mounting etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
mounting etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

21 Eylül 2016 Çarşamba

The science is mounting – giving babies peanuts and eggs cuts allergy risk

In the 1970s, when we were in school, food allergies were rare. But Australian children now have the highest rate of food allergy in the world. Up to one in 10 infants and two in 10 school-aged children have a proven food allergy.


In the 14 years to 2012 there was a 50% increase in hospital visits for anaphylaxis, the most severe allergic reaction. Infants and toddlers accounted for much of this increase.


The most common food allergies are to nine main food proteins: cow’s milk, soy, egg, wheat, peanut, tree nuts, sesame, fish and seafood. Egg and peanut allergies are the most common in infants and toddlers.


New research published today in the Journal of the American Medical Association shows the early introduction of egg (from four to six months) and peanuts (from four to 11 months) is linked to lower rates of egg and peanut allergy.


The researchers analysed the combined results of trials investigating whether food allergens in babies’ diets prevent the development of allergies to these foods. They concluded there was “moderate” certainty that early introduction of egg or peanut was associated with lower risks of egg and peanut allergy.


They also found that early introduction of gluten (wheat) was not associated with an increased risk of coeliac disease.


The researchers used the term “moderate” certainty because the review is based on a mix of studies with different designs and of varying quality. Feeding studies can also be difficult to “blind”; for some studies participants and researchers knew who was given egg or peanut, so were open to some bias.


As a result the authors say more work needs to be done to better understand the precise optimal timing for introducing eggs and peanuts.


Nonetheless, these findings affirm the recently updated Australian infant feeding consensus guidelines. These state that when parents introduce solids – at about six months but not before four months – they should also introduce previously avoided foods such as peanut and egg. This should occur in the baby’s first year of life.


The problem is, there have been so many changes to guidelines over the last few decades that parents are no longer sure what to believe.


In Australia, dietary recommendations aiming to reduce the risk of food allergies began to appear in the early 1990s. They recommended infants avoid certain foods such as egg and peanut. These guidelines were largely based on outcomes of trials focusing on the mother avoiding allergens during pregnancy and while breastfeeding.


In 2008, a number of research projects (including our own) questioned whether these older studies were flawed because they had not adequately adjusted the results to account for the fact that those with a family history of allergies adhere to recommendations better than those without, thus biasing the result.


These new studies accounted for this fact. We found, paradoxically, that earlier introduction of foods such as egg and peanut, at about six months, appeared to protect against food allergy. This has resulted in a complete rethink in our approach to preventing food allergy.


(Note that these findings relate to the prevention of food allergies, not the management, which remains unchanged. Children with food allergies should continue to avoid those foods.)


Based on this research, feeding guidelines began stating that earlier introduction did not increase the risk of food allergy and may indeed be protective.


These recommendations were strengthened this year after research trials tested the effect of eating common allergens (in particular, peanut) in the first year of life compared with completely avoiding them. The guidelines now recommend that exposure to egg, peanut and other foods frequently associated with food allergy should occur in the first year of life to offer protection.


It’s still not clear if this approach alone will prevent the whole food allergy epidemic. Some children will still develop food allergies despite following the feeding guidelines.


We know the tendency to develop allergic disease is inherited but environmental factors, including the microbiome, vitamin D levels, migration effects, the number of siblings and exposure to pets also all appear to play influential roles, as does the presence of early onset eczema. Research trials are investigating the role these factors play in the development of food allergy risk.


In the meantime, experts agree there appears to be a window of opportunity in the first year of life where exposure to foods such as peanut and egg decreases the risk of allergy to these foods. Diet diversity remains an important part of a healthy diet.


For the most recent infant feeding guidelines and information about introducing solid foods to infants, visit the Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy website


This article was originally published on The Conversation



The science is mounting – giving babies peanuts and eggs cuts allergy risk

29 Mayıs 2014 Perşembe

NHS suppliers encounter mounting financial and staffing pressures

Stainless steel tea kettle

NHS suppliers are feeling the heat as fiscal pressures proceed to expand. Photograph: Alamy




NHS foundation trusts (FT) and NHS trusts are facing the broadest range of issues for much more than a generation such as dealing with an ever tighter price range and swiftly rising demand. With NHS England warning of an “even more tough” financial year than 2013-14, how did NHS providers finish final year and what shape are they in to deliver the modifications required to make the NHS clinically and financially sustainable?


