highlight etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
highlight etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

26 Kasım 2016 Cumartesi

Bristol student deaths highlight campus crisis in mental health

Nathan is a 20-year-old arts student. He had depression before he came to university, and felt well-supported by his family, but it has been difficult living and studying away from home.


“Suddenly you come to university and you’ve not got your family around you. So you need your friends, which is tricky because they are busy and stressed themselves.”


Nathan (who did not want his real name to be used) has a history of self-harming and has received support from the student mental health services, which he says are over-subscribed.


When he visited them three weeks ago to try to get counselling, he was told there was a waiting list and he would not be seen until after Christmas. He was offered a 20-minute drop-in session but he says he feels he needs more than that.


Nathan is a student at the University of Bristol, where it emerged this week that three teenagers, all believed to be first-year students, had died within weeks of starting their studies this term. The cause of death in each case will be decided by a coroner, but relatives of two of them have indicated that they killed themselves.


The deaths at Bristol, one of the most prestigious universities in the country, have resurfaced concerns about a crisis in student mental health and the capacity of universities to respond to it. A recent Guardian investigation revealed that the number of students seeking counselling at university has gone up by 50% in the past five years.


“The pressures on students to be successful in all aspects of their lives are completely unrealistic,” said one head of student services. New students were particularly vulnerable as they negotiated the social pressures of freshers’ week and the academic expectations of their courses.


“Not only are they expected to be A* students, they are expected to be living the life, to be good looking, to have the right clothes and to do the right social activities.”


Students have a lower suicide rate than the general population but it appears to have grown. Figures from the Office for National Statistics show that in 2014 there were 130 deaths by suicide of full-time students aged 18 and over in England and Wales. This compares with 112 in 2011; and 75 in 2007. The increase can be explained in part by the growing university population, which now stands at 2 million.


A survey by the National Union of Students last year, revealed that nearly eight in 10 student respondents (78%) had experienced mental health difficulties over the previous year and a third (33%) said they had had suicidal thoughts. Other surveys have shown that one in five students are self-harming.


Ruth Caleb, the chair of the Universities UK mental wellbeing in higher education working group and head of counselling services at Brunel University, said most, if not all such services were seeing students who had had suicidal thoughts. Although student deaths by suicide were rare, they happened across the sector and had a devastating effect,” she said.


“It’s absolutely heartbreaking. It raises awful feelings. It just makes you feel very, very sad and wish you could have done something to support the student, but quite often they’ve not come forward.”



Bristol University.


Bristol University. Photograph: eye35.pix/Alamy

In Bristol, up and down the chilly hills of Clifton on Thursday morning, news was slowly filtering through as students made their way from seminars and lectures to the student union. Not everyone knew. “Three?” exclaims one girl, clutching a pile of books on film noir. “I had no idea,” said another.


Nathan had heard about the deaths, as had his friend Bella, a second-year English student who knew one of the students because they came from the same area and used to go to the same parties. “It’s weird,” says Bella. “It was so unexpected.”


“For everyone involved it’s shocking,” said Mark Ames, director of student services at Bristol. “We have 22,000 students, so in any one year we would expect to have to manage the fact that some of our students will die while they are with us.


“In common with any other university, on occasion we do have a student death that unfortunately the coroner might conclude was death by suicide. But our numbers over the years do not suggest we have a trend here. Unfortunately, what we have is a coincidence.


“As far as we are aware there’s no link between the deaths – although we are very aware of the risks of clusters in these kind of events.”


In the last academic year Bristol had one death by suicide; there were none the year before that, and one the previous year.


When told about Nathan’s experience, the university apologised and urged him to contact their services again.


“Like every university counselling service, we are over-subscribed for individual counselling,” a spokesman said. “Many of our counselling interventions can begin immediately. We assess the needs of each student to work out what is the most appropriate intervention for them.”


Universities are aware that the first few weeks in higher education can be challenging for vulnerable new students.


“Anybody changing their life is going to be anxious,” Caleb said. “Quite often you’ve moved geographically. It’s a completely different life. You are out of your comfort zone, you don’t know anybody. You have to come out of your room and make friends.”


Bristol puts on live performances in freshers’ week by a New Zealand organisation called UniSmart which provides a one-stop student survival guide, including information about welfare and wellbeing, and there are welcome talks from staff who oversee halls of residence. But some students the Guardian spoke to said they would have liked more information about the mental health support services available. Others said they felt well looked after.


Bristol, like the rest of the sector, has witnessed a marked change in the support needs of new students over the last few years. The number of students who lack the necessary “resilience” to meet the challenges of independent living and study has grown, according to Ames, and many more arrive having already been diagnosed and treated for a mental health condition.


