Mass etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
Mass etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

18 Nisan 2017 Salı

Bashar al-Assad trained as a doctor. How did he become a mass murderer? | Ranjana Srivastava

Preparing dinner, I bite my tongue as images of the latest atrocity in Syria flashes on the screen.


“Isn’t he a doctor too?” my daughter asks.


“Yes,” I cringe at the “too” and rededicate myself to the carrots.


But she knows that conversations about medicine are usually far more animated in our household and immediately sniffs out my reticence.


“I don’t get it. Aren’t doctors supposed to help people?”


Since it’s too late to switch channels, I say something benign. But the footage continues, leaving her to conclude, “I guess not all doctors save lives.”


The heart-wrenchingly succinct statement goes to the heart of my own dismay at the appalling crisis in Syria. More than 400,000 dead, most recently in a nerve gas attack. Six million citizens internally displaced. Five million refugees fled to neighbouring countries. An entire country in spasms. And to add to the unspeakable tragedy, at the hands of a president who used to be a doctor. Not just a theoretical doctor, not one of those who enrolled in medical school but never touched a patient. No, Bashar al-Assad was a proper doctor who by all accounts was personable and polite.


A doctor who studied first at the prestigious Damascus University, then committed to post-graduate training and finally went to London to gain further experience in ophthalmology, a niche medical specialty with many aspirants and limited places. A doctor whose boss recalled him as humble and whom nurses thought exemplary in reassuring anxious patients about to undergo anaesthetic.


To his medical class he was unassuming, seemingly unaffected by his status. Perhaps he had secured admission in the way of other entitled offspring, through power and privilege, but he seemed to be at ease with the responsibilities of being a doctor.


Some classmates kept their distance, wary of the dictator-father’s long reach. Some suspected he didn’t have it in him to be a leader, but then, the world needs good followers and it would have been quite normal for Assad to have settled in a leafy corner of London and practised his craft. Not necessarily groundbreaking stuff, but solid, dependable, everyday medicine that relieved the suffering of many. No one thought he would turn out a mass murderer.


Upon becoming president, he returned to London with his glamorous and accomplished wife, herself a cardiologist’s daughter, who presumably possessed insight into a doctor’s obligations. At his old eye hospital, he looked longingly at a slit-lamp and fondly recalled his medical training.


When he was recalled home, Syria was in the grips of a rebellion, Sunni fighting Shia against a backdrop of roiling tensions in the Middle East. Perhaps Assad, the urbane, London-educated ophthalmologist who spoke of Syria’s “own democratic experience”, would be the people’s advocate, the agent of change. But alas, the Damascus spring didn’t last and Assad the kindly doctor transformed into Assad the feared killer.


Revulsion at the horrific abuses perpetrated by the Nazi doctors – Josef Mengele most infamous among them – led to the development of the Nuremberg Code, which govern the ethics of human experimentation. Radovan Karadžić was a psychiatrist and a poet before being convicted of genocide in the former Yugoslavia. British doctor Harold Shipman injected lethal drugs into more than 200 patients, and American cardiologist Conrad Murray was convicted of homicide after injecting Michael Jackson with the anaesthetic agent, propofol.


History has witnessed other doctors turned rogue but Assad’s attack on his own people is staggering by any standard. He has gone from bombing civilians to destroying entire hospitals, and whatever and whoever lies in their wake. Nearly 800 medical personnel have been killed and many others detained and tortured. Four hundred medical facilities lie in ruins, their hapless occupants either dead or badly injured.




Doctors around the world regard Assad’s deeds with dismay and horror




Entire cities have been left without medical aid, turning treatable injuries into fatal wounds. The United Nations has pleaded that “even war has rules” but experts say that no previous war has witnessed such deliberate, systematic targeting of medical facilities and health professionals.


