Jeremy Hunt"s plan to shame GPs with minimal cancer referrals is not the solution | Zara Aziz

A GP in consultation with a patient. Referral rates for cancer diagnosis will fluctuate in accordance to a variety of factors. Photograph: David Sillitoe for the Guardian

The well being secretary, Jeremy Hunt, desires to name and shame GP practices with lower cancer referral costs. The NHS Selections website will mark reduced-referral GP practices as “red”, or “green” if they refer far more. This is in response to significant variations in cancer diagnoses across England, which is becoming attributed to GPs not referring individuals early sufficient. According to figures from the Royal College of Basic Practitioners , three-quarters of individuals with cancer are referred right after one particular or two GP consultations. There is definitely room for improvement.

Several higher-danger symptoms are less difficult to refer, such as a persistent cough, a adjust in bowel routines or excess weight loss. It is the non-certain symptoms this kind of as tiredness that are typically the most demanding. Pancreatic cancer is a notoriously challenging diagnosis and can present with just malaise, reduction of appetite, new onset diabetes or back ache, all of which we see on a day-to-day basis in basic practice. Pancreatic cancer is the ninth most typical cancer in the Uk but the fifth most typical cause of cancer death.

GPs have clear tips on “two-week wait” referrals for all cancers, whereby any person who presents with specific high chance indicators or signs, known as “red flag”, ought to be referred straight away and seen in hospital within two weeks. The criteria for referral is really specific and does not consider into account a GP’s intuition or non-particular symptoms. In our practice we audit our two-week wait referrals, to guarantee first of all that the patient has been witnessed by a specialist and hasn’t been misplaced in the method and secondly, to see if a cancer diagnosis was produced. The vast bulk of our referrals are, reassuringly, not diagnosed with cancer.

Demographics also perform a large element when it comes to looking at cancer diagnosis and mortality costs. I educated as a GP in an affluent semi-rural practice and often noticed the anxious nicely. The appointments were longer, much less pressured and a lot of sufferers attended for an “MOT”. It was then that I saw my 1st malignant melanoma when a “well” patient came to have all their moles looked at. It was a quite early presentation and they made a full recovery with no spread or recurrence of the disease.

I now function in a massive urban practice with varied health beliefs. There is more deprivation and healthcare complexity and a lot of sufferers, specifically guys, will present right after weeks or months of worrying signs and symptoms. For some of our sufferers, their proximity to hospitals or cultural beliefs indicate that they will bypass GPs altogether and attend A&ampE departments for initial presentation of signs and symptoms.

Most GPs do not see plenty of new cancer diagnoses each year, however most of us will make one or two cancer referrals a day. Nationally, only 10% of two-week referrals turn out to be cancer, which is comparable to individuals referred from our practice. But we do see lots of coughs, colds, malaise, aches and pains. The danger with this “kneejerk” name and shame policy would be that we would see a sharp rise in anyone with a cough or cold getting referred. As a end result, this will rapidly saturate the capacity of cancer clinics and delay investigations. The last point that we would want is the two-week wait to improve to a four-week wait or even longer.

Statistics for every practice are presently offered on the internet for GPs and the public to appear at. GP practices are conscious if they are substantial or reduced referrers it would seem that the new proposals would include absolutely nothing but be tantamount to “naming and shaming” medical professionals. Any analysis of cancer referral prices need to seem at the patient demographics of a practice, its cancer prevalence and other parameters such as no matter whether it is an outlier in other respects. There will indeed be some GP practices that are a result in for concern, but this is normally currently apparent to commissioning groups and NHS England, and it would make much more sense to performance manage these locally rather than adopt a damaging culture of blame and dread.

Jeremy Hunt"s plan to shame GPs with minimal cancer referrals is not the solution | Zara Aziz