Ben, who is in his first-year of a law degree, is one such student. Originally from the north, he feels a long way from home. He informed the university before arriving that he had a history of mental health problems, but has heard nothing since, and though he said he felt well now, he would not know where to go for help.


“I feel it should be a bit more proactive,” he said. “It’s daunting coming to university. The course is intense. You are bombarded with all this social stuff, but it can get quite lonely. You can go into yourself.”


A fifth-year dentistry student said she felt well supported by the university. “The university do send out regular emails about if we are not coping well, or if we feel stress. There’s definitely support available on the website.”


Two second-year medical students agreed they felt well supported, though they thought medics benefited from a particularly close-knit community. Others said it depended on who you ended up living with.


Mental health and wellbeing are a growing priority across the sector, but experts say more needs to be invested in services in some universities. A report in September by the Higher Education Policy Institute thinktank said some institutions needed to triple their spending on mental health services to meet demand.


The University of York has been more open than most about the challenges of providing mental health support after it emerged that there were five student deaths by suicide between February 2015 and January 2016. A university report into student mental ill health included data from ambulance callouts to the university, which showed that in the first few weeks of 2016, up until 9 February, there were 12 callouts for incidents of self-harm or attempted suicide – half of all callouts to the university. In the previous year there were 134 emergency callouts, of which almost a third (32%) were for self-harm or suicide attempts.


A spokesperson for the university said: “As the number of students considering higher education grows, we must anticipate mental health vulnerabilities by encouraging openness between staff and students to talk about these issues in a supportive environment.


“Over the next three years we are investing £500,000 in mental health support services and awareness campaigns across campus. This includes expanding our in-house counselling service, with the addition of two new members of staff, to ensure that those who need urgent appointments can be seen very quickly.”


The universities umbrella body, Universities UK, is working on a strategy aimed at improving the mental health and wellbeing of students.


“It’s up to universities to make student life as stress-free as possible,” said Caleb, who is on the steering group. “Universities are trying to do their best and still we are seeing a high level of mental ill heath coming through. Some students you are very concerned about and you need to look after them very carefully. Sometimes it’s the ones who have not disclosed [that they are having are problems].”


Siobhan O’Neill, a professor of mental health sciences at Ulster University, agreed: “It’s not just about the services provided, it’s about students coming forward. We find that students are reluctant, particularly the ones at risk of suicide, to ask for help.”


Students are under more pressure than ever, she said.


“There’s student fees and debt. Students and their families are risking more by going to university. The stakes are much higher.” Then there are the additional pressures from social media and “social perfectionism”.


She added, however, that it was important not to be alarmist – most young people do well at university and manage the transition from home to independence successfully. “For most it’s a really good time – sometimes the best years of your life.”


  • In the UK, the Samaritans can be contacted on 116 123. In the US, the National Suicide Prevention Hotline is 1-800-273-8255. In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is on 13 11 14. Hotlines in other countries can be found here


Bristol student deaths highlight campus crisis in mental health

18 Eylül 2016 Pazar

Bishop campaigns to highlight issue of body image among children

Rachel Treweek, the bishop of Gloucester, has said she is highlighting the issue of body image among children to challenge perceptions that physical appearance determines self-worth.


On Monday, Treweek – the first female bishop to sit in the House of Lords – will visit All Saints Academy in Cheltenham to talk to a group of 13- to 16-year-olds in the first of a series of school visits in her constituency to discuss the issue.


It follows a report from the Children’s Society last month that found one out of three girls aged 10 to 15 was unhappy with her appearance and felt ugly or worthless.


The study highlighted the growing pressure of social media with regard to body image. The proportion of girls with negative feelings about their bodies increased from 30% to 34% over five years; among boys it remained unchanged at 20%.


Treweek told the Guardian the issue urgently needed addressing. “When I talk to girls, it strikes me how much of how they view themselves and their self-worth is caught up with appearance and the way that society sees them,” she said. “Issues of health and mental health are more and more linked with how people are viewed by others, and much of that begins with external appearance.”


The bishop plans to listen to the concerns of teenagers over the coming months before considering what action can be taken.


“I want to challenge the subconscious messages we’re giving,” she said. “We need to look at the language we use as adults and how it shapes our culture. For example, when adults engage with girls, nearly always the first thing we say is a comment on appearance. We need to find out who they are, what they enjoy, what they’re good at, what makes their souls sing.”


She added: “I don’t want to say to girls: ‘Don’t worry about hair or nails or fashion’ – I want them to enjoy those things. But I want these things to be an expression of who they are, not their starting place.”