It defies belief, but in a way it makes sense, that a doctor who once felt the pulse of people, knows that the way to still that pulse is by aiming his strongest weapons at the hospitals that keep people alive and give them hope. It would take a doctor to predict the psychological devastation and desperate surrender of a people robbed of gauze for a bleeding wound, antibiotics for a festering sore, surgery for a lodged bullet.


There are interesting views on how someone who once pledged to save lives could so wantonly destroy them. Perhaps he is striving to prove himself to his dead father who had openly favoured his older son who died in a car accident while Assad was becoming an ophthalmologist. The younger Assad was teased for being interested in human blood rather than the blood of politics – this is the revenge of the bullied.


Or more chillingly, all that medical training was just a show and behind the suave specialist lay a murderer who always had the measure of his power. Medical training necessarily inures doctors to pain and suffering: imagine how inefficient a doctor would be if he faltered at a patient’s every tear and cried over every wound. Part of becoming a good doctor is to learn to stand back enough to help, but most doctors experience a continual tightrope in maintaining a professional boundary while being empathetic. Perhaps Assad just dumped the empathy while fortifying the boundary.


Doctors around the world regard Assad’s deeds with dismay and horror. They know how many of their colleagues leave medicine for far, far smaller reasons than killing a patient. Most doctors can’t bear having a stain on their conscience for missing a diagnosis or misprescribing a drug, never mind that the patient wasn’t even hurt. Doctors take their own lives at the mere thought that they did something wrong. It beggars belief that someone who was once one of them could so systematically and remorselessly kill his own classmates and their patients.


History will diagnose Assad one day but in the meantime, when I see my Syrian patients I can’t help wondering whether to just treat their illness or acknowledge their deeper wounds. Their fragility is obvious as is their concern and shame.


Assad’s crimes against humanity seem distant until they are personalised in the form of a son, a mother, a neighbour. The easiest answer is to feel helpless and stay silent but it just doesn’t feel right. Another is to express solidarity with our fellow human beings even as they live unrecognisable lives in distant lands. This, too, can feel inadequate in the face of punitive government policies. A third is to support the courageous professionals and the organisations that are determined to stay put in Syria against the odds. Most of us won’t go to Syria because we are not skilled or capable of working in dangerous and impoverished settings. But we can be effective through donating to credible charities, such as the Red Cross, The White Helmets and Médecins Sans Frontières, who can channel our aid where it is needed.


Our gestures can seem insignificant in the face of so great a tragedy but I hope it says to the Syrian people that while their own doctor president has given up on them, the rest of the world has not.



Bashar al-Assad trained as a doctor. How did he become a mass murderer? | Ranjana Srivastava

15 Mart 2017 Çarşamba

What Happened to Obama Era Of Mass Shootings Under the Trump Administration?

It has been horrific to watch all mass shootings in America over the last 8 years. Everyone has been traumatized by the images of carnage week in and week out. Have you noticed these mass shootings are no longer happening in America?


In any political environment, it is important to observe what is actually happening not just what is being said. This is an observation only. Considering all the Machiavellian possibilities. Looking through history, it would be naïve not to question the surge of mass shootings in the Obama era in this context.


Under the Obama Administration, mass shootings were up many times over any previous president. A constant bombardment of horrific incidents involving mass shootings was endured by the public during the last 8 years. It seemed every couple of weeks a deranged person was killing in mass. Hardly a month went by without these scenes being projected through the media. With hyperventilating commentary from mainstream media on how gun rights were to blameThe constant drumbeat of gun control as the only answer to stop the carnage. Obama himself saying this had become routine. Routine indeed as there was a mass shooting on average of about every 3 weeks. Some shootings in clusters and others further apart. Sometimes multiple instances in a row when certain legislation was being pushed. Always used to for political advantage.


Accompanied by ridiculous coverage ready to go by the mainstream media. In many instances, the killers were known to the Intel Agencies like the San Bernardino shooters and the Boston Marathon bombers. Yet the Intel Agencies were called off months before each incident. This has happened many times. Instead of talking about false flags, Operation Gladio, or the Obama justice department protecting their wind up toys from an investigation. Let’s ask a simple question. What happened to all the Obama Era Mass Shootings under the Trump Administration?


