Usain Bolt uses homeopathy for sports injuries- you can too

Usain Bolt uses homeopathy for sports injuries. Bolt has used homeopathic remedies since he was 16 years old. When he injured a hamstring in July of 2016, Usain Bolt withdrew from the Olympic trials. Using homeopathic remedies, Usain was able to heal his hamstring and go on to win numerous Olympic Medals in the Rio Olympic Games of 2016, including his third consecutive gold medal in the 100-meter race, just one month after his injury.

About Usain Bolt and homeopathic treatment for hamstring injury

Usain Bolt is an Olympic Gold medalist from Jamaica. In July 2016, he was diagnosed with a grade 1 tear of his hamstring muscle. One month after homeopathic treatment, he was able to compete and win Olympic gold medals. His treatment was conducted by Dr. Hans-Wilheim Muller-Wohlfahrt. Usain Bolt has been a patient at this clinic since he was 16. Because Bolt was born with a spinal curvature called scoliosis, he has often developed back pain needing treatment. Dr. Muller-Wohlfahrt specializes in sports medicine and is the doctor to many other famous athletes, including Boris Becker and the German Football (soccer) team.

Common homeopathic remedies for sports injuries

ARNICA

Arnica is the most common remedy used for acute sport injuries. Arnica is of particular use when there is swelling or bruising. Arnica can be used in low potencies every 15 minutes, or until bruising is reduced.

BELLIS PERENNIS

For deeper bruising, Bellis perennis can be useful. This remedy is also useful for tearing of muscles.

LEDUM

Ledum is the remedy of choice when the bruising is black or to treat sprained ankles. This remedy is especially indicated if the injured area feels cold but is made worse by the application of heat. The person needing Ledum is often relieved by the application of ice to the injury.

NUX VOMICA

Nux vomica can be used to treat stiffness after muscle overuse. Stiffness and overuse injuries are well treated by Nux vomica.

Usain Bolt and homeopathy

Arnica, Ledum, Bellis and Nux are likely remedies that Usain Bolt used in recovering from his torn hamstring. Homeopathy has a long history in clinical use for sports injuries.

About the author:

Melanie Grimes, CCH, is a writer, health educator and homeopath. She is a member of the Association of Health Care Journalists. She has taught at Bastyr University and lectured internationally. Follow her blog at MelanieGrimes.com. To order professional quality vitamins, visit her online vitamin shop at https://www.healthwavehq.com/welcome/mgrimes.

Sources include:

https://homeopathyresource.wordpress.com/2016/08/19/sprinter-usain-bolt-bounces-back-from-injury-with-the-aid-of-homeopathy-to-win-gold/

https://drjafersadiq.wordpress.com/2016/08/10/why-do-world-famous-athletes-use-homeopathy/

http://usainbolt.com

http://olympics.cbc.ca/news/article/usain-bolt-wins-200-gold-andre-grasse-gets-silver.html

Usain Bolt uses homeopathy for sports injuries- you can too

Jeremy Hunt asked health-related chief to look at research backing homeopathy

Medics raised questions about Jeremy Hunt’s obvious backing for homeopathy when he was made overall health secretary. Photograph: Neil Hall/PA

The well being secretary, Jeremy Hunt, asked the chief health care officer to assessment 3 sector-funded research in favour of homeopathy, emails released below freedom of data laws have revealed.

The emails demonstrate the well being secretary asked Prof Dame Sally Davies to appear at 3 scientific studies funded by Laboratoires Boiron, the world’s largest producer of homeopathic items.

When he was appointed health secretary in 2011, medics raised concerns in excess of Hunt’s preceding comments about the value of homeopathy, which is regarded by scientists to be medically ineffective. In a letter to a constituent in 2007, he mentioned homeopathic care was “enormously valued by 1000′s of individuals” and advised it must carry on to be supplied by England’s well being service.

The emails, first reported by BuzzFeed, display Hunt wrote to Davies in December 2013 asking her to overview the reviews and a letter from his workplace to a third get together explained it was “important we do not price reduction distinct approaches of treatment method if they demonstrate to be efficient”. Even so, the chief healthcare officer replied that it was “challenging to draw valuable conclusions” from two of the trials and a third had issues with its scientific method.

Sources shut to the overall health secretary said Hunt had merely been passing on the reviews to the chief health-related officer soon after they had been provided to him by an MP. “He does not express an view on homeopathy and he is not an advocate,” one particular source said. “An MP gave Jeremy these reviews and asked him to seem into them. Simply because he does not have an view, he passed them on to the chief healthcare officer and asked her to look into them. He was just the conduit. He expressed the chief medical officer’s view when he wrote back to the MP.”

