Asylum seekers and the poorest parts of the UK are being let down | Letters

“Most refugees sent to the poorest parts of the UK” (Front page headline, 10 April). Here are suggested headlines for the remainder of the week: “Lowest life expectancy in the poorest parts of the UK”; “Proportionately highest levels of indirect taxation…”; “Worst maintained private and public housing…”; “Highest levels of prescription drugs…”; “Highest attendance at A&E departments…”; “Least investment in schools…”; “Highest number incarcerated…”; and more.

Condescending notions such as “responsibilisation” are used to deflect the political, economic, structural dynamics and suffering of poverty. Zero-hours contracts are recast as “flexible and adaptive working”; low-waged health support workers are declined travel time; part-time contracts without holiday pay or security underpin; essential services are cut to the bone. The list is endless.

On estates of poverty-induced resentment, the comparatively few refugees and asylum seekers entering Britain are warehoused and managed by private, profit-driven companies with, at best, questionable track records – G4S and Serco to name but two. The lack of coherent, integrated, humanitarian policies and interventions is the outworking of inadequately funded public authorities, reflecting a cynical and divisive betrayal by central government of those most in need, whether citizens, refugees or asylum seekers.
Professor Phil Scraton
School of Law, Queen’s University, Belfast

• I was saddened but not surprised by your front page. An asylum seeker living with me has told me how he was initially sent to a hostel in Manchester after his arrival in Kent, but when he put in his asylum application, he was transferred to a house in a remote suburb of Liverpool. Unable to afford public transport, he had to walk for an hour or more to shops or to meet people: “it was like being in prison,” he says.

The charities I have been in contact with tell me there are enough potential hosts to house all the asylum seekers they are dealing with, but they lack the resources to assess their suitability. Why can’t the government work with these charities to enable more asylum seekers to be housed with people who are keen to help them learn English and find out more about life in the UK?
Cary Bazalgette
London

• Yvette Cooper and the home affairs select committee are absolutely right to criticise the government’s policy on asylum seekers, and in particular its reliance on private sector providers of accommodation. In Newcastle some years ago, one such provider housed Iranian and Iraqi refugees in the same premises. More recently, the change from the provision of accommodation and support by Your Homes Newcastle (a public sector body leading management of the issue in the north-east) to G4S and its subcontractor Jomast, coupled with a reduction in funding, has effectively led to the disappearance of support services.

Treating the issue as a matter of housing alone is unsatisfactory, both for the asylum seekers and refugees and for the other residents of what tend to be the most disadvantaged areas of towns and cities in the least prosperous parts of the country.
Jeremy Beecham
Labour, House of Lords

• Your front page says the home affairs select committee is calling for changes to the “appalling” system of sending these hapless people to the poorest parts of the country. Since government policy for their dispersal has been framed around the inability and unwillingness of local councils to provide education, health and other services for them, the outcome of location in impoverished ghettoes is inevitable. These same blanket policies mean that private hospitality, widely and generously offered, is effectively prevented from being taken up. Thus a Kindertransport scheme was made impossible.

Keith Vaz, as its previous chairman, presided over a select committee on the Shaw report, which highlighted many of the shortcomings in government policy but was kicked into the long grass.

The Home Office claims the UK has a proud history of granting asylum to those who need our protection. We now seem to be at the end of history.
Tommy Gee
Wingfield, Suffolk

• Zoe Stewart (Passport checks for patients is an abandonment of NHS principles, theguardian.com, 7 April) is right to say that health tourism costs the NHS a relatively small amount (0.3% of a £130bn annual budget or some £330m). That is still the cost of a new hospital, so not insignificant, but she misses the bigger issue entirely.

The NHS, social housing and all of our public infrastructure were built by previous generations, out of their taxes, with an expectation that not only they but their descendants would benefit. The reason that “health tourism” sticks in the craw is that it breaks the implicit promise of “social goods” being passed on from generation to generation. People do have a sense of ownership over great public enterprises, and with that there is resentment of newcomers who are perceived as not having contributed to the development of the “common weal”, and who are then perceived as taking their jobs, houses and healthcare.

Proclaiming the “universality” of rights or benefits, while attractive as a principle, only really works in stable, homogenous societies. Immigration, of any variety, can dent that sense of communal solidarity, and hence “cracking down on health tourism”, an important though relatively minor financial amelioration, has a wider and justifiable significance.
Simon Diggins
Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire

• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters

Asylum seekers and the poorest parts of the UK are being let down | Letters

In pictures: Urban explorer visits abandoned asylum in Maryland

A stretcher stands in the middle of a hallway inside an abandoned asylum, although patient information lay scattered on the floor. Erected in 1925, the 200 acre, 22-creating Forest Haven asylum, in Laurel, Maryland, housed some of the area’s most mentally troubled residents.Picture: Johnny Joo/Barcroft Media

In pictures: Urban explorer visits abandoned asylum in Maryland

Pregnant asylum seekers on Nauru transferred to Australia for abortions

Three pregnant asylum seekers have been transferred to Australia from offshore detention on Nauru soon after requesting abortions due to the harsh situations within the detention centre and because they did not want to deliver a little one up on Nauru, Guardian Australia understands.