Mass Shootings under the Last Five Presidents


Ronald Reagan: 1981-1989 (8 years) 11 mass shootings
Incidents with 8 or more deaths = 5


George H. W. Bush: 1989-1993 (4 years) 12 mass murders
Incidents with 8 or more deaths = 3

Bill Clinton
: 1993-2001 (8 years) 23 mass murders
Incidents with 8 or more deaths = 4


George W. Bush: 2001-2009 (8 years) 20 mass murders
Incidents with 8 or more deaths = 5

Barrack H. Obama
: 2009-2015 (in 7th year) 162 mass murders
Incidents with 8 or more deaths = 18


Source: List of each event by TruthStreamMedia



What happened to all the Obama Era Mass Shootings under the Trump Administration?


We are already well past the longest time without a mass shooting under Obama. Statistically, if these were all organic events, there would have been one by now. Under Obama, there would have been several by now. Sometimes week in and week out. Trump has been in office for 52 days as of the writing of this article. Not one mass shooting or terrorist attack. Canada had a conveniently timed shooting when the temporary travel ban was introduced but nothing in America.


Why hasn’t there been one of these attacks in America since Trump was elected? Perhaps without the lax oversight or outright protection of a corrupt justice department. These wind-up toys can no longer operate in the continental United States. In the most heavily surveilled population on the planet, it would be very difficult to pull off one of these operations if the government were actually intent on stopping them. These types of operations take money and coordination that is very detectable by Intel agencies.


Trump has instructed the Justice Department to focus resources on actual terrorists, not veterans and gun owners. Breaking up and disrupting plans that would have gone through under Obama. Bringing to bear all of the surveillance tools used on the American people to stop actual plots.


 Is this what we are seeing?


Now there is no clear political advantage is to be gained through such acts by the establishment, mainstream media or gun control advocates. If a mass attack were to happen, it would only bolster Trump’s calls for better vetting of immigrants, border security, and 2nd Amendment rights. So they stop. Very interesting. Of course, mass shootings and terror attacks will never completely end. Yet the suspicion is there will be much less under a Trump Administration. Just an observation that many may be thinking themselves.


Sources:


Visit RaptormanReports for news, science, and history


Why Have There Been More Mass Shootings Under Obama than the Four Previous Presidents Combined?



http://truthstreammedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Mass-Murders-1981-2015-under-5-presidents.pdf


http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/12/mass-shootings-mother-jones-full-data


http://www.naturalnews.com/035849_domestic_terror_plots_FBI.html



What Happened to Obama Era Of Mass Shootings Under the Trump Administration?

13 Mart 2017 Pazartesi

What Happened to Obama Era Of Mass Shootings Under the Trump Administration?

It has been horrific to watch all mass shootings in America over the last 8 years. Everyone has been traumatized by the images of carnage week in and week out. Have you noticed these mass shootings are no longer happening in America?


In any political environment, it is important to observe what is actually happening not just what is being said. This is an observation only. Considering all the Machiavellian possibilities. Looking through history, it would be naïve not to question the surge of mass shootings in the Obama era in this context.


Under the Obama Administration, mass shootings were up many times over any previous president. A constant bombardment of horrific incidents involving mass shootings was endured by the public during the last 8 years. It seemed every couple of weeks a deranged person was killing in mass. Hardly a month went by without these scenes being projected through the media. With hyperventilating commentary from mainstream media on how gun rights were to blameThe constant drumbeat of gun control as the only answer to stop the carnage. Obama himself saying this had become routine. Routine indeed as there was a mass shooting on average of about every 3 weeks. Some shootings in clusters and others further apart. Sometimes multiple instances in a row when certain legislation was being pushed. Always used to for political advantage.


