qualifications etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
qualifications etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

6 Mart 2017 Pazartesi

NHS manager who earned £1m jailed for fabricating qualifications

A former probation officer who earned more than £1m working in very senior NHS management roles after he fabricated qualifications has been jailed for two years.


Jon Andrewes, 63, claimed to have two PhDs and a master’s degree but in fact had only a higher education diploma in social work and a teaching qualification. He also lied over his work history, falsely claiming to have worked in the Home Office.


Andrewes, who styled himself Dr though he had no right to the title, worked for more than a decade in various senior health jobs across the south-west of England including chair of the Royal Cornwall hospital trust. He was also chief executive at St Margaret’s hospice in Taunton and temporary chair of Torbay NHS trust.


Sentencing him at Exeter crown court, Judge Geoffrey Mercer QC told Andrewes: “For a period of over 10 years your outwardly prestigious life was based upon a lie, a series of staggering lies, repeated lies about your education, and employment background and your experience. Lies by which you obtained responsible positions.”


He said Andrewes would not have held those roles if he had told the truth and he had caused real damage to public confidence in the organisations he worked in.


Andrewes falsely claimed to have:


• A diploma from the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants


• A PhD in ethics management from Plymouth University


• A PhD in business administration from Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh


• A master’s from the University of Edinburgh


• A degree from the University of Bristol


After the hearing, Alex Johnson, a senior crown prosecutor with the CPS’s specialist fraud division, said: “Jon Andrewes repeatedly lied on his CV in order to better his chances of securing lucrative senior roles across the health service. The investigation team built a case which clearly outlined the scale of the deception and, faced with the evidence against him, Andrewes pleaded guilty.”


Andrewes, of Totnes in Devon, admitted two counts of fraud and one count of obtaining a pecuniary advantage by deception. The prosecution followed an investigation by anti-fraud officials at the Department of Health.


Cameron Brown, prosecuting, said Andrewes earned more than £1m during a 10-year period. He said the prosecution did not accept Andrewes’s claim that he had performed excellently during his time at various NHS bodies, saying he was rated as “unsatisfactory” in some of his jobs.


Ros Collins, defending, said Andrewes was extremely regretful and remorseful at his “sheer stupidity” in fabricating his educational qualifications. She said: “He has every respect for his former employers. He is very distressed for causing them any embarrassment. He has been loyal to the caring profession for many, many years.”


Collins said the sham qualifications gave him a “foot in the door” but making a success of it was down to him. She added: “These things happen where people inflate their CV out of desperation to get work.”


The court was told there was an ongoing NHS investigation into how Andrewes was able to hoodwink his way into senior roles.



NHS manager who earned £1m jailed for fabricating qualifications

29 Nisan 2014 Salı

Physicians who oppose morning-after pill on conscience grounds encounter qualifications bar

They believe that emergency contraceptive which requires effect soon after the moment they argue “life” has begun is related to abortion.


The exclusion, confirmed in updated guidelines, applies to specialist diplomas in sexual and reproductive well being as properly as total membership of the faculty.


Although the diplomas are viewed as an important qualification for GPs or nurses treating sexually transmitted infections or concerned in household preparing, total membership is observed as vital for medical doctors who specialise in the area.


The prohibition is confirmed in the most current version of the suggestions which have been amended earlier this yr right after the qualifications have been opened to nurses as effectively as physicians.


It states that individuals with moral objections are “welcome” to examine the diploma course but adds: “Completing the syllabus implies willingness throughout training to prescribe all kinds of hormonal contraception, such as emergency, and willingness to counsel and refer, if proper, for all intrauterine techniques.


“Failure to full the syllabus renders candidates ineligible for the award of a FSRH Diploma.”


It adds: “Doctors who hold moral or religious reservations about any contraceptive strategies will be unable to fulfil the syllabus for the membership … or specialty education.


“This will render them ineligible for the award of the examination or completion of instruction certificates.”


By contrast, those who refuse to carry out abortions on grounds of conscience appreciate particular legal safety.


The RCOG insisted that even though the new suggestions were not too long ago up to date the exclusion was lengthy-standing.


Dr Peter Saunders, chief executive of the Christian Health-related Fellowship stated: “It bars professional-existence physicians from specialising in sexual and reproductive overall health and also helps make it significantly more difficult for non experts to get jobs in household arranging or reproductive health.”


He additional that although the guidelines would clearly influence Catholics who adhere to the church’s educating on contraception, a lot of other individuals would also be impacted.


“If you search at non-Catholic Christians there would be numerous who could have no objection to contraception and see it as accountable behaviour but who draw the line at prescribing contraceptives which are meant to be taken right after fertilisation,” he stated.


David Jones, director of the Anscombe Bioethics Centre, the Roman Catholic institute in Oxford, explained: “By these guidelines the FSRH is seeking deliberately to exclude people who have a conscientious objection to some or all varieties of contraception from eligibility for the diploma and from membership of the faculty.


“This is a form of unjust discrimination towards professionals on the basis of their personal beliefs and, indirectly, a form of discrimination against patients who share the exact same beliefs and who may possibly wish to be treated by pros with a sympathetic understanding of their position.”



Physicians who oppose morning-after pill on conscience grounds encounter qualifications bar