When will public anger over the NHS reach a political tipping point? | Polly Toynbee

There is an ebb and flow in reporting on the NHS as Trump, Syria and Brexit dominate front pages. But the pressure-cooker state of the entire service still worsens. This morning’s latest figures are just a snapshot of deterioration – but every target is missed, for A&E, ambulance response times, for treating psychosis within a week, for cancer waiting times, blocked beds and diagnostic tests.

“Demand” is rising, the government says, as if serious illness were a choice, though the pressure comes from well-predicted rapidly increasing numbers of old, sick people: this February’s A&E figures are, as ever, better than deepest winter January, but worse than February last year, as this crisis ratchets up. Major A&E centres are treating 81.2% of patients within four hours, against a target of 95% that used to be hit before 2010. The government likes to blame frivolous users of A&E, but those are easily triaged to on-site GPs. Serious delays are due to very ill people needing to be admitted with no empty beds: bed occupancy is at dangerous levels, as Chris Hopson of NHS providers warns, where doctors often have to decide “one in one out”, discharging those who still need more care too early.

Take the temperature in virtually every part of the NHS and the wonder is how the heroically overstretched staff keep the wheels on the trolley. Take this week alone: the Royal College of Physicians says 84% of doctors have to cope with staff shortages and gaps in rotas. GPs? Two years after a government promise of 5,000 more GPs, numbers are still falling. They dropped by 400 just in the last three months of last year: as doctors find the workload unmanageable some escape abroad, take earlier retirement or become locums. Too few new doctors want the burden of running a GP partnership, so 92 practices closed last year, tipping hundreds of thousands more patients on to already overloaded neighbouring GP lists.

Today the Royal College of Nursing starts consulting its members on whether to hold a strike ballot, the traditionally most reluctant of unions to take action. But with public sector pay frozen yet again at 1%, when inflation will shortly hit 3%, nurses are departing, like doctors, for less stressful, better-paid work. Recruitment from the EU is plummeting, as predicted.

As everyone firefights, all the preventative services are being cut that might prevent patients needing a crisis bed

As everyone firefights, hand to mouth, all the preventative services are being cut that might help keep patients from needing a crisis bed. The government has lines to take but no answers, and some of those “lines” are fictions. No, the NHS has not had £10bn, as Theresa May keeps claiming: it’s more like £4.5bn over four years, says the Kings Fund.

No, the £2bn given to social care will not ease the beds crisis, for all the exhortations to councils to use every penny of it in releasing bed-blocking patients with new care packages at home. NHS Providers, representing NHS hospitals, mental and community trusts, says councils are using that money to stem the collapse of existing care services and care homes, as the higher minimum wage and rising costs cause multiple closures. Cuts leave at least half a million old people getting no care, who would have done, and that risks falls, neglect and extra hospital visits. The care crisis is seeing 900 care workers a day leaving underpaid and overworked jobs.

Money, you might think, comes last in hospital managers’ priorities. But they are being severely harried and punished by NHS England to rein in ballooning debt by plundering capital funds and selling bits of land to cover running costs, one-offs many say they can’t repeat this year. An NHS England-commissioned report says £10bn is needed to cover this depleted capital: that’s not for grand new projects, but for basics like outworn dialysis machines.

A chair of a leading teaching hospital tells me “heroic assumptions” are being made by most trusts agreeing their “control totals”, their spending limits for this year. Debts will swell again. This year the NHS gets just a 1% increase, next year an unprecedented zero.

One of the Labour’s NHS triumphs was to cut waiting times for operations from 18 months to 18 weeks – but now that totemic 18-week limit has been abandoned. However, that only adds to hospitals’ financial woes as they rely on income from elective surgery, while every extra emergency costs them money.

This is the dismal background to the reorganisation that NHS England head Simon Stevens is attempting, almost undercover. His state of play review of his five-year forward plan passed hardly noticed, announcing a first tranche of England’s 44 STPs, (sustainability and transformation plans) to reconnect local services fragmented by the Lansley 2012 act.

Most observers think it the right way to go, putting the NHS and social care under a united structure with one finance hub, ending destructive and expensive competition and tendering of services. But hardly anyone thinks this can be done with no new money: every STP calls for capital for new beds and units. Virtually all involve closures and mergers stirring a local political outcry.