Accompanied by ridiculous coverage ready to go by the mainstream media. In many instances, the killers were known to the Intel Agencies like the San Bernardino shooters and the Boston Marathon bombers. Yet the Intel Agencies were called off months before each incident. This has happened many times. Instead of talking about false flags, Operation Gladio, or the Obama justice department protecting their wind up toys from an investigation. Let’s ask a simple question. What happened to all the Obama Era Mass Shootings under the Trump Administration?


Mass Shootings under the Last Five Presidents


Ronald Reagan: 1981-1989 (8 years) 11 mass shootings
Incidents with 8 or more deaths = 5


George H. W. Bush: 1989-1993 (4 years) 12 mass murders
Incidents with 8 or more deaths = 3

Bill Clinton
: 1993-2001 (8 years) 23 mass murders
Incidents with 8 or more deaths = 4


George W. Bush: 2001-2009 (8 years) 20 mass murders
Incidents with 8 or more deaths = 5

Barrack H. Obama
: 2009-2015 (in 7th year) 162 mass murders
Incidents with 8 or more deaths = 18


Source: List of each event by TruthStreamMedia



What happened to all the Obama Era Mass Shootings under the Trump Administration?


We are already well past the longest time without a mass shooting under Obama. Statistically, if these were all organic events, there would have been one by now. Under Obama, there would have been several by now. Sometimes week in and week out. Trump has been in office for 52 days as of the writing of this article. Not one mass shooting or terrorist attack. Canada had a conveniently timed shooting when the temporary travel ban was introduced but nothing in America.


Why hasn’t there been one of these attacks in America since Trump was elected? Perhaps without the lax oversight or outright protection of a corrupt justice department. These wind-up toys can no longer operate in the continental United States. In the most heavily surveilled population on the planet, it would be very difficult to pull off one of these operations if the government were actually intent on stopping them. These types of operations take money and coordination that is very detectable by Intel agencies.


Trump has instructed the Justice Department to focus resources on actual terrorists, not veterans and gun owners. Breaking up and disrupting plans that would have gone through under Obama. Bringing to bear all of the surveillance tools used on the American people to stop actual plots.


 Is this what we are seeing?


Now there is no clear political advantage is to be gained through such acts by the establishment, mainstream media or gun control advocates. If a mass attack were to happen, it would only bolster Trump’s calls for better vetting of immigrants, border security, and 2nd Amendment rights. So they stop. Very interesting. Of course, mass shootings and terror attacks will never completely end. Yet the suspicion is there will be much less under a Trump Administration. Just an observation that many may be thinking themselves.


Sources:


Visit RaptormanReports for news, science, and history


Why Have There Been More Mass Shootings Under Obama than the Four Previous Presidents Combined?



http://truthstreammedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Mass-Murders-1981-2015-under-5-presidents.pdf


http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/12/mass-shootings-mother-jones-full-data


http://www.naturalnews.com/035849_domestic_terror_plots_FBI.html



What Happened to Obama Era Of Mass Shootings Under the Trump Administration?

30 Mayıs 2014 Cuma

Simon Stevens: NHS should end mass centralisation - your views

The NHS need to finish mass centralisation and alternatively increase its regional companies to treat men and women in their own communities, Simon Stevens, the new chief executive of NHS England has explained.


In a marked reversal of present policy, Stevens stated the NHS must broaden its neighborhood services because numerous sufferers are not handled with “dignity and compassion”.


Several wellness solutions in western Europe were previously successfully serving their regional communities with no centralising almost everything, he extra. He informed the Daily Telegraph on Friday: “A variety of other countries have discovered it possible to run viable nearby hospitals serving smaller sized communities than sometimes we believe are sustainable in the NHS.”