The last fortnight has noticed the publication of yr end reviews from Check for NHS Foundation Trusts and the Trust Advancement Authority for NHS Trusts. They recognize 4 trends: “extremely considerable fiscal pressure”, a quick, largely unfunded, growth in employees numbers, very good operational performance with some increasing considerations, and a pessimistic outlook.


Quite considerable financial pressure


The reviews display that the fiscal position of NHS providers is deteriorating quickly. In 2012/13, the 249 NHS providers produced an aggregate surplus of £591m. In 2013/14 they planned a surplus of £183m. In reality, at year end, the sector had an overall deficit of £108m. The £700m descent into deficit in a single 12 months is a quite massive, rapid, damaging, alter.


The quantity of trusts in deficit is growing rapidly with the place of acute hospitals specifically worrying – of 145 acute trusts, 41% (59) had been in deficit at 12 months finish. We know that a lot of of these are effectively run suppliers that haven’t been in deficit for a prolonged time, if at all. Despite the very best efforts of their management teams they are getting driven into deficit by growing demand and the unprecedented squeeze on costs paid by commissioners.


This is regardless of the two FTs and trusts continuing to supply important monetary financial savings – for example, £1.2bn or three% of controllable working costs in 2013/14 in the FT sector. The actuality even though is that after three many years of the Nicholson Challenge “the much more standard inner value-reduction efforts … hav[e been] all but exhausted”.


This economic deterioration isn’t just limited to a handful of trusts creating larger deficits – it is affecting almost all trusts.


Improved staffing numbers


Considerably of this monetary pressure is triggered by a speedy unplanned boost in personnel numbers. In the FT sector, for example, these went up by more than 24,000 – a 4% boost on 2012/13 – with 15,000 of these unplanned.


Higher numbers of the appropriate personnel are, of program, good news for patient care and it’s right that NHS suppliers respond to the Keogh and Francis critiques, and the new CQC inspection regime. But this service improvement comes at a expense and this improve is a huge, largely unfunded, extra monetary strain on trusts.


The FT sector information also demonstrates the consequence of this kind of a quick, massive, enhance when there is much more demand than long term provide. Trusts have to use several more agency and contract staff than planned, which carries its very own dangers. FTs alone invested £1.4bn on such employees in 2013/14, compared to the strategy of £523m.


Excellent operational efficiency but growing elective access considerations


Overall, “the sector has usually carried out nicely in preserving important operational standards”. The mixed efforts of local community, psychological overall health, ambulance and acute trusts and FTs in delivering the A&ampE standard is “a considerable achievement at a time of great stress for which fantastic credit is due to personnel”. There is, nevertheless, developing pressure on elective accessibility with “a system-broad decline in waiting time efficiency” in the last quarter.


Pessimistic outlook


NHS suppliers are facing a quintuple whammy so “plans submitted by trusts for 2014/15 show that the general [financial] place is very likely to deteriorate even more”, with an additional set of new pressures due in 2015/16. The 5 sources of strain are:


• A continuing squeeze on income by means of additional tariff efficiencies in 2014/15
• Continuing demand growth
• Pressures to preserve and invest service top quality – for instance personnel increases
• Squeezed specialist commissioning contracts, as NHS England seeks to decrease overspends in this price range
• The impact of the Far better Care Fund, which decreases NHS funding in 2015/16 by £1.9bn.


To date, patients largely haven’t felt the stress on finances hit their companies, as suppliers have absorbed the influence by cutting surpluses and going into deficit. This is unsustainable and several providers are now worrying about how to keep the quality of patient care large as assets are squeezed. If we are to stay away from the sector falling even more into deficit at the finish of 2014/15 we urgently require a funding and payment strategy that greater matches the actuality of what companies are becoming asked to deliver.


Chris Hopson is chief executive of the Basis Trust Network


Are you a member of our on the internet community? Join the Guardian healthcare network to receive regular emails and exclusive provides.




NHS suppliers encounter mounting financial and staffing pressures