Brothers etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
Brothers etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

6 Mart 2017 Pazartesi

Brothers fined over "depressing, unsafe" Liverpool care home

Two brothers have been fined more than £82,000 after their “depressing, unhygienic and unsafe” care home was shut down by inspectors.


Amjad Latif, 56, and his younger brother Amer, 47, ran the Mossley Manor care home in Liverpool until June 2015 when a new resident’s daughter was so appalled by conditions that she took her mother home after two hours and complained to the Care Quality Commission (CQC).


CQC inspectors gagged at the smell in some residents’ rooms when they made a surprise inspection, Liverpool magistrates court heard on Monday. The inspectors found elderly people who had not bathed properly for four weeks and had not been washed in days.


One man with Parkinson’s disease was taken to hospital with aspiration pneumonia after choking because carers kept giving him food he could not swallow. His need to be fed mashed food and have his head held up while drinking had not been properly recorded on his care plan, the court heard.


Sentencing the brothers on Monday after the CQC brought a case against them, a district judge branded Mossley Manor “a lack of care home, not a care home”.


Judge Andrew Shaw told the court he was shocked by the harrowing conditions suffered by some of the 43 elderly residents living there when it was closed. The Latif brothers had betrayed their vulnerable clients, he said.


Fees at the home started at £1,000 a month for council-funded residents, with private residents charged almost twice that.


A shortage of hot water meant that staff regularly had to boil pots of water in the kitchen in order to do the washing up or the most cursory bed baths. One resident showed inspectors the bathroom near their bedroom where there was no running water in the sink, a blocked toilet and no plug for the bath.


Some communal toilets were without soap, towels or plastic bags in the bins, with used incontinence pads left around residents’ rooms.


One bedroom window was broken in three places and the cracks had been taped over. It was also jammed open, leaving a 5cm gap that the resident tried to block with socks to keep warm.


A blind woman who fell 14 times in a year was told to press an alarm she could not see if she got into difficulty, said Jenny Ashworth, prosecuting, who branded the home “depressing, unhygienic and unsafe”.


In one of the most shocking observations in the CQC’s 16-page report, inspectors wrote: “We went into some people’s bedrooms and were shocked at the terrible smell and state of their rooms. On two occasions we had to leave the rooms as the smell of stale urine and body odour was overpowering.


“In one of these rooms a person was lying in bed at lunchtime. This person had incontinence issues and required incontinence aids. The records showed that this person had not had a bath or a shower in the four weeks prior to the inspection and had not had a wash for five days.


“We asked a member of the care staff why this person was in bed and they told us that they thought that the person was depressed as they kept saying that they wanted to die. We could not see that any appropriate action had been taken to support this person.”


The substantial Victorian property is part of an estate currently on the market for £2.5m. The elder Latif brother lives in a £1m house in Bowdon, Cheshire, while his younger sibling lives in a £1.2m gated house on a tree-lined street in Woolton, south Liverpool.


The brothers admitted at an earlier hearing that they had failed to notify authorities about the deaths of 10 residents at the home, failed to inform the CQC of three serious incidents, failed to provide safe care and exposed residents to “significant” risk and harm.


They pleaded guilty to 14 charges in all, between 14 April and June 2015.


Fining the brothers £82,429.72, the judge said he had been affected by reading the case papers. “It was a distressing experience and emotionally I felt both a degree of incredulity and anger that the residents in this home were so betrayed by the individuals paid to look after them and deriving a considerable amount for doing so,” Shaw told Amjad Latif, the only brother to attend court.


Latif’s lawyer, Kevin Donnelly, said his client was an educated man with many business interests who had inherited the business from his late father. He wrongly assumed the care home would run itself, Donnelly said. He was remorseful “and accepts that these failures were wide-ranging and significant”.


Amjad declined to talk to reporters outside court, saying: “There’s nothing left to say.”


But one couple whose mothers were both at Mossley Manor, paying £450 a week for private care, said the tough fine should be a deterrent.


“Let this be a lesson to other care home owners that you have got to follow the guidelines of the CQC otherwise they will close you down,” said the husband, whose mother was 91 when she had to leave the home and move to another with just four days’ notice after the CQC shut it down.


He said he was shocked and disgusted to hear how bad conditions had become. “It must have mostly been happening behind closed doors because our mothers were quite well looked after – but we were in almost every day to check on them,” he said. “Perhaps it was the others who didn’t receive any visitors. It was horrendous to hear what was going on.”