What do you consider? Need to there be a lot more investment in local community companies? How can they help? Or, must there be much more hospital closures? Share your thoughts in the comment area under or tweet us @GdnHealthcare



Simon Stevens: NHS should end mass centralisation - your views

NHS must end mass centralisation, says new boss

NHS England

NHS England’s new chief executive Simon Stevens mentioned also numerous individuals were being robbed of ‘dignity and compassion’ simply because of a lack of local care. Photograph: Owen Humphreys/PA




The NHS have to end mass centralisation and as an alternative increase its regional services to deal with people in their personal communities, the new boss of NHS England has stated.


The chief executive, Simon Stevens, who began in the part final month, said also many older sufferers were currently being robbed of dignity and compassion simply because of a lack of nearby care.


Numerous health providers in western Europe have been presently successfully serving their neighborhood communities without having centralising everything, he added.


He advised the Every day Telegraph on Friday: “A number of other countries have discovered it attainable to run viable local hospitals serving smaller communities than at times we consider are sustainable in the NHS.”


He mentioned the complex care methods outdoors hospitals must adjust and investment was essential in local community companies for older folks to cease escalating numbers ending up in hospital.


“You can’t have a modern day well being services that is not treating older patients with dignity and compassion, supporting them at home and making sure targeted prevention [of unwell overall health].”There is a big chance to reorganise that so it meets the requirements of these at home. At the minute it is as well complex and too fragmented. If you were starting up from scratch you would not design community solutions like that.”


Firms ought to also financially reward personnel for losing weight and adopting a wholesome way of life, he suggested, mimicking similar schemes in the US.


He blamed the European operating time directive for damaging healthcare in the NHS and creating it more difficult for modest hospitals to remain open, while waiting time targets introduced below Labour grew to become an impediment to care in as well numerous cases.


On Wednesday Stevens is to make a speech to the NHS Confederation’s conference in Liverpool, outlining versions of care to create neighborhood services around tiny hospitals and meet the needs of an ageing population.


He stated it could indicate hospitals taking in excess of the working of some GP providers, and a lot more near doing work amongst specialist and neighborhood care.


Before taking on his new role, Stevens was president of global overall health and group executive vice-president at UnitedHealth, a US personal healthcare company, and had worked across the NHS working hospitals, overall health authorities and local community providers.


He took more than from Sir David Nicholson, who made a decision to retire after the Stafford hospital scandal.


Stevens had been broadly regarded as David Cameron’s favored candidate for the work and was previously a wellness adviser to Tony Blair when he was prime minister.




NHS must end mass centralisation, says new boss

25 Mart 2014 Salı

Stop Water Fluoridation! Mass Government-Forced Fluoridation Decreases IQ

Water fluoridation is the addition of the chemical fluoride to public water supplies, for the purpose of reducing cavities.


Currently, two-thirds of Americans have fluoridated public water, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Of those served by municipal water systems, the figure climbs to 73.9 percent.


A 2009 study that tracked fluoride exposure in more than 600 children in Iowa found no significant link between fluoride exposure and tooth decay. Another 2007 review in the British Medical Journal stated that “there have been no randomized trials of water fluoridation,” which is currently standard for all drugs.


Does Fluoride Decrease Intelligence?


In a meta-analysis, researchers from Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) and China Medical University in Shenyang for the first time combined 27 studies and found strong indications that fluoride may adversely affect cognitive development in children. Based on the findings, the authors say that this risk should not be ignored, and that more research on fluoride’s impact on the developing brain is warranted.


The average IQ difference between high and low fluoride areas was 7 points!


Fluoride seems to fit in with lead, mercury, and other poisons that cause chemical brain drain,” the author of the study, Grandjean says. “The effect of each toxicant may seem small, but the combined damage on a population scale can be serious, especially because the brain power of the next generation is crucial to all of us.”


How is this possible?


Dr. Vyvyan Howard – a PhD fetal pathologist, who is a professor of developmental toxico-pathology at the University of Liverpool and University of Ulster, president of the International Society of Doctors for the Environment and former president of the Royal Microscopical Society and the International Society for Stereology, and general editor of the Journal of Microscopy – said in a 2008 Canadian television interview (short, worthwhile video at the link) that studies done in several countries show that children’s IQ are likely to be lower in high natural water fluoride areas.