NHS trusts are free of charge to fund homeopathic treatment options if they wish, though use of the substitute medication has been widely discredited. Final month, a review by Australian scientists concluded that homeopathy was no much more efficient than a placebo.

The draft paper by Australia’s National Well being and Health care Analysis Council assessed investigation into the effectiveness of the substitute medicine on 68 health circumstances and discovered was “no trustworthy evidence that homeopathy is powerful”.

Homeopathy is claimed to “allow likes remedy like” by making use of very diluted kinds of the ailment it is treating. “No excellent-top quality, effectively-designed research with ample participants for a meaningful result reported either that homeopathy induced better well being enhancements than a substance with no effect on the health condition (placebo), or that homeopathy induced overall health enhancements equal to individuals of yet another remedy,” the report’s summary said.

Jeremy Hunt asked health-related chief to look at research backing homeopathy

Jeremy Hunt sent homeopathy research to chief healthcare officer

Chief health care officer Sally Davies has mentioned publicly she believes homeopathy is ‘rubbish’. Photograph: Ben Stansall/AFP/Getty Images

The overall health secretary, Jeremy Hunt, asked the chief health care officer to commission professional critiques of 3 homeopathic remedy studies carried out by a industrial French organization – in spite of the CMO’s publicly expressed belief that homeopathy is “rubbish”.

Dame Sally Davies, the CMO, has categorically dismissed homeopathy as a waste of time and cash. “I am perpetually stunned that homeopathy is available on the NHS,” she told the Commons science and technology committee in January 2013.

However Hunt, who expressed help for homeopathy in 2007 before he joined the Department of Well being, asked Davies to initiate critiques of 3 studies carried out by the French company Boiron, which have already been dismissed by scientific critics.

Boiron has run into legal troubles in the US in latest years. In 2012, it set aside $ 5m to refund customers who bought certain homeopathic products. Skilled witnesses argued that the “energetic ingredients” were neither energetic nor substances.

Homeopathic treatments are dilutions of substances to this kind of a high degree that the authentic ingredient is undetectable.

Hunt’s action followed lobbying from the strongly professional-homeopathy Tory MP David Tredinnick. The wellness secretary’s intervention was unveiled via a Freedom of Info request by the web site BuzzFeed.

In a letter to Tredinnick, Hunt thanked the MP for drawing his attention to the scientific studies and said: “It is essential we do not discount different techniques of remedy if they demonstrate to be efficient and I asked the CMO to have them reviewed. The research have now been assessed by two senior researchers with experience in research layout and encounter of research in complementary therapies.”

The letter, drafted for Hunt, showed that the researchers located the studies did not provide proof of the efficacy of homeopathy. Two of the scientific studies had been “well-designed, with robust outcomes” but had been basically descriptive studies, that is, that they did not test 1 treatment against one more or towards a placebo, as would come about in a clinical trial.

The third review in contrast two group of sufferers with musculoskeletal disorders, such as back strains and sprains. 1 group was treated by GPs using homeopathy and the other by GPs utilizing traditional signifies. “Drawing any company conclusions is hard since of the relatively reduced response fee at 12 months and in certain the lack of randomisation, which implies that the results may have been developed by distinctions in between patient groups that have not been taken into account,” the reviewers had found.

Hunt, nevertheless, said he was prepared to carry on the discussion. “I am of program satisfied to place any counterpoints or additional scientific studies you might have to the reviewers for further consideration,” he told Tredinnick in his letter.

Hunt signed an early day movement welcoming the availability of homeopathy on the NHS in 2007, but a source near to the overall health secretary stated on Thursday: “Jeremy is not a supporter of homeopathy and is not persuaded that there is any scientific evidence that it works.”

Jamie Reed, a shadow wellness minister, mentioned patients and medics would be dismayed but not shocked to find out that Hunt had “wasted time and money” on investigating studies into homeopathy.

He added: “The government’s own NHS Selections web site states that the proof for homeopathy is ‘scientifically implausible’ but this isn’t going to appear to be sufficient for the error-susceptible well being secretary. As his policies continue to injury the NHS, I hope he hasn’t ordered an investigation into the use of leeches.”

Edzard Ernst, emeritus professor at Exeter University and a critic of homeopathy, mentioned there was presently evidence in the public domain relating to Boiron’s studies. “I have repeatedly commented on the dismal good quality and misleading conclusions of Boiron-sponsored study on my weblog,” he stated. “We have to inquire why an individual in a position like Hunt ignores all these facts and requires such extraordinary action.”

The examine evaluating patients treated by GPs with distinct strategies discovered significantly less medicine in the homeopathy group. It was, Ernst stated, “a self-fulfilling prophecy, like finding that a good deal of men and women in Macdonalds consume meat”.

