Cooper etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
Cooper etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

26 Ekim 2016 Çarşamba

The rhetoric around obesity is toxic. So I created a new language for fat people | Charlotte Cooper

There are lots of words used to describe people such as me. Medics and their allies will use some Latin or Greek to make their language appear authoritative and scientific. According to them I am obese, or someone requiring bariatric intervention. By extension, in newspapers I am part of an anonymous population blob known as “the obese”.


If I go shopping for clothes I might be called plus size. If I meet someone who finds someone with a body like mine shameful, I might be euphemistically described as big or large. Others might try to spin this shame into something more positive and pretty, like curvy. If someone tries to translate my work, they might use words such as gordo, dicke, grasso, grande. In some places there might not be words for me, either because no language exists, or because some people relate to me through a lexicon of disapproving looks and disgusted sounds.


I like to call myself, and be called, fat. This is simple and descriptive and it feels powerful to reclaim a word that is frequently used pejoratively. I am a fat activist, which is a term that can mean many things, but for me it means that I think fat is a political subject.


Fat is typically framed as a health problem but health is not apolitical, as bodies of work in the social sciences have come to reveal. Debates about the NHS, and fat people being held responsible for funding crises, are just one area in which fat is a political subject. The social hatred and scapegoating of fat people can also be seen as political.


In my most recent book, Fat Activism: A Radical Social Movement, I argue that fat activism can be anything done by anyone for any reason. It is not necessarily about self-acceptance, improving health, developing self-love or addressing stigma – though that can be part of it. It can be as much about joining organisations as tweeting; as going to a fat clothes-swap as writing and sharing a poem; as having a conversation with someone as presenting a paper at a conference. It can be weird, illegible, ambiguous and antisocial. There is no singular way of being a fat activist.




I think the experience of being fat is valuable. This is heresy to those who think fat people should not exist




In calling myself fat I am drawing on a feminist practice of naming things in order to bring them into being. This means naming myself, on my own terms, and using language to define the world around me as I experience it. I do this because I think the experience of being fat is valuable. This is heresy to those who think fat people should not exist. But the view from the margins illuminates a lot about the shadow side of conformity, norms, and fears concerning embodiment and difference, and how these are manipulated for power and profit.


Earlier this year I published a homemade dictionary of fat activist words and concepts. I wanted to subvert the language of medicine and public health to give readers a playful glimpse of a subculture. Here are some examples.


Alliteration


A literary device that is irresistible to people writing about fat, especially journalists: piling on the pounds, fat fighters, weight watchers, and so on. Maybe they do this because fat is intrinsically funny to write about, not like serious stories or hard news.


Belly


The part of your body that’s under your tits and above your privates. Can be any size, shape, texture, colour, levels of hairiness, sweatiness. A place where fat accumulates on some people. Sometimes flops around, sometimes is bold and stout. Sometimes makes gurgling noises. Sometimes has creases and stretch marks. Sometimes has a mind of its own and will not behave. A delightful, gorgeous thing, a source of physical power much maligned and fretted over. Important resource in gut-barging competitions.


Calorie


A way of talking about energy that you get through eating food. An obsession. A pretty name for a girl child.


Fathlete


A fat athlete.


Thin


A person who is not fat. A person who is better-looking, healthier, more intelligent, more likely to succeed in life, sexier, more lovable and better to be with than any fat person. A very good and virtuous and normal person.


Wings


Fat upper arms that get more wobbly and loose with age. Source of power.


I created A Fat Activist Vernacular because I am interested in language and power in relation to fat people. The weight-loss industry is worth a fortune, and there is a lot of money and status riding on the question of who gets to define fat experience – generally public health politicians and their friends and allies in the weight-loss industry and medicine. My preference would be that this is a subject for fat people to work out for ourselves by valuing and sharing our own experiences. But there are many others with vested interests in owning and wielding this information.


The language of fat activism, frequently raw and emotive when people talk about being objects of hate, is being appropriated and gentrified by academics and professionals, tidied up and made respectable, while ousting the originators. You can see this in the transformation of the activist term fatphobia into the blandly inoffensive “weight bias”, which is sure to make its way into policy sometime soon.


My own term, “headless fatty” – referring to media images of fat people whose heads have been cropped out of the frame – was also cleaned up by a prominent academic at Yale as “headless stomach”. What happens more often is that fat activist originators of language and concepts are not cited, and their ideas become appropriated and made respectable without anyone being the wiser.


Meanwhile, at the age of 46, I have found other ways of speaking about this subject. After embarking a few years ago on a lifelong ambition of becoming a contemporary dancer, in November I will be dancing a piece called But Is it Healthy? in the Wellcome Collection’s Obesity gallery. I get asked the question all the time and it is impossible to answer it in words, not least because fat people are a diverse group, health is constructed in myriad ways, and expert science is not incontrovertible. So I will dance the answer instead! This will be performed as a duet by Kay Hyatt and me to a soundtrack I have made based on archival recordings by fat feminist activists made in 1980 by Karen Stimson at the New Haven Fat Women’s Health Conference. The speakers are Diane Denne, Judy Freespirit, Aldebaran and Judith Stein; a recording of Marcia Duvall, also present on the panel, has unfortunately been lost. These women are founders of many of the ideas circulating in fat activism today, but they have been neglected historically. I would love more people to know about their work.