He said that these studies are plausible because fluoride is known to affect the thyroid hormone which affects intelligence and fluoride is also a known neurotoxicant. Such studies have not been conducted in countries that artificially fluoridate the water such as the US, UK and Canada, but should be, he said.


Why isn’t our government doing anything?


An overwhelming number of scientific studies conclude that cavity levels are falling worldwide … even in countries which don’t fluoridate water.  Specifically, the scientific literature shows that – when fluoridation of water supplies is stopped – cavities do not increase (but may in some cases actually decrease).


The studies seemingly prove without doubt that it is fluoride drastically affects our brain and its ability to function.  A drastic 7 point reduction across the US & Canadian populations is a gives us a significant intellectual disadvantage against China and Russia that remain natural.


Help Aqua Health Labs reach the government and force change by the people!   We need your support so together we can reach our goal to stop fluoridating our water our water supply.  Fluoride is an outdated draconian mass medication strategy that needs to stop!  Act now with us & sign the petition!


https://www.change.org/petitions/epa-stop-allowing-fluoride-in-the-us-water-supply


Jordan Markuson is a nutritionist, writer and conservationist.   He is an activist supporting consumption of raw, renewable, and organic foods


Sources:


http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/02/harvard-study-published-national-institute-health-journal-finds-fluoride-lowers-childrens-intelligence-7-iq-points.html


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/?term=10.1289/ehp.1104912


http://www.livescience.com/37123-fluoridation.html



Stop Water Fluoridation! Mass Government-Forced Fluoridation Decreases IQ

Stop Water Fluoridation! Mass Government-Forced Fluoridation Decreases IQ

Water fluoridation is the addition of the chemical fluoride to public water supplies, for the purpose of decreasing cavities.


At the moment, two-thirds of Americans have fluoridated public water, according to the Centers for Illness Management and Prevention (CDC). Of those served by municipal water methods, the figure climbs to 73.9 %.


A 2009 review that tracked fluoride publicity in more than 600 children in Iowa found no significant website link among fluoride publicity and tooth decay. Another 2007 assessment in the British Health care Journal stated that “there have been no randomized trials of water fluoridation,” which is at the moment regular for all medication.


Does Fluoride Reduce Intelligence?


In a meta-analysis, researchers from Harvard College of Public Health (HSPH) and China Health care University in Shenyang for the very first time mixed 27 scientific studies and identified sturdy indications that fluoride may possibly adversely influence cognitive advancement in children. Based on the findings, the authors say that this chance should not be ignored, and that much more investigation on fluoride’s influence on the building brain is warranted.


The regular IQ difference in between higher and minimal fluoride places was 7 factors!


Fluoride would seem to match in with lead, mercury, and other poisons that cause chemical brain drain,” the author of the examine, Grandjean says. “The effect of every single toxicant may seem to be modest, but the combined harm on a population scale can be severe, specifically since the brain energy of the subsequent generation is crucial to all of us.”


How is this attainable?


Dr. Vyvyan Howard – a PhD fetal pathologist, who is a professor of developmental toxico-pathology at the University of Liverpool and University of Ulster, president of the Global Society of Medical professionals for the Environment and former president of the Royal Microscopical Society and the International Society for Stereology, and standard editor of the Journal of Microscopy – stated in a 2008 Canadian tv interview (brief, worthwhile video at the hyperlink) that studies carried out in numerous countries display that children’s IQ are likely to be decrease in high natural water fluoride regions.


He explained that these research are plausible due to the fact fluoride is known to impact the thyroid hormone which affects intelligence and fluoride is also a recognized neurotoxicant. Such scientific studies have not been conducted in countries that artificially fluoridate the water this kind of as the US, Uk and Canada, but ought to be, he explained.


Why is not our government undertaking anything at all?