He mentioned he was astonished that Hunt had offered to refer any further evidence from Tredinnick back to the reviewers. “He is actually offering additional assistance he consequently is considerably far more than a ‘conduit’. [Which is] really unbelievable – officially, he had renounced his enthusiasm for homeopathy.”

The campaign group Sense About Science stated Tredinnick had currently raised the scientific studies with them, at a hearing of the science and technology committee in Could final yr. “He already knows about the limitations of these research,” mentioned the campaigns director, Sile Lane. “It is a disingenuous request. This is single-review campaigning – if the pharmaceutical market did this, people’s response would be, rightly, indignant.”

Jeremy Hunt sent homeopathy research to chief healthcare officer

Homeopathy awareness can make the planet a healthier, happier place | Michael Marshall

Planet Homeopathy Awareness Week – the yearly promotional campaign organised by homeopaths about the world – kicked off on Thursday. This yr, rather than disregard it, moan about it or condemn it, scientists and sceptics alike should join in.

This may appear relatively perverse – particularly given the comprehensive evisceration of homeopathy earlier this week at the hands of the Australian National Overall health and Medical Analysis Council, which concluded “there is no trustworthy proof that homeopathy is effective”. Yet what homeopaths are in search of – consideration and awareness – is precisely what they ought to steer clear of. As any person who has explained the baffling approach of homeopathic dilution to an incredulous colleague will attest, raising awareness of homeopathy is by far the quickest way to dispel any belief in it.

With this in thoughts, the Great Contemplating Society (a charity that promotes rational considering) has launched its personal homeopathy awareness week website: homeopathyawarenessweek.org. The internet site highlights twelve points that homeopaths appear surprisingly unwilling to make individuals conscious of, like examples of exactly where homeopathy has critically harmed sufferers.

Apologists for homeopathy will argue that due to the fact the tablets include nothing at all but sugar, they can’t be harmful. Although their chemistry may be exact, their conclusion definitely is not. For example, there is the situation of Penelope Dingle, a bowel cancer patient in Australia who followed the tips of her homeopath husband, and as a consequence suffered a agonizing and unnecessary death.

Equally tragic is the story of Gloria Thomas, a child whose homeopathically handled eczema became so badly contaminated that it led to her death at the age of 9 months. The public ought to also be aware that homeopaths often provide ineffective homeopathic “alternatives” to vaccines that put children at threat of serious disease. You won’t discover these stories on any other homeopathy awareness websites.

It is alarming to note that homeopaths all around the globe are appropriate now claiming to treat a assortment of significant circumstances, this kind of as malaria, AIDS and even the Ebola virus. Indeed, Homeopaths Without Borders – a group of doubtlessly nicely-that means folk – are flying into areas of crisis in the building world carrying suitcases total of homeopathic tablets that contain nothing but sugar. It is not so much Médecins Sans Frontières as Médecins Sans Medicine.

Of course, belief in homeopathy is not merely a curio identified solely on foreign soil – it is effectively represented, for illustration, on the shelves of high street pharmacies in the United kingdom. Boots – the company whose otherwise exceptional reputation made it the target of demonstrations towards homeopathy in 2010 – nonetheless unapologetically stocks homeopathic goods on its shelves in thousands of retailers up and down the nation.

Luckily, there are constructive signs. In 2010, when I first became involved in alternative wellness activism, the NHS funded no fewer than five homeopathic hospitals nowadays all have both closed or faced a severe risk to their existence. Latest figures, obtained via a freedom of information request by the Nightingale Collaboration, demonstrate an encouraging swing away from homeopathy, with prescriptions falling from a substantial of 170,000 per annum in 1996 to just over 10,000 final 12 months.

Clearly, demand is falling. Provide, too, is on shaky ground. When Nelson’s homeopathic pharmacy – sugar pill supplier of option for Boots and Holland &amp Barrett – explored the likelihood of exporting to the US, the resulting FDA inspection reached a startling conclusion. In accordance to the report, the succussion method (the vigorous shaking that apparently activates the “vibrational memory” of water) meant that in a single out of every 6 homeopathic vials observed, the magical drop of homeopathic liquid missed the sugar tablets fully.

“The lively ingredient was rather seen dripping down the outdoors of the vial assembly. [Nelson’s] lacked controls to guarantee that the energetic ingredient is delivered to every bottle.”

In other phrases, 1 in six vials of homeopathic capsules from the greatest supplier of substantial street homeopathy incorporate no homeopathy at all. That no customers seem to be to have observed speaks volumes for the efficacy of homeopathy.