Treweek acknowledged that as one of a handful of female bishops she had a different perspective on society than her male colleagues. “The church doesn’t always appear in touch with people’s everyday lives. This faith stuff has got to connect with people’s lives – and if this is shown to be an issue affecting girls’ mental health and happiness, then we have to be listening to that, the church needs to engage with it.”


The Children’s Society report found that 14% of girls aged 10 to 15 were unhappy with their lives as a whole. Another study last month by the Department for Education found an increase in psychological distress among 14-year-olds in 2014 compared with similar research in 2005.



Bishop campaigns to highlight issue of body image among children

12 Mart 2014 Çarşamba

Two Examples Highlight Issues Of Demonstrating The Advantage Of Digital Overall health Technological innovation

We are constantly told healthcare is “ripe” for disruptive innovation, a process of creative destruction enabled by the exciting new technologies of digital health.  Yet, the robust demonstration of almost any substantive benefit (beyond perhaps transient delight and toxic self- absorption) has been slow in coming.


The challenges of moving a health-related technology from promise to impact are illustrated nicely by two recent attempts to carefully evaluate the benefits of intriguing new devices.


The Propeller Health Inhaler Monitor


The first study (NCT01509183) was sponsored by Asthmapolis (now Propeller Health), and sought to examine whether use of the company’s inhaler monitoring device resulted in improved asthma control, the study’s primary endpoint.  Control, measured by the Asthma Control Test (ACT) would be assessed at 4, 8, and 12 months.


The device senses inhaler use – in this study, the use of fast-acting “rescue” inhaler medications, specifically — and communicates data to patients (via an app) and to providers (via reports and change of status alerts), according to MedPage Today.  In this study, asthmatic patients who had experienced a “healthcare utilization event” in the preceding year were randomized into either an active group , receiving the device and associated data, or a group receiving a deactivated device that provided no supplemental information.


As study co-author Bob Quade explains in an email, “the fundamental intervention is information.


At a national meeting last November, interim results were presented.  These data revealed slight improvements in the ACT in the active arm compared to the control arm in both adults and children, differences not statistically significant.


However, additional analysis found subjects in the actively monitored group used rescue inhalers significantly less often than the control group.  Perhaps most strikingly, inpatient days were reduced from 0.225 per person per year in control group to 0.087 in active group; emergency room visits decreased marginally (from 0.141 per person per year in control group to 0.103 in active group) as well.


This reduction in utilization is claimed to be associated with a savings of $ 688.05 per patient (compared to baseline);  subjects  in the control group, notably, were found to save $ 281.95 per patient compared to baseline, suggesting a regression to the mean effect, not surprising given that subjects were selected based on experiencing a healthcare event in the previous year (most asthma patients don’t experience events in any given year).  It’s also possible that simply participating in the study may have contributed to a change in utilization (the Hawthorne effect at work).  Both possibilities were  acknowledged by Quade.


However, the active group still exhibited a dramatic savings (~$ 400 per patient) associated with reduced utilization compared to the control group, despite the lack of significant changes in asthma control as measured by ACT scores.  This presents a real puzzle.


Some, such as wellness guru Al Lewis (author of Why Nobody Believes The Numbers, and more recently, Surviving Workplace Wellness) look at these results incredulously.


“Their own numbers don’t add up,” he asserts in an email.  “First, they say it’s not statistically a significant difference.”


“Even if it were significant,” Lewis continues, the difference reported on the ACT “is something like 2.2% improvement in the score.  Then, they claim an inpatient reduction of 62%. This violates several of the rules in Why Nobody Believes.  First, costs can’t decline that much and second, the cost reduction has to tie to the quality improvement.”


An alternative explanation, however, is that there are improvements in care not reflected in the ACT measure; for example, if the intervention doesn’t prevent exacerbation but catches them early enough to enable them to be managed as an outpatient rather than an inpatient, this could theoretically save significant dollars, yet be difficult to pick up on the ACT.


This study highlights the challenges of rigorously demonstrating the benefit of a digital health intervention that appears to make a world of sense.  It seems logical, even obvious, that improved monitoring of rescue inhaler use, coupled with improved, immediate communication with patients and providers would improve disease management.  As study principal investigator Rajan Merchant points out, it enables the care of asthma patients to transition from episodic to continuous – one of the key ambitions of digital health.


I look forward to examining a peer-reviewed publication once the study is completed later this year, and all data are read out.  My suspicion is that there may ultimately be a cost-savings achieved (vs the control group), and perhaps eventually a small improvement in asthma control.   Whether this economically justifies the use of the intervention will need to be determined, given the cost of the devices and software, and the extra provider time potentially required.