An overwhelming amount of scientific research conclude that cavity ranges are falling around the world … even in countries which really don’t fluoridate water.  Especially, the scientific literature demonstrates that – when fluoridation of water supplies is stopped – cavities do not increase (but might in some situations truly lessen).


The scientific studies seemingly show without doubt that it is fluoride drastically impacts our brain and its ability to perform.  A drastic seven point reduction across the US &amp Canadian populations is a provides us a important intellectual disadvantage against China and Russia that remain all-natural.


Aid Aqua Overall health Labs attain the government and force adjust by the folks!   We need to have your help so together we can reach our goal to cease fluoridating our water our water supply.  Fluoride is an outdated draconian mass medicine method that needs to quit!  Act now with us &amp signal the petition!


https://www.change.org/petitions/epa-end-permitting-fluoride-in-the-us-water-supply


Jordan Markuson is a nutritionist, writer and conservationist.   He is an activist supporting consumption of raw, renewable, and organic foods


Sources:


http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/02/harvard-research-published-national-institute-overall health-journal-finds-fluoride-lowers-childrens-intelligence-7-iq-points.html


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/?phrase=ten.1289/ehp.1104912


http://www.livescience.com/37123-fluoridation.html



Stop Water Fluoridation! Mass Government-Forced Fluoridation Decreases IQ

17 Şubat 2014 Pazartesi

Statins: Is the public beginning to question mass medicalisation?

Great Information FOR NOSES


There is, regrettably, not a whole lot that can be carried out for individuals troubled by persistent catarrh, with all its attendant miseries of a constantly blocked nose and hefty head, a post-nasal drip and, worst of all, the reduction (or marked diminution) of the sense of smell. These with a historical past of allergy may possibly be helped by the use of a steroid nasal spray, and some may react fairly drastically to abstaining from milk and dairy items. But for everybody else – aside from typical steam inhalations – that’s about it.


It as a result verges on the miraculous to understand that more than 3-quarters of individuals are “significantly improved” following a 3-month program of the low cost antibiotic erythromycin, taken at half the standard dose. Those wishing to know far more should read “Macrolide Therapy of Persistent Rhinosinusitis” by Anders Cervin, published in the journal Rhinology. Check out tinyurl.com/rhinologydownload for a totally free pdf.


—————————–


AN Reply TO FACIAL NUMBNESS


The misfortune of the young girl with persistent facial numbness, hearing troubles and vertigo following her return from a backpacking holiday in West Africa two many years in the past, has prompted readers to stage out that the US Food and Drug Administration lately warned that the antimalarial drug mefloquine can trigger neurological side-effects that could “persist for months or many years or grow to be permanent”.


Meanwhile, the same pattern of symptoms might, if transient, be a variant of migraine affecting the blood provide to the brain stem that connects the brain to the spinal cord. A correspondent from Dubai reports recurrent, and quite distressing, episodes that went undiagnosed for four many years – in spite of all the usual brain scans – right up until a new doctor joined the practice and recommended he give the anti-migraine drug Imigran. This, apparently, “did the trick”.


—————————


CAN YOU Aid?


This week’s health-related query comes courtesy of Mr HM from Bolton, whose enthusiasm for walking the fantastic outside is increasingly curtailed by a dread of heights – both when hill rambling and on cliff-tops – which induces feelings of nausea and vertigo. He also finds descending inner staircases with a wide central void “almost impossible”.


Curiously, his wife is similarly impacted, as nicely as discovering the interior of massive buildings such as cathedrals quite tough to deal with. They would the two be much more than interested in any achievable options.


—————————


RESTLESS LEGS Take A NAP


Finally, a reader reports that because discontinuing the acid-suppressant drug omeprazole, she can when again sleep through the night, getting no longer stored awake by the unpleasant sensation of restless legs syndrome – usually compared to “ants crawling up and down the bones”. This satisfied end result is practically undoubtedly relevant to the truth that omeprazole interferes with the absorption of iron from the gut – as iron deficiency is the underlying, and eminently treatable, result in in virtually one particular fifth of these with this problem.