Jeremy Hunt, who always presented himself as the patient’s ally, rooting out poor quality, wallowing in the Labour disaster at Mid-Staffs, has fallen uncharacteristically quiet. He has nothing much to say about patient safety in A&Es or elderly patients turned out of beds too soon. Not even deaths on trolleys in A&E corridors in Worcester roused his usual righteous ire.

Concern about the NHS has risen high in recent polling: what no one knows is when public anger will reach a political tipping point. May and Hammond stay iron-clad adamant: all this is NHS shroud-waving and there will be no more money. Lack of any opposition helps, but can they really tough it out where Thatcher, Major and Blair all bent in the face of NHS crises?

When will public anger over the NHS reach a political tipping point? | Polly Toynbee

Anger as tampon tax is used to help fund anti-abortion group

A new row has broken out over the so-called tampon tax after it emerged that a quarter of a million pounds from a controversial levy on women’s sanitary products is to be given to an anti-abortion organisation.

Under pressure from campaigners after failing to honour a pledge to scrap the 5% VAT on sanitary products, former chancellor George Osborne said that more than £10m a year would be redistributed from the tax receipts to women’s charities.

But there was consternation on Saturday night among women’s groups and politicians who had campaigned on the issue after it emerged that £250,000 of that money is going to Life, a charity that campaigns against abortion and has been at the centre of controversy over the information provided by a network of unregulated pregnancy counselling centres.

A spokesperson for the End Violence Against Women Coalition said: “We are surprised to see that Life is the recipient of a very significant tampon tax grant. The government set out clearly that this money would be spent in ways that would address women’s specific needs and inequalities. It is hard to understand how a service offering counselling based on the fundamental premise that abortion is wrong, to vulnerable women, can do that.”

The government announced last Friday that 70 organisations across the country would share £12m from the tampon-tax fund, which it said would improve the lives of disadvantaged women and girls across the country.

Rob Wilson, the minister for civil society, gave details of the funding on a visit to the Suzy Lamplugh Trust, which is to receive £200,000 to help increase its casework support service for women who are being stalked.

Four other charities, ranging from the Women’s Rape and Sexual Abuse Centre Cornwall, which is getting £179,157, to Black Country Women’s Aid (£240,401), were highlighted in a press notice from the Department for Culture, Media & Sport.

No mention was made of Life, but the organisation appears on a separate long list, which says it will receive £250,000 for “housing, practical help, counselling, emotional support and life skills training for young pregnant women who are homeless”. There has been surprise not just at the award, but at its size: it is one of the largest donations on the list.

Life describes itself as unique, combining “pro-life advocacy and education work with nationwide services providing positive alternatives to abortion”. It served notice last year of plans to increase its online presence to compete with established service providers such as Marie Stopes and the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS).

Among others who criticised the grant was Labour MP Paula Sherriff, whose successful amendment to last year’s budget led to the government pledging to abolish the tax.

“It will seem bitterly ironic to many women if we are taxed for our biology, only for the government to hand over that money to organisations that don’t even believe we should have control over our own bodies, especially when so many are left without basic sanitary protection,” she said.

“Just this Thursday, I led a Commons debate on period poverty and discussed terrible cases like the homeless women who can’t afford tampons and whose health is at risk, the girls in Leeds who play truant during their periods and a charity that provides free sanitary products to Africa now getting requests from schools in Britain because so many female pupils cannot afford them.

“Tackling these issues would surely be a better use of the tampon tax fund. The minister agreed on Thursday to look at funding for sanitary protection in schools and homeless shelters, and I will be asking the government to review their allocation of the tampon tax fund urgently.”

There was also criticism from the Women’s Equality Party. Its leader, Sophie Walker, said: “We consider any restriction on women’s reproductive rights as violence against us and thus it was a shock to learn the government has used the tampon tax fund to support a charity whose mission is anti-choice and aims to ‘make abortion a thing of the past’.

“While we appreciate the work Life does to support homeless pregnant women and care for children with life-limiting or terminal illnesses, we are very disappointed to see the allocation of such significant funds to this one charity while many others struggle, particularly those supporting black and minority ethnic women and disabled women who experience some of the highest rates of violence against them and yet are consistently at the bottom of the list for funding.

