Virginia etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
Virginia etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

16 Şubat 2017 Perşembe

Unhappily married? You’re not alone | Virginia Ironside

The marriage between Tini Owens and her multimillionaire mushroom farmer husband, Hugh, doesn’t sound like one that most of us would relish. She tried to divorce him last year, but was told by a judge that she couldn’t, because they hadn’t lived apart for five years. Now she has asked the court of appeal to overturn that ruling.


Hugh had, according to evidence supplied by Tini, constantly berated her about a year-long affair she’d had, rowed with her in an airport shop, criticised her to the housekeeper, avoided speaking to her during a meal in a pub – and asked her to pick up bits of cardboard from the garden.


But the accusation of “unreasonable behaviour” was thrown out because the judge decided the grounds were too flimsy. This is a very odd conclusion – the judge essentially told poor Mrs Owens she must stay married to a husband she no longer wants, until enough time has elapsed for his agreement to no longer be required. Yet I don’t entirely blame the judge; he was just upholding laws requiring a couple to have lived apart for at least five years if one party opposes the marriage’s dissolution.


The letters I received as an agony aunt showed me the vast range of behaviours in a marriage that some people are prepared to put up with – and not put up with. One reader and her husband hadn’t spoken to each other for five years – and used their son as an intermediary. But neither wanted to divorce. Another woman put up with her husband having countless affairs. Miserable as such marriages might seem to us, for those couples they were good enough.


On the other hand, one man wrote to say he wanted to leave his wife and children just because he’d spotted her kissing another man while drunk at an office party. No matter how she grovelled and apologised, he couldn’t accept it.


I would guess the problem in the Owens’ marriage is not so much that one behaved entirely unreasonably to the other; it is that they have different expectations of marriage. A man of Hugh’s age, 78, a man who’s done national service, a man who may have seen his own father behave in the same cavalier way to his mother as he behaved to Tini, just doesn’t see the problem. Marriage for him is for life, even if his wife did have an affair.


She, on the other hand, is looking for warmth and compatibility. She described to the court feeling “unloved”. And as she can’t get the warmth she needs from Hugh, at 65 she understandably wants to move on.



Unhappy couple


‘We’ve all witnessed married friends arguing and bickering so much that we wonder how they can stand each other.’ Photograph: Alamy

Tolstoy said: “All happy families are alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.” But he was wrong. Happy – or happyish – families can be very different. They range from being comfortable and loving to those in which both partners feel that the upside of being married only just outweighs the downside. Unless behaviour is intolerable by any person’s standards, how can a judge rule on it?


If one partner spends the night gambling away the family savings and yet the other can tolerate this behaviour, then the relationship could be regarded as OK. Not happy, but bearable. We’ve all witnessed married friends behaving in a way that we would find unacceptable. They argue and bicker so much that we wonder how they can stand each other. But we don’t know what each partner gets out of this. Who knows, perhaps it’s a weird kind of foreplay? After they’ve had a good public snipe, they may go back home for glorious sex. To outsiders it’s a mystery how the relationship works, but somehow it does.


And we’ve all seen relationships break up when one or other of the partners “reforms” their bad behaviour. A woman complains bitterly about her alcoholic husband but finds living with him sober too much to bear.


Sometimes dysfunctional relationships totter on because partners’ behaviour resembles what they each experienced as a child. Although the protagonists may not exactly enjoy it, at least it reminds them of the security of being at home.


As for Tini feeling “unloved, isolated and alone”, is this grounds for divorce? Who hasn’t had a row in an airport shop? A silent meal? I’ve sat through hundreds. In Tini’s position, another woman might tell Hugh to pick up his own cardboard and laugh at his grumpiness.


I don’t know what the appeal court will decide about the Owens’ marriage, but as judge James Munby pointed out this week: “It is not a ground for divorce if you find yourself in a wretchedly unhappy marriage – people may say it should be.”


I don’t – because it’s often too difficult to say whether the petitioner is being made unhappy by the other person, or whether she or he is the sort who finds insult and cruelty in every breath their partner takes.


I started off by saying the Owens’s marriage isn’t one that most people would relish. But on reflection, who am I to say? I’ve met too many people who can happily shrug off behaviour I find wretched, to judge.



Unhappily married? You’re not alone | Virginia Ironside

31 Ocak 2014 Cuma

If we do not place people ahead of earnings, spills like West Virginia are our potential | Jeff Biggers

West Virginia chemical spill

Crews clean up a chemical spill along the Elk river in Charleston, West Virginia. Photograph: Tyler Evert/AP




The dirty secret in President Obama’s “all-of-the-over” energy policy was quietly overlooked in his State of the Union tackle.


More than two weeks after global media consideration on the West Virginia coal-chemical disaster, the most essential line of details still remains buried in an AP report:



…[A] assessment of federal environmental enforcement records demonstrates that nearly 3-quarters of the 1,727 coal mines listed haven’t been inspected in the past 5 many years to see if they are obeying water pollution laws. Also, 13% of the fossil-fuel fired electrical power plants are not complying with the Clean Water Act.