Email medical questions confidentially to Dr James LeFanu at drjames@telegraph.co.united kingdom. Answers will be published on the Telegraph site every Friday, at telegraph.co.uk/overall health



Statins: Is the public beginning to question mass medicalisation?

15 Ocak 2014 Çarşamba

Medicine Or Mass Murder? Guideline Primarily based on Discredited Research Might Have Triggered 800,000 Deaths In Europe Above The Last 5 Years

Final summer season British researchers provoked concern when they published a paper raising the probability that by following an established guideline Uk medical doctors might have triggered as a lot of as 10,000 deaths each and every year. Now they have gone a stage further and published an estimate that the same guideline may have led to the deaths of as many as 800,00 folks in Europe in excess of the last 5 many years. The discovering, they publish, “is so massive that the only context in the last 50 many years comes from the largest scale professional failures in the political sphere.” The 800,000 deaths are comparable in size to the worst instances of genocide and mass murder in latest background.



Hannibal Lecter

Hannibal Lecter (Photograph credit: Wikipedia)




In their new post published in the European Heart Journal, Graham Cole and Darrel Francis continue to investigate the extent and implications of the injury brought on by the Don Poldermans research misconduct situation. The earlier paper demonstrated the potentially large and lethal consequences of the current European Society of Cardiology guideline recommending the liberal use of beta-blockers to safeguard the heart in the course of surgical procedure for folks undergoing non cardiac surgical procedure. The guideline was flawed due to the fact it was partly primarily based on unreliable research performed by the disgraced Poldermans (who also served as the chairman of the guideline committee). This could look like a very technical query but it effects several millions of men and women and may possibly, as Francis and his colleagues have demonstrated, led to a lot of thousands of pointless deaths.


The new article, the 1st of two parts, makes no new scientific claims, but as an alternative commences to contemplate the broader implications of the story. Cole and Francis briefly contemplate the dilemma of clinicians who may possibly “feel unable to act in contravention of guideline recommendations recognized as ‘state-of-the-art’ by the European Society of Cardiology” and who might even be penalized for failing to follow tips.


They note that much more than half of the lives lost– potentially much more than 400,000– may “have occurred after the research was discredited,” however some of the injury could have been mitigated if doctors  changed their practice soon after reading through about the controversy. (There was a two year delay soon after the start of the Poldermans affair until the ESC  withdrew the beta-blockade recommendation.)


Cole and Francis argue that a lot demands to be transformed in the application of medical study:



The aviation occupation has led the way in systems to stop, identify, review, and understand from skilled failures. Clinical medication is now following the very same path. We must produce similar programs for study.



In the 2nd part of their report, to be published in two weeks, Cole and Francis will increase the possibility that the obligation for misconduct lays not just with misguided researchers like Poldermans but also the institutions and the institutional leaders that offer uncritical help to research factories. Further, they will go over the part of journal editors and, even, journal readers.


Comment: It would be effortless to dismiss the views of Cole and Francis as outrageous and overly provocative. After all, with the exceptions of Josef Mengele or Hannibal Lecter, medical doctors aren’t usually murderers, at least not intentionally. My best guess is that the Don Poldermans of this globe strongly feel they are carrying out great, even though that might lead to cutting corners and, then, covering up the corner cutting.


But there are very good factors to consider that this sort of provocation is necessary. There is, it has now turn out to be clear, a basic lack of concern and response to proof of scientific fraud and misconduct. Journal editors, deans, division chairs, and others look much more concerned with safeguarding the track record of their respective institutions than aggressively upholding the integrity of science and research. Of course, defending science and keeping the reputation of an institution must not be opposing options. But since they are, maybe a tiny provocation is in order.



Medicine Or Mass Murder? Guideline Primarily based on Discredited Research Might Have Triggered 800,000 Deaths In Europe Above The Last 5 Years