The government had originally faced a potential rebellion over the issue, after an amendment tabled by Sherriff won the backing of Eurosceptics keen to assert Britain’s power to set its own tax rates. Osborne had originally pledged to remove the tampon tax in November 2015, but was unable to do so due to regulations applied by the European Commission that prevented member states from doing so.

The government said on Friday that it is committed to continuing the fund until EU rules allow a zero rate of VAT to be applied to women’s sanitary products and that a decision will be made on the future of the Fund once this has been achieved.

Wilson said at the launch of the fund: “From Cornwall to Dundee, the tampon tax fund continues to benefit organisations in every corner of the UK working to improve the lives of disadvantaged women and girls, including those who’ve been affected by violence.

“This fund is helping to improve lives, supporting our ambition to create a fairer, shared society for everyone. I’m glad that so many worthwhile organisations will benefit from this money.”

A spokesperson for Life said: “We believe that our support services for women are not a luxury but are essential for them to have the space to look at options for continuing their pregnancies with support.”

Anger as tampon tax is used to help fund anti-abortion group

Anger after NHS warns PrEP HIV drug could put other treatments at risk

A warning from NHS England that it cannot confirm funding for drugs to treat rare conditions including cystic fibrosis in children if it is to pay for an HIV prevention pill has been criticised by Aids campaigners.

The high court ruled on Wednesday that NHS England can fund pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a medication that cuts the risk of HIV infection by almost 90% and is aimed particularly at men who have unprotected sex with multiple male partners.

NHS chiefs immediately said they would appeal against the decision and warned that if the health service is to be responsible for providing the HIV therapy, at a cost of £10m-£20m a year, it may not fund other treatments.

As well as a cystic fibrosis drug for children, eight other treatments would be under threat of having funding cut, according to the NHS, including stem cell transplants for a rare blood cancer and a prosthetic knee for amputees.

Related: Users of HIV prevention PrEP urge NHS to fund ‘life-changing’ medicine

Drugs for rare conditions are categorised by price and effectiveness, from level one to five. The NHS statement said: “Given the ruling, NHS England cannot confirm funding for those treatments and services in levels three and four.” It did not name specific conditions.

Deborah Gold, the chief executive of the National Aids Trust (NAT), told the Times the statement was “deeply unhelpful”.

She said: “NHS England press releases now appear to be pitting PrEP against other treatments. Had NHS England not unlawfully pulled PrEP from its decision-making process in March, all prioritised new policies and drugs would now already be funded.”

Other treatments at risk of losing funding include a drug to prevent low sodium levels in the blood of chemotherapy patients, a childhood narcolepsy treatment and brain implants for children with hearing problems.

The NAT brought the high court case following anger and consternation among campaigners after NHS England said it would not fund PrEP because it did not have the power to do so. It argued that it was the role of local authorities, which have been given control of public health measures including reducing smoking and family planning as well as HIV prevention. Local authorities said they did not have the money to pay.

Mr Justice Green in the high court said NHS England had erred and that both it and the local authorities were able to fund the drugs if they so chose.

“No one doubts that preventative medicine makes powerful sense,” he said in his judgment. “But one governmental body says it has no power to provide the service and the local authorities say that they have no money.

“The clamant [the National Aids Trust] is caught between the two and the potential victims of this disagreement are those who will contract HIV/Aids but who would not were the preventative policy to be fully implemented.”

Gold said it was “enormously disappointing” that NHS England had decided to appeal against the ruling.

Anger after NHS warns PrEP HIV drug could put other treatments at risk

Anger more than refusal to send ambulances to 999 calls

In latest years, England’s ten NHS ambulance trusts have set up techniques to “triage” 999 calls and minimize the numbers taken to Accident &amp Emergency departments.

Overall health officials say this kind of schemes must be expanded, alongside a controversial national 111 phoneline, in buy to alleviate pressures on hospitals and ambulance solutions.

The report by the Care High quality Commission (CQC) discloses that a lot more than 300,000 calls to 999 ambulance companies are now getting resolved every year by means of telephone suggestions only, in an initiative recognized as “Hear and Treat.”

But the CQC survey of 3,000 recipients of the service suggests a lack of self-assurance in the program, with many individuals left baffled or fearful following becoming advised an ambulance would not be sent.

Amid individuals who have been not sent an ambulance right after speaking to one phone handler, 27 per cent felt the motives for not totally explained to them.

When patients felt they were offered a total explanation, 17 per cent still disagreed with the choice not to send paramedic out to them.

In complete, 11 per cent of those who were offered healthcare advice over the cellphone explained they did not have self-confidence in the phone handler who took their phone.

The polling identified most people could recognize the health care tips they were offered over the telephone, but seven per cent could not, even though 13 per cent did not agree with the tips they were offered.

Professor Sir Mike Richards, Chief Inspector of Hospitals at the Care Quality Commission, explained: “When a person rings ‘999’ they are in evident distress and they need to be listened to and allowed to discuss their considerations. In most cases, this looks to be taking place.”

“As ‘Hear and Treat’ is a phone suggestions service, it is actually critical that clear guidelines are provided, which folks comprehend and can follow. With seven % of men and women reporting that they did not realize the guidance that was provided to them, ambulance trusts must appear into this more.

“We value the significance of public feedback and how people’s experiences are driving enhancements. We anticipate NHS trusts to use the survey findings to recognize the place improvements are necessary.”

David Griffiths, nationwide skilled advisor for ambulance and urgent care at CQC mentioned: “The results of this survey show a higher level of all round satisfaction, despite the fact that there are some places for improvement.

“Ambulance services carry on to experience increases in the number of 999 calls they acquire, so it is crucial that absolutely everyone recognises the need to use ambulance resources wisely. This is a particularly true in rural places in which travel distances and time to hospitals can be extremely significant.

“We anticipate to see enhancements in the areas which we have recognized, so that ambulance services offer ’Hear and Treat‘ solutions that are risk-free and successful.”

Anger more than refusal to send ambulances to 999 calls

Elliot Rodger Did not Have Autism. He Had Anger

Anger. (Photograph credit score: Wikipedia)

Very small about what Rodger wrote and did suggests an autism spectrum disorder, such as the fact that he had apparently exceptional executive function and social dissembling capabilities, which he demonstrated in deceiving the deputies dispatched to his apartment in one of the essential turning points of this tragedy. While not all autistic men and women are the very same, executive perform and an capability to dissemble are far more generally regions of deficit–if an inability to dissemble can be regarded a deficit, which in many social conditions, it most likely is.

I’ve already tweeted and posted about autism and violence extensively. The bottom line is that autistic men and women are far significantly less very likely than non-autistic people to engage in criminal activity of any type.

Some information retailers reported the attorney’s original assertion but then rewrote their stories to remove it. That is proper simply because reporting second-hand data about any mental well being (or in the case of autism, neurobiological) condition is not in trying to keep with present journalistic tips. In truth, the AP up to date individuals guidelines in the wake of the rampant speculation and misreporting about the Sandy Hook shooter in 2012.

Armchair diagnoses in particular are inappropriate. If you are not a clinician who has personally evaluated the individual in question, you are not able to make an informed diagnosis of anyone. Rodger apparently was evaluated by numerous clinicians, nevertheless reportedly did not have an autism diagnosis. Offered the significant misinformation out there about autistic people–particularly about empathy (autistic men and women not only have empathy, but also their empathy may possibly overwhelm them)–any reporting that relies on armchair diagnosis or 2nd-hand data basically does harm and perpetuates a stereotype with no basis.

A generalization of that observation is that any reporting that blames mental illness for this man’s actions does the identical for individuals who have a psychological wellness situation. For some point of view, one particular in 4 of us in the United States, at least, has a mental disorder of some variety. The vast majority of individuals who have a psychological illness are not violent, and more critical, the huge majority of individuals who commit violence are not mentally ill.

They are, even so, angry. And if there’s one factor I’m fairly positive we can all agree on about Rodger or Lanza or the several other below- or unreported mass murders, forty% of which begin with domestic violence and the mind-boggling bulk of which are committed by men, it’s this: Anger is the frequent aspect. Not psychological sickness. Not autism. Not even misogyny, despite the fact that that mixed with hatred and guns certainly tends to make for a deadly and horrific blend. Nope. It’s anger. We do not want to go through between the lines of Rodger’s manifesto to find what lurked beneath. That anger is right there, in his phrases and his video, staring us in the encounter.

Elliot Rodger Did not Have Autism. He Had Anger

Stephen Sutton admits to "anger" above medical professionals misdiagnosing his condition

“If it had been caught earlier it could have led to a much better prognosis. It could have modified the predicament.

“But even saying that, I’m not one particular to dwell on the previous. It is what it is.”

Mr Sutton played football for Walsall youth team and competed in cross-country working and athletics at county degree just before he started to suffer stomach cramps, weight loss, sickness and loss of appetite in 2011.

“It got to the point the place what ought to have been a minute-prolonged walk would get 10 minutes since of the discomfort,” he says.

But medical professionals sent him residence with laxatives, despite a household historical past on his father Andrew’s side (with whom he stays close) of Lynch Syndrome, a genetic condition that increases the risk of bowel cancer and a selection of other tumours.

“I lost two stone in weight and was quite, really sick,” he explained. “We gave the physicians all the info they essential, informed them about the family background and even showed them a booklet about Lynch Syndrome.

“It explained the frequent symptoms of bowel cancer — I had each single 1. But I just naively listened to them, hoping it was going to get better.”

He was ultimately given an emergency CT scan when he had deteriorated so significantly that he couldn’t keep down fluids or food and was unable to sleep since of the discomfort.

The scan revealed a blockage in his bowel. The following day, he underwent surgical procedure which revealed that the development was cancerous.

Since then, the 19-yr-previous has collected far more than £3.22 million for the Teenage Cancer Trust because posting a image of himself in hospital in April with a goodbye message when he believed he was close to death.

Nonetheless, the inspirational younger man produced what he described as “a miraculous recovery”, coughing up a tumour, and soon after effective surgery was effectively sufficient to be discharged from Birmingham’s Queen Elizabeth Hospital on Might 2.

But commenting on his Facebook page – which has 750,000 likes – he advised supporters he was once more posting from his hospital bed.

He mentioned: “Sadly these days I have ended up back in hospital. I had some breathing difficulties starting up last night and following going to A&ampE have been admitted back to a ward for monitoring.

“I have nevertheless received the cough, then fairly rapidly created a wheeze in my breathing and breathlessness upon any physical exertion.

“There’s no instant panic and I’m presently very steady – I have been place on nebulisers and other meds which are at the moment assisting my symptoms hugely.”

He added: “The doctors consider there may possibly be some thing restricting my airway once more, they are not positive specifically what nevertheless however (tumour regrowth, infection, inflammation, are all prospective causes described), but are at the moment discussing the possibilities and my scan results to choose what to do following.”

Mr Sutton’s story has inspired men and women around the planet after he was diagnosed with bowel cancer aged just 15.

Two many years ago, he discovered his sickness had spread and was terminal. And so he wrote a bucket record of 46 items he needed do just before he died, and place it on Facebook.

The checklist included hugging an elephant, receiving a tattoo and learning to juggle. Leading of the record, nonetheless, was raising £10,000 for the charity Teenage Cancer Trust.

3 weeks ago, his site went viral when, with a collapsed lung and believing he was ‘a goner’, the teenager posted a picture of himself in a hospital bed giving his trademark thumbs-up indicator. His message touched hearts across the globe.

“It’s a ultimate thumbs-up from me,’ he wrote. ‘I’ve carried out nicely to blag items as well as I have up until now, but unfortunately I think this is just a single hurdle as well far.

“It’s a shame the finish has come so out of the blue. There’s so several men and women I haven’t acquired round to appropriately thank or say goodbye to. Apologies for that…

“Whatever transpires next I want you all to know I am currently in a great place mentally and at ease with the scenario. That is it from me. But existence has been excellent. Extremely very good.”

Speaking about his then farewell message, he explained: “Naturally, it was emotional,” he explained. “But as quickly as I wrote my farewell, all this enjoy and support started coming in. It was humbling.

“There had been messages from all corners of the Earth. Long messages. Short messages.”

Money started to flood in for his nominated charity. To date, he has raised a lot more than £3.2 million and donations are even now coming in.

Over the weekend, a petition at adjust.org calling for Mr Sutton to be knighted the two for his charity perform and efforts to increase awareness about cancer had attracted 31,300 signatures.

Stephen Sutton admits to "anger" above medical professionals misdiagnosing his condition

Anger is an Important tool if we discover how to use it

There is an inherent strain for us to forgive.  It is regarded an excellent. Even so, the biggest fallacy of ideals comes about when we push a method primarily based on its perfect rather than its merit or legitimacy.  The truth is, we are deeply intelligent beings here to dwell our reality authentically and to the fullest extent .  We are right here to soar into our “beingness” and produce infinite variations of our truthful divine expression.

Every single minute is a opportunity for us to be fully “who we are”.  So then, what, pray tell, do we do with anger?  This is a profound question.  The spot in which we have to get started is to accept the validity of our anger and soreness just before it can be transformed.  We have to give credit to the part of ourselves that is saying “something in my existence needs to adjust so I can fully express myself”.

Anger is effective instrument.  Like all strong tools–sexuality, femininity, the body–anger has been suppressed in our globe.  Think about a world where we all spoke our reality, never settled for second best by no means took or felt offense.  Imagine if we had been all just getting genuine, and when issues were not in integrity with our love and bliss, we had been given the space to express ourselves and architect a modify with the support of everyone close to.  Wouldn’t that be great?

At the moment we live in a way the place every time we feel a discordance with our truth and begin to express it, we Fear that we will be viewed as angry, unevolved, unloving, “rough close to the edges”, obtaining “low vibe bad energy”, and all kinds of social stigma.  We are encouraged to very carefully and artfully suppress the intelligence of our feelings, or we will be viewed as “controlling”or “aggressive”.  Particularly within spiritual circles, it is deemed “falling out of your equanimity”.

I think that equanimity is a lovely idea, but when used properly, you see the beauty of every single element of your getting.  Equanimity to me is when you are in alignment with all your feelings.  The false meaning of equanimity is this spot the place you are just satisfied all the time…exemplifying the utmost politeness, kindness and adore in the face of Every thing, even items that are in deep conflict with your reality. Is getting able to withhold Response to corruption or discordance the highest kind of mastery?  Or is it the highest from of cowardice?

Global politics is the macrocosm of our personal accepted human politics.  Just as we justify our lies and suppressions to stay away from causing ripple, our government and politicians expose us to the identical normal of deception in the title of diplomacy.  It’s a normal, that we as awakening beings are setting out to reform, all although even now juggling our ancient programming of deep inner judgment of coming across as becoming angry.

Right here is my basic resolution:  Consider the time to understand the source of your anger.  Figure out if it is coming from a location of dread or disharmony with your truth.  If it is your reality, enable the feeling of anger to energize your quest turning out to be a lot more of who you are. Do not let yourself or other folks strain you into forgiveness until you are actually prepared to forgive.  I don’t really think that YOU can forgive any person.  Forgiveness is a method.  It basically happens.  In reality, it is inevitable.  If we purely and organically give ourselves time to process every feeling of anger, hurt, and pain, there are two natural outcomes. First of all, the discordant energy transforms.  This is the magic of the alchemical energy present in the belly fire of anger.  No guts, no glory.  Secondly, this will naturally end result in forgiveness.  If your intentions are right, the divine purpose of lighting this fire is to create greater harmony.  So really, we detest the game, not the player.  So once the game is destroyed but your truth, you transcend the need to forgive. Consequently, I say forgiveness is inevitable.  It is a organic progression.

Contrary to well-liked belief, each and every time you go via honoring your emotions and energy, you do by yourself, your opponent, and the globe at huge a favor.  With every truth expressed, with every battle won, really like is the great victor.  By way of your courage and authenticity, a small bit of dense matter in our collective universe is launched.  Slowly but definitely feelings and sensations will be heard, received, and given its correct standing on planet earth and beyond.

About the writer:

Indra is a powerful international healer. Through her function, she has assisted hundreds of folks locate well being, wealth, enjoy and happiness, transforming their lives permanently.

At age 15, she had her spiritual awakening in India, through which she experienced a deep bodily, DNA-degree activation. This led her to the discovery of profound understanding about self-empowerment by way of the activation of DNA.

Wanting to check out the complete significance of her experience, she took on the challenge of testing her spiritual expertise in daily situations, exposing her self to all elements of the human knowledge. This intense experiment with the programmed world proved to be a strong confirmation that the Bliss Instinct reigns supreme to all other instincts of human type. Getting returned to her normal blissful state by way of the LumenOctave principles, she has devoted her existence to healing and inspiring individuals all around her.

Holding a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology and a Masters in Communications, Indra combines her esoteric and intuitive information with sensible academic and corporate expertise to supply a in no way ahead of noticed healing strategy, which addresses the human problem on all amounts.

Anger is an Important tool if we discover how to use it