Translation: with federal and state blessing, the coal business underneath President Obama is totally free to operate in a continual state of violation.


In the meantime, in the newest episode in West Virginia’s coal-chemical debacle, state officials announced on Wednesday that residents impacted by the latest coal-chemical catastrophe are inhaling formaldehyde, a recognized carcinogen.


“There is by no means peace in West Virginia,” labor organizer Mary “Mom” Jones famously mentioned practically a hundred years in the past, “due to the fact there is never ever justice.”


Our president and nation should get past a crisis management approach to the coal market, and come to grips with the double-headed source of the current Elk River disaster – lax and unenforced laws for coal mining and chemical operations, and the stranglehold of sector lobbies above public officials in charge of regulation. Otherwise, the Obama administration’s “all-of-the-over” policy will merely lengthen a bitter legacy in coal country: there will never ever be clean water in West Virginia, since there is never ever justice.


Sure, hearings and investigations will be held, legislation introduced, an unenforced regulation or two extra, a corporate official may possibly be fined or even go to jail, but the truth is that toxic waters from numerous phases of coal mining will continue to flow with costly and devastating wellness results – until public officials and their appointees are barred from accepting political contributions from the very industries they regulate.


This may possibly sound hyperbolic, and surely naïve – but I create soon after years of covering coal ash pond breakages, coal slurry disasters, and water-contamination issues from strip-mining discharges and the subsequent lack of regulatory action.


I also create from experience: my grandfather was a coal miner in southern Illinois, who barely survived a mining catastrophe in an age of regulatory corruption, struggled with black lung disease (a preventable coal dust inhalation malady that was initial diagnosed in 1831) that nevertheless kills about 4 coal miners every day. My grandfather’s 150-12 months-old farm in the Shawnee Nationwide Forest region, was eventually stripmined and the neighborhood creek left sterile from mining discharges.


I have realized two issues from the treatment method of my grandfather and residents in today’s coal mining communities: in a nation that prioritizes coal business income above workplace and residential security, people are as disposable as our organic resources in openly accepted national sacrifice zones. And secondly, all coal mining safety laws have been written in miners’ blood the exact same is accurate for innocent citizens afflicted by clean water violations by coal and chemical firms.


A commentary I wrote in jest five years ago now would seem deadly severe: Coal Ash Crisis Management – What is It Going to Get, Dead Bodies?


Five many years following the historic Tennessee Valley Authority coal ash pond disaster, when arsenic-laced ash flooded into eastern Tennessee waterways, EPA officials lastly agreed this week to a settle a law suit and issue federal laws by the finish of the year for coal ash disposal. Over 1,000 toxic coal ash dumpsites simmer today, like accidents waiting to come about.


Four many years right after the New York Times exposed the harrowing reality of coal slurry injections contaminating underground watersheds and consuming wells in Prenter, West Virginia, the place an extraordinary corridor of brain tumors, cancer and other issues have devastated a community, coal states like Illinois proceed to green-light the exact same method of injecting deadly coal slurry into the watersheds of its residents.


3 years right after citizens groups in Kentucky found over twenty,000 incidences of unreported Clean Water Act violations from coal mining operations in eastern Kentucky – hailed as “Clean Watergate” due to the state of Kentucky’s lack of oversight – reckless strip mining operations continue to destroy the Cumberland waterways without end.


Two years right after the US Geological survey located that mountaintop elimination operations have adverse impacts on surrounding soil and water and in excess of 20 other peer-reviewed research performed over a decade have enumerated the affect on the overall health of neighboring communities (which include birth defects and cancer) – mountaintop elimination operations continue unabated in central Appalachia.


The background of regulating the US coal business, specially in terms of clean water violations, is riddled by a stunning anatomy of denial in each generation.


Nonetheless, a decades-lengthy resistance continues by impacted residents to defend their overall health, livelihoods and civil rights. Fed up with state and federal inaction, residents living underneath mountaintop removal operations have even launched their own bill – the Appalachian Communities Wellness Emergency Act – in Congress for a moratorium on the substantial strip mining operations right up until suitable well being assessments are made.


In excess of 30 many years ago, I lugged a pail of discolored water from a effectively in the back hollers of Bailey Mountain in West Virginia. I followed a trail of coal dust till I reached an elderly woman’s front porch, only a couple of hundred feet away from a strip mine. The smell of the water created me gag.


When I was initial informed by West Virginia pals of the 9 January coal-cleansing chemical catastrophe, the black waters of Bailey Mountain and the inexorable clash between coal and clean water returned to me with a bitter taste.


West Virginia has been consuming contaminated water for decades. And it always will – except if the nation decides to finish our denial of the ever mounting well being and human fees of the coal market, launch a coalfields regeneration transition program, and finally bring justice to the coalfields.




If we do not place people ahead of earnings, spills like West Virginia are our potential | Jeff Biggers