The dance emerged from a period of research in which Hyatt and I explored what it is like to be continually asked: “But is it healthy?”; it brings together years of activism, explaining, patient listening and deep frustration in response to this question.


Through dance I am developing a different kind of language, using my body expressively and encountering audiences who have been worn down by the rhetoric of the obesity epidemic for the past decade and a half, and want something different.


I hope that by watching us dance in the Obesity display at the Wellcome Collection, audiences will understand that there are other ways of talking and thinking about fat than those which have been dominant in recent years. It is unbelievable that fat people like me have to lobby so very hard to be seen simply as human. I hope the dancing, and its soundtrack, helps people recognise that fat people have community, histories, cultures, agency, thoughts and lives all of our own.


Charlotte Cooper and Kay Hyatt are performing on 4 November 2016 as part of the Friday Late Spectacular: Body Language at the Wellcome Collection



The rhetoric around obesity is toxic. So I created a new language for fat people | Charlotte Cooper

27 Haziran 2014 Cuma

Yvette Cooper warns of a public solutions crisis if the Tories win in 2015

Yvette Cooper

Yvette Cooper will tell the Fabian Society that public providers must suggest empowerment and opportunities. Photograph: Antonio Zazueta Olmos




The NHS, police, education technique and social care are at threat of an “existential crisis” within the subsequent five years if the Conservatives win the subsequent election, Yvette Cooper, the shadow property secretary, will warn on Saturday.


In a broad-ranging speech the senior Labour MP, tipped as a long term leader, will say public solutions are about empowerment and possibilities – not just a safety net, as the Tories feel.


She will make the feedback at a conference organised by the Fabian Society, which sets out its own 12 tips for Labour’s manifesto. Its very first suggestion is that a Labour government should freeze public support investing until the deficit is underneath handle and prioritise cash for healthcare, children and expertise.


Other proposals contain linking pension payments and many other rewards to wages barring firms from running total public services upping the minimum wage to 60% of median earnings a 5-year programme of tax reform a Uk sovereign wealth fund and a new midweek bank holiday in aid of the setting.


Ahead of the conference, Andrew Harrop, common secretary of the Fabian Society, mentioned the celebration had “tons of comprehensive policies to deploy in 2015, but lacks a clear story of how Britain will be distinct by 2020 after five many years of Labour in energy”.


He additional: “Eyecatching but little-scale promises are not sufficient – the party needs to adopt radical long-phrase reforms. This is the only way Labour can reconnect with voters and prove that the political events are not all the exact same.”


Cooper, speaking alongside the shadow wellness secretary Andy Burnham and Jon Cruddas, get together policy chief, will say Labour will focus on public providers in the runup to 2015.


“At a time when folks truly feel insecure and overstretched, high quality public solutions matter much more than ever,” she will say. “Yet appropriate now people essential public companies we depend on are underneath increasing threat.”


Setting out prospective policy concepts in her own home affairs brief, Cooper will announce that Labour would hold a overview of failed rape convictions to operate out why the variety of productive prosecutions is falling. She will also confirm the party’s commitment to holding police disciplinary hearings in public to boost transparency in the wake of scandals such as Hillsborough and undercover police forming relationships with activists. Communities and councils ought to also have a say in appointing police chiefs and setting priorities for their regional forces, she will say.


Her intervention continues the themes of Ed Miliband’s Hugo Youthful lecture emphasising the value of “individuals-powered” public services. It also comes ahead of a speech on Monday by her husband, the shadow chancellor Ed Balls, who will unveil hard measures to tackle tax avoidance.


In distinct, he will require tax havens that are Uk overseas territories to publish information of who owns organizations headquartered on their shores.


Other measures include tackling dormant businesses that can trade for up to 5 many years with no paying out tax, and “disguised employment” specifically in the building market.


“George Osborne is failing to tackle tax avoidance. The most latest figures from HMRC present that the volume of uncollected tax in our economy – the ‘tax gap’ – went up final yr. This is not good sufficient, so Labour will make reversing this trend and narrowing the tax gap a priority for HMRC,” Balls mentioned.


Labour will also table an amendment to the finance bill next week urging the government to act to close a eurobonds loophole, which allows companies to shift income out of the Uk and has been estimated to be costing up to £500m a year in lost revenues.


It comes as parliament’s specifications watchdog said it would contemplate a complaint about the links between two shadow cabinet ministers and the IPPR thinktank, following they endorsed some of its policies.


Rachel Reeves, the shadow perform and pensions secretary, and Cruddas are accused of failing to declare “sponsorship” by the IPPR in the register of MPs’ interests.


There is a lengthy tradition of back links between the IPPR and Labour, similar to that among proper-leaning thinktanks such as the Centre for Policy Research and Policy Exchange with the Conservatives. Cruddas said the complaint was “completely ridiculous”.




Yvette Cooper warns of a public solutions crisis if the Tories win in 2015