Promoting etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
Promoting etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

30 Ağustos 2016 Salı

Care firm criticised for promoting "exciting" prison self-harm incidents

The UK’s largest private healthcare provider has been criticised after one of its senior executives spoke of the “exciting life of prison medical staff” in reference to life-threatening injuries and self-harm.


Dr Sarah Bromley, Care UK’s national medical director for health in justice, said in a staff recruitment video: “If you like life to be exciting, there are always alarm bells going off, resuscitations, self-harming incidents, a lot of chaos that goes on in our prisons.”


The remarks, which have been criticised as ill-judged and offensive, come at a time when suicides and self-harm rates are at a record high in prisons in England and Wales.


Care UK is the UK’s largest independent provider of health and social care services. Its health and justice arm provides healthcare in 30 prisons in England and Wales, including some of the biggest.


It provides healthcare in HMP Leeds, which has seen five apparently self-inflicted deaths in the last year. At Chelmsford prison, where it also operates, an inspection report published this week said health provision was inadequate. Inspectors said self-harm levels were “very high, far higher than at comparator prisons.”


This month a coroner said “significant failures” by Care UK had contributed to the death of a prisoner at Pentonville jail in London. Terence Adams, 43, killed himself at the prison last November. Mary Hassell, the senior coroner for inner north London, found medical staff did not take immediate action after Adams’ admission to the jail despite recording a “high risk of self-harm”.


Adams had been deemed at risk on a mental health assessment, which should have triggered an immediate admission to in-patient care at the jail. Instead he was placed in a normal cell. He killed himself three days later.


The coroner also said a report compiled by Care UK after the death was not shared with the coroner’s office until it was accidentally discovered by lawyers during the inquest.


Also this month, the Ministry of Justice published a bulletin on deaths, self-harm and assaults in prisons. In the 12 months from June 2015 there were 105 apparently self-inflicted deaths, a 28% increase on the previous year, and 34,586 reported incidents of self-harm, up 27%.


Deborah Coles, the director of Inquest, which supports relatives of people who die in custody, said Bromley’s remarks were offensive to the hundreds of families the charity had represented over the years.


Coles expressed concern that the comments demonstrated a lack of understanding of the vulnerability of prisoners and the staff who work with them.


“If this is the premise in which staff are recruited to work in some of the most challenging prisons, it is not hard to imagine the quality of training Care UK staff receive,” she said.


“The evidence from prison inspectors and the coroner earlier this month is alarming. When will the government stop prioritising profit over quality of service and look at how these private providers are operating on the ground?”


A Care UK spokesman said: “The video seeks to explain to healthcare professionals the difficulties, but also the opportunity, of providing complex multi-disciplinary care to vulnerable people, who often have had limited access to healthcare in the past, within what is inevitably a challenging environment.


“Whilst seeking to describe the nature of the role and environment appropriately, we are of course sensitive to the perceptions of everyone connected to prison healthcare and we will review our recruitment material accordingly.”


After the Guardian contacted Care UK about the recruitment video, the company edited the film, removing Bromley’s reference to excitement, resuscitations, and self-harm.



Care firm criticised for promoting "exciting" prison self-harm incidents

11 Temmuz 2014 Cuma

Why J Crew is promoting clothes that"s even smaller than dimension zero

Waisting away

Waisting away? No healthful grownup ought to need to have a size 000. Photograph: Alamy




Title: 000.


Age: Brand new.


AKA: XXXS.


Physical appearance: Really modest.


How modest? If it were a particular person, it would have a 58cm (23in) waist.


Is it a particular person? Allegedly.


If it is not a man or woman, then what is it? It really is clothing. Or, far more exclusively, it’s a clothing dimension. Or, even far more particularly, it really is a women’s clothes dimension just lately introduced by US retailer J Crew.


Who the hell is supposed to match it? Officially, J Crew is making 000 clothes to appeal to the “smaller sized-boned” female. But it has been accused of taking “size vanity” to preposterous extremes.