Two Examples Highlight Issues Of Demonstrating The Advantage Of Digital Overall health Technological innovation

Two Examples Highlight Difficulties Of Demonstrating The Advantage Of Digital Health Technologies

We are consistently advised healthcare is “ripe” for disruptive innovation, a approach of inventive destruction enabled by the interesting new technologies of digital wellness.  Yet, the robust demonstration of nearly any substantive advantage (beyond probably transient delight and toxic self- absorption) has been slow in coming.


The issues of moving a well being-associated technologies from guarantee to effect are illustrated nicely by two recent attempts to cautiously evaluate the benefits of intriguing new units.


The Propeller Wellness Inhaler Keep track of


The initial research (NCT01509183) was sponsored by Asthmapolis (now Propeller Wellness), and sought to examine regardless of whether use of the company’s inhaler monitoring device resulted in enhanced asthma control, the study’s main endpoint.  Manage, measured by the Asthma Management Test (ACT) would be assessed at four, 8, and 12 months.


The device senses inhaler use – in this study, the use of quick-acting “rescue” inhaler medicines, especially — and communicates data to sufferers (via an app) and to companies (via reports and adjust of standing alerts), according to MedPage These days.  In this examine, asthmatic individuals who had seasoned a “healthcare utilization event” in the preceding yr were randomized into either an energetic group , acquiring the gadget and connected data, or a group obtaining a deactivated gadget that offered no supplemental data.


As research co-writer Bob Quade explains in an e mail, “the fundamental intervention is information.


At a nationwide meeting last November, interim outcomes have been presented.  These data unveiled slight enhancements in the ACT in the lively arm compared to the management arm in each adults and children, differences not statistically important.


Nonetheless, extra evaluation discovered topics in the actively monitored group utilized rescue inhalers drastically significantly less often than the manage group.  Maybe most strikingly, inpatient days were diminished from .225 per particular person per yr in manage group to .087 in lively group emergency area visits decreased marginally (from .141 per particular person per yr in manage group to .103 in lively group) as nicely.


This reduction in utilization is claimed to be associated with a financial savings of $ 688.05 per patient (compared to baseline)  subjects  in the handle group, notably, were identified to save $ 281.95 per patient compared to baseline, suggesting a regression to the indicate impact, not surprising offered that subjects had been selected based on experiencing a healthcare event in the previous year (most asthma sufferers really don’t knowledge occasions in any given 12 months).  It is also feasible that basically participating in the examine may possibly have contributed to a adjust in utilization (the Hawthorne impact at operate).  Each choices were  acknowledged by Quade.


Nonetheless, the energetic group nevertheless exhibited a dramatic cost savings (~$ 400 per patient) linked with decreased utilization in contrast to the management group, in spite of the lack of significant adjustments in asthma handle as measured by ACT scores.  This presents a actual puzzle.


Some, such as wellness guru Al Lewis (author of Why No person Believes The Numbers, and much more just lately, Surviving Workplace Wellness) appear at these outcomes incredulously.


“Their personal numbers do not add up,” he asserts in an e mail.  “First, they say it’s not statistically a considerable difference.”


“Even if it had been significant,” Lewis continues, the difference reported on the ACT “is one thing like two.2% improvement in the score.  Then, they claim an inpatient reduction of 62%. This violates a number of of the guidelines in Why No person Believes.  First, costs can not decline that significantly and 2nd, the price reduction has to tie to the quality improvement.”


An alternative explanation, even so, is that there are improvements in care not reflected in the ACT measure for instance, if the intervention does not prevent exacerbation but catches them early ample to allow them to be managed as an outpatient rather than an inpatient, this could theoretically conserve substantial bucks, nevertheless be challenging to select up on the ACT.


This review highlights the difficulties of rigorously demonstrating the benefit of a digital well being intervention that appears to make a globe of sense.  It seems logical, even evident, that improved monitoring of rescue inhaler use, coupled with improved, fast communication with individuals and companies would enhance disease management.  As examine principal investigator Rajan Merchant points out, it enables the care of asthma sufferers to transition from episodic to steady – a single of the key ambitions of digital overall health.


I look forward to examining a peer-reviewed publication when the examine is finished later on this 12 months, and all data are go through out.  My suspicion is that there may ultimately be a price-savings attained (vs the handle group), and perhaps ultimately a modest improvement in asthma manage.   Whether this economically justifies the use of the intervention will need to have to be determined, given the expense of the units and software, and the further supplier time potentially needed.



Two Examples Highlight Difficulties Of Demonstrating The Advantage Of Digital Health Technologies