abuse.


We need to educate our children and remove the associated guilt of the victims.


End the tyranny of sexual shaming.


The primary point I wished to raise is about a woman’s right to select.


The Offences Towards the Particular person Act which criminalises females for taking their fertility in their very own hands.


The patriarchal laws and the predominantly male enforcers of mentioned archaic acts of parliaments condemn us criminals if we terminate our pregnancies.


We are forced to break the law, go to other components of the Uk on illicit journeys, incorporating secrecy and criminality to presently traumatic scenarios.


We are forced to lie to medical doctors.


Conceal our shame.


An bhfuil sin cothrom?


We can argue that this is because we are in Ireland, an outstanding place historically, a Christian country. If we are to attribute the suppression of female autonomy as a upholding of fundamentalist Christian values, let me inform or remind you that abortion is not pointed out in the Bible.


It is a social construction, a lot like the compulsory hair covering in Muslim countries. Burqas, hijabs, gloves are not talked about in the Qur’an either.


One more act of suppression on the female type.


Conceal sexuality.


But the oppression of girls by refusal to apply the Abortion Act 1967 is probably the 1 level that the opposing conservative events can agree on.


An bhfuil sin cothrom?


I am calling for the patriarchal laws to be transformed and affirmative action taken. We are in a lucky place here in Ireland in contrast with other regimes, in spite of dealing with a lifetime in prison for having an abortion. We need to use the relative freedom we possess, like the freedom of speech, to vocalise our struggle and help other individuals much less lucky.


We must not grow to be complacent! The struggle is not in excess of! Carry on the fight for equality in the encounter of informal misogyny, bodily misogyny and, most importantly, resist and revolt against misogyny by the state.


Equal rights for girls means equal rights for all! Continue the suffrage, assistance other ladies, do not be complicit in the commodification of the female kind, do not judge other ladies in how they dress, who they have sex with, their sense of humour, the books they have read through etc. We have to unite as collective force and fight the patriarchal powers as an alternative of dividing ourselves into feminist sub-groups.


Do not let the superficial age we live in divide and conquer us, unify, organise, protest, demonstrate, enjoy your neighbours, celebrate distinctions. We owe it to our suffragist brothers and sisters who have fought for the rights we have right now.


Make abortion cost-free, protected and legal.


Corp s’agam, Ré s’agam. My body, my option.


Equal rights for all.


• This is the text of a speech provided at an International Women’s Day event at the Stormont assembly



A scream of solidarity to my fellow ladies everywhere | Cara Park