Of the 3 girls – the first of whom was transferred in February – one had her pregnancy terminated although the other two have however to make a ultimate decision on the termination.

The February situation – of a Rohingyan girl named Salima – was reported by the ABC. Salima’s spouse Mamun advised the ABC from Brisbane: “If we born with a youngster in Nauru the youngster need to die since the services [are] not very good in there.

“There is a very little room. Households are given a fan. But in a single camp there is no fan. When you take meals – lunch and dinner – you need to be standing two hours in the line.”

The two most current instances involve pregnant ladies transferred to Darwin. A single family members were sent around three weeks in the past and an additional all around eight weeks in the past.

Youngster asylum seeker advocate group Chilout and a senior supply with expertise of the situations confirmed the transfers had occurred.

Chilout spokeswoman Sophie Peer explained all three females had cited conditions in detention and the longevity of remain on the tiny Pacific island state as reasons for their selections.

A leaked report, written by five independent health care specialists, documented the dire state of psychological overall health between pregnant ladies on Nauru. The report mentioned that most pregnant women on the island were struggling depression, with a lot of scoring 24 on the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale, in which depression is diagnosed with a score of ten.

Guardian Australia has also been advised by a senior supply that a 32-12 months-old woman was evacuated below emergency following a suicide try on Nauru last weekend.

“The actions taken by these families indicate just how dire the scenario is on Nauru,” stated Peer.

“From maternal overall health through to paediatric care and simple living situations, the entire facility on Nauru is inappropriate for women and kids.

“Our government has stripped these households of all hope and has created family members organizing decisions practically impossible.”

Immigration minister Scott Morrison did not respond to a request for comment.

Pregnant asylum seekers on Nauru transferred to Australia for abortions

The Last Asylum by Barbara Taylor – overview

Imagine if, on top of all your other worries, you started to go mad. Lena Dunham in Ladies conveyed this effectively, when Hannah started counting footsteps and digging into her ears. Thoughts you have lived with for as prolonged as you can bear in mind no longer result in mere anxiety, but intolerable agony. Tics speed up and take more than. Men and women do their best to support you, but they aren’t sturdy adequate, and you wear them out. Who or what may be in a position to hold you although you work your way by means of this crisis? Is there any level in even striving to aid, or is it greatest for absolutely everyone if society simply locks you up?

In 1983, Barbara Taylor was a young activist and scholar, the author of the prizewinning Eve and the New Jerusalem: Socialism and Feminism in the 19th Century and an editorial collective member at History Workshop Journal and the feminist paper Red Rag. But she was unhappy and self-destructive and felt herself turning out to be much more so. And so she did what London intellectuals did in the 1980s and began on a program of total-on classical psychoanalysis with a Harley Street practitioner: the dreams, the leather sofa, the functions. She would not publish another guide for 20 many years.

To begin with, she writes, evaluation only confirmed her sense of how unique and special she was: “I buzzed with my new-found status … I felt gorgeous,” she writes. But then, childhood demons began to overwhelm her. She drank, she left her task, she necked capsules “like a party drunk guzzling peanuts”. She was admitted to Friern psychiatric hospital in north London in 1988 and was in and out of its revolving doors 3 occasions in excess of the next handful of many years. The late 1980s and early 1990s are now acknowledged to historians as “the twilight … of the Asylum Age”, as the mental hospital went out of style and care in the community came in. Taylor moved from Friern to a hostel in 1992 and the hospital itself closed the 12 months following.

The fantastic Victorian edifice of Friern has been well-known most just lately as a star of Will Self’s novel Umbrella (“the North Circular of the soul,” Self dubs its legendarily prolonged and sinister central corridor). But when it opened in 1851, the Middlesex County Pauper Lunatic Asylum was identified throughout Europe as “a prestige institution to comfort and heal the human mind”. “No hand or foot” was ever to be bound there. Sufferers would operate in the hospital’s fields and bakeries, obtaining relief and redemption in the bonds they produced with employees and their fellow individuals, securely held in the stability of asylum schedule. This then-pioneering method to madness was known as “moral treatment method”. Because the anti-psychiatry motion of the 1960s it really is most typically imagined of as the therapeutic-community ideal.

