According to psychological well being specialists who personally diagnosed serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer, he had a character disorder. That didn’t cease the authors of a recent paper trying to link autism and mass murderers, serial killers, and other homicidal maniacs from listing Dahmer as “highly suspected” of having an autism spectrum disorder, along with a 61 other individuals who were by no means diagnosed with 1, like Timothy McVeigh, Terry Nichols, and Dylan Klebold.
I’ve observed some recklessness in my wanderings through the world of autism science, but these authors attain depths I can’t fathom. If you doubt that, allow me just stage out that they use the Day-to-day Mail as 1 of their citations to demonstrate that a killer not diagnosed with autism might have it and cite an writer who very considerably needs to make up a diagnostic group known as “Criminal Autistic Psychopathy” as a subset of Asperger’s. Which no longer exists.
In their paper, which is generating a splash, of program, Clare Allely and co-authors declare that 67 of the 239 “eligible killers” they evaluated in their review had “definite, very probable, or possible” autism spectrum disorder. But a closer appear at their numbers demonstrates that of these, only 6 were in the “definite” group. That’s two.five% of the complete of 239 they examined. It is a percentage that occurs to be just somewhat less than the two.6% recognized in the most thorough study of autism prevalence in the basic population to date, in South Korea.
The evaluations of the South Korean population were thorough, but possibly no other population receives a lot more specialist interest and evaluation than killers like these who survive their crimes, as Dahmer, McVeigh, and Ramirez did, and killers who do not but whose writings and other leavings undergo deep scrutiny from authorities involved in their situations. Their evaluations are not a mystery. Psychologists had accessibility to Dahmer and evaluated him. Psychologists had access to Richard Ramirez (the Nightstalker) and evaluated him. Ditto McVeigh. These are specialists who personally evaluated these killers, and “autism” was not on their listing of labels.
It is inappropriate for anyone–much much less these authors, offering the imprimatur of science and peer review–to diagnose from a distance an individual they have in no way even met and with whose case they are not deeply acquainted. Include to that their conflation of mass murderers and serial killers, whose psychic motivations can be really various, and this complete paper is one large, hot, irresponsible mess. One that, I’ll add, is quite opaque on the criteria they utilised to diagnose these killers as “highly probable” or “possible” for possessing an autism spectrum disorder and at a single point elides it totally by referencing “evidence of ASD traits.” Everyone shares autism traits–autistic folks are not Martians with an completely separate set of nonhuman behaviors. That does not make every person autistic, which includes folks who may have overlapping traits and commit horrible acts. And autistic people who do commit horrible acts are no much more representative of autism than are the men who commit such acts representative of men in general.
Evidence-based mostly research examining established commonalities among folks who commit crimes like this can be enlightening, but wild speculation and retrospective diagnosing do practically nothing useful and can result in substantial harm to law-abiding people who carry any of these labels, no matter whether autism, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or other folks that have been advised. Autistic individuals are men and women, and like other men and women, some tiny percentage of them can engage in violent behaviors, though overall, they “almost never” target anyone outside their households, strategy the violence, or use weapons. There is no single or even group of diagnoses that explains or predicts the horrific habits of mass murderers. And some unsupported assumptions about autism–such as the continued canard that autistic individuals lack empathy (they do not)–help no one particular and definitely really do not guidebook us to way to stop this kind of tragedies.
I’ve written about this concern before simply because of the website link amongst Adam Lanza and autism, and the unifying characteristic of men and women who commit crimes like this isn’t a failure of eye make contact with in childhood or becoming quirky or weird or distanced–none of which is remotely pathognomonic for autism. The vast bulk who commit these crimes are males. Some, which includes Timothy McVeigh, have or had problems frequent to numerous several of us, such as depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and panic attacks, all of which the psychiatrist who evaluated McVeigh recognized. That doesn’t indicate that we want to starting eyeing depressed guys askance or spend time looking all around the archives of serial killer and mass murder situations for “evidence of depressive traits” so that we can retrospectively diagnose them with depression.
Serial killers are not like mass murderers. They are compulsive sadists–not a characteristic of autism–who do have a tendency to lack empathy. Some are angry. Mass murderers like McVeigh may possibly share that lack of empathy, but they have something else that drives them, too. Another attribute of McVeigh’s psyche, according to that diagnostician, was anger. Rage. Hatred.
The authors of this egregious paper helpfully offer some silly Venn diagrams that allegedly demonstrate the overlap of autism, brain injury, and emotional distress. But as I’ve written before, the actual unifying characteristic of most mass murderers is not any of these. It’s the anger and the rage, usually blasted outward at innocent targets by way of very easily accessible firearms. No autism needed … or, in the vast vast majority of cases even identified in this paper … diagnosed.
No, Timothy McVeigh Was Not Autistic
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder