Bottom etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
Bottom etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

19 Ekim 2016 Çarşamba

Top UK tourist attractions come bottom for healthy children"s meals

Many of the UK’s most popular tourist attractions are failing to serve up healthy meals and snacks for young visitors, instead largely selling pre-prepared children’s lunchboxes loaded with sugar along with chips and “unimaginative, ultra-processed” foods, according to new research by a charity.


The Soil Association’s annual Out to Lunch survey found that 75% of lunchboxes sold at popular attractions did not routinely include a portion of vegetables or salad, while half included muffins, cakes and sweet treats but no fresh fruit.


Millions of families visit the UK’s main visitor attractions during the school holidays. Yet a poll by the charity showed that only 14% of parents said they thought the children’s food on offer was good enough.


The charity and organic certification body, which supports sustainable food and organic farming in the UK, surveyed the food and drink on offer at 20 of the UK’s most popular family attractions, covering all English regions, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland and ranking them in an online league table. Research was undertaken covertly by parents, as well as via desk-based menu reviews and a questionnaire.


London’s Natural History Museum and Brighton Pier scored joint last place in the league table, while the Eden Project in Cornwall topped the rankings, with Chester zoo in second place. When it came to sustainability and sourcing, only three attractions – Eden Project, Chester zoo and Durham cathedral – could reliably tell parents where their meat came from.


“Visitor attractions are making life hard for parents who want to enjoy a healthy and happy day out,” said Rob Percival, Soil Association policy officer. “Lunchboxes loaded with sugar and unimaginative ultra-processed foods are the norm and also a missed opportunity. So long as junk-filled lunchboxes continue to dominate family outings, parents will have a hard time convincing their children that healthy food can be a treat too.”


A lunchbox at London zoo was found to include up to 36g of sugar – 189% of a child’s daily sugar allowance – for example, while kiosks in the zoo sell fizzy drinks at a cheaper price than water.



Visitors go in the main entrance of London Zoo.


Visitors go in the main entrance of London Zoo. Photograph: Matt Dunham/AP

Of the good practice highlighted in the survey, Chester zoo served locally sourced milk and farm-assured meat, while all meals at the Eden Project were freshly prepared and included locally sourced meat and vegetables.


“Good food is at the heart of the Eden Project experience,” said Andrew Holden, the Eden Project’s purchasing director. “We make sure that meals are freshly prepared and that our ingredients are responsibly sourced, fairly traded, organic, local, and seasonal.”


Parents reported that while sugary and fizzy drinks were readily available, few attractions were prominently providing free fresh drinking water for children.


Anya Hart-Dyke, an Out to Lunch secret diner parent, commented: “I’ve lost count of the lunchboxes and children’s meals we’ve encountered on family days out that I just won’t consider buying for my child. Healthy, real food must be a priority for family attractions – I’d be far more likely to come back if I knew my child would get some proper food.”


The survey found some of the most popular attractions serve some of the worst food – the five bottom-scoring attractions receive 4.5 times as many visitors each year, compared with the five top scoring venues. The majority of attractions offered healthier adult food, compared with options for their children.


The Natural History Museum, which attracts 5 million visitors a year, said in a statement: “As a museum we help inform choices for society to create a sustainable future. Our restaurants and cafes are run by Benugo, who exceed standard practice for ingredients’ provenance, welfare and farm assurance, and seasonality. We look forward to engaging more fully in the survey next year and are confident that our high standards will result in a better ranking.”


Anne Martin, managing director of Brighton Pier, questioned the the survey results, saying the attraction had not received the questionnaire. “Accordingly, the survey results are inaccurate and unrepresentative of the efforts we have made to offer our customers a choice of healthier, sustainable dining options. The children’s menu in Palm Court was at the forefront of Jamie Oliver’s recent national Sugar Smart campaign when it was launched in Brighton, offering reduced sugar items to children: we have received many compliments for this as a result.”



Top UK tourist attractions come bottom for healthy children"s meals

22 Ocak 2014 Çarşamba

The Bottom Line On ObamaCare: A Plus for Sufferers & Insurers, A Minus For Hospitals

In my search for clarity with respect to the controversial Affordable Care Act, I was most fortunate in creating the acquaintance of Dr. Kenneth Davis, the brilliant and refreshingly analytical CEO of Mount Sinai Overall health Method in New York. In truth, five minutes into the interview I experienced an outstanding Aha minute when Davis informed in his gritty design of the 9 matrixes that make up the gist, the guts, of Obama Care.


Davis” keen insight allowed me to visualize a cross section of three elements of wellness care, Accessibility, Price and Top quality, towards three principal groups involved in healthcare, sufferers, providers(hospitals) and payors (insurance coverage companies). This exercise really resulted in the chart under, which Davis and his associates provided to Forbes.


As Davis articulated the 9 matrixes I could visualize for the very first time a way to organize in my mind the heretofore murky blather of speaking heads on tv as effectively as the axes beng ground by politicians and overall health gurus of all stripes. I could even area in these 9 matrixes plus or minus signs for the rewards and disadvantages of Obama Care.


In quick, the publicly held well being insurance coverage companies like United Health, Aetna and CIGNA will acquire new customers citizens with no overall health insurance will now have a possibility at well being care coverage that includes solutions like mental health treatment, mammograms and other childbirth care.( In point of fact, I was warned in late 2009 by a deeply concerned member of the U.S. Senate that the Reasonably priced Care Act was ” a sellout to the overall health insurance firms.”) As for the medical professionals, who may well acquire a lot more patients,they will be paid much less for their services if they really do not go out of network.


The hoary challenge for hospitals like Mount Sinai is to move patients into so-named Accountable Care Organizations(ACOs) which is a way to share the risk pool with Medicare. The aim is to stop hospitalizations and needless testing in purchase to bend the value curve.


In its utterly simplified terms Accessibility is useful to sufferers, a lot more or significantly less so for the insurance coverage companies, as they get new clientele and, however, a minus for the providing hospitals and their health care personnel. Hospitals will see more individuals, but main cuts in DSH plans that cover uncompensated care will hurt(These cuts had been implemented on the presumption that far more people will have coverage underneath Obama Care) Nationwide hospitals will shed some $ 160 billion nationwide.


The element of Value is most definitely a plus for the insurers who get organization from the probably 30 million uninsured Americans who will now have entry to overall health insurance, but it is a minus for the providing hospitals due to restrictions written in to the law. For sufferers, it can be either a plus or a minus, dependent on how many “ invincible” youthful individuals with no well being insurance coverage sign up, which will determine if premiums can be maintained at a realistic price. It will be a major challenge to persuade the so-called “invincibles” who may possibly feel they really do not presently require medical insurance coverage to budget it into their plans rather than pay the lesser dollar penalty.


The hoary challenge for hospitals like Mount Sinai is to move sufferers into so referred to as Accountable Care Organizations(ACOs) which is a way to share the threat pool with Medicare. The purpose is to avoid hospitalizations and needless testing in purchase to bend the price curve.


This is why hospitals like Mount Sinai are winnowing out physicians who permit as well a lot of hospitalizations and buy also a lot of expensive tests. In a nutshell, this is the Minus for those medical doctors who are not able to or will not change to the new discipline in medicine mandated by Obama Care. Even now and all, the advent of Obama Care has not decreased the amount of people applying to Health care College, in accordance to Dr. Davis.


As numerous insurance programs are primarily based on the star system and the star method is primarily based on doctor performance, Obama Care must lessen the quantity of doctors who are portion of the wellness exchanges via which the healthcare ideas are provided.
The hospital returns that advantage from remaining in the new method.


Quality is one more difficult matter. It should be a plus for sufferers simply because the new mandate demands particular good quality measures and forces hospitals to offer greater care or else drop reimbursement for the risks of many re-admissions and hospital born infections.


The wellness insurers get a large win due to the increase in the amount of individuals paying premiums. Also, they really don’t have to spend for re-admissions, which is a enormous benefit when so several poor sick people maintain obtaining their health care care by way of hospital emergency rooms. Offering hospitals must be huge winners but they have to meet extremely high high quality standards and are not getting reimbursed for these added resource efforts. So, for the supplier, what appears to be a plus could actually turn out to be a minus.



The Bottom Line On ObamaCare: A Plus for Sufferers & Insurers, A Minus For Hospitals