Maybe most surprising and encouraging of all is just how mainstream this discussion has turn into. Homeopathy is now the butt of mainstream comedians’ jokes and Television sketch displays, and homeopaths have grow to be a watchword for anachronistic thinking, overtaking the Flat Earthers. And, judging by the responses on Twitter to our homeopathy awareness web site, these days practically everybody has their very own “homeopathy is ineffective” gag.

So, I say: deliver on higher awareness … but awareness in its truest sense. Awareness that homeopathy has no scientific basis, is a waste of your income and has the prospective for great harm. If we can continue to spread this type of awareness, we’ll consign homeopathy to the historical past books where it belongs.

Michael Marshall is the undertaking director for the Good Considering Society. As vice president of the Merseyside Skeptics Society, he is also one of the organisers of QEDcon, which starts tomorrow. He tweets as @MrMMarsh

Homeopathy awareness can make the planet a healthier, happier place | Michael Marshall

Homeopathy is bunk, examine says

Homeopathy is no far more efficient than a placebo, according to an extensive research by a peak science entire body.

The draft paper by the National Wellness and Healthcare Research Council (NHMRC) assessed research into the effectiveness of the option medicine on 68 wellness problems and concluded “there is no dependable evidence that homeopathy is effective”.

Homeopathy claims to “let likes cure like,” by using highly diluted forms of the ailment it is treating. The Australian Homeopathic Association states the practice treats sufferers as a “whole man or woman, taking into account character, life style and hereditary factors as well as the history of the illness.”

But the NHMRC review, conducted by a functioning committee of healthcare authorities, mentioned it had no affect on a selection of circumstances and illnesses which includes asthma, arthritis, rest disturbances, cold and flu, chronic fatigue syndrome, eczema, cholera, burns, malaria and heroin addiction.

For the 68 conditions – including these listed – the overview both concluded definitively that homeopathy was not a lot more efficient than a placebo, or at the really least there was no reliable evidence to propose it was.

“No good-top quality, effectively-designed scientific studies with sufficient participants for a meaningful consequence reported both that homeopathy brought on higher wellness improvements than a substance with no impact on the well being problem (placebo), or that homeopathy triggered health enhancements equal to these of one more remedy,” study the report’s summary.

Physicians welcomed the findings.

Professor John Dwyer, an immunologist and Emeritus Professor of Medication at the University of New South Wales, advised Guardian Australia that the report was extended overdue.

“Obviously we understand the placebo impact. We know that a lot of people have illnesses that are quick lived by its really nature and their bodies will cure them, so it’s very effortless for individuals to fall in trap that due to the fact they did ‘A’, ‘B’ follows,” he stated.

Dwyer, who is also a co-founder of the scientific lobby group and watchdog Close friends of Science in Medicine, said it was not ethical for folks to prescribe a placebo and “fool people”, and mentioned homeopathic preparations must be “put away” once and for all.

He stated the best danger in homeopathy was in its use as a vaccination.

“In my point of see as an immunologist, the most severe problem was the spreading of the notion that homeopathic vaccinations were harmless and just as good as orthodox vaccinations. Folks who think that are not defending themselves and their children,” he explained.

Homeopathic “vaccinations” are presented for regular illnesses, as effectively as some that there are no medica vaccines for, mentioned Dwyer.

“Homeopathic vaccines had been currently being offered for HIV, TB, Malaria… none of them were effective,” he mentioned.

The Western Australia president of the Australian Health-related Association (AMA), Richard Choong, agreed and mentioned the AMA has lengthy held there is no proof to help homeopathy.

“Homeopathy is not a science. It is not primarily based in science,” he told Guardian Australia.

“In a great deal of instances it can be regarded as hazardous and can risk people’s lives, and vaccination is a classic example of this,” mentioned Choong.

“Patients have been led to feel that they’ve been vaccinated in some way, using homeopathy, when there’s no evidence to say they have been immunised against a disease which may result in harm to them if they were to catch it.”

Each Choong and Dwyer referred to as for the legitimisation of homeopathy to finish, including the cessation of personal medical insurance coverage subsidies and the sale of homeopathic preparations in pharmacies. The two also criticised the educating of the practise in tertiary education.

The report stated that “not all evidence is of equal value,” dismissing anecdotal assistance for the effectiveness of homeopathy, and urged well being experts to be aware of the science and inform their sufferers.

“It is not attainable to inform no matter whether a health treatment is efficient or not basically by contemplating individuals’ experiences or healthcare practitioners’ beliefs,” stated the report.

Submissions from homeopathy interest groups and the public have been between the scientific studies assessed by the NHMRC, but “did not alter the conclusions” of the Council, in some situations due to the bad quality of the research submitted.

Homeopathy is bunk, examine says