Brothers fined over "depressing, unsafe" Liverpool care home

22 Ocak 2017 Pazar

Big Brother’s eye on the health service | Letters

Thirty years ago, when I learned that time and motion studies had been used to devise the work rota in the casualty department where I worked, it seemed logical and unthreatening. John Harris’s piece (They call it fun, but the digital giants are turning workers into robots, 21 January) reminded me that when computers in the out-of-hours service started to monitor general practitioners’ activity continuously in 2007 it felt very Big Brotherish. The times patients waited were colour-coded, spurring us on to stop them turning red, and our scores were fed back each month, with pats on the back or threats of sanctions. The monitoring coincided with a reduction in staffing levels.


At much the same time, GPs’ referrals to hospital started being scrutinised (and, indeed, triaged) by a Kafkaesque system of so-called healthcare professionals. An attendance certificate omitted from a lengthy online annual appraisal form could generate a warning. Small wonder that GP posts fail to attract applicants and that early retirement appeals to so many.
Dr Stuart Handysides
Retired GP, associate editor, ProMED-mail


Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com


Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters



Big Brother’s eye on the health service | Letters

20 Nisan 2014 Pazar

Cooperation And Corruption: Brothers From The Identical Hormonal Mother

We humans contend with really a handful of wicked flip sides in our individual and interpersonal lives. Gratitude can transform into resentment. Concern can morph into apathy. Really like can speedily turn into hate. New investigation digs deeper into a related neurobiological duality that can, and usually does, run rampant in groups: the Jekyll and Hyde of collaboration and corruption.


Researchers hypothesized that oxytocin—the same hormone that preceding scientific studies have strongly linked to cooperation and altruism—can predispose us to acting dishonestly if we believe doing so will benefit our group of selection. A “group” in this case signifies anyone to whom we come to feel some sense of obligation, be it household, coworkers, peers, political cronies or our Friday night craft beer buddies.


In our day-to-day lives, oxytocin is thought to perform a massive role in how closely bonded we come to feel to our group. It isn’t just the “cuddle hormone” (usually mentioned in scientific studies about enjoy and affection) but also the group-cohesion hormone.


To check the hypothesis, the study team gave 1 group of healthful male participants a dose of oxytocin by way of nasal spray and another group a placebo nasal spray (neither the participants nor the researchers knew which participants acquired which spray). The participants have been then asked to toss a coin multiple times and make predictions on whether they’d flip heads or tails, and then self-report on the outcomes. How well they did, they were told, would win or get rid of funds for their fellow group members. How they reported—honestly or dishonestly—was kept anonymous, assuring the participants that how they chose to respond wouldn’t reflect back on them personally.


We may well guess that participants would lie far more often about the benefits only if they, individually, could benefit – but instead participants provided oxytocin lied drastically far more about the coin flip than the placebo group only if undertaking so acquired income for their fellow group members. And they lied for the group even if they believed that the favor wouldn’t be reciprocated.


To locate out if participants would react the very same if they have been told they’d benefit individually, the researchers place another group through the exact same testing problems but told participants that the outcomes of their predictions would only win or get rid of them income, with no group advantage or loss connected. The results in this situation showed that oxytocin did not influence participants to lie any much more than individuals in the placebo group.


In other phrases, oxytocin promoted lying for group but not person advantage.


The study has a handful of limitations, the most apparent of which is that it used only male participants. Whether or not or not oxytocin would influence females towards group dishonesty is impossible to inform from these benefits.


But, at least for men, it would seem that increased levels of oxytocin potently affect selections to lie for the group’s benefit. This could aid clarify the “you go, I go, we all go” nature of fraternal groups. And the outcomes highlight the part of group bonding in forging hard-to-break corruption. Last year’s hit film, The Wolf of Wall Street, a correct tale about a group of corrupt stock brokers generating an obscene quantity of ill-gotten funds, and lying to guarantee that no 1 got caught (at least for a even though), comes to thoughts as a vivid illustration.


The review was published in The Proceedings of the Nationwide Academy of Sciences.


You can uncover David DiSalvo on Twitter @neuronarrative and at his website, The Everyday Brain. His newest book is Brain Changer: How Harnessing Your Brain’s Electrical power To Adapt Can Adjust Your Lifestyle.



Cooperation And Corruption: Brothers From The Identical Hormonal Mother