In practice, sadly, life at Colney Hatch did not work out as the visionaries had hoped. Alarms were soon raised about overcrowding and bad sanitation, and the ban on straitjackets was soon lifted. The notorious “back wards” became a dumping ground for folks with dementia and with no family or close friends to shield them – Sans Every little thing, to quote the title of a pioneering 1967 examine of institutional abuse of elderly folks. Taylor whitewashes none of this, but has warm memories nevertheless of her time there. “Cradled in Friern’s unyielding embrace, I located myself surviving feelings that out in the globe had felt unendurable.” That safety was a constant, in spite of the bleakness of the setting and the frequently “attenuated” care.

Even at her maddest, Taylor could see that the psychological health technique was changing. New medicines managed the far more antisocial of patients’ symptoms, making it possible for scope for significantly less severely circumscribed techniques of residing – networks of hostels and halfway homes, therapeutic day centres and help groups, all of which Taylor has needed and all of which assisted keep her on her feet. But the medicines could also be employed to maintain people quiet on the cheap, so they could be sent home to be looked following by their families, if their families had the wherewithal – or sent away to reside on the streets if not. “The mental well being method I entered in the 1980s was deeply flawed, but at least it recognised needs – for ongoing care, for asylum, for an individual to depend on when self-reliance is no alternative.” Whereas the care-in-the-local community program that has replaced it offers only “individualist pieties and self-aid prescriptions” – and of program the drugs.

Taylor’s guide is not a misery memoir, though as the author acknowledges, a lot of it is miserable. There aren’t any sensational particulars of extreme cruelty, for one particular thing. Taylor invested her early life in Canada, the first little one of a lefty legal household. “There is no victimiser in my story, or if there is, I am it.” Her dad and mom had been flawed but plenty of people, her analyst tells her, have childhoods as poor as hers with no breaking down like she did he lists for her some of the paths she may stick to. “You could decline into a psychoxsomatic sickness from which you’d most likely not recover. You could grow to be a prolonged-term psychiatric patient … Or you could descend so deeply into alcoholism that you’d never ever be retrievable.” Or she may have died, by her own hand or by a proxy. A lot of individuals with mental overall health troubles do.

Taylor is aware that her very own opportunities have been enhanced by her social privilege. “I considered I knew every thing about extreme anxiety until finally I witnessed the agonies of a man at chance of dropping his property because of a mix-up in his ‘social care’ payments … Any person who thinks that madness is down to defective brain chemistry requirements to seem tougher at the overpowering correlation in between economic deprivation and mental sickness.” And she’s mindful, as well, that of all the therapies and men and women that contributed to her survival – medical doctors and nurses and buddies and fellow sufferers – the most significant and most continual presence over the thirty-yr span of this story is the psychoanalysis: five 50-minute hrs weekly, including up to about four,000 sessions above twenty many years. Can it be that if you actually want folks with psychological overall health troubles to get far better, this is just the amount of time and interest it takes? If so, how do we resource it? (Taylor is not explicit about this, but it seems that her parents paid for her.)

“The rites” of psychoanalysis “can seem ridiculous”, Taylor admits, outlining how her see of them transformed in excess of the decades. At 1st, she noticed them as “cultic icons, symbols of the larger mysteries”. Then, she “savaged them as low-cost tricks”. “And later nevertheless, considerably later on, I came to see them as containers for the uncontainable, strong supports for emotional chaos.” She writes effectively about the psychoanalytic approach, which is to say, she’s great at conveying its fundamental “soreness and tedium”, the penis dreams, the dead-little one dreams, the numerous dreams about roast chicken. She raged for many years, she sulked for years, she did yr-on-yr of brattish tantrumming: “I am me, not some typical or backyard sicko,” as she puts it at one particular level. Gradually and gradually, however, without even noticing, she is finding out that there is nothing at all special either about herself or about her suffering. “At times, momentarily, the fog of dread and detest would thin and I would catch a fleeting glimpse of anything new.”

For almost 20 many years the former asylum at Friern has been acknowledged as Princess Park Manor, a improvement of luxury flats. Taylor, meanwhile, moved from her hostel area to a flat of her personal in the 1990s, and acquired a task at the University of East London. She fell in enjoy, gained a loved ones and published a book about Mary Wollstonecraft. In 2004 she did up her property with reclaimed oak boards that had been salvaged, she was advised, from an old mental hospital in north London. And so, “with considerably grizzling and several back-steps”, she progressively found herself more stable and self-accepting, “living a daily life I desired to lead”.

But think about, as she says, a young girl nowadays locating herself in difficulties of the sort she had in the 80s. Even supposing she can fund psychoanalysis, what takes place if she breaks down throughout that? “There is a complicated reply to this question and a very simple 1. The difficult response includes crisis teams, acute wards, recovery strategies, care programs …” Maybe she would be fortunate, maybe not. “The simple answer relates to what I needed most: asylum, a secure spot to be, a ‘stone mother’ to hold me as extended as I needed it.” And what with the mental hospitals gone and the hostels all gone personal, she would not get it. “Would I make it? … It would be a difficult call.”

The Last Asylum by Barbara Taylor – overview