Dimension vanity? It means producing the illusion of thinness in your customer by resorting to quantity deflation. The notorious American “dimension zero”, for example, equates to a United kingdom dimension 4. A minor later, the 00 dimension (United kingdom 2) was introduced, now followed by 000.


Doesn’t that simply help to perpetuate a warped public perception of what constitutes a regular human physique? It undoubtedly does. A 58cm waist is deemed a healthy measurement for a woman aged six to eight.


It really is the two harmful and sickening! Your outrage is mentioned, even though dimension vanity is typically for the advantage of the bigger buyer, ie the size 24s who have been flatteringly downgraded to a twenty.


Is that J Crew’s explanation? Oh no. A spokesman for J Crew stated the 000 innovation was “basically addressing the demand coming from Asia for smaller sizes than what we had carried. Our sizes typically run large and the Asia market place tends to run little.”


Now I do not know what to believe. Or what to wear. Mail Online, alternatively, attributed the demand for the new sizing to a trend on the component of female celebrities of posting skeletal selfies, which are noticed by impressionable young ladies.


I’ve in no way seen any such selfies. Will not fret, Mail On-line reprinted loads of them so you can get the notion.


What next? Zero-zero-hrs contracts? Treble-zero tolerance? Never give anybody any suggestions.


Do say: “It does not even make mathematical sense – zero occasions zero occasions zero is nevertheless zero. Zero to three decimals areas is still zero. YOU Cannot HAVE Smaller sized THAN ZERO.”


Will not say: “Hey, skinny! The children’s division is on the second floor.”




Why J Crew is promoting clothes that"s even smaller than dimension zero

5 Şubat 2014 Çarşamba

Kicking The Habit: CVS To Quit Promoting Tobacco, Sacrificing $2 Billion In Revenue For Public Well being And Long term Growth


CVS, the biggest pharmacy chain in the United States, will stop selling cigarettes and other tobacco merchandise in all of its seven,600 shops by October one, its mother or father firm CVS Caremark CVS Caremark announced this morning. It is the first time any drugstore has ever dropped this deadly funds cow, and it is portion of a significant shift in path for the drugstore giant.


“We’ve acquired 26,000 pharmacists and nurse practitioners who are assisting hundreds of thousands of individuals each and each day,” mentioned Larry Merlo, the chief executive of CVS Caremark. “They control circumstances like substantial blood strain, higher cholesterol, and diabetes — all problems that are worsened by smoking. We’ve come to the determination that cigarettes have no place in an atmosphere exactly where healthcare is getting delivered.”


The selection acquired quick praise from the American Healthcare Association, the Robert Wood Johnson Basis, and the American Cancer Society American Cancer Society. “Over time, we think lives will be saved by this,” says Cancer Society President John Seffrin. But the public-well being-mindedness will price CVS billions – virtually. The organization says $ 2 billion in product sales will be shaved off its $ 125 billion prime line. That will strain earnings, also, even though Merlo swears incremental cost cuts will preserve individuals pressures from displaying up in its profit statements.


Merlo says that continuing to promote cigarettes, which the Surgeon Common blames for 480,000 deaths each yr from heart illness, lung cancer, and stroke, was anathema to CVS’ long-term prepare to grow to be a central player in the U.S. well being care method that interacts ever a lot more closely with patients, providing flu shots, reminding them when they are not filling prescriptions, and, via its 800 Minute Clinic in-store nurse practitioner stations, prescribing medicines. “I see my function as insuring that the firm is positioned for growth,” says Merlo. “And that is what this decision is about.”


CVS, like rivals Walgreen Walgreen and Rite-Assist Corporation, is seeing a dramatic change to its enterprise as it focuses much less on taking marginal revenue out of drug income and far more on bigger agreements with hospitals and insurance coverage firms. In fact, CVS is in the midst of an even larger shift than its competitors. Simply because of its 2007 merger with Caremark, the firm is not only a drug keep chain but also a pharmacy benefit manager, that means it performs with insurance coverage organizations and employers to control drug costs. The assumption is that by currently being a rival to each Rite-Support and positive aspects manager Express Scripts Express Scripts, CVS can extract greater cost savings and offer you better care to individuals, conserving employers money the two by cutting expenses and by generating folks healthier.


Amongst CVS’ newer offerings: a deal with insurers by means of which sufferers who have not filled a necessary prescription, like a hypertension drug, are given counseling from a pharmacist if they demonstrate up wanting something else, like an antibiotic. This is attainable since CVS has information of the two in-keep and mail-purchase prescriptions unfilled prescriptions cost the healthcare system $ 300 billion yearly, CVS says. Yet another new solution will aid sufferers indicator up for pricey medication for cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, and other “specialty” circumstances, support them figure out how to pay out for them, and permit them to both get them in the mail or select them up at a CVS story.


These new efforts have led CVS to function much more closely with hospitals, doctors’ networks, and what are referred to as Accountable Care Organizations, new kinds of organizations encouraged by Obamacare in which medical doctors agree to be paid not for every stitch, prescription, or procedure but based mostly on how nicely individuals do right after therapy. If CVS can support save money or maintain patients healthier, it may possibly get a piece of the action. But these efforts were major to cognitive dissonance, says Troyen Brennan, a former professor of medicine at Harvard Health care College who is now CVS’ chief healthcare officer.


“We would often get the question: why do you proceed to sell cigarettes?” says Brennan. “Because from the physicians’ and nurses’ stage of see, you’re either all in for healthcare or you are not.” He says he thinks that possessing been the 1st pharmacy to drop cigarettes will be a “competitive advantage” against other retail pharmacies because of the credibility it will give CVS when speaking to doctors.


It’s surely receiving good buzz from organizations pre-briefed on the announcement. Risa Lavizzo-Mourey, MD, the CEO of the Robert Wood Johnson Basis, called CVS’ cig ban “a large and crucial stage forward for moving us as a nation to a area exactly where we can be healthier.” And Robin Koval, the chief executive of Legacy, the basis formed to cease teen smoking formed when 46 states’ attorneys basic settled with tobacco makers, virtually mentioned “Wow.”


“For the number a single retail pharmacy chain to get a extremely daring stage like this and place folks and their overall health in front of revenue sends a signal that if you want to speak the speak about becoming there to serve your buyers and their healthcare demands, then you have to walk the walk,” says Koval.


In the shorter phrase, the cigarette ban might help with one particular new organization: CVS is offering patients’ smoking cessation treatment, which will usually be paid for by insurance coverage but which some individuals will require to spend for out of pocket. Sufferers will be offered numerous counseling sessions with a nurse practitioner and perhaps, if they need them, nicotine substitute gums, lozenges, or patches or medicines like Chantix and Zyban that can help sufferers quit. CVS does not promote so-called e-cigarettes, which vaporize nicotine so it can be inhaled.


Will the halo from the public health praise be sufficient to make up for the hit to earnings? Possibly. The $ 2 billion in yearly revenue lost is only one.six% of total revenue. In flip, CVS says that this will strain earnings by 17 cents per share, or 40%, on an yearly basis. But simply because the removal will not have entirely happened until October, that will only hit this year’s earnings by 6 to 9 cents per share. And CVS says it can make up individuals costs, maintaining its guidance, although that earnings coverage has to come from somewhere. The company is creating a daring bet on rebranding itself as being not just a shop, but a healthcare business. Arguably, it’s not there however. But Merlo has established a clear sense of direction, and when it comes to a massive, often slow-moving business, that is a very good thing.


Also on Forbes:



Kicking The Habit: CVS To Quit Promoting Tobacco, Sacrificing $2 Billion In Revenue For Public Well being And Long term Growth